Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Spacing of track feeders with Kato N scale Unitrack

8938 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
PED
  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 571 posts
Spacing of track feeders with Kato N scale Unitrack
Posted by PED on Monday, December 12, 2016 9:25 PM

My previous layouts (all HO & DC) were always built with flextrack with minimal rail joiners (mosty soldered) so I could be be reasonable generous on spacing of rail feeders. However, I am now building a new N scale layout using Kato Unitrack (no soldered rail joints). Most guidance I find on the internet is very variable with ranges from 3 feet to 6 feet apart for traditional track with little info on spacing for Unitrack. I don't think distance is the main factor with Unitrack. I think the number of unsoldered rail joiners is more critical than just distance since the major losses are at the rail joiners. Power drop in a 4 foot section of track would be much higher if it was built with a bunch of short segments (many rail joiners) rather than fewer long track segments (few rail joiners). I have not tested this but logic tells me this is the case so I plan to always use the longest possible track pieces to minmize rail joints.

For track feeders, I plan to use the Kato terminal rail joiner (power feeds thru a rail joiner) or my own home made version of the Kato joiner to save a few dollars. My main question is how often should I include a powered rail feeder in my Unitrack layout? My current thinking is to insert enough power feeders such that no spot on the track is ever more than 4 or 5 rail joints away from a feeder. That means inserting a track feeder midpoint of every 8 or 10 joints of track. In addition, I will be using a track feeded at the points end of every turnout to minimize any power problems thru the turnout.

I am looking for some feedback from Unitrack users on what spacing they found to be best.

Paul D

N scale Washita and Santa Fe Railroad
Southern Oklahoma circa late 70's

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 568 posts
Posted by Alantrains on Tuesday, December 13, 2016 4:45 AM

PED,I think you are on the right track (sorry) putting them in relation to the number of joins rather than distance. I have a small layout using the smallest radius curves and lots of short tracks and have done what you proposed. Whilst the layout is still new, I haven't had any problems yet. I soldered wires to the rails as well as using the Kato powerfeed tracks where they fit my design.

Alan Jones in Sunny Queensland (Oz)

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 568 posts
Posted by Alantrains on Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:19 AM

PED,I think you are on the right track (sorry) putting them in relation to the number of joins rather than distance. I have a small layout using the smallest radius curves and lots of short tracks and have done what you proposed. Whilst the layout is still new, I haven't had any problems yet. I soldered wires to the rails as well as using the Kato powerfeed tracks where they fit my design.

Alan Jones in Sunny Queensland (Oz)

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!