Sheldon, I am going to encourage you to do just that.
It would be fascinating to see it in operation because it sounds pretty darn cool to read about it and its capabilities.
Rich
Alton Junction
richhotrain Sheldon, have you ever made a video, or would you consider making one, that shows your layout being operated in the way you describe it? It sounds fascinating, and I, for one, would love to see how it operates. Rich
Sheldon, have you ever made a video, or would you consider making one, that shows your layout being operated in the way you describe it?
It sounds fascinating, and I, for one, would love to see how it operates.
Rich, right now the layout is being rebuilt, but when it is a little farther a long I will happily do so.
I had the layout well on its way to completion some years ago, then the wife and I decided that we did not want to stay here to retire. I decided then to rebuild the layout in a modular form rather than complete it and have to tear it down latter.
I do have a friend nearby, with the "single track, no signals" version of my control system, and I really should talk to him about the same thing. We could make a video of his operation, which is very similar.
All I would need to do is learn how operate one of these new video cameras, which I don't really have. I have a still camera that takes video, but I have never had much luck using it.
Here are a few pictures of the controls on my friends layout:
The buttons you see assign throttles, his layout uses all ground throws for turnouts, there are seven "town" panels similar to these two which assign all the cabs as you walk around the layout. His layout theme is early 1900's logging/shortline. A typical "town" has only two primary track sections to assign, all other power routing is done by turnout postion. Trains can enter the town, pass an opposing train, work the sidings, all with only the turnout controls and pushing a button or two. Redundent buttons for the next town allow the opperator to move to the next town without any doubling back to assign or drop cab assignments. Four trains can navigate the point to point mainline in any direction all at he same time. like my layout, he uses Aristo Radio throttles. There are staging yards at each end. Sheldon
The buttons you see assign throttles, his layout uses all ground throws for turnouts, there are seven "town" panels similar to these two which assign all the cabs as you walk around the layout.
His layout theme is early 1900's logging/shortline.
A typical "town" has only two primary track sections to assign, all other power routing is done by turnout postion. Trains can enter the town, pass an opposing train, work the sidings, all with only the turnout controls and pushing a button or two. Redundent buttons for the next town allow the opperator to move to the next town without any doubling back to assign or drop cab assignments. Four trains can navigate the point to point mainline in any direction all at he same time. like my layout, he uses Aristo Radio throttles. There are staging yards at each end.
Sheldon
It's amazing that some of the advanced DC systems can really mess with a decoder.
Pete,
I have the same situation here. I use Aristo Craft Train Engineer radio throttles. They produce a pulse with modulated output just like the motor control from a DCC decoder. The speed control is exceptional, but most dual mode decoders will simply not work at all, or work poorly at best. Yes, many decoder equiped locos simply sit and vibrate, others experiance delayed starts, jackrabbit starts, no slow speed, etc.
My layout is a double track mainline and I use an advanced cab control system that allows throttles to be assigned to track sections by pushbuttons as operators walk around - from either end of each track section - so there is no doubling back - OR - the CTC dispatcher can handle all cab assignments as part of clearing signals. All done with lighted pushbuttons and relays, as are the fulling intergated turnout routing controls. Track routes through complex interlockings are set by pushing one button.
So with a dispatcher, operation is much like DCC to the mainline operator - drive your train on the trackage where you have green signals.
The layout is designed for long trains and is relatively large but simple, so this system works very well, much like the prototype.
rrinkerI don't mess with CV2 much, all of my non-sound decoders are TCS and their auto-adjust BEMF always starts on step 1 without messing with CV2. Really, all I do with most of my locos is install the decoder and assign an address.
Randy.
Most of my 70+ decoders are TCS but I have to say a majority are before they put BEMF in. I too am stuck with 2 of those non adjustable top speed decoders from the company not mentioned. I actually hate them and think they were a total waste of rare hobby dollars. Like I posted earlier one is getting changed out for a WOW in the next couple of weeks.
My sound decoders (all steam except for one) is a mix of Loksound , QSI ,Paragon 2, and Blueline with TCS motor control. I sold off 3 Soundtrax LC decoders and bought LS Select.
Pete
I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!
I started with nothing and still have most of it left!
ATLANTIC CENTRALIt is really amazing how differently some of these locos run on DC once the dual mode DCC decoders are gone.
Sheldon.
