Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

N scale micro layouts thread

115720 views
75 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:17 PM

Burlington Northern #24

No Galaxy, it wasn't you it was the other fellow who mixed up the scale that the layout and myself are in.  

Oh, {slaps forehead}
 
Bang Head
 
I see now I reread agian, I see I got confused. In my older age is easy to do!
 
I still wish you luck and you have actually invigortated me to dosomething small N cale, even a "shoebox" or "attache case" layout mini.
 
Have a  great night.
 
Geeked
Later Edit; I have wanted ot do an Attache case layout for awhile...now to find a CHEAP Attache case!!! To find one, period!

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:26 PM

No Galaxy, it wasn't you it was the other fellow who mixed up the scale that the layout and myself are in.  

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:38 AM

Burlington Northern #24

11" N scale radii curves, it was never a problem. Can I not want something simple to practice my scenery skills on? 

There will be plenty of time for me to use massive radii, etc. on my next layout, but at the rate that the spot for is getting taken care of it may never happen.

Most certainly you can have something simple.
 
I just suggested what I did about what can be done  based on  your statement of:
"amazing, yes I'd really like to try and do an urban scene or something with a small town sort of feeling."
I took that to mean that you thought you had not enough room for much, and I was stating one CAN have  a nice scene setting on a small scale.
 
That was all.
 
If I was out of line, please forgive me. Confused
 
Geeked

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:06 AM

galaxy

Gary,

I know you are doing N Scale, and a circle is about all you get unless you strive for 2 circles in some manner on the same layout.

Just to give you an idea of what a small layout can do...In HO, granted, but people tell me what I have done is "impossible".

I have a 3.5 foot x 5.1 foot HO layout. It consists of a 15"R inside oval interconnected to an 18"R outer oval via 4 switches aimed at each other. Inside the 15"R oval is a 4 spur mini yard, AND A 2 SPUR  engine storage/servicing facility. I also have a "track to nowhere" side on the other side of the station near the 4 spur yard that simulates another siding That is not connected in any way, but "disappears into the horizon". {I mentioned that to you already}.

I have a mountain top on the back right corner on top of which I have a water wheel saw mill and lumber storage shed with another piece of short 9" track "disappearing" into the horizon.

I have a "mini town" in the center betwixt the station. 4 spur yard and engine facility.Its just a few buildings and houses.

In order to avoid the "flat pancake look" I used Woodland Scenics {WS} risers and inclines on top of which I used WS black foam roadbed with latex caulk to tie down the track. It makes the terrain "undulate" instead of flat as a pancake.

Remembering that ROUGHLY, HO is twice the size of N, that means an comparabel  N scale would be about 24" x about 31".

That  is a  lot of action in a small space!!! I am NOT saying that in 24x31 inches in N you could get all i got in, mind you. Just saying a LOT of action can be paced into a "circle only" or "two circle only" layout!

So give 'er a go and have fun!

Geeked

EDIT: here is a link to a whole website of SMALL MICRO layouts!!!: Hunt an' poke around, LOTS of stuff with pics there!!!:

http://www.carendt.com/index.html

 

I for one would love to see a track plan or some pics of this layout .

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:45 AM

11" N scale radii curves, it was never a problem. Can I not want something simple to practice my scenery skills on? 

There will be plenty of time for me to use massive radii, etc. on my next layout, but at the rate that the spot for is getting taken care of it may never happen.

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:44 AM

HI Galaxy,

The OP's problem was he insisted on using a 22" radius (the equivalent in HO) and then you would have issues on a 4x4 HO layout.

All remarks about using a smaller radius or a tad larger piece of ply were rejected.

I am glad he is happy building his circle of track now and he is able to find the site of the late Carl Arendt for tons of inspiration.

Paul

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 2:14 AM

unfortunately my LHS carries very little MRRing stuff. Atlas & bachmann track, Atlas, MP, Bachmann kits, and atlas rolling stock. 

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:26 AM

Hi Burlington Northern #24

Next time you are in a hobby shop.

Take a look at Peco  "N" set track points (switches).

