Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

yard advice

15408 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Saturday, June 12, 2010 8:28 PM

train lover12
part of what i like about this layout is that i can build it in sections that can be taken apart and stored against the upper wall when not in use. i could probably also make the legs removable and store it under neath the staging yard so that it would take up no more space than a 13' long shelf layout. And as for when i am operating it, that would almost entirely be done from inside the donut. No offense but I think that is much more workable than the plan you proposed.

 I think the HOG-inspired plan certainly is buildable for a beginner. It is the "taken apart and stored when not in use" aspect I am somewhat sceptical about. There is a significant difference between a layout that can be disassembled occationally (e.g. to be taken to a modular meet) and one that must be disassembled and assembled every time you run trains.

 The most obviously workable plan so far in all your threads was probably this one:

It is of a size you can fit into your room. It can fairly easily be stowed away in a corner if/when necessary.

It has enough variety to allow you to run trains in quite a few different ways. It has a couple of sidings so you can do meets and passings. It has a little yard, that also can double as interchange tracks.

It has two distinct scenes and a workable scenery plan. If you want to add that river you were talking about, you can easily e.g do that in the upper left hand corner, letting the branch line cross over the other line and a river on a bridge of some kind.

If you get ambitious after doing phase 1, you can fairly easily put up a shelf down along the left wall for a mine branch.

But you have to decide for yourself what you want, and go build that layout.

Smile,
Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Saturday, June 12, 2010 6:53 PM
part of what i like about this layout is that i can build it in sections that can be taken apart and stored against the upper wall when not in use. i could probably also make the legs removable and store it under neath the staging yard so that it would take up no more space than a 13' long shelf layout. And as for when i am operating it, that would almost entirely be done from inside the donut. No offense but I think that is much more workable than the plan you proposed.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Saturday, June 12, 2010 5:36 PM

train lover12
okay here is the rest of the layout, now showing the closet!  what do you guys think

 Okay track plan. But is there *any* realistic chance of your parents actually letting you build a layout that fills up most of your room, and leaves you with just a narrow 2 foot corridor between your bed and the layout ?

 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Friday, June 11, 2010 4:36 PM
okay here is the rest of the layout, now showing the closet! what do you guys think of the three towns i added? are they too close together? any thing that looks bad? oh, and i realize that i have a double industry switchback (or whatever you want to call it) but the industry on the left holds 2 50' cars and the one on the right holds one, the lead holds three cars and my chosen locomotive (in this case an alco RS-1) so i wont have to mess with any industry i dont need to mess with. i was thinking i could turn the town on the lower left side into a single large industry, so what type of industries would you find in new england? and are there any free recourses you could point me to? thanks any and all help is appreciated.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Friday, June 11, 2010 10:26 AM
yeah secondary line would be the better term. any ways here is tweak #1. i only drew the yard, main, and staging. i think this yard is more user friendly. the top track is the main, 2nd is a passing siding, 3rd is the A/D track, and 4th/6th are class. tracks. the yard lead is the continuous run connection. it would be disguised by a building flat in front of it near the turnout on the left side. the reason i put the staging ladders there is that there is a closet on the top of the left wall that is 30" deep that i forgot to draw in ill add that in the next revision.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Fenton, MI
  • 289 posts
Posted by odave on Friday, June 11, 2010 9:21 AM

The operations you describe are not really for a "branch" as that type of line is commonly described.  What you have is a main line that runs through trains between City A (north staging) and City B (south staging).  It's probably a "secondary" line, given the amount of traffic you describe.  Branches typically start at a main through-line, run for a ways, then dead-end somewhere.  I guess it could still be a branch if you considered north or south staging to represent the "dead-end" of the branch.  The traffic you want still seems a bit high for a branch, but maybe it's a busy branch.

I would be inclined to rotate the layout 90 degrees counter-clockwise and slide it down to the "bottom" wall of your room, then stretch out the staging yards and curve them around on the top wall.This will let you move the staging ladders off of the layout proper to make them and the continuous running connector easier to hide.  And if you do that, arrange the trackwork from both staging yards such that the main is not going through the diverging route of the turnout.