It's amazing that some of the advanced DC systems can really mess with a decoder. A friend of mine has a system he built with recycled electronics. It pulses DC on the rails at such a frequency that dual mode decoders will either just sit there or take off like a rocket. Block control with wired hand throttles. Very responsive system that pulses or kicks at low throttle and the pulses degrade as the knob is turned. It is a small switching layout (Point to point about 24 feet long around two walls) with 2 throttles that have different plugs so you can't mess up and plug into the wrong block. Timed relays between blocks keep the trains running until the next block. The only switch is the one for the wye. To keep your train running into the next block you have to plug your throttle into the next block plug before you reach the end of the first block. The timers are set for about five seconds. Plenty of time to reach the next block plug. Neat system and works very good but you still can't go different directions in the same block.
rrinker I thought about setting that all up, at least on all the decoders that support CV2, 5, and 6 (which is every one I own except one...guess the brand...) so that different categories of locos woul dhave different throttle responses, and top speeds would be limited to something prototypical even if the throttle was wide open... Never got around to it, I just find myself workign the throttle differently based on the type of loco, and never really crank it up all the way. There IS an advantage to actually doing all the setup though - if the model is a rocket and runs at 80 scale MPH at full throttle and really should only do 40, by setting CV5 to limit the top speed, you get half the speed change with the same range of motion on the throttle, making each movement of the knob that much of a smaller incrememnt for finer control. I don't mess with CV2 much, all of my non-sound decoders are TCS and their auto-adjust BEMF always starts on step 1 without messing with CV2. Really, all I do with most of my locos is install the decoder and assign an address. --Randy
I thought about setting that all up, at least on all the decoders that support CV2, 5, and 6 (which is every one I own except one...guess the brand...) so that different categories of locos woul dhave different throttle responses, and top speeds would be limited to something prototypical even if the throttle was wide open...
Never got around to it, I just find myself workign the throttle differently based on the type of loco, and never really crank it up all the way. There IS an advantage to actually doing all the setup though - if the model is a rocket and runs at 80 scale MPH at full throttle and really should only do 40, by setting CV5 to limit the top speed, you get half the speed change with the same range of motion on the throttle, making each movement of the knob that much of a smaller incrememnt for finer control.
I don't mess with CV2 much, all of my non-sound decoders are TCS and their auto-adjust BEMF always starts on step 1 without messing with CV2. Really, all I do with most of my locos is install the decoder and assign an address.
--Randy
Randy,
Interesting that you bring up top speed.
With my Train Engineer throttles, and my 13.8 Volt regulated power supplies, it is also interesting how many locos only reach "realistic" top speeds at full throttle. Example - At 13.8 volts, my older production Proto E8's (I don't have any of the new Walthers regeared versions) run at 88 smph - a typical top speed for those locos.
This is true of a great many of my locos, at 13-14 volts, they run at realistic top speeds for their type.
Sure, there are a few hot rods, but by limiting the voltage to 13.8 in the first place, the full range of the throttle is available in most cases, without exceeding reasonable scale speeds.
Again, without a whole lot of ajustments or programing.
For whatever it is worth, the old NMRA DC propulsion standard was that a loco should reach a reasonably prototypical top speed at 12 volts. So apparently some of these manufacturers have been paying attention over the years.
That sounds like a good plan. For me, similar results are achieved without any speed matching at all.
Since everything is DC here, new locos are simply tested with locos they would likely run with, and notes made about speeds and starting voltages. This info is used to create acceptable "groups".
It is really amazing how differently some of these locos run on DC once the dual mode DCC decoders are gone.
locoi1sa Always set the starting speed first. And use the torque compensation. Then the top speed. Then split the difference between CV2 and 5 in CV6. If CV2 is 10 and CV5 is 200 then CV6 should be 95. If you set CV2 after you have set CV5 and 6 you will not have a straight line speed step. Then add just a little in CV3 and 4.
Always set the starting speed first. And use the torque compensation. Then the top speed. Then split the difference between CV2 and 5 in CV6. If CV2 is 10 and CV5 is 200 then CV6 should be 95. If you set CV2 after you have set CV5 and 6 you will not have a straight line speed step. Then add just a little in CV3 and 4.
Pete, I like that. I will give it a try.
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
richhotrainRemind me, though, is it better to have the faster or slower loco in the lead?
Rich.
There should not be a faster or slower loco to make a big difference. If they are all the same brand then they should be close enough. Put them on the same loop of track. Not the inside outside. First set up one (Maybe the lead unit but does not matter). Then put one behind the already set up one about a foot apart and use POM to set it as it goes. Then do another and another using the first as the benchmark.
Everything will be happy happy.
