Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

X crossings in HO

2591 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 7 posts
X crossings in HO
Posted by sklwfea on Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:33 AM

MY 0-4-0 stops on the X every time. How can I wire this track unit to improve movement?

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 569 posts
Posted by ratled on Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:28 AM

Before you change the track have you checked the loco with a NMRA gauge?

ratled

Modeling the Klamath River area in HO on a proto-lanced sub of the SP “The State of Jefferson Line”

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,468 posts
Posted by Graffen on Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:21 AM

sklwfea

MY 0-4-0 stops on the X every time. How can I wire this track unit to improve movement?

Firstly, what make of track is it?

Secondly, what do you mean by X crossing? Is it the frog of a regular turnout? Or a crossing track?

You need to have what is called a "live frog" to improve the electrical circuitry in the turnout.

In that case you have to isolate the frog and power it with current from a polarity switch.

Swedish Custom painter and model maker. My Website:

My Railroad

My Youtube:

Graff´s channel

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,484 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, November 18, 2010 6:48 AM

Is the engine stalling or are you getting a short?

I had an Atlas 30-degree crossing on my layout.  It would short whenever an engine went over it.  I assume it was a manufacturing defect, and replaced it with a Walthers crossing.

Now, I have a stalling problem.  Back when we were discussing this on another thread, someone suggested that the plastic guard rails on some crossings are too high.  This lifts the wheels off the metal rails, and they lose contact.  For longer engines with multiple power-pickup axles, it's no problem, but for an 0-4-0 it can mean a stall.  The solution is to sand down the guard rails.  I've been doing scenery lately, so I haven't gotten around to removing the crossing from the layout to do this, but it's on the list.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 921 posts
Posted by dante on Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:47 PM

Another possible solution, at least to a stalling problem with an 0-4-0, is to add a separate pickup shoe to the loco (see Tomar) that will allow pickups to straddle the dead frog.  Shorts are another matter, of course.

Dante

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,484 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, November 19, 2010 9:43 AM

Does the 0-4-0 have a tender?  If so, adding pickups to the tender's wheels and wiring that power back to the engine will greatly improve any stalling problems.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,820 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Friday, November 19, 2010 10:36 AM

I assume that by "X" crossing he means a diamond (X is a pretty clear picture of what that looks like)

An 0-4-0 is a very small engine and will easily stall out on dead, insulated frogs. (I don't know what kind of track the original poster has, but I'll guess that it's commercial track with plastic frogs.) If the 0-4-0 is a tank engine (no separate tender) like the little "Docksider" that Bachman or Model Power (I forget which) had, it unfortunately may be completely incompatible with the particular crossing. You'd really need to auto-power the frogs somehow for such a small engine to work on the crossing. Which will not be possible with a commericial diamond with plastic frogs.

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 921 posts
Posted by dante on Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20 AM

As I mentioned, I added a pickup by Tomar to the frame of my 0-4-0 (original Varney Docksider tank). This provides a space of about 2" between the front driver pickup contact point and the Tomar.  I checked this spacing against a 30 degree crossing by Walthers/Shinohara (not installed) that has metal but insulated "frogs."  It is more than enough for the driver and added pickup to span the dead zone, even if it were all plastic.  45 and 60 degree crossings have shorter dead zones.

Dante

 

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: East Haddam, CT
  • 3,272 posts
Posted by CTValleyRR on Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:16 AM

MisterBeasley

Is the engine stalling or are you getting a short?

I had an Atlas 30-degree crossing on my layout.  It would short whenever an engine went over it.  I assume it was a manufacturing defect, and replaced it with a Walthers crossing.

Now, I have a stalling problem.  Back when we were discussing this on another thread, someone suggested that the plastic guard rails on some crossings are too high.  This lifts the wheels off the metal rails, and they lose contact.  For longer engines with multiple power-pickup axles, it's no problem, but for an 0-4-0 it can mean a stall.  The solution is to sand down the guard rails.  I've been doing scenery lately, so I haven't gotten around to removing the crossing from the layout to do this, but it's on the list.

Mr. Beasley.  I did this on my layout using a rotary tool and didn't have to remove the crossing.  A good vacuuming afterward cleaned up the plastic dust.

Connecticut Valley Railroad A Branch of the New York, New Haven, and Hartford

"If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!