The modeled yard's purpose is to support a local switching job that serves the on-board industries, as well as originate two transfer trains that run to City A and City B at the end of the day.  I would also add an interchange with another railroad at this yard for more variety.  You've probably got the space for an interchange track and a diamond, with the other road's main represented as a short section of "dead" track that runs into the backdrop.

I would make the siding in the lower-left longer so you can have meets between longer trains.

It seems you also have room for a single "big industry" with multiple spots for multiple car types on the bottom.  Think about your setting and era and find one that would fit.

I haven't studied each industrial scene or the yard for operations in detail, but I'm assuming more refinements are coming.  There's a switchback arrangement on the top of the yard - be aware of the limitations they bring and be sure it's what you want.

Seems like a good start to me, anyway.  Keep posting your tweaks!

--O'Dave
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Friday, June 11, 2010 1:52 AM
so i think ive come up with a pretty good plan: ok here is my plan. the way it would work is that a through train would come out of the top staging yard (lets call it north)into the yard. it would leave the caboose on the branch (actually the main) and pull into the A/D track and drop the inbound cars that would already have been sorted at the previous yard so they would be at the end. then it would use the main and pick up the caboose and head around into south staging. then the cars would be sorted and a local would drop cars at local industries. some time another through train would come from south staging and drop off some cars then go into north staging. then a train would be made up to serve the industries along the branch. the train would drop off inbounds and pick up outbounds. the out bounds would be sorted back in the yard and eventually two outbound trains would be made up. they then would leave to their respective staging. in the layout the continuous run connection would be disguised/hidden. so how does all this sound? does the plan look good? i think i may want to rework the yard a bit so that its easier to use from staging. any thing that isnt clear? just ask. does it seem workable?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 6:10 PM

 

markpierce

A classification yard at the "end" of the branch is incongruous.  Typically, branchline terminals serve industries.  The "yard" there isn't to classify trains: to break-up trains only to resort them into new trains.  It is to receive cars to be distributed to local industries and then reassemble cars into a train to return to the "rest of the world."   While some cars may have been picked up or are yet to be delivered along the branchline, there is little need to "classify" since everything is destined to be shipped back to the mainline.   You'd be better off with industrial spurs rather than the several classification tracks.  Industries are essential, a run-around track is convenient, and engine terminal is optional because engine servicing is mostly done "back home" somewhere on the mainline.

 Mark make a good point here. You quite possibly could get more interesting operations out of a different type of yard.

 Here is a yard track plan heavily based on a yard from Jack Gutsch's "Minneapolis and St. Loius" from the 2007 issue of Great Model Railroads (http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=a&id=1567):

 

 As you can see, this yard area has quite a few (six) local industries, and still has room to turn a train of up to 12-13 cars or so (on the main, using the runaround behind the freight house/depot

 It is about 10 x 2 feet in H0 scale - ie should fit reasonably well in about 6 feet of length by 15" of depth in N scale. It it was going to be used as an end-of-track element, the end of track should be towards the right - allowing a little tail on the main on the right.

 Anyways - time for me to hit the sack.

 Smile,
 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 4:15 PM

I like that last sketch that Stein came up with, that is a really nice design. Too big? Trust me, if you go with a smaller HOG type layout, you'll be wishing you did a more interesting, fun, plenty of operations opportunities type of layout.

What I'm saying is, make sure you don't get bored after a few months. I'm so glad I went with a bigger layout for my first time, and guess what, I'm already expanding into the next room!

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 2:40 PM
wow that looks really cool. but i think it might be a little too big for my first layout. what i like about the HOG is that it is relatively small in area but gives a long run (about 26 feet). also i think i will be able to keep the sections separate so that when im not using it i can take it apart and store it against the wall.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 2:16 PM

train lover12
i don't really get what you're picturing, could you make a sketch?