Hi, Pete
locoi1sa I can actually run diesels on the front with steam pushers or the other way around.
I like your system and I'd like to eventually have sush a standard. There are the occasional times when I'll need a helper and I'll do just what the railroad did. Send out whatever engine I have available and either tie on to the head end or shove from the rear with the helper on its own throttle. The speed matching is done by the skill of the engineer.
Even on the Water Level Route the station switcher would be put in helper service occasionally to get trains up the West Albany hill then cut off on-the-fly.
Take care, Ed
ATLANTIC CENTRALUNLESS, you speed match the whole fleet to ONE standard. That is my main point. I have no desire to speed match 140 locos to one standard - like Randy said, that would be a lot of work - and likely would not stay effective over time.
I actually have mine broken into 5 standards. Steam switchers, Diesel switchers, Road freight steam and diesel, Steam passenger, diesel passenger. Since the bulk of my 70+ fleet are road freight locos they all are set the same. When I acquire a new or rebuild/repair another one it is speed matched with a like loco that does the same duty. I can actually run diesels on the front with steam pushers or the other way around. There are two exceptions to my standard. My lone 44 ton loco is set up to run with the steam switchers and one Bachman K4s pacific that runs as fast as the passenger diesels do. I do not run passenger locos on freight and visa verse. This 5 step standard has worked great for me for the past 7 or 8 years. It does not take a lot of time to do it. I take the already setup loco and the new one to the club and use POM and a couple of laps on the outside main and done. The worst ones to do are those darn Soundtrax decoders. They are slowly getting phased out where I only have 2 left. In the next week or so one is getting swapped with a TCS WOW decoder.
Rich,
Thank you for the more detailed explaination.
As Randy described, there is a differance between what one "can" do, and what needs to be done. He understood my post, and provided an opinion on the subject that made sense, as opposed to other who simply took my post as DC vs DCC.
What "needs" to be done varies from modeler to modeler based on their needs and goals, and your better explaination and Randy's input made it make more sense to me.
As I have explained before, it has been my experiance over MANY years running DC, that locos that are actually needed to pull a given train, need not run at exactly the same speed to work well together.
And, for the record, if I do have a slightly faster loco, I put in the rear, so the train weight loads it first. That has always worked well for me.
Yes, DCC allows one to make ANYTHING run with ANYTHING. But at what cost of time and ajustment? And how do those ajustments effect the locos ability to run with other locos?
UNLESS, you speed match the whole fleet to ONE standard. That is my main point. I have no desire to speed match 140 locos to one standard - like Randy said, that would be a lot of work - and likely would not stay effective over time.
So unless you speed match the whole fleet to one standard, you are still left with "groups" that run together and locos that cannot cross those "group" lines.
Since I model the 50's, I am content to buy groups of locos from the same brands and run them in fixed consists, or be able to mix and match within those groups.
Also, I have found that even across different brands, many of todays products (last 15-20 years) have similar gearing and do run together fine. It is hit and miss, trial and error.
BUT, even outside the world of diesel lash ups it works more times than not. In my steam fleet, the following "group" of locos run together just fine:
Proto 2000 2-8-8-2
Spectrum 2-6-6-2
Spectrum 4-8-2
Bachmann 2-8-4 (converted to 2-8-2's)
BLI USRA Heavy 2-8-2
Spectrum 2-8-0
All are true DC, none still have dual mode decoders.
So again, that for the explaination Rich, and I'm gladyou got the results you were looking for.
jalajoie richhotrain Remind me, though, is it better to have the faster or slower loco in the lead? Rich In my DC days I used to place the faster loco on the front and I think most do. Bill Nanny a member of the old Atlas forum was placing the faster loco trailing the consist. His view was the load of the train was slowing down that faster loco. I guess it is debatable.
richhotrain Remind me, though, is it better to have the faster or slower loco in the lead? Rich
Remind me, though, is it better to have the faster or slower loco in the lead?
In my DC days I used to place the faster loco on the front and I think most do. Bill Nanny a member of the old Atlas forum was placing the faster loco trailing the consist. His view was the load of the train was slowing down that faster loco.
I guess it is debatable.
Let the debate begin !
Maybe, I should start a new thread to get everyone's attention.
I think that I will.
Jack W.
I use JMRI,(link below) when speed matching. I use a stop watch and a loop of track and relate all the locos to a standard loco for that loco's type. You can of course use two locos one behind the other and work to get them the same. But, I have found the stop watch method to be quicker when doing more than a couple. You can adjust the speed curves of several locos at the same time with JMRI which is handy if you're using the one loco following another method.
