Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Signals

5827 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Signals
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:04 PM

Ok so track work is almost done and flawless.  Our next step is signals.  But I'm totally lost here.

Here's what we want.  We want a three color style signal and the whole layout will run between 16-20.  I want the system fully automated.  Preferably don't want to have to hook my laptop up to it.....but I want it to work as it should.  Red busy, yellow use caution and green fully clear block.

I know there is no "easy" system for doing signals when it comes to this hobby.  But I guess I would like peoples input on what is easiest and works well. 

So far I believe my best option is the z-stuff signals with built in sensors.  They allow you to daisy chain the signals all together so one works with the next.  So this signal won't turn green until the next signal turns yellow.  Things like that.

I don't mind wiring.  So that can get complicated.  I'm ok with that.  I would however like to stay away from putting sensors in the track bed as well.  Call me anal or OCD or whatever but I don't want to see two little black sensors in my ballast. 

At least the sensors with the z-stuff signals could be hidden somewhat with bushes or scenery of some sort.  Not my ultimate choice, but so far seeming like the easiest and best.

Input?

Mike

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:21 PM

I originally went with current sensors but I want to be able to detect anything on the rails so I’m in progress of changing over to optical beams.  Any object on the track that block the beam at coupler level will trip the detector.  I use standard LEDs where you can’t see the light beam and IR LEDs where they can be seen.  It gets a bit tricky hiding the LEDs but they work flawlessly.
 
My Blog post on my original signal system.
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:23 PM

That's actually a very good point.  I want the sensor to be tripped by a set of cars if need be.  The current sensor wouldn't do that until the actual locomotive tripped that.  In the mean time you've had 15 cars go by the signal. 

Very good point.  Further confirms the fact I'm headed in the right directing with optical sensors.

Thanks Mel!

Mike

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:41 PM

5150WS6
I want the sensor to be tripped by a set of cars if need be. The current sensor wouldn't do that until the actual locomotive tripped that. In the mean time you've had 15 cars go by the signal.

No, I don't think you are headed in the proper direction.  You don't need to have a locomotive to actuate the sensor.  This is accomplished by adding a small resistor across the insulated wheel on the freight car truck.  I believe that one resistor per car is all that is required.

I don't believe that it is possible and/or practical to have any sort of optical sensor that can look at every section of track.  So what happens when you get an unwanted uncoupling and half your train gets left behind?  With the current sensor/resistor method you can see cars on the track even if they are standing still without a loco.

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:52 PM

Actually that's a good point too.  Other than the fact it would involve wiring resistors on a every stinkin car I have.  That would take forever.  But you're right.  Have an uncouple and the photo sensor thing isn't the best option. 

Hmmmm.  Now I'm back on the fence.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: North Dakota
  • 9,592 posts
Posted by BroadwayLion on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 5:13 PM

LION uses 48 wheel pickup on the trains of him. 14 miles of track. Lots of signals.

LION uses relays for his signals. No mystery black chips for this felid.

ROAR

The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.

Here there be cats.                                LIONS with CAMERAS

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 5:26 PM

5150WS6
Other than the fact it would involve wiring resistors on a every stinkin car I have.

Actually you would not be wiring anything.  What they do is lay a small (surface mount?) resistor between the metal axle and the back of the wheel across the insulation.  There is a product I believe is called wire glue that is used to afix the resistor in place.

I'm sure that there must be a youtube video somewhere showing the process.  You do need metal wheels/axles however.

Edit:  Here's a link to a guy doing it in N scale: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVshMV6Hb_Q

However, I think that the wire glue method probably works better than the conductive paint product he is using.

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 5:32 PM

Oh ok, that would be easier for sure.  I do have metal wheels on all cars already so that parts done. 

So for the current sensors.....I wired a feed to every piece of track on my layout.  Could I just attach the sensor wire to my pigtails coming off the track? 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 5:41 PM

If you are using the induction coil devices, the powerfeed wire goes through the coil and would have to connect to all the pigtails that are associated with the section that is to be monitored.  So if you had a passing siding, you would need one coil for the main, and one coil for the siding.  I think each turnout would probably be block by itself, but I'm not totally sure.