While these brutes are horrible short sharp things I would not normally sugest unless being used

in the confines of a very tight industrial area, they are a good quality point

They are worth a look for your tiny layout the curved side is 9" radius which is sharp but might get you the desired sidings.

regards John

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 5:14 PM

actually galaxy you just gave me an idea(if you didn't hear the light bulb click Laugh). I could raise part of the track. I've been wanting to try and put some water or a water like scene thingy majigerbobber. 

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:48 PM

Gary,

I know you are doing N Scale, and a circle is about all you get unless you strive for 2 circles in some manner on the same layout.

Just to give you an idea of what a small layout can do...In HO, granted, but people tell me what I have done is "impossible".

I have a 3.5 foot x 5.1 foot HO layout. It consists of a 15"R inside oval interconnected to an 18"R outer oval via 4 switches aimed at each other. Inside the 15"R oval is a 4 spur mini yard, AND A 2 SPUR  engine storage/servicing facility. I also have a "track to nowhere" side on the other side of the station near the 4 spur yard that simulates another siding That is not connected in any way, but "disappears into the horizon". {I mentioned that to you already}.

I have a mountain top on the back right corner on top of which I have a water wheel saw mill and lumber storage shed with another piece of short 9" track "disappearing" into the horizon.

I have a "mini town" in the center betwixt the station. 4 spur yard and engine facility.Its just a few buildings and houses.

In order to avoid the "flat pancake look" I used Woodland Scenics {WS} risers and inclines on top of which I used WS black foam roadbed with latex caulk to tie down the track. It makes the terrain "undulate" instead of flat as a pancake.

Remembering that ROUGHLY, HO is twice the size of N, that means an comparabel  N scale would be about 24" x about 31".

That  is a  lot of action in a small space!!! I am NOT saying that in 24x31 inches in N you could get all i got in, mind you. Just saying a LOT of action can be paced into a "circle only" or "two circle only" layout!

So give 'er a go and have fun!

Geeked

EDIT: here is a link to a whole website of SMALL MICRO layouts!!!: Hunt an' poke around, LOTS of stuff with pics there!!!:

http://www.carendt.com/index.html

 

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:27 PM

amazing, yes I'd really like to try and do an urban scene or something with a small town sort of feeling.

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:16 PM

Burlington Northern #24

yep, ops are no longer(I didn't realize they were) a goal for this layout. are all of the pictured layouts yours Mr. Smith? They look great!

Yep, the top in HOn30, the bottom two are G, one is 24" square and the other which I posted earlier is 36" square.

I sort of fell into building micros a few years ago when I had to dismantle my fixed layout when we demolished and rebuilt our garage. I started with the 36" sq pizza, added the second level track about a year later and have been dabbling with micros ever since. As I said they are very fun to build and quite addictive. The chief advantage being you can build a micro and finish it quickly , they dont take up anywhere as much room as a traditional layout, and you can try a wide range of scales styles gauges ideas fantasies whatever, without breaking the bank or causing a near divorce when your layout eats up the entire family room.  Wink

So go for it and remember with a micro, the detailing gets focused inward, every square inch is part of the layout and something for the eye to consider. They are great tools for learning detailing.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:30 PM

yep, ops are no longer(I didn't realize they were) a goal for this layout. are all of the pictured layouts yours Mr. Smith? They look great!

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 10:53 AM

Paulus Jas

BN guy,

please wake up.

You will NEVER EVER get something in beyond a circle as long as you use an 11 inch radius. The 11 inches are the centre-line so you will need the extra inch at both sides to keep your trains from kissing the edge. 

A last try: using the 9,75 inch code 80 track of Atlas will give you 2,5 inch to play with. Just enough to get Texas Zepher first option in, just not enough to realise his second plan. 

I would head for the hardware store. When you politely ask,  they may find you a slightly bigger piece of scrap ply for free.

