Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

WWII, Landing Craft on Flatcar or Gondola

4890 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Luxembourg, Europe
  • 9 posts
WWII, Landing Craft on Flatcar or Gondola
Posted by El Capitan on Friday, April 11, 2008 3:51 AM

Hi,

I'm searching for photos and information about shipments of Landing Craft and other amphibious vehicles by rail during WWII. One picture in "Americas Fighting Railroads" (ISBN 1-57510-001-0) caught my attention. Its an LCM 3 loaded sideways into a ??52'6" drop end gondola. The motive power was an ERIE steam engine. I guess that most landing craft like the Higgins Boats were immediately loaded to transport ships from their construction site in New Orleans. This is certainly the case for all shipments to Europe, but how was it for the Pacific Coast. The land way was shorter than the sea way to get all these landing craft to LA, San Francisco or San Diego. Pictures of LCVP, LCM, DUKW or Buffalos if there exist any, would be of great use.

Thanks a lot

Alain Kap, Luxembourg

Alain
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, April 11, 2008 8:38 AM

Don't assume all of them were built in new Orleans.  There were plants all over the country.   Some even in landlocked plants. The shipyards in Wilmington DE made all sorts of boats and ships during WW2, from landing craft to minesweepers.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Friday, April 11, 2008 8:38 AM
In my opinion shipping by rail would have been a last aternative.  They would have been oversize and have had to be shipped as high wide loads which would have had slow orders delaying other war goods from reaching ports.  In addition ship travel to the Panama Canal was fairly safe and there was no real submarine presence off the west coast that I am aware of.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Friday, April 11, 2008 1:36 PM

A couple days ago I saw a photo of WWII landing craft loaded on flat cars on a train in Truckee, CA.  Here, I found it.  It is on page 164 of John Signor's book Donner Pass.  There was a single boat for each flat car, and secured by brasing at the ends and under the hull.  Obviously, they were headed for the Pacific campaign, presumably via San Francisco Bay Area ports where, incidentally, a large number of mass-produced transport ships were built (remember Kaiser?).  Railroad photos during WWII are relatively rare.

Mark 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Friday, April 11, 2008 2:04 PM

 ndbprr wrote:
In my opinion shipping by rail would have been a last aternative.  They would have been oversize and have had to be shipped as high wide loads which would have had slow orders delaying other war goods from reaching ports.  In addition ship travel to the Panama Canal was fairly safe and there was no real submarine presence off the west coast that I am aware of.

Actually, military equipment transport by train, at least on the Southern Pacific during WWII was relatively common, including landing craft.  I can remember as a child in Truckee seeing many of these trains coming through westbound, including landing craft on flat-cars, as the Pacific Theater intensified. 

Mark's right--there is a very good photo of the way they were loaded onto flatcars in Signor's book DONNER PASS.  Though the craft were large loads, they were not 'oversized' enough to give clearance problems in the many tunnels and snowsheds of the Donner Pass route. 

Tom

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Friday, April 11, 2008 11:50 PM
It was my impression that they moved anything any way they could as long as it got to the Pacific eventually.  In an eatery along the PA Turnpike, I once saw a series of photographs of small landing craft loaded onto tractor trailers, making their slow way west on primitive highways. If they departed somewhere east of there in January 1942, they might have made it to California in time for the war to end.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: heart of the Pere Marquette
  • 847 posts
Posted by J. Edgar on Saturday, April 12, 2008 3:02 AM

 the Mulberry docks used at Normandy where constructed specificly along the route of the original Erie mainline because it was originally constructed to 6' gauge and had extremely wide clearances...compared to say the Pennsy or NYC...there was actualy an advertising slogan used by the Erie...."Remember the man who built his boat in his basement...he is now using it from eruope to the pacific thanks to the Erie Railroad....."

the WPB (War Production Board) had other LCT's and LCP's  built along the Erie for the same Reason

 im sorry that i dont have info about the westcoast but i would venture that the WPB would find routes and locate war plants along these routse with the clearances needed

i love the smell of coal smoke in the morning Photobucket
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: heart of the Pere Marquette
  • 847 posts
Posted by J. Edgar on Saturday, April 12, 2008 3:16 AM

 ndbprr wrote:
In my opinion shipping by rail would have been a last aternative.  They would have been oversize and have had to be shipped as high wide loads which would have had slow orders delaying other war goods from reaching ports.  In addition ship travel to the Panama Canal was fairly safe and there was no real submarine presence off the west coast that I am aware of.

 there were numerous Wolfpacks off the eastcoast until mid '44....the tanker S.S.Esso was torpedoed off the New York Coast in 1942...after that ALL oil coming from Tx\Ok went by rail...US Railroads moved an ungodly ammount of material during the war...it was pretty much THE only way to move things...i suggest finding the book by Don Ball Jr. titled The Decade of the Trains:the 1940's...most of the text in that book was writen by Rogers Whitaker who worked for the ODT (Office of Defense Transportation)in the Transportaion corps during the course of the War so i trust his numbers.....and realy they are staggering

i love the smell of coal smoke in the morning Photobucket
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:18 AM

Look on e-bay or in libraries for US Army or AAR loading diagrams.  They give instructions for how to load and brace things on railcars.  I know I have seen diagrams for various landing craft on cars (in addition to tanks, tractors, trucks, trailers, etc, etc).

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:36 AM

One thing to consider about landing craft as flatcar loads.  While they are large, they aren't particularly heavy, awkward to balance or difficult to brace and tie down.  As long as clearances along the route were adequate, there would be no reason (other than lack of locomotive horsepower) that they couldn't be rolled at track speed.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Luxembourg, Europe
  • 9 posts
Posted by El Capitan on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 6:50 AM

Dave,

I found a link to a lot of TM's with loading diagrams at

http://www.tpub.com/content/railroad/TM-55-2200-001-12/css/TM-55-2200-001-12_120.htm

These show early diagrams until today's. The only one for loading boats is for LCVP's but not for bigger ones like the LCM's. Probably during WWII there were less loading restrictions for transporting military vehicles than there are today.

regards

Alain 

Alain
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Luxembourg, Europe
  • 9 posts
Posted by El Capitan on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 6:54 AM

I think I should buy this book also. Thanks for the info

Alain

Alain
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 450 posts
Posted by Trynn_Allen2 on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:45 PM

I tried looking in the book to see how to tie down an M3 Stuart or M5 Stuart, but didn't see anything.  Could one of you try and see what you come up with?

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: heart of the Pere Marquette
  • 847 posts
Posted by J. Edgar on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 4:12 PM

heres a pic for ya....hope it helps...

 

i love the smell of coal smoke in the morning Photobucket
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 450 posts
Posted by Trynn_Allen2 on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:45 PM
Danke, J. Edger.  That is exactly what I was looking for.  Now just to find the unit markings for the tank unit that I want and I should be all good.  You wouldn't by chance have the Osprey Publishing bookl on the M3 would you Big Smile [:D]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!