By the way, if you look at the second video he shows how he wires the block detectors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZZ3VGPQzms

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 6:01 PM

I guess I didn’t explain well enough how I’m installing my optical detection so here is a diagram of my longest block detector.  The black dashed line is the optical beam at coupler level.  It covers the entire 10 foot long block and anything that blocks the beam trips the signal system.
 
   

An optical detection system does require several beams on curved track, the max on my layout is four beams for the solid red and green blocks on my diagram because of the complex curved route.  The dashed tracks are hidden in my mountains.

 
I run dual mode DC and DCC and the current detection was just too unreliable.  I’m not a rivet counter but I do want my signals to work correctly.  My normal operation is to uncouple at the far end of the long siding (Kadee Electric 209 Uncoupler) and leave the cars for a different locomotive to pickup later.  The optical system works even with no power to the rails, in DC mode I turn off the power to my sidings and the signal system still shows occupancy because the beam is blocked.
 
I’m not knocking current detection.  I used it for over 30 years back to Twin “T” detection days.  I just found a better way for my dual mode operation.
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 6:09 PM

Mel....an SP guy.  Knew I liked you!  :)

I'm still leaning towards the optical.  As much as I hate the idea of having to hide sensors, I hate the idea of not only purchasing but wiring in all the current sensors needed to make the layout work properly.  That along with the cost.  The optical would be a lot cheaper just because I wouldn't need so many sensors as I would for the current version.

We'll see.  Still not 100% but the optical is more what I'm leaning to.  Just seems a little more user friendly at this point.  I've been in railroading for 40 years but this is my dad and I's first layout in DCC so the learning curve there is big for us.  I'd love to get a JMRI set up at some point, but that's a long way off.  Looking for a simple and good working sytem at this time.

Mike

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 10:25 PM

 Really depends on what you are trying to do. "Pretend" signals controlled by something like the Logic Rail Signal Animator, optical dectecots are fine. If you want the signal reading based on actual occupancy of the block, current sense detectors are the way to go. Not sure what Mel's issue is with current detection, but it is highly reliable, and if you get at least a few cars besides cabooses fitted with resistor wheels, you stand a chance of actually holding the block indication red if the train comes apart in the middle of one. The best sort, at least if you are using DCC, uses a small transformer to detect the presence of the locos and resistor wheels without actually causing a voltage drop. Diode types work fine, but they do cause a voltage drop, so if you have undetected blocks, you usually have to still have the detection diodes even if nothing is actually hooked up to them so the voltage remains consistent between blocks.

                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Thursday, December 31, 2015 7:07 AM

rrinker

Not sure what Mel's issue is with current detection, but it is highly reliable, and if you get at least a few cars besides cabooses fitted with resistor wheels, you stand a chance of actually holding the block indication red if the train comes apart in the middle of one.

                             --Randy

 

 

Randy I’m not knocking current detection!  As I said I use it for years and it worked well on my new signal (5 years old now) system.  Over the years I have added a lot of rolling stock and the resistor wheel thing to me is a pain in the you know where.  I’m coming up on my 79th birthday and installing resistor wheel sets doesn’t fit my time frame or $$$$.
 
I used Twin “T” current detection on two layouts for over 30 years and other than the voltage drop they worked extremely well.  I used diode/optical couplers for my current layout and with the exception of not detecting plastic wheels they worked good to.  I never have liked the1.4 voltage drop but I lived with it.  
 
I found out by trial and error the optical beams work very reliably, they even detected a mouse in my mountains.  The County plowed a field a block away and we were infested with field mice.  I wouldn’t have known I had a freeloader if he hadn’t tripped my signal system.
 
My final decision to go the optical route was parking cars on my hidden sidings in DC mode. I went with dual section blocks, 10 foot for cars and two foot for locomotives.  I turn off the power to the “locomotive section” and when the locomotives get there they stop . . . . the train is now correctly parked over an electric uncoupler.
 
In the case of my Athearn Daylight passenger cars they all have plastic wheels so no current detection.  It’s the same with freight, I have very few cars with metal wheels and my optical system doesn’t care.  I’m thinking about converting my Daylight cars to Athearn metal wheels but I’m not there yet.  Too many factors to consider.
 
