BMMECNYC gregc if the booster supplies 15V, a short should result in 24A. Where are you getting that number?
gregc if the booster supplies 15V, a short should result in 24A.
Where are you getting that number?
24 A = 15 V / 0.61 Ohm
greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading
BMMECNYCAlso for calculating the booster's circuit breaker tripping, you need to factor in the wire out to the track and the wire back to the booster.
gregci calculate the worst case wire resistance of 0.616 ohm for the 6 ft 26g case, total resistance for both paths.
gregcif the booster supplies 15V, a short should result in 24A.
gregc25' of 14g feeders of various gauge (18-26) and lengths (0.5 - 6ft) am i correct?
Yes
gregcwhat am i missing?
I cant tell by your post.
The table provided indicates a Go/No go test. The booster either tripped or it didnt.
Also for calculating the booster's circuit breaker tripping, you need to factor in the wire out to the track and the wire back to the booster.
So its actually 50 ft of 14 AWG out and back + 1ft-12ft of feeders.
Also this:
https://sites.google.com/site/markgurries/home/dcc-general-best-practices/wiring-planing
carl425 With feeders too far apart a short will not trip the breaker. See "The Great Feeder Experiment" at http://www.wiringfordcc.com/track.htm
See "The Great Feeder Experiment" at http://www.wiringfordcc.com/track.htm
i looked at The Great Feeder Experiment and have a hard time believing the results based on the description.
My understanding is he connected a 5A booster to a piece of 3ft flex track through
am i correct?
based on wire resistance reported in the American Wire Gauge, i calculate the worst case wire resistance of 0.616 ohm for the 6 ft 26g case, total resistance for both paths.
if the booster supplies 15V, a short should result in 24A.
a more simplistic case is that 31ft of 26g wire has a resistance of 1.3 ohms or 2.6 ohms.
what am i missing?
i strung 54 ft of 30g wire, measured 5.8 ohm (5.6 according to the wire table) and 1+A bulb on my PowerCab lit up.
ATLANTIC CENTRALExactly. And none of our locos draw anything near 1 amp these days. So the REAL voltage drop is minuscule.
Yeah but...
With the small current draw of today's locomotives, the issue in feeder size and spacing is no longer the voltage drop when running the locomotives. It is passing the "quarter test". You want the circuit breaker to trip whenever there is a short on the track. With feeders too far apart a short will not trip the breaker.
I have the right to remain silent. By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.
BMMECNYC ROBERT PETRICK gregc Nickle-silver track has a resistance of 1.45 millohm/in (0.057 ohm/m) which is the equivalent of #22g wire. 32" radius amounts to 17' of track per loop. The track length fed from one feeder/loop is 8.5', reached from two separate points and ~0.15 ohm or 0.15 V drop at 1A. Just a quick math question . . . If the feeder spacing is 8.5 feet, doesn't that mean that the load (engine) is always less than 4.25 feet from the feeder? So, why isn't the resistance of 0.00145 ohms per inch multiplied by 4.25 feet (51 inches)? Just asking. Robert Greg, The postulated scenario states one set of feeders in 17' feet of track. => Furthest distance a locomotive can be is 8.5 feet. Sheldon, Most locomotives now draw 1/3 amp or so. Is the OP running modern production equipment... That 1/3 amp everyone throws around is the steady state draw of the locomotive measure current draw on a 30" curve with a 3% grade (or whatever this ends up being). You are also assuming one locomotive will pull the train up this grade.
ROBERT PETRICK gregc Nickle-silver track has a resistance of 1.45 millohm/in (0.057 ohm/m) which is the equivalent of #22g wire. 32" radius amounts to 17' of track per loop. The track length fed from one feeder/loop is 8.5', reached from two separate points and ~0.15 ohm or 0.15 V drop at 1A. Just a quick math question . . . If the feeder spacing is 8.5 feet, doesn't that mean that the load (engine) is always less than 4.25 feet from the feeder? So, why isn't the resistance of 0.00145 ohms per inch multiplied by 4.25 feet (51 inches)? Just asking. Robert
gregc Nickle-silver track has a resistance of 1.45 millohm/in (0.057 ohm/m) which is the equivalent of #22g wire. 32" radius amounts to 17' of track per loop. The track length fed from one feeder/loop is 8.5', reached from two separate points and ~0.15 ohm or 0.15 V drop at 1A.
Nickle-silver track has a resistance of 1.45 millohm/in (0.057 ohm/m) which is the equivalent of #22g wire.
32" radius amounts to 17' of track per loop. The track length fed from one feeder/loop is 8.5', reached from two separate points and ~0.15 ohm or 0.15 V drop at 1A.
Just a quick math question . . .
If the feeder spacing is 8.5 feet, doesn't that mean that the load (engine) is always less than 4.25 feet from the feeder? So, why isn't the resistance of 0.00145 ohms per inch multiplied by 4.25 feet (51 inches)?
Just asking.
Robert
Greg,
The postulated scenario states one set of feeders in 17' feet of track. => Furthest distance a locomotive can be is 8.5 feet.
Sheldon,
Most locomotives now draw 1/3 amp or so. Is the OP running modern production equipment...
That 1/3 amp everyone throws around is the steady state draw of the locomotive measure current draw on a 30" curve with a 3% grade (or whatever this ends up being).