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/
JMRI makes dealing with decoder CVs a whole lot easier and to me more fun.
Richard
rrinker There just should never be so much variation between a group of same brand locos witht he same motors and drive trains, using the exact same decoders, assuming someone hasn't mucked around with the decoder settings.
There just should never be so much variation between a group of same brand locos witht he same motors and drive trains, using the exact same decoders, assuming someone hasn't mucked around with the decoder settings.
You would think so, and in a perfect world, I suppose that would be true. But it may be a matter of quality control that four Athearn Genesis F7 units don't run at the exact same speed. Slight differences in the gears, or motor, or drive trains, or wheel sets.
The other issue in speed matching is the layout itself. I have a double mainline with more outer curves than inner curves so the loco on the outer track has more distance to travel than the loco on the inner track.
But, overall, the speed differences are not that great.
I don;t see it taking more work to get locos to run together on DCC - it only does so because there are features that let you fine tune them - OPTIONAL fine tuning - that you don;t have in DC. I read all these people setting up loops, with one of the various speedometer products, or using the Bachrus test stands with speedometer, and writing these scripts in JMRI to tune locos to run together - at first I think,. hmm, I ought to get that too. Then I think, but I haven't done diddly to any of my locos to make them run together, they just DO, just like people using DC.
What you CAN'T easily to in DC is make various different brands run together easily - unless you consider swapping drive trains and/or motors to be 'easy' compared to setting 3 numbers on a decoder. Even then - I've said it before, I have a 3 unit consist I run at shows all the time, with a pair of Proto GP7's sandwiching an Atlas Trainmaster. The Geeps ahev TCS T-1 decoders, the Trainmaster is a Gold series with QSI sound. I didn;t set anything other than address - they run together fine when pullinng a train. If I operate unprototypically and try jackrabbit starts, the Geeps will spin for a while until the TM catches up, but if I operate in a more reasonable fashion, there's no problem. I didn;t run them through mearures test loops and tweak CVs for hours to do this, I just put them on the track and ran them. Same as DC.
Again, it's a matter of doing soething because you HAVE to, or just because you can? Just because you CAN build 28 step speed ables into most DCC decoders and make things absolutely dead on at all speeds - should you waste all that time? Even with JMRI to help, it takes a while - if you simply put the exact same table values in every loco, then they are no more speed matched than before you started the process, each loco requires custom settings if you are trying to tweak them to run that close. And after that 100 hour loco has another 100 hours on it - will it STILL run at the same speed as before? Probbaly not, so back on the speed loop and do it all over again. IMO - totally unecessary in most cases.
Now - take one of the older Proto E units, and the newer Walthers ones, with totally different gear ratios - they aren't going to work well together on DC, and DO need some speed matching to run well together on DCC. The easiest DC solution is to pick up one of the older ones on ebay and put your new shell on the old chassis, then they will run the same. Of course, you cna do the same for DCC as well.
ATLANTIC CENTRAL Motley Sheldon, We all know you dislike DCC, and of course every single DC loco you own runs perfect. WE GET IT. Every single post from you, saying the same thing, over and over and over. Enough already. No, you don't get it. I don't dislike DCC, I don't need DCC. There is a big difference. And yes, when I am done with them, all my locos run perfect, as they would if they had DCC as well. It just takes way less work to get hem to run perectly on DC. Sheldon
Motley Sheldon, We all know you dislike DCC, and of course every single DC loco you own runs perfect. WE GET IT. Every single post from you, saying the same thing, over and over and over. Enough already.
Sheldon,
We all know you dislike DCC, and of course every single DC loco you own runs perfect.
WE GET IT. Every single post from you, saying the same thing, over and over and over.
Enough already.
No, you don't get it. I don't dislike DCC, I don't need DCC. There is a big difference. And yes, when I am done with them, all my locos run perfect, as they would if they had DCC as well. It just takes way less work to get hem to run perectly on DC.
Yes you are indeed a DCC hater. Its the tone you speak about it, how "difficult everything in DCC is." How in DC you could do this, that and the other. You never change your tone. Its always the SAME thing.
Can't you think of something else to say?
I speak for others as well, as we are sick of the DC verses DCC talk from you.