Early on I had derailment problems with Athearn Streamlined cars.  By trial and error I figured out that swapping one axle on each truck so that each truck had one metal wheel on each rail stopped the derailing.  Then recently I discovered that the wheel width was different (.020” to .030” difference) between the metal wheel and the plastic wheel. ????  Thus another reason for Athearn metal wheel sets.
 
I know optical isn’t liked by most model railroaders but for me it has worked out very good.  They have proven to be extremely reliable.  I still have several blocks to convert before my layout is totally done.  It is a slow and tedious project to do it perfect!  Hiding the LEDs can be a real challenge.
 
A minor tip about IR beam alignment, a digital camera sees the IR beam in the viewfinder.
 
At this point I must do a warning about IR LEDs.  If you use IR LEDs you must be careful to point the LED emitters away from little viewing eyes.  In reading the forum I also found out my layout is built lower than most, my layout is 36” from the floor and my grandkids and great grandkids love to watch my trains do their thing.  Protecting their eyes has to be your highest priority!!!!
 
      
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:16 AM

Going back to the OP, a couple of points....

First, why don't you want to use a computer? With the available programs you can make things much easier than doing an old-fashioned set up with a bank of relays. Use JMRI interface on a computer and you can do a lot of things much easier than using older technology.

Second, Z-Stuff signals by themselves are probably going to give you the appearance of a working signal system, more than an actual working system. Again, using a PC or laptop to control things is going to be handy. Plus, I'm not sure the big base Z-Stuff uses for their sensors is less obtrusive than a small hole in the ballast here or there.

Last, I'd suggest picking up the Dec 2015 RMC. It's starting a series of articles by Bruce Chubb on signalling a model railroad. As he points out, before installing a signal system, you have to understand how real railroad signals work. It's much more complicated than the automobile 'red means stop, green means go' road lights. Red sometimes means an absolute stop, sometimes 'stop and proceed', and sometimes 'slow way down'. Also, you're going to need some double-head interlocking signals where two lines come together or split apart, or in some other situations. These tell your engine crew whether their train is continuing straight on the mainline, or heading off on the branchline, or which track they'll be on when switching from single track to double track. 

p.s. If you go with track sensors, you can buy wheelsets now that have the resistor already installed. One per car is usually sufficient.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:42 AM

Stix,

Well I'm not totally against the pc idea actually.  In fact I wouldn't mind going that route at all as long as it's all fully automated.  I don't want to have to worry about driving locos and working signals at the same time.  Guess that was more the reason for the infrared type signals. 

And yes I know that JMRI is an amazing program once you get it up and going.  But unfortunately there are a couple problems with that part of the technology.  My dad and I are doing this.  Now while my dad is a pretty sharp guy at 74, getting him to wrap his head around the DCC thing is almost overwhelming at some points.....as it is for me.  This is our first layout since I was single digits.....back when track was brass and DC.

The learning curve for that stuff seems rather high too.  I'm just getting to understand all the DCC stuff and CV's and programming consists and yada yada.  With a 50 hour a week job at this point I'm not sure I have the time or the patience to sit and work out the JMRI stuff as well. 

I think it will come down to cost mostly as well.  It seems overall much cheaper to head the route of the infrared vs the current type block detection.  But maybe you guys that have done the current style can confirm that as I'm still not totally clear as to what all is involved.  I know you have to have the current sensors for the block, then you have to have multiple sets of signal controllers and then the signals themselves.  Now that I say it out loud I guess it's the same with the infrared more or less.

I guess going the pc route seems a little more daunting than maybe it is.  I'm an IT guy and build all my own pc's as well as have some good electrical background, so I'm no slouch......but I'm also OCD so I have to have it all run perfect!  LOL!

I will grab the issue of RMC.  Read stuff from Bruce for years now so that will be an eye opener for sure.  Thanks for the info on that!

Mike

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, December 31, 2015 10:23 AM

 Using the computer for the "logic" part is generally easier that the crazy programming to set up the same sort of logic in a device that has only a couple of buttons or needs CVs programmed to define the logic. Once it is set up, it's automatic - you aren't constantly fiddling with the computer unless you want to make changes to the logic rules. You CAN also set it up so the computer acts as a CTC panel to line switches and set signals, but it doesn;t have to do this, it can simply process inputs from the detectors and switch positions and send out the signals to light the appropriate signals.