Paul

Theres nothing wrong with a simple circle Stick out tongue,

General comment regarding  small pizza type layoutsPirate

OK there are no ops but thats not the goal now is it, its to develop modeling skills, thats what micro Pizza layout likes this are best for. As the OP does say he has plans for a larger layout down the line but that he wants to develop his skills now.  Besides Micro Pizza's are just plain fun and allow alot of folks who dont have room for a traditional layout, to dabble in model railroading of various scales : 

PS this above is also 24"x24" and in G BTW Surprise

I also have a Gn15 24"x30" layout in the works as well as a 9" square N layout, If you love to model but dont want to spend 20 years and a zillion dollars filling a basement, this is a great way to participate in the hobby. Stick out tongue

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 10:01 AM

ok, first off please calm down, I've read all your guy's suggestions, I understand I won't get much with 11" curves, I just want something simple that I don't have to pour a bunch of money into, I know that's not possible but I'd rather just keep this simple and focus on the details of the scene(s), as well as practicing my ballasting skill, what I can do to liven up building kits, and if my abilities from my previous layout will be improved.  

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 2:57 AM

BN guy,

please wake up.

You will NEVER EVER get something in beyond a circle as long as you use an 11 inch radius. The 11 inches are the centre-line so you will need the extra inch at both sides to keep your trains from kissing the edge. 

A last try: using the 9,75 inch code 80 track of Atlas will give you 2,5 inch to play with. Just enough to get Texas Zepher first option in, just not enough to realise his second plan. 

I would head for the hardware store. When you politely ask,  they may find you a slightly bigger piece of scrap ply for free.

Paul

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:55 AM

Texas Zepher

Burlington Northern #24
yeah, hmmmmm well I grabbed a couple extra boxes of 11" and there are some small straights in between  maybe I could get an 11" inside of another 11" loop.

That is a good idea but won't work in a 24"x24" space.   Any straight at all will require the equivalent length extension to the space.

hmmmmmm, I wonder I may have to buy another box of varied short length track the straight pieces are only about an inch long. 

Rmax, I like that Idea I was going to try and keep it simple I've got a few small locos to choose from an NW2, RS1, F7, GP15-1, a GP9, and a 2-8-4 for steam

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, April 15, 2013 10:59 PM

Burlington Northern #24
yeah, hmmmmm well I grabbed a couple extra boxes of 11" and there are some small straights in between  maybe I could get an 11" inside of another 11" loop.

That is a good idea but won't work in a 24"x24" space.   Any straight at all will require the equivalent length extension to the space.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 642 posts
Posted by RMax1 on Monday, April 15, 2013 10:53 PM

I build 2x4 modules and as I get room join them together.  That way I do not waste time or materials as much.  I have also been finding out that my love for large locomotives is not as practical so I am going to smaller locos and cars.  I have found there are some really interesting things about small locos.  One of the things I am finding out is how to manage the illusion of distance.  The smaller loco kind of give the feel of switching without actually having to do it.

RMax

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Monday, April 15, 2013 10:30 PM

yeah, hmmmmm well I grabbed a couple extra boxes of 11" and there are some small straights in between  maybe I could get an 11" inside of another 11" loop. 

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, April 15, 2013 9:59 PM
I will be following this thread. I have a 24"x32" board that I am trying to plan for a Gn15 project. I want it to have two or three levels so this will be fun to see what you come up with.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Monday, April 15, 2013 9:54 PM

hmmmmmm, maybe I can't seem to decide upon what I want to do. I wonder if there are curved turnouts that measure out to 11" radius. I'll be back I'm gonna go take a gander, at curved turnout selection.

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, April 15, 2013 7:59 PM

galaxy
You COULD do a double mainline with the 9-er inside the 11-er

OR put the 9-er over top the 11-er with the 11-er in a tunnel directly underneath the 9-er. {The 11-er will naturally extend out beyond the 9-er loop.}

AH! of course.  That gives me another idea (actually one of the oldest ideas in the model railroad layout history).   Take a loop of 11" and a loop of 9 3/4"  break each loop in 1 place.  Connect the one to the other making a figure-8 with the one loop flipped inside the other.  Make the track go up and over.  Way more interesting than a simple 11" loop. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Monday, April 15, 2013 7:19 PM

I didn't want to discourage you, especially since you said you were going to try chopping the switch, but I didn't think it would fit.

You COULD do a double mainline with the 9-er inside the 11-er

OR put the 9-er over top the 11-er with the 11-er in a tunnel directly underneath the 9-er. {The 11-er will naturally extend out beyond the 9-er loop.}

There would be obvious variants that way. There would be space between the 9-er above and the 11-er below to put something...