 

(Edit: irrelevant comment removed)

Here:

 

 

Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:26 PM
i don't really get what you're picturing, could you make a sketch? that does sound interesting. to get my round 'n' round fix i could also just get a 3x4 sheet of plywood or something and put a loop of track on it. but for now i think ill keep moving forward with the HOG style layout. i think i have an idea for a small yard : this would go against the wall with the high window, the closet is to the left and the bed is below. the yard would be a small junction yard with the main line (in staging). the traffic on the branch would be light. there would only be a couple of through trains every day. at the opposite end of the branch from the yard is a connection to another rr with trackage rights agreements so this route could be used for fast freights and passengers. there will be some occasional through trains because the main is old and is reaching its max. traffic density (plans are being formed to fix that). so does this look like it would work?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 11:10 AM

train lover12
yeah modelling just one town is definitely an option but i like being able to follow my train around a lot. another idea that i just had would be to do a HOG type of layout with staging on a Wye going into the closet. does that sound workable?

 

 Sure. But if your main goal is to maximize the run length for a single train, you can get even more run length by simply dropping the continuous run requirement, and do a layout on narrow shelves up along the left wall, right out on a peninsula, down along the peninsula towards the window, back on the outside of the peninsula (the side towards your bed), and finally back along the upper end of the table and along the top of your left wall up towards your closet.

Get you say four or five fairly big scenes (along left wall), down along inside of peninsula, along outside of peninsula, top of peninsula, last wall.

 No staging, no big classification yard. You have a small yard (just a few double ended tracks which ends in a small piece of track long enough for an engine and a caboose) at one of the ends, where cars has been dropped off for your branch line.

At the last destination (or perhaps second to last) you have a runaround, so you can get your engine on the other end of the cars for heading back.

You go pick up your engine at an engine house, sort inbound cars according to how you plan to spot them at industries, and then trundle on down the line to serve four or five small communities that visually are separated from each other.

Smile,
Stein


 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 10:06 AM
yeah modelling just one town is definitely an option but i like being able to follow my train around a lot. another idea that i just had would be to do a HOG type of layout with staging on a Wye going into the closet. does that sound workable? ill post a preliminary plan in a bit.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 8:39 AM

train lover12
the features i would like are, single track mainline, two staging yards (one for each end of RR), one classification yard, 2 or more towns, 15 inch minimum mainline radius (other can go smaller, 12 inch absolute minimum), i would like to model the new haven rr in the mid 1950's,

 

 Mmmm - would it be fair to say that you are probably wanting to follow along with your train as it moves from junction to town A to town B to yard, and maybe down the branchline?

 Rather than visualizing being in a spot where a train arrives from somewhere else, does something more or less interesting, maybe interacts with other trains arriving from somewhere else in some way (interchange, taking a siding, a block swap, whatever), and then departs for somewhere else again?

 The latter type of layout is a lot easier to model in little space. In principle it consists of modeling one place on e.g. 75% of a 4x8 foot table, using the last 25% narrow stripe of the table behind the backdrop to allow a few trains to arrive from somewhere else or depart for somewhere else.

 Say something like Marty McGuirk's Androscogging Central (from his starting in N scale book). I googled, and found an early version of his plan (then named "Pine Tree Central" - in honor of the pioneering Carolina Central) over on railroad-line forums, in this thread: http://www.railroad-line.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=22305&whichpage=1

 Looks like this:

 

 Just one town. But room for running trains from two railroads, interchanging cars between the two, local switching, a couple of industries on one trailing point spur (relative to the interchange track), some big industries on facing point spurs, with an ingeniously located runaround.

 Marty was not trying to model the run of a train from junction to end of line. He was trying to create a believable place where the trains will arrive, do something and then depart from.

 Maybe an option for you too ?

 Smile,
 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Fenton, MI
  • 289 posts
Posted by odave on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 7:00 AM

train lover12
...they seem good at first but as i give them closer and closer examinations and the new plan smell wears off and i find that i like it a lot less.

 

Be aware that it's likely that you'll find this happening with any plan you find or come up with.  This is why its important to write down the features and scenes that you want in the layout most, and keep going back to that list to remind yourself of what's important when you find yourself in the weeds.  

You probably did this in your other threads, but I don't have the time to review them now.

Just don't get discouraged, and don't expect to find or come up with a plan that's perfect in every way - otherwise you'll be waiting for a long time.   If you want something more concrete, maybe make sure that your top 3 or 5 or 7 druthers are covered by a plan, and that will probably be good enough to get started.

