Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Is there a really reliable DCC system?

8904 views
57 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:33 PM

MRRSparky
No, but it disappoints me (and at least two of the online Digitrax dealers) that D keeps on selling this device when nearly every other manufacturer's equipment is capable of read back.  It seems to me to be a product long past its use-by date.

Price point would be one main reason.  There is an $80 difference between the Super Chief and SEB sets.  Plus you can easily add a PR3 and get decoder read back as well as a PC interface.  This is what a buddy of mine, Cudaken, well known in these parts did.  He saved some bucks by purchasing the SEB model with the DB150 but got the read back feature with the PR3. 

The main reason they continue with the DB150 is that is the primary 5 amp booster add on for any Digitrax layout.  If they did not sell, I can;t imagine that Digitrax would keep producing them.   Personally, I would not purchase a system without read back, but clearly there are those that are happy to.

If it were the only choice of Digitrax command station I would also be dissapointed, but since you have other options for more or less cost that offer read back it really is not a problem.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Posted by MRRSparky on Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:56 PM

This is a small layout and I only have one throttle (a DT 400) and am not using the jump ports. In other words, there is nothing else that can access the system.

One other poster asked me to clarify the "random status codes." What happens is that, each time I turn on the power to the system, the same loco will show up with a status code of "Tri, 14, 28 or 128." It is frequently a different status code each time power is initiated.  I can either edit it to 128 with the DT 400 or the Zephyr.

After I operate a locomotive, I always dispatch it back to the system; I've done it that way for years.

The loco seems to run OK, but I am having a great deal of difficulty getting speed matching done with the Speed Table. Digitrax states that a Status of "Tri," the command station will not let the decoder use the Speed Table. Thus, my suspicion that no matter to what I change the Status, the command station is still operating in "Tri" mode.

As to the DB 150, I sold it for several reasons - one being its inability to read back decoders.  It was designed that way; I used it for probably 8 years and I finally got frustrated enough to buy a command station that WILL read back decoders.  Please note that I stuck with Digitrax equipment.  Do I see that as the fault of the DB 150?  No, but it disappoints me (and at least two of the online Digitrax dealers) that D keeps on selling this device when nearly every other manufacturer's equipment is capable of read back.  It seems to me to be a product long past its use-by date.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Posted by MRRSparky on Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:28 PM

Thanks for your thoughts.  I have had Digitrax systems for almost as long as they have been in business, so the potential move to a new manufacturer has a bunch of risks for me.  I have to balance that risk against what to mean is an extraordinarily high failure rate, given the lack of use of my systems.  It does not make sense to me that I should be having this number of failures.

To answer your question, I have developed the habit of dispatching each locomotive back to the stack so that it is no longer assigned to any throttle.

What I meant when I said, "Randomly assigned different status numbers ..." is that the same locomotive will have anyone of the four possible status codes assigned to it each time I energize the system.  Power is supplied to the command station from Digitrax's PS-315 wall wart. 

The previous power system that "buzzed" was a Loy's Toys Fuel Station that I built up from their parts.  It got to be really annoying.  I could hear its buzzing over the trains running.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:52 PM

Georgia Flash

 "Simon" said: 

"I ran a loco into an unprotected program track...burned out the program track electronics". Huh? I am very new at this DCC stuff; and, in my hands right now,  have the simple switch needed to separate the "program track" from the rest of my emerging layout. Exactly, and simply (I'm a dummyDunce), how and why does one need an isolated, separate "program track"? The Digitrax info recommends, but does not clarify why. Currently, I only have one loco that I would like to "program" with its own 'address'. So, Simon: How do the program track electronics get 'burned out'?

Thanks,

"G-Flash"

 

  On DCC systems that support a separate programming track, the outputs for that programming track are current-limited to protect the decoder and/or command station in the event of a short.

  Many folks isolate a siding or spur for programming, often using a DPDT switch to connect that isolated track to either the track power or the programming outputs.

  However, if that DPDT switch is set to the "program" setting and a loco (or even a lighted car) bridges the gap between the "full-power" track and the programming track, full track power will feed back into the programming track through the loco's (or car's) internal wiring.