                    --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, December 31, 2015 10:33 AM

 Well that explains it somewhat. I didn;t say you were bashing current detection, just wondering what problems you had that made you not like it as much. Twin-T says it all. Yes, at one time that's all there was (and some really oddball other options using relays, and variations with one transistor and a diode, etc). Part of how it worked though is that it was specific to the transistor characteristics - and affordable transistors in the 50's were hardly top quality parts - even the cheapest junk parts from China these days have better characteristics. So Twin-T was designed to work around all that. Biggest problem with DC is that when the train stops, the power is off, so that has to be fixed. AND when you go in reverse, the polarity is reversed. Also designed into the circuit. DCC is MUCH easier - the power is always on, and you only have to measure on one side of the waveform. The modern equivalent of the Twin-T uses the drop across a diode pair. Still has the same problem - it drops the voltage to the track, though by less than the Twin-T. Half, in fact - 1 diode junction rather than 2. Still not good enough for me. Along comes the current transformer - several commercial DCC detectors use this as well as several DIY projects. Now there is no voltage drop, but these will not work on DC.

 IR optical detection works great for fixed position detection - staging tracks, setting off crossing gates, etc. Better for those uses than current detection. My layout will have both kinds as needed.

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 10:38 AM

Does anyone know of a stupid simple crayon and construction paper type drawing is of what's needed and how it all goes together?  I'd like to see just how the pc set up is wired and where things go and how many are needed......

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, December 31, 2015 11:59 AM

Why has no one asked....

DCC or DC?

DCC: this is simple as it gets.  There are tons of youtube videos online: http://www.digitrax.com/products/detection-signaling/

DC: http://www.gatewaynmra.org/electrical-electronics/

 

Your choices are current dectection, relay detection, IR detection, and photo detection.

three color signals are similarly wired in a cascade fashion above.  Red connects to yellow on the next block.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 602 posts
Posted by NP01 on Saturday, January 2, 2016 12:04 AM

5150WS6

Does anyone know of a stupid simple crayon and construction paper type drawing is of what's needed and how it all goes together?  I'd like to see just how the pc set up is wired and where things go and how many are needed......

I have words. The kids broke the crayons. At this point I don't know what type of DCC system you will have, so I will assume Digitrax ... since they are the only one I know who make all components to pull this together ... Except for the actual signal lights. 

Step 1: Connect a computer to your layout

Purchase a Digitrax PR3 and connect it to you command station (base unit) via a loconet cable (LNC162). The Digitrax PR3 has a USB cable. Follow PR3 instructions carefully to make sure the drivers are installed correctly. Now download and install JMRI. You will need to tell it the kind of system you have, but typically in 15 minutes you should be able to control an Engine. 

Step 2: Set up detection 

Buy a Digitrax BDL168. Divide your layout in sections and connect each section to the BDL168. Of the two wires coming out of the command station, one can go to track as before. The other must pass thru the BDL168. Of course the sections will need to be separated electrically. The BDL168 has 16 sections ... And once you connect it to the loco-net, the JMRI will see 16 sensors in Tools > Tables > Sensors menu. They will show "active" or "inactive" based on occupancy.

Step 3: Set up a signal controller. 

Buy a Digitrax SE8C  ... This one is a tough one ... But once connected to loconet and once you attach a signal to it (they give you a test signal), you can select a switch (eg #257) and set it to closed and thrown to effect the aspect of the signal. The SE8C supports 32 independent signal heads. It also supports 8 slow-motion turnout controllers so you can throw switches.

Step 4: Purchase and wire your actual signals. Place them at the locations you want and connect them to the SE8C. 

Step 5: Create signal logic In JMRI.

 

Using the "Logix" function, build logic for the signal. You can do things like: "if block 2 is inactive and switch 5 is thrown and signal 1 is not red then show Green". 

Yep ..l its that easy. But it's all worth it when you first see a train pass by and your signal reacting to it. 

NP. 

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Saturday, January 2, 2016 1:07 AM

NP,

Thank you.  Pretty much exactly what I was looking for.  Basically a grocery list.  And that was my bad for not giving more details.  My DCC system is all NCE.  Pretty happy with their stuff.  But I'm assuming Digitrax is just as good for the signal system.