You are also assuming one locomotive will pull the train up this grade.
The OP's layout plan, posted on this forum for months now as he works out the details, is small with relatively short staging tracks, which likely equals short trains. I suspect one loco will handle most trains up that helix.
I don't personally use DCC, but I have been closely involved with the design, building and wiring of two large, basement filling DCC layouts, and the conversion of several DC layouts to DCC.
In the DC to DCC conversions, no addtional feeders were added. Existing block feeders were simply connected together into districts and fed. They all work just fine.
I think Paul3 and a few others on this forum with suitable experiance will support my view that this multiple feeder thing is way over kill. Especially in todays world of low current motors.
And again, the solution to a lot of these problems is soldered rail joints.
When I was a child, my father set up a large (5' x 18') "Christmas Garden" every year using TruScale Ready Track. Even for a 10 week Christmas display, he soldered all the rail joints, and then unsoldered them for dis-assembly.
That was back in the 60's with current hog open frame motors. He wired the layout with surplus telephone wire and fed each block/loop with only one feeder. Those trains ran fine.
Sheldon
Since we are on the topic of the helix, I would suggest making the helix its own power district, protected by a circuit breaker separate from other layout circuit breakers.
What I do know is it is easier to start both model train and real train on level ground than on a grade.
What I dont know is 1) if the OP has tested the ability of his locomotives to start a train on his planned grade and 2) will the locomotives will stay or slide backwards when power is secured.
I think Greg's comment of 'reached from two seperate points' clouded the issue. With one drop only, the 8.5 distance and voltage drop is correct. Robert's conclusion,as well as mine, and maybe Sheldon's, was that there were two seperate points where there is a drop. Rereading Greg's post, he did say one drop.
yes the feeder spacing is 17', but the furthest distance the current needs to flow is half that distance as BMMECNYC stated.
BMMECNYC floridaflyer What Robert and Sheldon said Except the feeder spacing isnt every 8.5 feet, its every 17 feet.
floridaflyer What Robert and Sheldon said
What Robert and Sheldon said
Except the feeder spacing isnt every 8.5 feet, its every 17 feet.
Okay. I thought we were talking about two feeders per loop. Sorry for adding to the confusion. Dang.
LINK to SNSR Blog
Exactly. And none of our locos draw anything near 1 amp these days.
So the REAL voltage drop is minuscule.
railandsail I've seen a few references that suggest it is NOT necessary to run the bus-lines along the track route in a spiral helix, but rather just run the track feeders lines down one of the vertical legs (post) to the bus wires at the bottom. I thought this was a good idea. My question is how many of these vertical connections should be made? My helix is a double track affair with radii of 32.5” and 29.5”. I have plans to stagger the rail joints, and to solder all the rail joints,...code 100 Atlas rail. Considering this sort of relatively small radius/circumference, I'm thinking I need only one feeder set of wires for each elevation/loop of the helix. And perhaps these feeders wires might be sized a bit larger than normal??
I've seen a few references that suggest it is NOT necessary to run the bus-lines along the track route in a spiral helix, but rather just run the track feeders lines down one of the vertical legs (post) to the bus wires at the bottom. I thought this was a good idea.
My question is how many of these vertical connections should be made?
My helix is a double track affair with radii of 32.5” and 29.5”. I have plans to stagger the rail joints, and to solder all the rail joints,...code 100 Atlas rail.
Considering this sort of relatively small radius/circumference, I'm thinking I need only one feeder set of wires for each elevation/loop of the helix. And perhaps these feeders wires might be sized a bit larger than normal??
Will the rail joints be soldered?
I know lots of guys with large DCC layouts without all this "every 6-8 feet" feeder business and their layouts work fine. Why? Refer to my first question - their answer is yes.
But in a worst case, two bus locations 180 degrees apart, tapping each level should be more than enough.
I run DC, advanced cab control with base station radio throttles, detection and signaling. All my rail joints are soldered within each "block", many of which are 20' - 25' long, each has only one feed which must run thru a current detector. No voltage drop issues.
At least 2 - that makes it about 8 feet apart for the outer track. 4 verticals would probably be better.
--Randy
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
My helix is 22" radius and has 4 levels. The levels are supported by 4 posts (lets say they're positioned at N-S-E-W. I ran the bus up the East and West posts and feeders to the rails. I used sections of flex track, which basically, ends up having a feeder every other joint.
Terry
Inspired by Addiction
See more on my YouTube Channel
Code 100 vs 83 improves your odds of getting away with one set of feeders per loop, but I'd probably still do at least two sets 180° apart.
I used 2/lap on my 24" radius code 83 helix.
My helix has the radius you have. I put 2 sets of drops on each track and level. Call it overkill or whatever, but it lets me sleep at night. I did not solder all the rails just in case there is a major track issue, the helix does not have to be ripped apart. Mine was custom made and would cost me a small fortune if I had to replace it.
In addition, I have all of my drops with 20 ga wire going to a track buss from the auto reverser. Works like a charm!
Good luck!
Neal
The circumfernce is 15 and 17 feet. 2*Pi*radius Doesn't sound so small, when people talk about feeders every 6 feet. I never built a helix, so it's all theoretical to me.
Henry
COB Potomac & Northern
Shenandoah Valley
Brian
My Layout Plan
Interesting new Plan Consideration