 That full power feeding back into the programming outputs of the booster/command station will often burn out the circuits powering those outputs, because they simply were never designed or intended to have to deal with that much of a current backflow.

  A better option than a single isolated section and a DPDT switch is to cut additional gaps and used a 4PDT switch wired such that you have dead sections between any "live" track and the programming track.  That way, you won't span from full-power to programming-power.

  It's been discussed here before, do a search on "4PDT" (without the quotes) and you should get some links to more info on the subject.

HTH,
Steve

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:46 PM

Georgia Flash

 "Simon" said: 

"I ran a loco into an unprotected program track...burned out the program track electronics". Huh? I am very new at this DCC stuff; and, in my hands right now,  have the simple switch needed to separate the "program track" from the rest of my emerging layout. Exactly, and simply (I'm a dummyDunce), how and why does one need an isolated, separate "program track"? The Digitrax info recommends, but does not clarify why. Currently, I only have one loco that I would like to "program" with its own 'address'. So, Simon: How do the program track electronics get 'burned out'?

Thanks,

"G-Flash"

 

G-Flash

I decided to have my program track as part of my layout.  In fact it is one of the tracks in my engine service facility.  I used a double pole double throw switch so that I can run a loco onto the program track.  Stop, throw the switch to program setting and then program away. 

To accomplish this the track spur was isolated with isolated rail joiners and the DPDT switch just switched the 2 rails between the program outputs of my Zephyr to the booster out puts.

 It worked fine until one day when I had the program section set to program and drove a loco under power.  As it crossed the isolated joiners a bridge was formed which delivered full track voltage and current right into the program electronics of the Zephyr.  Lets just say it did not like it!

Now, when I switch the track to program, there is a 6" section of track leading to the program track that becomes dead.  Now if I run a train in under power, it will stop in its tracks before it can reach the program track.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:32 PM
MRRSparky
f)  This command station recently came back from in-warranty repair because it would randomly assign different status numbers to my locomotives, 7 in total.  I still does exactly the same thing that I sent it in for, after the manufacturer supposedly replaced all the command station internals!  Nothing else is connected to it other than the layout.
I do want to add that although I have never seen this happen, I have heard of at least a few other people who aparently had the same problem.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:25 PM
hornblower
Not one problem with my MRC Prodigy Advance system in ten years.
I hate to break it to you, but the Prodigy Advance has not been out for ten years. I believe it came out in 2005, maybe 2004, but definitely not 1999. I'm not positive, but I'm pretty sure the original Prodigy wasn't even out 10 years ago, because MRC was still advertising the Command 2000 in August of 2000.
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • 84 posts
Posted by Georgia Flash on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:16 PM

 "Simon" said: 

"I ran a loco into an unprotected program track...burned out the program track electronics". Huh? I am very new at this DCC stuff; and, in my hands right now,  have the simple switch needed to separate the "program track" from the rest of my emerging layout. Exactly, and simply (I'm a dummyDunce), how and why does one need an isolated, separate "program track"? The Digitrax info recommends, but does not clarify why. Currently, I only have one loco that I would like to "program" with its own 'address'. So, Simon: How do the program track electronics get 'burned out'?

Thanks,

"G-Flash"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:50 AM

hornblower
Not one problem with my MRC Prodigy Advance system in ten years.

 

Are you positive the Prodigy Advance or any MRC DCC systems have been on the market for 10 years?

Jack W.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Fullerton, California
  • 1,364 posts
Posted by hornblower on Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:39 AM
Not one problem with my MRC Prodigy Advance system in ten years.

Hornblower

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:57 AM

Add me to the list of very satisfied Digitrax user.

At my local club we are using a Super Chief 8amps radio system since 1999 and it has been working flawlessly since.

Same thing with my own Zephyr that has been ticking like a Swiss watch since 2002. Even after a trip to the floor, my mistake of course.

I also own 4 Digitrax throttles, one UT1, one UT4 radio, one DT100 radio, one DT400 radio. Never had a problem with either and never had a button stick. 

