Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Why has DC power all of a sudden become ADC?

11125 views
72 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 2:51 PM

I've been an electrician and electrical contractor for 40 years.  I've never seen the term "ADC" used in the trade.  There would be little need to, as DC is either extremely rare or extinct in the field.

I wouldn't be surprised if someone derived the subject term from "A DC".  As in "1.2 A DC" That would be 1.2 amps direct current.  I frequently see things like "15.2 A AC".  If the voltage is already pinned down, the only variable to be discussed is the current.

Actually, if such an acronym were desired, true direct current would be referred to as "DDC", I think.  It's either on, or off.  You know, like a battery in a flash light.  Once you vary the DC with a rheostat, you could then call it "ADC".  So a power pack could be an AC/DDC/ADC converter.  Seems pretty pointless.

The term seems to be an answer to a question nobody asked.

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 3:37 PM

PM Railfan
...ADC is rolling waves (no straightness) while DCC looks like a cityscape (lots of straightness). But BOTH are DC...

DC power for a model railroad can have different forms - it can be "straight" if it is well filtered, in which case it will still vary up and down as the throttle is varied, but for a set speed it is a flat line.  It can have "rolling waves" if it is not well filtered (sometimes done on purpose to help with slow speed control of locos).  It can "look like a cityscape" if it uses PWM (pulse width modulation).  It can even be combinations of these, for example some throttles will use PWM or allow some unfiltered pulses through at low settings and switch to pure filtered DC at higher setttings.

 

DCC is NOT DC, but square wave AC.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 4:15 PM

I just waded (if that's the appropriate word) through an acronym list for ADC.  Several hundred entries.

Did I find Analog Direct Current?

 

Uh, no.

 

Did I find ANYTHING similar?

 

Uh, no.

 

I did a google search for "analog direct current".

 

I found it on this site.  This one here.  And nowhere else.  In all the google world.  Which is pretty much the known universe.

 

Now, stop wasting your time talking about something that doesn't exist.  And go play with trains.  Right this instant.

 

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 5:25 PM

7j43k

Now, stop wasting your time talking about something that doesn't exist.  And go play with trains.  Right this instant.

Ed

 

Awh Daddy, do I haff to?

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 6:07 PM

NP2626

 

 
7j43k

Now, stop wasting your time talking about something that doesn't exist.  And go play with trains.  Right this instant.

Ed

 

 

Awh Daddy, do I haff to?

 

 

If'n you want dessert tonight, you will!

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,682 posts
Posted by Lone Wolf and Santa Fe on Friday, February 6, 2015 11:41 PM

Mark R.
The only reference I can find for ADC with reference to our hobby is "Analog to Digital Converter"

In the television industry ADC is Analog to Digital Converter, a device which converts old fashion NTSC signal from a video tape into a digital cable signal. So in the model railroad hobby it would be equalivant to an onboard DCC decoder. But I think the original post refers to someone thinking Analog Direct Current, confusing it with AAD and ADD which are commonly printed on music CDs to identify which part of the recording process was analog and digital with AAD standing for Analog recording, Analog mixing, Digital master.

Modeling a fictional version of California set in the 1990s Lone Wolf and Santa Fe Railroad
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, February 6, 2015 11:57 PM

PM Railfan

ADC refers to nothing other than 'Analog Direct Current'. Not suprising most havent heard of this as 99% of us are model railroaders, not electricians. Ask an electrician what DCC is and he will be scratching his head. And before DCC ever became DCC.... what did you call it? You didnt call it anything because it didnt exist.

So, PM Railfan who first used this term a few weeks ago on the forum, says ADC stands for Analog Direct Current.  You can read his full reply on page 1 of this thread.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, February 7, 2015 6:24 AM

google turns up advanced DC thottles and advanced DC cab control besides others

I would doubt it refers to analog to digital converters (ADC) since the more common need in model railroading would be to convert a digital value into an analog (DAC) voltage to drive a motor.   Every decoder includes a type of DAC to convert a digital value for the speed to a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal to drive the motor.  (I guess that an ADC is needed to measure BEMF).

ADCs have been around at least as long as the phone system went digital back in the early 60s.