--O'Dave
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 1:31 AM
oh, i forgot to say, its N scale. and ive looked all over this site and the rest of the internet but havent found anything that inspires me either.
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 258 posts
Posted by J.Rob on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 1:22 AM

If that is HO scale the 15 inch curves will cause a lot of problems for you. I would suggest using a larger curve so that you will not be limited to very short cars and very small locos. Some equipment can be run on really tight curves but it all looks better on larger curves.

I would suggest looking at  some plans in the model railroader data base for some ways to put in the tracks and operational goals you want. Even if you can only increase the space for your turn back curves and then pinch the layout down in the middle you might be happier with what you build. I am in the planning stage of my layout and I am looking at 36 R min for the main line by comparison. This is going to cause me to make trade offs with regard to what will fit trackwise but the 2-10-4s and 2-6-6-6s will look a lot better going around curves that are not near their minimums.

If your space limits you to something with less than the ideal space you may consider a switching layout with out the continuous run feature, several of them have been built over the years and you may get to incorporate this layout into a larger one when space becomes more available.

What ever you decide to build you will need to build to your wants and tastes. Good luck with your layout.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 1:01 AM
yeah ive gone through a lot of ideas and plans, the reason is that they seem good at first but as i give them closer and closer examinations and the new plan smell wears off and i find that i like it a lot less. i dont know if it is just me or if it is like this for every one but no plan or part of a plan has jumped out at me so i hope that if we get rid of all the unneeded limitations that i may see something i will like in the long run. by the way if you do decide to help you dont have to follow all of my druthers i gave. i will just try to fit what i can into the plans.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:46 AM
yeah i did base my layout on his. i guess you shouldn't copy an idea without understanding it fully. the layout is that shape and size because i based it on 2 HCD's, i thought it would be easier to construct. now i think i can get a better layout shape for my money. my problem is that i just cant think that way. i am nearly incapable of thinking abstract thoughts like that, so i guess i am asking for help again. any ideas for a basic layout shape? i only need a basic benchwork shape and rough idea of mainline location and shape. My layout room is 13x13 but also serves as my bedroom. Here is a scale diagram of the room: the furniture can be rearranged, one of the dressers may be removed and the closet may be used. the features i would like are, single track mainline, two staging yards (one for each end of RR), one classification yard, 2 or more towns, 15 inch minimum mainline radius (other can go smaller, 12 inch absolute minimum), i would like to model the new haven rr in the mid 1950's, any more info i should have added? will all this even fit in my space? thanks for any and all help
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:43 AM
Plan he is posting now is based on a David Popp plan. 

Room plan (layout is oriented with staging along left wall, stub end of staging at lower left hand corner):

 

He has gotten a few suggestions for alternate plans before, both here and at the trainboard forums.

Here is a link to the kid's previous thread from a while back here (back in Feb 2010), where the room is described: http://cs.trains.com/trccs/forums/t/168641.aspx?PageIndex=1

 Here is a  link to one of the threads he did at trainboard (in March 2010): http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?t=119066

 

Smile
Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:35 AM

I trust there will be an aisle at the bottom of the plan.  If not, a three-foot reach is a bit too much for an industrial/switching area.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:27 AM

A classification yard at the "end" of the branch is incongruous.  Typically, branchline terminals serve industries.  The "yard" there isn't to classify trains: to break-up trains only to resort them into new trains.  It is to receive cars to be distributed to local industries and then reassemble cars into a train to return to the "rest of the world."   While some cars may have been picked up or are yet to be delivered along the branchline, there is little need to "classify" since everything is destined to be shipped back to the mainline.   You'd be better off with industrial spurs rather than the several classification tracks.  Industries are essential, a run-around track is convenient, and engine terminal is optional because engine servicing is mostly done "back home" somewhere on the mainline.

Mark

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 10:31 PM

Either coincidentally or purposefully, you've copied much of David Popp's original New Haven Naugatuck Valley layout from Model Railroader January 2003. (For some reason, this layout isn't in the on-line track plan database).