Michael
CEO- Mile-HI-RailroadPrototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989
ATLANTIC CENTRAL Rich, First let me say that I'm glad you got everything worked out with these locos. I have two 3 unit sets of Genesis F units, DC powered of course, which are amoug my best running locos. Your original problem is the one thing I just can't get over about DCC. My 6 Genesis F units all run great together - right out of the box. As do all 15 Proto FA 's, the 8 Proto GP7's, the 4 Proto BL2's I have - I can mix and match those 27 locos at will. Not to mentiion 4 Proto PA's that all run fine with each other, as do my 6 Proto E8's. So I don't get why four Athearn Genesis F units with the same decoders did not run fine together? But again, glad you got it worked out - and glad I don't have to "speed match". Sheldon
First let me say that I'm glad you got everything worked out with these locos.
I have two 3 unit sets of Genesis F units, DC powered of course, which are amoug my best running locos.
Your original problem is the one thing I just can't get over about DCC.
My 6 Genesis F units all run great together - right out of the box.
As do all 15 Proto FA 's, the 8 Proto GP7's, the 4 Proto BL2's I have - I can mix and match those 27 locos at will.
Not to mentiion 4 Proto PA's that all run fine with each other, as do my 6 Proto E8's.
So I don't get why four Athearn Genesis F units with the same decoders did not run fine together?
But again, glad you got it worked out - and glad I don't have to "speed match".
Sheldon, I have to agree with Michael. This is not a DC versus DCC issue at all.
It depends what you mean by running "fine".
Remember, I have had these locos for 10 years and they have always been coupled to one another.
Early on, I discovered that the wheels on the front truck of one F7A had flattened because the gears had locked in the truck assembly. Athearn sent me a new front truck assembly. From then on, my only problem with the Genesis F7A units was the premature burn out of the incandescent bulbs. So I replaced the bulbs with Miniatronics bulbs and more recently with LEDs. But that bulb problem was typical of Genesis locos and I am surprised that you have never experienced the issue. It occurs in both DC and DCC. It is a bulb problem, not a DCC problem.
Now, regarding how "fine" they run, they have always run fine. When I recently had a decoder problem on one of the units, I decided that it was time for me to fine tune all four units. I soldered the power pick up trucks to the copper contacts on the trucks. Have you done that? I lubed all of the gears which were bone dry. My understanding is that Athearn does not lube the gears before release.
Then, as a final testing step, I ran each loco, two at a time side by side, on my double main line. They all ran "fine". But, inevitably, one was the fastest, one was the slowest, and the other two ran at speeds in between. My observation was that all ran "fine" and the speed differences were not that great. But, since I was going about fine tuning them, I wanted to speed match them. And, let's face it, this is an advantage of DCC over DC. In DC, you cannot speed match, so if the locos don't run "fine", you are at risk of damaging the gears.
Sheldon, to my knowledge, placing a decoder in a loco does not adversely affect performance or alter the speed of the loco. As far as I am concerned, had I set the locos side by side on a DC layout before installing the decoders, the speed differences would have been the same as I experienced in DCC. Are you saying that the installation of decoders and the running of the locos in DCC adversely affected the performance and speed of the locos?
I would be willing to bet that if you could line up your Genesis locos side by side, they would exhibit speed differences, however slight. I find it hard to believe that two identical locos ever run at exactly the same speed. Eventually, one will outrun the other. Yet, they still run "fine".
twcenterprises Now, by saying you have already matched your locos, and that you are pleased with the results, that indicates to me that you have them reasonably well matched, in which case further adjustment of CV2 may not be absolutely necessary. Only you can be the judge of that.
Now, by saying you have already matched your locos, and that you are pleased with the results, that indicates to me that you have them reasonably well matched, in which case further adjustment of CV2 may not be absolutely necessary. Only you can be the judge of that.
Brad, after I read your reply, I went back and re-read retsignalmtr's post. Now, I see what you and he were saying.
In retsignalmtr's post, he set CV5 and CV6 to fixed values, then re-adjusted CV2.
What I did, after first finding the appropriate value for CV2 in each loco, was to adjust CV5 and CV6 on each loco to match speeds, so I was done. No need to re-adjust CV2 at that point.
One thing that I will point out about my own situation. Although I have been operating in DCC for almost ten years now, I have spent way too little time learning about CV's. I either have bought a loco with decoder (and sound) already installed, or I simply installed a non-sound decoder myself and set up the basics, ignoring everything else. I have done little consisting and when I have, it has only been with two matching diesels. In the case of this 4-loco Athearn Genesis F7ABBA consist, I never attempted to speed match.