Also, you don't HAVE to have a switch..you could have a "disappearing" sideline that "disappears" behind a building that is not connected directly to the oval of 11-er to simulate a siding/industry.

It may not seem like it, but you DO have a realm of all kinds of possibilities!!!

Think and play and experiment!

GOod luck!

Geeked

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Monday, April 15, 2013 2:39 PM

alrighty seems that the overall design has had a change, the switch didn't fit. I'm using 11" so I guess that this layout will be about track work, scenery and some scratchbuilding. 

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Monday, April 15, 2013 3:38 AM

hi gentlemen,

I overlooked the posting of Texas Zepher.

Wish you luck

Paul 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Monday, April 15, 2013 2:28 AM

hmmm, maybe texas zephyr I have a box of 9 3/4's on hand I'm going to swing by my LHS tomorrow after class to see if they've restocked their track.

Alco, I know but I feel that I'd be much better of just sticking with a simple 2' x 2'  I've got wood for my bigger layout but I need to clear out the space that it is going before I can do anything else.  I wanted something simple to build, easy to maintain, and something to test on. I understand the one(s) you've suggested are centimeters bigger but  I want to keep it as simple as possible with little wood work and other non needed activities.

John, I like the idea but this layout will be mostly for tracklaying, scenic, scratchbuilding, and generally making a scene feel bigger than it really is. because the track will not be nailed down a quick shimming and addition of C55 track linked with the C80 will allow operation in the future. 

Rest assured I've read all of your guy's suggestions, and will consider them.

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Sunday, April 14, 2013 7:28 PM

Burlington Northern #24

I will Mr. Smith!(G scale holy smokes that's a pretty tight fit.) 

John, if I read your post correctly you want me to build it so that it may be an extra branch onto my 4' x 6'. Unfortunately C80 and C55 are different rail heights. I was also planning to keep the layouts separate, the 2' x 2' was going to be a basic circle with an industry to switch and place cars. I know that my locos and rolling stock will be limited but that's ok because I didn't want anything complex. 

Hi Burlington Northern#24

Just  thoughts for your consideration as you should be able to get more than just a circle of track and a siding in the allotted space.

Yes the idea was to consider using the small layout as a branch line for the later larger project

It would be a shame to do all that work only have to start from Zero again on the big project.

I can tell you scenery will be a challenge in a small space but well worth the effort, the big advantage you will have is time to think and see just how far you can push the level detail.

regards John

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Back in the PNW
  • 659 posts
Posted by alco_fan on Sunday, April 14, 2013 6:18 PM

Burlington Northern #24
Alco fan, I have this board that I bought to originally house the power packs and block selectors

Wood is not that expensive. The existing board limits what you can do, save a week or two and buy a larger piece of wood.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:48 PM

Burlington Northern #24
I'm going to build a small tabletop N scale layout on a 2' x 2' ...  I know that due to the tiny nature of the board, my space will be limited. I plan on using my xuron rail cutters to shorten a turnout so I can have an industry to switch. the track I'm using is code 80, I know that the biggest loco allowed on the board will be an SD40. it's also going to be a test bed for new scenery techniques as well as basic wiring

I don't know how much basic wiring experience one can get on a layout so small.  

Here is the best I can do with the amount of space given and using Atlas track.  Curves are 9 3/4" radius.

If you can find another 3" for 24"x27" then one can get a second much longer industrial track and operation becomes much more intersting.

Here is an HO 32" x 34" equivalent that I built several years ago.   On difference in it is that Atlas made curved turnouts for HO scale.  Minimum radius is 15".  There is a back story posted about it and its operation here on the forum somewhere on a thread concerning the smallest layout.

Now if you switch to older Bachmann track I believe they make 9" and even 7 3/4" radius curves and also turnouts that had a curved radius departure track to match the 9" curve.   Peco makes an N-scale curved turnout but the radii are so large the Atlas normal #4s work better.

If you could squeeze out yet another 3" or 4" then you could get the N-scale equivalent of the one below.  It is a pretty cool layout that we (children and I) had hours of fun with.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!