Jack W.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:26 AM

If the current system is a Zephyr with a DT400 throttle then you actually have the potential for 5 different control throttles on the system at once.  (2 on the DT400, the Z throttle, and the 2 jump throttle connections of the Z).  Even if you don't have anything connected to the jump throttle, you can still inadvertently have locos assigned to the jump throttles.  The potential most certainly exists to have throttles fighting over the same loco.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:56 AM

MRRSparky

 Is there anything out there that has a solid, reasonably repair-free history?


I kind of hate doing this as I pretty much understand how to use this stuff.  I'd be starting all over.  Your opinion please.

  Actually, Digitrax equipment has that kind of history.

  I've had my Super Chief (DCS100, DT400's, UP5's, PM42, DS54's, DS64's, MS100, PR3) for about the same time as you, except in a basement instead of a heated, air-conditioned, and carpeted bedroom, and I've had no problems with any of that equipment whatsoever.  Zero, zip. zilch, nada.  It all works perfectly and has been as solid as a rock.

  My opinion, since you asked, is that maybe you don't really "understand how to use this stuff" as well as you believe.

  For example, it's fairly common knowledge that the overlays used on DT400's sometimes cause the buttons to stick, and that the cure (as already mentioned in this thread) is simply to open it up and twirl a #11 Exacto in the holes to remove the offending bits.  No postage, no waiting, instant gratification!

  And you sold the command station because the (separate) power supply was buzzing?  Why not just repair/replace the power supply?  As was also noted previously in this thread, a buzzing power supply is certainly not normal.  If it were me, I'd immediately address the obvious power supply issue, before suspecting any of the devices powered by it.

  Also, I have to ask:  What does "assign different status numbers to my locomotives" mean?  I know you can status-edit to change between 14 and 28/128 speed steps, but as long as I've been using/reading about DCC I've never heard your terminology used before.  But it sounds suspiciously like you're referring to locos that haven't been dispatched still being under the command station's control, which is something that someone who pretty much understands how to use this stuff would know how to address...

Steve

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:31 AM

CSX Robert
MisterBeasley
With the Lenz control bus architecture, I can start an engine, unplug the throttle and move to a different jack elsewhere on the layout, and resume without missing a beat.  I don't need to manually "re-acquire" the engine - it just happens automatically.
Digitrax works the same way and though I have not operated on them, my understanding is that NCE, MRC, and CVP's EasyDCC also work the same way.

I think that one of the only walk around systems that does not permit this is the NCE PowerCab, and that is only in the very base model where the throttle is the command station.  As soon as you add the Smartbooster the throttle can be unplugged and moved in this way.

 

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:12 AM
MisterBeasley
With the Lenz control bus architecture, I can start an engine, unplug the throttle and move to a different jack elsewhere on the layout, and resume without missing a beat.  I don't need to manually "re-acquire" the engine - it just happens automatically.
Digitrax works the same way and though I have not operated on them, my understanding is that NCE, MRC, and CVP's EasyDCC also work the same way.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:07 AM
MRRSparky
..I sold the original command station when I finally got fed up with its inability read back any decoder...
While you probably did not mean for it to, when I read this, especially in the context of the rest of this post, it sounds like you are complaining about a fault in the command station. I think it should be pointed out that the DB150(which I assume you are talking about here, if I am wrong, please correct me) was never designed to read back decoders, so this issue was not a fault, but merely a feature that the DB150 did not have but you decided you wanted.
MRRSparky
...I got fed up listening to the power supply buzzing...
I'm with Randy here, the power suppply should not be buzzing. What power supply were you using and did you mention the fact that it was buzzing to Digitrax? If there is something wrong with the power supply, it could very well play havoc with the rest of the system.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • 1,511 posts
Posted by pastorbob on Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:36 AM

I used a non DCC command system called Dynatrol for many years.  It was good, it was limited, but it worked.  In 1999 Dynatrol was fading away, but made dual decoders that worked for Dynatrol and the new DCC standard.  The decoders were manufactured by NCE so I bought some and installed them for the day I would be leaving Dynatrol and going DCC.  Finally, year 2000 I made the switch to NCE and have been using NCE ever since.  Today, my system is the NCE command station, 4 boosters, and RB02 wireless. 