I also designed the layout with AnyRail and heard that you can import the track design directly too JMRI.  And I already have it downloaded to my laptop.

And I've got 300' of track.....that's going to take some figuring on where I want to have the sections.  But technically for the signals to work correctly all those sections must be connected together correct?  More or less?

All my switches are hand throws as well.  So I won't have any of those electronically controlled.  At least not at this point. 

It doesn't seem nearly as overwhelming now that you sort of spell it out that way. 

So answer me this.  On the BDL168.  Or any signal detector.  I have leads or feeds already coming off each section of track.  Do one or both wires need to go in or through the BDL168?

Thanks again for the input.  You guys might be converting me to block detection......

Mike

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Saturday, January 2, 2016 8:21 AM

The Carolina  Southern Division of the National Model Railroad Association runs wonderful Set of classes every January.  I have learned a great deal in those classes.

I use current detection.  PR3, BDL168, RD2s, and SE8C.  The BDL168 also triggers 3 grade crossing signals via DS64s.  I purchased a couple of resistor wheel sets, but now make my own with super glue and conductive paint.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, January 2, 2016 11:30 AM

 Each detection section gets gapped on one rail. The other rail remains continuous unless you have multiple boosters, in which case both rails are gapped at that border, same as always - adding signaling and detection does not change the basic power wiring rules.

 I also suggest you take a look at RR-CirKits. Their devices are broken down into logical units that include the detection, turnout motor drive, and signal drives for specific sections of the layout. Plus they use transformer detection, which does not reduce the track voltage like diode drop detection in the BDL-168.

It's fairly common for people to use NCE to run the trains but Digitrax (or equivalent Loconet products, such as the RR-CirKits components) for the signalling and dectection - while NCE has a few items that can be used, like the AIU and the BD20 block detectors, the NCE bus really can't handle the traffic of all the detections and signal drivers on a busy layout.

To figure out exactly where things go, and how much equipment you will need, you need to understand signaling itself. Once you've figured out where it is logical to place signals, you can start to see where you need to set the block boundaries to detect a train to be able to set the signals to the correct aspect. Once you have an idea of how many signal heads you need and how many blocks, then you can calculate how many of a given circuit board you need to be able to handle those counts.

 Running it all with JMRI is great, because JMRI can simultaneous hook up to your NCE system to use throttles and do programming while also hooking up to the Loconet to read the bloc detectors and set the signals. All at the same time.

 And if it makes you feel somehow 'dirty' connecting Brand D equipment to your Brand N equipment - that's where companies like RR-CirKits come in. Digitrax has more third party support than all the others combined, so you can put together a Loconet signal system and not use any products actually made by Digitrax.

                       --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: Ohio
  • 231 posts
Posted by josephbw on Sunday, January 3, 2016 11:56 AM

Here's another option for detecting cars. At our club we mixed up a batch of flat black paint and graphite. This was painted on one axle of each car from wheel to wheel. After the paint dried we scraped some of the paint off until we had about 1000 ohms of resistance. This has worked fine with first the Twin T system and later on with Digitrax. I'm not 100% sure of the exact ohms we were shooting for as it's been about 30 years ago when we did it. But I'm going to the club in a while and I'll check and update this when I get back.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 602 posts
Posted by NP01 on Monday, January 4, 2016 1:36 AM

You are welcome. For NCE ... I really don't know this system at all. But as Randy said, I know of at least two people here on the forum who use Digitrax loconet for signal/turnout control on a layout that is NCE for DCC and engine control  ... Perhaps one would chime in. 

5150WS6

All my switches are hand throws as well.  So I won't have any of those electronically controlled.  At least not at this point.  

This would mean you would need a way for JMRI to know the switch position some other way ... If you want signals to respond based on switch alignment. I think RR-circuits makes a board for this. 

5150WS6
 So answer me this.  On the BDL168.  Or any signal detector.  I have leads or feeds already coming off each section of track.  Do one or both wires need to go in or through the BDL168? 

Only one wire goes thru the BDL. Have to make sure it's the same rail (left or right). I believe BDL has an occupancy output as well that can drive a signal without a computer or SE8C, but of course that would be very simplistic signalling. 

