Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Is 3x6 in Depth Enough & Resource for Layouts?

21539 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 13 posts
Is 3x6 in Depth Enough & Resource for Layouts?
Posted by jvivlemore on Friday, December 28, 2012 4:11 PM

#1)  Based on various posts here and on a Facebook thread I've decided to do an N Scale Layout.  The smallest would be 3x8 and largest would be 4x8.  I've seen several people say 3x8 is PLENTY for running large freight or passenger trains, however, others have said for all equipment I may purchase in the future to run properly I might want to do 4x8 instead.  Obviously the longer section doesn't really matter as much.

#2)  Once I determine a size I need to find a layout that fits running two trains at once with some some siding to park cars but also gives me enough room to build a city.  Does anyone recommend a particular book for this considering the layout sizes above?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Friday, December 28, 2012 8:06 PM

There are several N scale track plan books available from AMAZON.COM on this page:

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&keywords=n%20scale%20layouts&page=1&rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3An%20scale%20layouts

Now as for size...there are N scale layouts on a 30" standard hollow core door that have two loops for two trains running and sidings and spurs so 3x8 should be sufficient. 3x6 might be a tad short, but if a standard door is good enough, then 6' or 8' length is plenty good.

A 4x8 would be VERY PLENTY for N scale...

{FWIW, I built a 3.5 foot x 5.1 foot HO SCALE layout with 2 loops and a 4 spur yard and 2 spur engine servicing facility- If I can get all that in HO in that space at a scale about twice the size of N scale, imagine what you can do in the same space with N!!}

GOod luck

Geeked

 

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Friday, December 28, 2012 8:44 PM

If I were to do an N scale layout based on the 4'x8' option, I'd get a saw and make it into a 1'x32', then make the whole thing a city scene.  No round-'n'-round, but lots to hold your interest if you enjoy switching moves.


Wayne

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Friday, December 28, 2012 10:29 PM

doctorwayne
If I were to do an N scale layout based on the 4'x8' option, I'd get a saw and make it into a 1'x32', then make the whole thing a city scene.  No round-'n'-round, but lots to hold your interest if you enjoy switching moves.

Wayne

Or you could put a divider down the middle and make it a 2' x 16' shelf layout.  You can still have the roundy-round for times you just want to watch trains run.

Steve S

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 29, 2012 1:21 AM

jvivlemore

#2)  Once I determine a size I need to find a layout that fits running two trains at once with some some siding to park cars but also gives me enough room to build a city.  Does anyone recommend a particular book for this considering the layout sizes above?

3 layouts come to my mind:

  • Dave Vollmer´s Juniatha Division, a 36" by 80" N scale layout built on a hollow core door, with a yard extension added at a later stage - view it here
  • Marty Mc Guirk´s Androscoggin Central, a 4 by 8 ft. N scale layout featured in the Kalmbach book "N Scale Railroading: Getting Started in the Hobby, Second Edition" - you can get it here and
  • MR´s 2010 project layout, the Salt Lake Route, featured in Jan. to May 2010.The Salt Lake Route requires a little more room - it´s a 4 by 9 ft. layout.

The Salt Lake Route is truly an island layout, requiring access to all sides of it, so the actual footprint is much larger.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Saturday, December 29, 2012 6:51 AM

Sir Madog

jvivlemore

#2)  Once I determine a size I need to find a layout that fits running two trains at once with some some siding to park cars but also gives me enough room to build a city.  Does anyone recommend a particular book for this considering the layout sizes above?

3 layouts come to my mind:

  • Dave Vollmer´s Juniatha Division, a 36" by 80" N scale layout built on a hollow core door, with a yard extension added at a later stage - view it here
  • Marty Mc Guirk´s Androscoggin Central, a 4 by 8 ft. N scale layout featured in the Kalmbach book "N Scale Railroading: Getting Started in the Hobby, Second Edition" - you can get it here and
  • MR´s 2010 project layout, the Salt Lake Route, featured in Jan. to May 2010.The Salt Lake Route requires a little more room - it´s a 4 by 9 ft. layout.