There was a learning curve in the beginning, NCE was fairly new at doing a retail business, but, I had few problems, and the ones I had were solved quickly by NCE.  I also learned that the owner or his employees were a phone call away.  Later, a good solid NCE Yahoo forum started and is going to day and is a major source of help for any questions.

The only time I ever had to send a component back was for an upgrade.  I have continued to add components, bought one new command station because of a major upgrade, put the old command station a an extra booster on my workbench for testing and other work.

Like any other company, especially electronics oriented, there have been a few snafus, and every company has those, I don't care what loyalists of other brands say, none are perfect.  But, NCE has not let me down, provided support when needed, and I am happy.  I am testing the new wireless upgrade and find I can stand outside the house and start a train in the basement with it.

I would suggest you research, talk to people, then make a move, but remember again, no one or no thing is perfect.

Bob

Bob Miller http://www.atsfmodelrailroads.com/
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:11 AM

 I have an NCE wireless system that I run sporadically like you described.  Always works fine for me. I have had it for 4 years.

Enjoy

Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:03 AM

I have a Lenz System 100, and an add-on Lenz 90 throtte unit.  Lenz does not provide a power supply.  I used an old train transformer to power the system, until it became overloaded.  Then I switched to an NCE 5-amp supply.

I have had no problems whatsoever with any of this equipment.  I've been running for 4 years now.  I run the layout most days, at least a little bit.  I've never had it do anything weird to my engines.  I also never lose control of a locomotive.  With the Lenz control bus architecture, I can start an engine, unplug the throttle and move to a different jack elsewhere on the layout, and resume without missing a beat.  I don't need to manually "re-acquire" the engine - it just happens automatically.

I greatly prefer the Lenz 100 throttle, by the way, to the point where I almost never use the Lenz 90 throttle.  If I had it to do again, I'd buy another Lenz 100 throttle unit despite the higher cost.  This has nothing to do with reliability, though, simply a preference for one throttle over the other.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, October 29, 2009 7:46 AM

 Several things stand out. Power supply buzzing? That right there indicates some sort of problem. Are you using that same power supply with the new command station?

 Second, what do you mean by randomly assigning new status numbers? Are you properly dispatching locos when you are finished running them? If you don't do this, the same loco can be selected multiple times in the command station and they will all fight one another as you try to adjust the speed and direction. (not 100% technically accurate but in essence this is what happens).

 I'm on my second Zephyr, but not because it failed. I lost it, my DT400, and all my model railroad equipment (long story, I covered it before) so last year I started over again. I did not hesitate to buy Digitrax again. Both Zephyrs never had an issue. My DT400 worked great on my klayout as well as that of a friend's. His Super Chief has been chugging along for several years now with no failures. Just recently did a few of his DT400 buttons start stickign, but the easy fix for that is to take it apart and twirl a knife in the holes from the inside to clear away the excess label.

 Name a system - you will ALWAYS find someone who has had problems. It's liek any other piece of electronic equipment - I build my own computers and I ONLY use Western Digital hard drives. Because I've only ever had ONE fail in 10 years of building my own computers. Other peopel tell me I'm crazy and they only use Seagate because they had 5 WD drives fail within the first month.

 I plan to have signalling and dispatcher operations on my layout controlled via JMRI. For this reason I would not even consider another brand of DCC system, NONE of them comes close to doing what Digitrax does with Loconet. I find it interesting the club I used to belong to finally went DCC with NCE equipment - yet they then ran a Loconet bus aroudn the layout and are using Digitrax components for detection and signalling. If you have no intention of doing this, another system will work just as well. But multiple failures of two systems poitns to some other common failure point and it might be worth a little investigation to avoid future frustration.

                                          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:56 AM

I knew you were discussing a DT400 because no one else produces what could be termed a "hot dog throttle" in comparison with their other models....at least that I know of.  Lucky guess...I guess.

Anyway, I ordered a Digitrax SEB, with the single accompanying DT400, back in March of 2006.  About seven months later I ordered a companion DT400 so that my brother or a nephew could run the trains with me.  Now, three and a half years later, everything works as well as the day I received them, and I have no problems whatsoever.