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Saturday, February 7, 2015 11:08 AM

richhotrain
 
PM Railfan

ADC refers to nothing other than 'Analog Direct Current'. Not suprising most havent heard of this as 99% of us are model railroaders, not electricians. Ask an electrician what DCC is and he will be scratching his head. And before DCC ever became DCC.... what did you call it? You didnt call it anything because it didnt exist.

 

 

So, PM Railfan who first used this term a few weeks ago on the forum, says ADC stands for Analog Direct Current.  You can read his full reply on page 1 of this thread.

 

Rich

 

Yes, and in my 55 years of train modeling, he's the first.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, February 7, 2015 11:47 AM

maxman

 

 
richhotrain
 
PM Railfan

ADC refers to nothing other than 'Analog Direct Current'. Not suprising most havent heard of this as 99% of us are model railroaders, not electricians. Ask an electrician what DCC is and he will be scratching his head. And before DCC ever became DCC.... what did you call it? You didnt call it anything because it didnt exist.

 

 

So, PM Railfan who first used this term a few weeks ago on the forum, says ADC stands for Analog Direct Current.  You can read his full reply on page 1 of this thread.

 

Rich

 

 

 

Yes, and in my 55 years of train modeling, he's the first.

 

I'm just saying, that's where the acronym, ADC, popped up and that is his definition.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Detroit, Michigan
  • 2,284 posts
Posted by Soo Line fan on Saturday, February 7, 2015 1:47 PM

In the automotive world, it stands for Analog to Digital Converter and some times referred to as a A to D converter. 

Second dtc parameter from the top: Click to enlarge.

Jim

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:27 PM

 That's what it stands for in the electronic world, too.

             --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Detroit, Michigan
  • 2,284 posts
Posted by Soo Line fan on Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:31 PM

Pretty much one and the same.Automobile Laugh

Jim

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:40 PM

richhotrain
I'm just saying, that's where the acronym, ADC, popped up and that is his definition.

 

Rich

 

 

Your point is noted.

 

The problem is that he says that it is far more than "his" definition.  He says that the term has "prolly" been around ever since the term "amp".  And yet, it does not turn up in a Google search--not as he defines it.

 

So, yes, it is HIS definition.  It is just not OUR definition.  

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Saturday, February 7, 2015 3:21 PM

In glad google has been around as long as electricity has. And is the end all-be all of definitions in this world. I spose since google is around now we can junk the old addage.... "experience wrote the book, not the other way around".

Think of all the money that will be saved when google replaces teachers, since google knows everything. Cant wait to see if google will wire my layout for me. I will go ask it right now.  Whistling

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, February 7, 2015 3:43 PM

PM Railfan
In glad google has been around as long as electricity has. And is the end all-be all of definitions in this world.

is analog DC redundant?   Is there some other form of DC that is not analog, maybe digital DC?    What exactly would that be?    Did I miss something when I got my EE?

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, February 7, 2015 3:49 PM

Laugh

PM Railfan

In glad google has been around as long as electricity has. And is the end all-be all of definitions in this world. I spose since google is around now we can junk the old addage.... "experience wrote the book, not the other way around".

Think of all the money that will be saved when google replaces teachers, since google knows everything. Cant wait to see if google will wire my layout for me. I will go ask it right now.  Whistling

 
And if you ask Google just right it will deliver proof that the Earth is flat, and that the Holocaust never happened - and probably that there is such a thing as a seven sided cube. Laugh
 
Remember, anybody can post anything somewhere on the internet, and Google will find it.  Now, how much of that Sturgeon*-proving sludge has been peer reviewed?
 
* Sturgeon's Law - 90% of everything is crud.
 
Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - including things that prove that Phil Sturgeon was right)
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,682 posts
Posted by Lone Wolf and Santa Fe on Saturday, February 7, 2015 9:45 PM

PM Railfan
99% of us are model railroaders, not electricians. Ask an electrician what DCC is and he will be scratching his head. And before DCC ever became DCC.... what did you call it? You didnt call it anything because it didnt exist.

Before DCC was standardized and branded, I believe it was known simply as 'command control' and was AC powered on model railroads like the legendary V&O. The decoders were so big they had to ride in the tender or in a dummy unit.

All of the model railroaders I know are either electricians including myself or else A/V or IT geeks who think they are electricians.

Modeling a fictional version of California set in the 1990s Lone Wolf and Santa Fe Railroad
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, February 7, 2015 10:24 PM

gregc
 
PM Railfan
In glad google has been around as long as electricity has. And is the end all-be all of definitions in this world.

