Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Grizzly Valley N scale layout

18732 views
95 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 723 posts
Posted by UNCLEBUTCH on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 10:07 AM

RWSlater
I am really drawn to the scenery and structure building. I really wanted to go with HO scale but I decided to go with N scale because of space limitations. I get more of what I want.

For me the trains are an excuse to build stuff. You don't need a lot of track and rolling stock to create a town/logging camp.

You may find N scale disapointing,as to building buildings,you can do so mutch more in HO and still not eat up that mutch space.

 Just thinking outloud

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 10:05 AM

RWSlater

No Robert I missed marked which side is 32".  A lot of the back track runs at about 30" from the table edge. I did some measuring with mockups and it looks like my guerrilla arms reach that far.  The plan is once I get the track down I will work from the back to the front doing my scenery.

Robert

Hey Robert-

Okay, but still not too bad. I don't have gorilla arms, but I can reach 30". Barely.  The thing about back tracks is not just reach. You have to be able to reach in and hold steady while you re-rail or re-couple or clear up tiny little bits of debris and whatnot. Having one of those lightweight folding step-ladder-stool-seat things nearby would be helpful.

I do N scale and have some pretty long reach in areas on my layout. Always glad to see new N scalers in the hobby. And with names that are easy to remember. 

Robert 

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    January 2018
  • 75 posts
Posted by RWSlater on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:52 AM

ROBERT PETRICK

 

 
railandsail

Regrets?....depends on your age, and your arm reach.

Perhaps you should consider a pop-out foam mountain piece in the center there?

 

 

I dunno. Doesn't look too bad. If I read the numbers right, the left dimension appears to be 32" to the leg of the L. I would think the main body is 24" deep. Reachable. N scale.

Robert 

 

No Robert I missed marked which side is 32".  A lot of the back track runs at about 30" from the table edge. I did some measuring with mockups and it looks like my guerrilla arms reach that far.  The plan is once I get the track down I will work from the back to the front doing my scenery.

 

Robert

  • Member since
    January 2018
  • 75 posts
Posted by RWSlater on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:45 AM

railandsail

Regrets?....depends on your age, and your arm reach.

Perhaps you should consider a pop-out foam mountain piece in the center there?

 

 

Thanks Brian, I think it will be OK still young and have some long arms. I will keep a lift out in mind though.

Robert

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:37 AM

railandsail

Regrets?....depends on your age, and your arm reach.

Perhaps you should consider a pop-out foam mountain piece in the center there?

I dunno. Doesn't look too bad. If I read the numbers right, the left dimension appears to be 32" to the leg of the L. I would think the main body is 24" deep. Reachable. N scale.

Robert 

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    February 2009
  • 1,983 posts
Posted by railandsail on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:31 AM

Regrets?....depends on your age, and your arm reach.

Perhaps you should consider a pop-out foam mountain piece in the center there?

  • Member since
    January 2018
  • 75 posts
Grizzly Valley N scale layout
Posted by RWSlater on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 8:45 AM
Hi everyone my name is Robert and I am new to Model Railroading I am coming to the hobby from Military 1/35 scale modeling and Figurer painting.  I am really drawn to the scenery and structure building. I really wanted to go with HO scale but I decided to go with N scale because of space limitations. I get more of what I want.
I am creating a freelance logging layout that is located on an Island.  I am using the tracks at the car ferry landing to use as an inbound and outbound track. I plan to stage inbound cars on the tracks and then switch them out with outbound cars.  Currently I have a 4-4-0 model power steam engine (DCC and Sound) and plan to run only 40’ cars on the layout.
Here is a copy of the track plan, I do know that I will probably have to use a step stool for the logging camp but it was a compromise I made knowing the issue. I could learn to regret it but we will see. I look forward to sharing my adventurer with this layout.
Thanks for looking
Robert

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!