Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

WS Trackbed

1214 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 23 posts
WS Trackbed
Posted by jjsjjs on Friday, October 20, 2006 9:54 AM

What is the current experience with WS foam trackbed.  I'm trying to decide whether to use it or cork under my code 83 Walthers or Micro Engineering flex track.  I plan to glue the track down to the trackbed.

Thanks,

Jack Scullen

jjsjjs@aol.com

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: High Point, NC
  • 127 posts
Posted by 91rioja on Friday, October 20, 2006 10:18 AM
Jack:

I am currently using it on my layout.  I have the strips in HO for the track, and the sheets for my yard.  Nice and quiet; goes down with a small coat of white latex caulk, and if I mess up, it comes right back up.  I used cork on my last layout, but I like the WS stuff better.

Chris
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Friday, October 20, 2006 12:12 PM

I used both the foam roadbed and cork on my HO scale home layout.

One day, as I was applying scenery, I leaned onto a piece of track with foam roadbed, and the foam did not recover from being mashed although the track did.  I had to remove the track and roadbed and start over in that area.

Cork roadbed is more durable and resilient than the foam, and cork is also slightly thicker than the foam, so some shimming is necessary where the two types butt together.

Foam is slightly quieter than cork until ballast is applied, and then you can't tell much difference at all between the two.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Friday, October 20, 2006 3:41 PM
While I generally use cork, I do have a section on my layout where it made sense from a scenic perspective to use the WS stuff.   I'm glad I used it there for the scenic effect, but I can't imagine using it for the entire layout.

Steve
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Gahanna, Ohio
  • 1,987 posts
Posted by jbinkley60 on Friday, October 20, 2006 6:00 PM

I use the WS stuff and really like it.  Easy to put down and pull up.

 

 

Engineer Jeff NS Nut
Visit my layout at: http://www.thebinks.com/trains/

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: New Brighton, MN
  • 4,393 posts
Posted by ARTHILL on Friday, October 20, 2006 6:05 PM
I am a fan of WS foam. The ease of laying and repair are the main reasons. The quiet bit is not mu style, railroads are noisy. I use latex caulk, but I like the clear variety.
If you think you have it right, your standards are too low. my photos http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a235/ARTHILL/ Art
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 21, 2006 12:46 AM
 ARTHILL wrote:
... The quiet bit is not mu style, railroads are noisy...


I agree - where did all this concern come from about having a "quiet" model railroad?
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
  • 1,169 posts
Posted by Adelie on Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:09 PM
I've used both and like the WS foam slightly better.  The main advantage is that it comes in 24' rolls, which makes it easy to put a lot of it down quickly.  It also seems to be more forgiving if you need to pull it up down the road.

- Mark

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!