 

is analog DC redundant?   Is there some other form of DC that is not analog, maybe digital DC?    What exactly would that be?    Did I miss something when I got my EE?

 

You tell me? The Aristo Craft Train Engineer wireless radio throttles I use have a square wave full voltage pulse width modulated motor control output - would you call that digital?

As opposed to most variable voltage/variable current DC throttles?

All acronyms are made up by someone - My control system is partly based on one called MZL by its creator, Ed Ravenscroft - easily read about in the back issues of Model Railroader right here on this site - but Bing and Google are clueless...... 

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Sunday, February 8, 2015 12:55 AM

Well, poking around the internet, it seems we have DC and AC, direct and alternating current.  We also have analog and digital signals.  According to http://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_DC_an_analog_signal, "if a circuit is using unidirectional (this means DC), non-time encoded current to communicate the value of a transducer, then YES - in this case it is acting as an Analog signal".

It also states "If a circuit is using unidirectional, non-time encoded current for reasons other than communication (such as providing power), then NO - it is not a signal, analog or digital."  Based on these statements, it is my opinion that since we use DC to provide power, it is not a signal.  Therefore analog DC is incorrect terminology in our application.

Certainly anyone who creates something can use any acronym he wishes.  This does not mean that we should use non-applicable acronyms.  Unless, of course, the goal is to either cause confusion or to be contrary, in which case one can do what one pleases. 

Google is not "clueless" concerning MZL.  I typed "MZL model railroad control" in the Google search box and got at least 10 refrences containing something about MZL, including http://www.dccwiki.com/DCC_History#MZL,

http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/16475,

and http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/7386

There does seem to be a conflict about what MZL actually stands for.  One of the sources says "Master, Zone Layout", and the other says "Main, Zone, Local".  So I'd appreciate it if someone could clear that up. 

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Sunday, February 8, 2015 5:30 AM

ATLANTIC CENTRAL
gregc
PM Railfan
In glad google has been around as long as electricity has. And is the end all-be all of definitions in this world.

is analog DC redundant?   Is there some other form of DC that is not analog, maybe digital DC?    What exactly would that be?    Did I miss something when I got my EE?

You tell me?

yes it is redundant in the contexts that I can find on these pages going back to 2009 (see tomikawa TT) where "good old analog DC" is being used to emphasis its difference from DCC.

ATLANTIC CENTRAL
The Aristo Craft Train Engineer wireless radio throttles I use have a square wave full voltage pulse width modulated motor control output - would you call that digital?

I wouldn't, because a digital circuit does not depend on the actual voltage, simply its state.

In a motor circuit, its not just that the PWM signal is on for 50%, but that it is on at a specific voltage for 50% of the time to provide the equivalent of a constant voltage of some value.

The control portion of a PWM circuit could be analog or digital.   It could be a discrete digital circuit or a digital processor (typical DCC decoder).

If you think of digital as simply having two states, would you describe a light switch in your house as digital?

Model railroads have had AC throttles and DC throttles.  Now is has DCC which puts an AC signal on the track.   But you wouldn't compare a DCC throttle to an AC throttle.  It's not that simple.

 

what confuses me (as well as others based on the length of this thread) when I read something like analog DC is that it implies a difference between just DC and that there is non-analog DC?

 

 

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Sunday, February 8, 2015 6:31 AM

gregc
 

what confuses me (as well as others based on the length of this thread) when I read something like analog DC is that it implies a difference between just DC and that there is non-analog DC

 

I would think there is. Computers all day long use digital (non analog) DC signals both as power and control and certainly data transmission which is nothing more than massively complex streams of power itself. There IS a difference. PWM IS a 'digital' DC signal. It IS a different signal from 'analog' DC and can be measured and seen on a scope. PWM has been manipulated to produce the pulse and the width. DC is now NOT in its original, raw state (Analog!). That is what the word 'modulated' means - to change the signal (why call it pwm if its just DC?). Thus why the word "analog" is used. So you dont have to drag out a scope to see the difference in signals. Analog simply inferes pure, unchanged, unadulterated DC power. Straight off the source. PWM DOES NOT come straight off the source. The analog DC power has to be 'changed' before it can be called PWM. Now you see the difference.