He was planning this to be part of his larger layout later and that had an effect on the way he designed his layout. It's probably not the ideal use of the space if the layout isn't going to be expanded upon.

If you have access on three sides or all sides of the layout, there could be better track plan choices to provide more engaging operation.

One thing his original layout has that creates more flexibility is two staging yards, one for each direction, where you have only one. In place of the visible yard you chose, he has an industrial area.

The operating pattern you describe, where every branchline train runs to the yard, wouldn't necessarily be typical of real life, unless that was an interchange yard with another railroad (which would be a nice enhancement).

In any case, if you are interested in operation, there is possibly more that can be achieved in the same space. But as with so many designs that are posted here, it is difficult to know without knowing the dimensions of the rest of the room to understand alternatives.

If you happen to be copying David Popp's layout, which is fine, just be aware that he always intended it to be part of a larger plan and made some choices because of that are not necessarily optimal for this space as a standalone layout.

If you came up with the design yourself, there may be other choices in the same space (after considering aisles) that would yield more operating interest.

If you decide to keep the configuration as drawn, give some thought to making the visible yard an interchange yard with another railroad. That would create a valid justification for most branch trains to work there (as well as adding interest on its own).

Best of luck.

Byron

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 5:56 PM

train lover12

Another option i thoight of is just use cassette staging, the only problem with that that i can think ofr is that in order to hold a full train it would have to be around 3 1/2 feet long.  i think something this long would be too hard too handle.  What do you guys think is the better option? 

I have both fixed and cassette staging.  The cassettes are lengths of steel stud, closed at one end, with flex track laid inside (rain gutter fashion) and secured with latex caulk.  The 'standard' length is 56.5 inches (and if that dimension sounds familiar, it should!) with a few longer and a few more shorter.  I store them on shelf brackets on the wall closest to the cassette dock.

The cassettes only originate about 5% of my total schedule, maybe four trains a 'day' (which may take a month of brief sessions to operate.)  Everything else operates from fixed staging.  Everything backs in, so there's no turning anything end-for-end in either stub staging or cassettes - but my layout is designed to make that possible.

I have also been operating a detached 'end of the railroad' module with (shorter) cassettes for every arrival and departure.  It's never operated for much more at a time than one train in - one train out even though it has a published schedule of a dozen trains each way each 'day.'  Operating EVERYTHING to and from cassettes is a royal pain in the rudderpost!

You did one thing VERY right!  You provided staging from the start as, "The rest of the world."  (Well, the rest of North America.)  Like yours, my planning from the beginning involved providing places in, "The rest of Japan," for National Railways trains to come from and go to.  Without staging, you end up with something like the CNJ Bronx Terminal - even then, it was connected to the rest of North America by 1:1 scale cassettes, aka car floats.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with LOTS of staging)

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 5:14 PM

the right yard is staging it represents the rest of the world so i think iget more out of it this way.  I could switch the railroad around so that the active yard is on the right and staging is on the left, then i could have enough room to make the lead a bit longer.  Another option i thoight of is just use cassette staging, the only problem with that that i can think ofr is that in order to hold a full train it would have to be around 3 1/2 feet long.  i think something this long would be too hard too handle.  What do you guys think is the better option? 

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Flyertown, USA
  • 640 posts
Posted by Timboy on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 5:13 PM

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 4:54 PM
.
Timboy

HI Kyle:

Maybe I don't understand your concept clearly.  I can see that each yard is dedicated to service a town/industry.  I'm thinking that the rear yard can be serviced by one of the loco sidings from the front yard, but not conveniently and it appears that that yard (rear) is actually the more important yard because it services two town/industry groups.  Perhaps a similar loco pocket for the rear yard?  It looks like you have the space.  Otherwise, nice trackwork to get the rear yard servicing the lower town/industry.  I think that scenic breaks are key to making the town/industry groups seem farther apart, geographically.

-Timboy

Not really, the one on the left is staging and the other is the terminus for the branch. by the way there will be a backdrop between the two yards and down the center (longways) of the loop. and can you explain more what you mean? i dont get it
  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Flyertown, USA
  • 640 posts
Posted by Timboy on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 2:25 PM

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!