Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Dcc stationary decoders on matrixed switch machines

553 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Dcc stationary decoders on matrixed switch machines
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:16 PM
I want to use stationary decoaders on a matrixed interchange yard.

Have tenshodo twin coil sw. machines on all turnouts in interchange, fed by 40 volts DC transformer.

Am concerned about amperage spike from throwing mutiple switches and how stationary decoder triggers switch machines. decoder uses(?) track power?
would seem to nees relay to keep amperage down to reasonable rate to not "smoke" the decoder.

Appreciate some advise.

thanks


Tom C.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:31 PM
I'm not an electrical engineer but I'm sure there is no decoder that can handle the kind of power needed to throw multi turnouts. The relay idea sounds like a good one. Or use the same address, set up in a matrix, for each decoder for each turnout.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:03 PM
I don't know of any that handle that voltage level out of the box. You're going to have to add relays or something. Check the CVP ADC4, there is a high power version but even that I don't think goes to 40v.
However - there is no need to throw all the switches at the same time. With DCC accessory decoders, you can set up routes in your DCC system. Route 1 lines the switches for yard track 1, Route 2 for track 2, etc. No more diode matrix stuff - the system handles that part for you.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:03 AM
Thanks for the help, I was sure their was a way to get around the problem!

I've got some direction now.

Tom C.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!