I bet it would really bake your noodle to think of AC as only being alternating DC!

What makes ADC redundant is the majority of the world only thinks in AC or DC. Thats it. Who ever really worries about the power coming out of the wall when they plug in a lamp or vacumm cleaner? But as you see, there are many forms of DC. ADC refers to its natural, raw state, in a distinct pattern (wave form). Thats it. Only meant to be a distinquishing aspect amongst the other related DC terms.

If DC is just DC no matter its form, then why was PWM and DCC coined as terms when we all could just be saying DC? Analog, however redundant, is no different in meaning as a term. It just describes DC in a particular form. This is what i was taught. Has served me fine for years and never have i ever seen it questioned like in this thread.

Heck from now on i will just say DC and let the reader wonder what type.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Sunday, February 8, 2015 6:41 AM

Put it to you this way, if there wasnt a difference in DC power (analog vs digital) then the screen infront of you would be an etch-a-sketch instead of a nice monitor! There IS a difference.

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • 1,047 posts
Posted by betamax on Sunday, February 8, 2015 7:55 AM

Direct Current is what you get from a cell (or several, which is a battery.)

Alternating Current is created by a rotating machine.

DC can be created artificially from an AC sinewave.

 

A series of binary pulses is not Direct or Alternating Current. It is a pulse train, created by switching the signal state as needed.

Both AC and DC are used for analog control, by varying the voltage and current to change speeds, brightness, or whatever.

Analog DC is almost as silly as Digital Speakers or Headphones.  Speakers are analog transducers, they don't work well (or last long) on a digital waveform.  Just because some some audio equipment uses Class D or worse amplifiers to achieve high power outputs cheaply doesn't mean it is a digital signal either.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Sunday, February 8, 2015 8:01 AM

PM Railfan
gregc

what confuses me (as well as others based on the length of this thread) when I read something like analog DC is that it implies a difference between just DC and that there is non-analog DC?

I bet it would really bake your noodle to think of AC as only being alternating DC!

don't understand why you would think this.  

But it makes the point I tried to make, which is if there is a term, Direct Current (DC), is there something that is not direct.   Indeed there is, Alternating Current (AC).   Alternating Direct Current (ADC) doesn't make sense.

but these are just one way of classifying electrical signals.   Analog and digital are another way.

 

PM Railfan
Thus why the word "analog" is used. So you dont have to drag out a scope to see the difference in signals.

There are hundreds of ways to describe electrical signals.   We don't say PWM DC and I've never seen signals for communication (e.g. FSK, PSK, QPSK, OFDM, CDMA, ...) which are almost always AC described as something AC (e.g. CDMA AC).

If you have the background, the differences between these signals can be describe precisely.

 

PM Railfan
Analog simply inferes pure, unchanged, unadulterated DC power. Straight off the source.

I disagree.   Almost all modulated waveforms (radio and communication) are considered analog even if they are carrying digital data.

But if i understand your point in the context of a model railroad throttle, I think your trying to say that a DC throttle which simply controls a constant voltage on the rails should be described as analog DC

and a more advanced throttle that injects pulses or use PWM could not be described as an analog DC throttle, which I disagree with.

 

PM Railfan
PWM IS a 'digital' DC signal. It IS a different signal from 'analog' DC and can be measured and seen on a scope. PWM has been manipulated to produce the pulse and the width.

I understand why you think it is digital.   And based on your description of analog DC signals as having a relatively constant voltage, I can see why you think PWM can't be analog.   But I wouldn't consider PWM as digital just because it has two states.

PWM is simply a different type of analog signal that is driving a purely analog device, in our case a motor.

 

PM Railfan
PWM has been manipulated to produce the pulse and the width. DC is now NOT in its original, raw state (Analog!). That is what the word 'modulated' means - to change the signal (why call it pwm if its just DC?).

If the current flow in the signal does not change direction, no matter how complicated the voltage changes, it is not AC and therefore DC.

while PWM can be DC (i.e. on/off vs V+/V-), DC is only one characteristic of a PWM signal

 

PM Railfan
If DC is just DC no matter its form, then why was PWM and DCC coined as terms when we all could just be saying DC?

DC only describes one small aspect of the signal.

The DCC signal carrying both power and communications over the rails is AC.   But that is only one characteristic.