I acknowledge your bitter frustration and disillusionment; it can't have done much good for your hobby enjoyment.  Personally, I wouldn't blame you for trying NCE or even MRC or Lenz.  If Digitrax won't help you, help yourself.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Posted by MRRSparky on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:13 AM
In fact I am referring to my Digitrax system. I feel I have experienced way too many failures for the little use the sytem gets. I doubt any one of my locos has more than 3-hours run time on them. I prefer to build prototype models, I guess. Some day I may get around to finishing the layout. As of now, it is simply a test bed to ensure the locos run properly and pull my models without problems.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Posted by MRRSparky on Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:10 AM
The term comes from my days on the skiing circuit.  A "hot dog" is someone who is especailly competent and showy.  I used that term to refer to my DT 400 throttle, the top of the line Digitrax, at least until the DT 402.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 2,751 posts
Posted by Allegheny2-6-6-6 on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:36 PM

 Sounds like you have an MRC system, as I have never heard of any of those complaints with any of the other manufactures you mentioned. That being said I thought MRC could hold it's own against any of the major players in the game but soon realized it had way too many limitations to be worth the money. I have since switched to NCE and have not yet had a single issue with it. I know an awful lot of people who have NCE and love it and know of one guy in particular who has one of the largest layouts in the country and is now switching over from Digitrax to NCE.

You can have problems with any system you buy but it's how the company treats you and supports the product which matters most to me. I'm sold on NCE.

Just my 2 cents worth, I spent the rest on trains. If you choked a Smurf what color would he turn?
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:20 PM

Out of curiosity, what is a "Hot Dog throttle"? I have not heard that term before to describe a throttle.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:55 PM

I have had Digitrax now for almost 8 years.  The system comprises several throttles, booster and command station.  It gets fairly regular use with the 2 boys running trains almost every day.  I have had one self induced problem when I had to send the Zephyr in for repair.  (I ran a loco into an unprotected program track and burned out the program track electronics).  It was taken care of very quickly and at what I felt was a modest cost. I subsequently changed my layout to build in a dead protected area when the program track is active.  The only other thing that has ever gone back was my DT400 throttle that I just sent in to be upgraded to the new radio throttle.  So in my experience, Digitrax has been very reliable.  The local hobby shop has a 4000 sq ft Digitrax layout that runs with about 5 boosters and dozens of throttles.   The throttles do take a hammering as kids get to use them for opperations one Sunday a month and the floor is concrete.  I know that they get their share of broken throttles as a result.  The command stations and boosters hold up just fine.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Is there a really reliable DCC system?
Posted by MRRSparky on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:34 PM

I'd like to find out what your experience is with the DCC equipment (not decoders) from Digitrax, Lenz, NCE and MRC.  I currently have equipment manufactured by one of the above and have had it for probably 10 years.

 My experience with this manufacturer has been as follows:

a)  The first command station went back once for repair and some time after that went back again when it was replaced by the manufacturer.

b)  The first basic throttle went back once for repair.

c)  The top of the line throttle that I bought to replace the basic one went back once to get the number face plate aligned properly so it did make the buttons stick.

d)  I sold the original command station when I finally got fed up with its inability read back any decoder AND because I got fed up listening to the power supply buzzing.

e) I bought this manufacturer's basic DCC command station and am controlling it with the hot dog throttle.

f)  This command station recently came back from in-warranty repair because it would randomly assign different status numbers to my locomotives, 7 in total.  I still does exactly the same thing that I sent it in for, after the manufacturer supposedly replaced all the command station internals!  Nothing else is connected to it other than the layout.

I have a small layout, located in a spare bedroom.  The layout can easily go 2-3 months without being run at all.  Then there will be 1-2 days of activity and then I am on to working on something else.  In other words, there is very little wear and tear, and the equipment is not abused.  The bedroom is heated and air conditioned, and even if I dropped something, there is deep carpet with an equally deep padding layer.

I am getting to the point of considering selling it all when the command station comes back from this repair and buying somebody else's system.  The question is, who's?  Is there anything out there that has a solid, reasonably repair-free history? 

I kind of hate doing this as I pretty much understand how to use this stuff.  I'd be starting all over.  Your opinion please.

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!