The Salt Lake Route is truly an island layout, requiring access to all sides of it, so the actual footprint is much larger.

Lest us not forget the SLR was based on a single sheet of 4x8 ply, a simple 1 foot wide notch was cut off (roughly 4 feet long), turned 90 degrees and glued on to the other end (4 foot side) to make a cookie-cutter top in total 4 foot by 9 foot, but about half of it is truly 3 foot deep.

Another one I am impressed with is from April 2008 issue of MR. I can't remember modeler/layout name, but the man built a 2'-8" by roughly 8 foot long shelf (a little wide for a shelf but the modeler truely built it as a shelf attached to the wall) with a continuous loop, a 3 track "yard", and a long spur.

Building according to the HO plan but using N scale, the 15" radius curves would be very big, and TONS of room for scenery, and because it was planned for HO there additional area where more N scale stuff could go.

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: East Haddam, CT
  • 3,272 posts
Posted by CTValleyRR on Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:13 AM

doctorwayne

If I were to do an N scale layout based on the 4'x8' option, I'd get a saw and make it into a 1'x32', then make the whole thing a city scene.  No round-'n'-round, but lots to hold your interest if you enjoy switching moves.


Wayne

You could take Wayne's idea one step further and do a "dogbone" arrangement, with a larger area at each end sufficient for turning your trains.

This is what I have done on my own layout, because while I enjoy realistic operations, there are times when I just want to let the trains run.

Connecticut Valley Railroad A Branch of the New York, New Haven, and Hartford

"If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:30 AM

In N scale, 3X6, 3X8, or 4X8 would all provide plenty of space for the Original Poster to build what he has described. There are hundreds of N scale layouts designed for hollow core doors that can be adapted to these form factors. [Personally, I wouldn't actually use the hollow core door for the benchwork base, but the size is handy for N scale.]

Although a narrow shelf-switching layout is a fine option for many, it won't provide what the OP has specifically said that he is looking for (running two trains at once, etc.).

The Google search string:
n scale hollow core door layout 
... will provide many alternatives. Any of these could be expanded to a 4X8 fairly easily. And while there are usually more-efficient layout footprints than an island in almost any space, at least in N scale a 3X8 or 4X8 is not nearly as restrictive as the same size in HO.

To the Original Poster: Although the track plan may not provide everything you are seeking, Marty McGuirck's N Scale Railroading: Getting Started in the Hobby, Second Edition would provide lots of useful how-to information for building any track plan, as others have suggested.

Byron

  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 13 posts
Posted by jvivlemore on Saturday, December 29, 2012 12:00 PM
Correct. I need to be able to run the two trains without doing switching so a narrow shelf layout is definitely out. I just want to watch them run by buildings and scenery. My boys are 1 and 3 so would enjoy that as well. Thanks for the layout suggestions. I will check out those links and see if those plans work.

I'm noticing that Kato Unitrack gets really expensive once you add a switch or crossover so that may adjust my plan due to cost.

I also plan on doing DCC. Is there anything I need to know about that before I buy track and lay it down?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada
  • 578 posts
Posted by Blue Flamer on Sunday, December 30, 2012 2:35 PM

jvivlemore
Correct. I need to be able to run the two trains without doing switching so a narrow shelf layout is definitely out. I just want to watch them run by buildings and scenery. My boys are 1 and 3 so would enjoy that as well. Thanks for the layout suggestions. I will check out those links and see if those plans work.

I'm noticing that Kato Unitrack gets really expensive once you add a switch or crossover so that may adjust my plan due to cost.

I also plan on doing DCC. Is there anything I need to know about that before I buy track and lay it down?

 
You are correct in your observation that Kato Unitrack gets expensive fast. When I started out I was using pieces of sectional track and it was getting to be a nuisance with all the joints so I scrapped it and went with Flex Track. It has fewer connections and is much faster to lay down in my opinion as it comes in 36" sections that you join with small connectors and solder together.
You first lay down your cork roadbed with your choice of adhesive and after it is cured (a day or so) sand it all smooth. Then you secure the track down using a VERY THIN layer of latex caulk and weight it down with cans of "wobbly pop" or if not available, cans of soft drinks for 24 hours or so.
 