Everyone probably knows, from my other related posts, that I have had a lot of issues with these four locos, their decoders, and their lights. I am at the point now where everything is running smoothly, so I have turn my attention to the speed matching issue. I am somewhat embarrassed that it took me this long to tackle an issue like speed matching and the larger issue of fine tuning the various other CVs such as 116 and 117 and 95. But, I am getting there, and I appreciate all the good help and advice that I am receiving here.
Let's try phrasing this differently. CV2 is telling the decoders to "begin moving". Now, if you're using 128 speed steps, having locos begin anywhere between steps 2 and 5 may not be a big deal. But let's say you're using 14 speed steps. By the time you get to step 5, one loco may already be going 10-15 scale miles per hour (SMPH), and another may just begin moving. Adjusting CV2 will correct this so all begin to barely move on speed step 1.
Personally, my eventual goal is to have all my locos set up to move "as slow as possible" on speed step one, maybe 2-3 SMPH.
Brad
EMD - Every Model Different
ALCO - Always Leaking Coolant and Oil
CSX - Coal Spilling eXperts
retsignalmtr Speed matching is recommended. Before I start to speed match loco's I set CV's 3 and 4 to 0, these are acceleration and deceleration CV's. Next set CV2 (start speed)so the loco's just begin to move on speed step 1. Try the loco in both directions as they may run differently in reverse. Adjust CV2 so the loco runs the same in both directions. Then adjust CV5 (top speed) to 255 and CV6 (mid speed) to 125. Place the locos on the track several inches apart, run on speed step 1 and readjust CV2 on the locos that don't maintain the same distance while running.
Speed matching is recommended. Before I start to speed match loco's I set CV's 3 and 4 to 0, these are acceleration and deceleration CV's. Next set CV2 (start speed)so the loco's just begin to move on speed step 1. Try the loco in both directions as they may run differently in reverse. Adjust CV2 so the loco runs the same in both directions. Then adjust CV5 (top speed) to 255 and CV6 (mid speed) to 125. Place the locos on the track several inches apart, run on speed step 1 and readjust CV2 on the locos that don't maintain the same distance while running.
The part in black makes sense to me, and I did that, and I am pleased with the results.
But the part in red confuses me. Why would you readjust CV2 at that point? Once you speed match with the proper values in CV5 and CV6, would any further adjustments to CV2 be necessary? What would it accomplish?
I try to get my locos to move at SS1. If it just barely moves (I watch the motor shaft ) then adjust non BEMF decoders torque compensation to keep it moving as slowly as possible. TCS calls it Dither, NCE calls it torque compensation. CV2 will get it moving. CV116 and 117 will keep it moving. I do this so all my locos can be interchanged and consisted. Here is a link to the DASR sheet. Page 3 has an explanation on what each CV does. http://www.ncedcc.com/pdf/dasr.pdf Please note that the non BEMF powered decoders should stop spinning the motor on SS1 when the loco is blocked or held. If the motor spins too fast you will have little slow speed response.
All my switchers are set to the same top speed, all my road freight units steam and diesel are set to the same top speed too. My steam passenger engines are set faster than the freight engines and the passenger diesels are set faster still. This way I can consist like units and still double head consists too. My previous club had some big hills to climb. I would advanced consist 2 steamers at the head end and then double head (old style or command station consist) one or a consist of 2 engines to push on the hill. I also run a six pack of Atlas and Athearn RS1 and RS3 engines using the same address style of consisting.
When I set up a new loco or one that has been repaired or upgraded I will speed match it with one of my older ones set up already. All my locos have a straight line (no speed curve) acceleration. They all have some momentum but not lots of it. The only two locomotives that never see a consist are the Tsunami powered steamers. Since I cannot set the top speed. They also tend to jump start and then crawl. Motor control is very important to me.
locoi1sa CV2 is the starting voltage in speed step 1. This CV will dictate how much voltage goes to the motor to start it spinning but not the current to the motor.
CV2 is the starting voltage in speed step 1. This CV will dictate how much voltage goes to the motor to start it spinning but not the current to the motor.
Pete, let me ask you this about CV2.
Let's say that I have two locos in a consist, an F7A and an F7B. Say that the F7A starts to move at SS3 and the F7B starts to move at SS5. Do I want both locos to start moving at SS1 or am I trying to get both locos moving at SS3.
Is that what the value in CV2 is supposed to do?
P.S. I have all four locos running fine with DA-SR decoders installed. I sent the faulty one to NCE after talking to Larry. I asked him to let me know what was wrong with it since power was being picked up at the front tabs but not transferring power to the motor.