Is DCC PWM?  It uses PWM to control the motor voltage, but PWM doesn't describe the control part of DCC

Is DCC digital?  it uses a digital processor.

 

PM Railfan
What makes ADC redundant is the majority of the world only thinks in AC or DC.

I doubt this is true.

 

PM Railfan
Heck from now on i will just say DC and let the reader wonder what type.

there is a large vocabulary of terms used to describe electrical signals which can be used to avoid confusion.  There's no need to make up new ones.

While DC and AC mean direct and alternating current, in model railroading they tend to refer to the type of throttle.   It would make sense to me to describe a digital DC throttle as using digital technology to control the analog voltage on the rails to a DC locomotive, just as describing a more common DC throttle using analog control circuits as an analog DC throttle.

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, February 8, 2015 10:10 AM

 The problem is in combining two things that aren't really related. AC and DC are two forms of current (or an Aussie band). Analog and Digital are two types of signaling. Selection of current type does not preclude selection of signalling system. Most computers are digital, and happen to use DC current, however there's nothing stopping you from doing digital signalling with AC. There are also analog computers that use, well, analog signalling. Nothing says you can't use AC current in an analog computer, or DC current.

 Likewise - we have analog control systems that in some manner vary the voltage that appears to the loco motors. We have digital control systems that send a digital signal to a decoder that controls the voltage that appears to the loco motor. You could have 60hz standard sine wave AC on the rails and still transmit a digital signal over that. You cna have fixed DC to the rails and transmit a digital signal over that - that's how many of the earlier comand control systems worked. You can have varying AC voltage on the rails to control trains - Lionel anyone?

 In a nutshell  analog does not always mean DC, digital does not always mean DC, digital does not always mean DCC, but DCC is always digital. ANd DC does not always mean analog.

                       --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Northern Minnesota
  • 2,774 posts
Posted by NP2626 on Sunday, February 8, 2015 12:13 PM

Wow, Randy, you mean acronyms may have multiple meanings?  How can that be?  

NP 2626 "Northern Pacific, really terrific"

Northern Pacific Railway Historical Association:  http://www.nprha.org/

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, February 8, 2015 3:47 PM

 Because no one of these wonderful standards bodies that exists for just about everything ever made a standard for TLAs. Across diciplines, the same acronym means different things. In engineering, ADC is analog digital converter. It could also be the Art Directors Club in advertising, or the Association of Diving Contractors

 My point is, AC and DC are types of current. Analog and Digital are types of signals. This back and forth about "well if there is analog direct current, there must be digital direct current" is completely meaningless because the two sets of descriptors do not go together. That's it. We've now had 3 pages of an pseudo-acronym that is not commonly if ever seen in the discipline to which it is being applied.

              --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, February 9, 2015 6:22 PM

To answer a question that was asked, and then ignored:

MZL - as originally envisaged and implemented by Ed Ravenscroft:

  • Master - a single panel that has the ability to run a train or trains on the entire layout.  If there is a full crew, the master panel becomes a CTC panel and its operator controls power routing and motorized switch points, leaving the train crews to run their locomotives.
  • Zone - a sub-panel that controls a single part of the layout, with pass-along connections that allow a moving lone wolf to move from zone panel to zone panel without 'losing' his train.  A zone may be a station, yard or interlocking, but always has one or more turnouts.
  • Local - not a panel, but a plug for a wired walkaround controller and manual controls for switch points so a switching crew can do their job up close and personal.  A zone may have one, several or no local workspots depending on its configuration.

The key feature of MZL control is that electrical sections which would be separate blocks in traditional cab control are end-connected by contacts on the devices that move switch points.  A train moving through something as complex as the throat of Grand Central Terminal needs power to only one section of track, probably the platform track at which it originates or terminates.  The contacts that move with the switch points take care of the rest of the route.

I will admit that a knowledge of Boolean algebra is handy for designing the circuitry...

As for the Analog in Analog DC - pure DC has a continuous, constant voltage and polarity (as from a lead-acid battery, 2.2 volts.)  We vary the voltage and sometimes reverse the polarity to control our miniature locomotives.  Hence, the controls we use are an analog of the controls on a 1:1 scale locomotive...

I rest my case.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - analog DC, MZL)

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Monday, February 9, 2015 7:05 PM

tomikawaTT
To answer a question that was asked, and then ignored: MZL

Chuck, thank you.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!