The normal turnouts are cheaper to buy than the KATO type but it is  possible to build your own for a lot less. If you go to the "FASTTRACKS"  Sp.? website, you will  find all kinds of helpful info including the templates for building just about any type of turnout. These are free to download.
 
For information on DCC, go to "Tony's Train Exchange" web site. He has a complete write up on DCC that you can download for free and print out. I found it a valuable reference.
 
As far as DCC Systems go, I am partial to the NCE starter set. The retail price is just under $200.00, but before Christmas, I saw it advertised at several places on the Internet for $155.00 to $160.00 . It is very simple to install. Connect your 2 Bus wires to the back of the panel that you have mounted to the fascia of your layout. Plug in the end of the Wall Wart transformer lead to the back of the same panel. Plug the wall wart into the wall. Plug the hand held unit into the front of the fascia mounted panel with the Phone Cord plug provided. RUN TRAINS. After I had mounted the panel to my facia, it took me less than 2 minutes to hook everything up and most of that time involved me trying to get back to my feet.
 
Of course, the previous paragraph assumes that you have thoroughly read the INSTRUCTION MANUAL that comes with the unit.
 
Sorry to have been so long winded. Good luck with whichever way you decide to go.
 
Blue Flamer.
"There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"." Dave Barry, Syndicated Columnist. "There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes." Doctor Who.
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Sunday, December 30, 2012 10:58 PM

jvivlemore
Correct. I need to be able to run the two trains without doing switching so a narrow shelf layout is definitely out. I just want to watch them run by buildings and scenery.

Oops, I missed that part. The Salt Lake Route would still be a good recommendation I think. I loved it when it came out and planned on making it, but don't have room for an overall 4x9 island.

MR has a neat little download (free) called Room Sized Plans, or something like that. In it is a nice MRL layout set in Montanaland with some good mountain scenery, although it is a bit bigger than you are asking about at 12' long. It is a twice-around continuous-loop track plan with grade separated tracks that cross over each other, enter tunnels, and there is a river scene where track follows waterway but don't remember if it crosses it.

It was designed as a table-top layout with hidden staging at the back, and even included a cement plant (rail load out) in case you ever did decide to do some switching.

Also don't over look MR's very own David Popp's  New Haven layout. It is a lot bigger being a room-size layout, but it's a wonder. There are a few parts that are designed on a HCD, and many other portions, like the paper mill, that provide great insperation. He authored a book published by MR/Kalmbach that is mostly made up for articles from MR featuring his layout, but IIRC there were a few things not covered in MR magazine that are in the book. It's a good book to have around.

There ya go MR/Popp, a free plug Geeked

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Monday, December 31, 2012 1:09 AM

I agree with blue flamer, start with Tony's Primer for DCC, if you'd like it:

http://www.tonystrains.com/tonystips/dccprimer/index.htm

Of course there is more info there as well:

Tony's Tips | Tony's Train Exchange.

MR has a few books on DCC too, they are available at the very top gray tool bar under the "shop" button.

We often suggest to newbies that they READ, READ, READ some more, then RE READ what they read! SO that it helps to eliminate any pitfalls that come with jumping in to fast.

ANY of the tracks with built-in road beds are/can be expensive. It adds up fast, even if you go with Atlas or Peco track and switches, and buy cork roadbed or the foam roadbed from Woodland Scenics to go under it {available here: http://www.wholesaletrains.com/Detail.asp?ID=20010856 } So don't let the prices "scare you".

The more track you want for your layout of any size, the more it will cost, BUT if you build your layout in stages, it helps to spread out the cost of the track.

Oh, and BTW, you can adapt any track plan meant for another scale to N scale, it will just be a smaller version in N than the stated HO or S or O/O27 scales/guages sizes.

good Luck ,and most of all, HAVE SOME FUN!

Geeked

 

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!