Take a look at Randy's comments on RR Circuits. Maybe plays better with NCE? I went with Digitrax simply because I already had a starter command station (the DCS51 Zephyr Extra) and so it was logical for me to start buying more Digitrax. 

Hope this helps. 

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, January 4, 2016 6:55 AM

 At least for block detection, the RR-CirKits stuff (or anyone's transformer detector) will probably play better with a non-Digitrax DCC system since it will not electrically connect to the track power like a BDL-168, and the BDL-168 is also somewhat dependent on the railsync signal in the Loconet cable, which in a Digitrax system is a low power mirror of the DCC track signal - you won;t have that linking one up to an NCE system. The transformer detectors work by sensing a current flow through the wire. It doesn't matter if this current flow is from NCE, Digitrax, Lenz, MRC, or any other DCC system. Or in some cases, AC hi rail.

                 --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, January 4, 2016 11:18 AM

5150WS6

All my switches are hand throws as well.  So I won't have any of those electronically controlled.  At least not at this point. 

You can buy manual ground throws for turnouts that have contacts attached, so your system can 'see' which way the turnout is thrown. Railroads use signals both to indicate block occupancy and routing - green-over-red means you're continuing on the mainline, red-over-green means your leaving the main and going on a branchline, or to an interchange with another railroad, etc.

p.s. whichever system you use (track detection, infra-red, light sensors) get a system that has some type of 'delay' setting. We've all seen layouts where the train passes a green signal and it changes to red...then green...then red...then green over and over as the train goes by, because the track occupancy is momentarily cutting out. With a delay, you can set it so once the block signals turn red, they stay red for say 2 seconds. That way, a momentary contact loss doesn't make the signal flicker back to green for an instant.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Monday, January 4, 2016 12:49 PM

Man.  So much to think about.  But you guys have successfully convinced me. 

I think the hardest part now will be to figure out where I need signals.  It's really hard since the layout is an oversized donut.....just what I have to work with for room. And dad and I like to run trains so there's lots of track to run around on.  That will be my first step. 

I also designed the layout in AnyRail which I know transfers right over to JMRI which will be one less step. 

I also planned ahead just in case I did want to do block detection and wired a drop off of every piece of track on the layout.  So it's sounding like once I have my blocks cut out I can just go in and put the block detector on one track lead and call it done. 

I like the idea of the delay.  I really want three color signals.  Green open, red as it passes through and when the next signal up the line goes yellow the signal before goes green.  Just like the real thing. 

I have used the Caboose Industry ground throws for all the switches.  I know they have one that has a sensor in it as well.  I can always switch out whatever switches I need to with that for JMRI to recognize what color needs to be shown where for what track.

I can't thank you guys enough for your input.  I am definitely going with block detection now.  And I'm going to head to RR-Cirkits to see what they have.  I defintely like having it's own power source for all the signal stuff. 

Mike

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, January 5, 2016 12:50 PM

Just got the Jan 2016 RMC in the mail last night, with part two of Bruce Chubb's series on signalling. I'd again strongly suggest you pick this issue and the Dec 2015 RMC up. Lots of good information on real signals, and model signalling with computers.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Oregon
  • 188 posts
Posted by 5150WS6 on Wednesday, January 6, 2016 12:22 PM

Stix--Yes, definitely going to pick those up!  Will definitely help.

Been talking a lot with Dick from RR-Cirkits. Not only some good products but so far top notch customer support and he's been extremely helpful in helping me figure out what is needed and will work best for me.  So I appreciate the recommendation to hit him up.  Good call for sure.

The main problem I'm having is it's such a small layout with a spiderweb of track.  This whole process would be sooooo much easier if I had my 40,000 sq ft shop with a 3' shelf layout running the entire perimeter of the place!  But no.  I had to crap 300' of track into a garage!  LOL!  It will be worth it though. 

But it's definitely very difficult to not have signals on top of signals yet still make everything work how it is supposed to.  Some areas I'm just going to have to omit singals just for overcrowding reasons and will have to deal with it.  Only my die hard RR buddies will realize it but it's just what it is. 

It seems like the wiring and all that will be time consuming but overall cake.  Figuring out blocks though is about to give me an aneurysm!  There again with such a small layout it's tough to figure out what goes where and where double signals need to be an singals......

We'll get it though.  Just trying to do it in baby steps!

Mike

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!