Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

why not 2"x4" benchwork

22258 views
39 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Asheville, North Carolina
  • 71 posts
Posted by Alan Robinson on Friday, November 13, 2009 6:03 PM

A useful technique for fabricating L girders I have used was to rip them from a straight 2 x 4. This left an L member 1.5" wide by 3.5" high with a piece of .75 x 2 left over. I could then use the left over piece for risers or what have you. I didn't have to glue and screw together any members to make the L members. I used these for both legs and beams to construct the benchwork frame. Using L girders definitely makes the assembly of other benchwork members easier and results in a very stiff piece of benchwork.

One drawback of this can be that the benchwork is rather deep and can create a situation of "banged heads" if it is rather low. In my younger days I could put up with that but as I get older and less flexible it is more of a problem. Still, if I had to do it over I would give careful consideration to the same technique.

Alan Robinson Asheville, North Carolina
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,908 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, November 13, 2009 6:42 PM

The original premise behind L girder construction was that it did not require a great deal of precision and/or carpentry skill to assemble.  Remember, this was before the general availability of the relatively inexpensive power tools we have today.  No one had a power drill, battery operated screwdrivers hadn't been invented yet, you were lucky if you had a scroll saw, and a lot of folks were trying to cut plywood with a keyhole saw.

L girder construction only had one purpose, and that was to support a model railroad.  I think I read someplace that it was just about useless for any other purpose, but that it was excellent for what it was supposed to do.  It was also economical in its use of wood.

Someone mentioned that they cringe when they hear about a person ripping a sheet of plywood into 3 inch pieces to assemble a table.  The purpose of doing this is because a 1 X 3 made from a multi-ply piece of wood is less expensive than an equivalent dimensional 1 X 3, is straighter, is a true size (not 3/4 X 1-1/2), and is more dimensionally stable.  The guy I railroad with has a 32 X 70 room with a room addition about 32 X 32.  The railroad has multiple levels.  All of his benchwork is open grid made from 3 inch strips of plywood.  I can assure you that it is plenty strong.

The use of a 2 X 4 in model railroad table construction is overkill, unless someone is giving you the wood.  Even then I think I would think twice about using it.  But the bottom line is that one can use whatever they want, even 4 X 4 and 2 X 6 if they want.  I think I remember seeing where someone actually had built a railroad scene on a piece of old log.  So, whatever works for you.

 

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Womelsdorf
  • 756 posts
Posted by HEdward on Friday, November 13, 2009 8:40 PM

Exactly what I built for my first step.  6'x20' with 2"x4"s and 3/4" plywood.  Basically, a floor about 3ft over the floor.  Tons of storage space below, and strudy enough to support people working on the two layouts.  The layout above will use alot of OLD 2x4s gathered from various undisclosed locations and most likely half inch plywood.  They may be overkill, but they're on hand.  Strong?  Yeah, the "table" might as well be a granite outcropping.

Proud to be DD-2itized! 1:1 scale is too unrealistic. Twins are twice as nice!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 2,751 posts
Posted by Allegheny2-6-6-6 on Friday, November 13, 2009 8:57 PM

 I have seen a lot of 2x4 bench work and the sections I salvaged from my old railroad are in fact 2'x4' isit over kill yes except you have the option to get up on top of the bench work and do work in hard to reach places where others who have used 1x4 don't plus most 1x4 you buy now is warped as a pretzel so another option is to cut what ever size u want from 3/4" plywood

 

 

 

Just my 2 cents worth, I spent the rest on trains. If you choked a Smurf what color would he turn?
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Nashville, TN area
  • 713 posts
Posted by hardcoalcase on Friday, November 13, 2009 9:05 PM

2"x4"... not even for legs... not even if free.  I rip studs free-hand with a power saw for 2"x2" legs; takes about a minute. 

Gee... why use a 2"x4" when a 4"x4" will work just as well?!? Smile,Wink, & Grin

Jim 

 

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Womelsdorf
  • 756 posts
Posted by HEdward on Friday, November 13, 2009 9:13 PM

I will not use them for a house, I will not use them for a mouse.  Not on a box, not with a fox.  Not in the rain, not for my trains.  On the other hand, Sam-I-Am has convinced me to eat Green Eggs and Ham.

Proud to be DD-2itized! 1:1 scale is too unrealistic. Twins are twice as nice!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Saturday, November 14, 2009 7:35 AM

Moonguy63,

Yes, there are 52 - 2x2 legs under my 11x15 layout.  They are spaced about 3 feet apart going east/west, and about 2 feet apart going north/south.  The layout is NOT attached to the walls, so obviously their are also legs around the perimeter.  And, as I have a 2 percent grade that runs around to a lower level to staging tracks, more legs than otherwise necessary are needed.  And yes, there is room for this 65 year old, 5'10", 225 lb guy to wind himself under the layout to reach all of the underside.

I've posted a number of pictures in this forum under "layout update" and that will give you a better picture of what I did. 

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:47 AM

rob.m
I have seen just about every way to build a layout except a simple 2"x4" constructed bench. I thought i would try something different this time but every thing else just seems to be more to do whith no benafit unless it is to be portable.

I inherited a partially finished layout with 2"x4" construction.  While I was working on finishing it, every time I went to drill a new hole (especially big 1"+ holes) I wondered what the original builder was thinking.   Every time I went to add a control plate, indicator light, or other thing to the outside frame and had to cut through all that, I wondered what the original builder was thinking.  It seemed that every time I tried to drill a hole from the top I ran into a 2"x4".   I had to offset more turnout motors than normal, etc.  It is amazing how much extra material that extra 1" of board puts in-the-way under the board when working on stuff.  Just from that experience I swore off 2"x4"s as a construction material.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, November 14, 2009 11:48 AM

Maxman, I didn't quote you (too long) but there are a few spots where I would differ:

Electric power drills were available at Sears in the early '50s - I know because I bought one.  Not sure when hand circular saws were first sold, but it was quite a while ago.

My cringe in reference to ripping up a plywood sheet for dimension lumber referred to the amount of work involved and sawdust generated, not to the strength of the result.  By the time a typical amateur sawyer finishes cutting up a sheet of plywood, I would have the equivalent steel stud benchwork erected and would be installing risers.

I remember a bit in MRR a long time ago where the cash-strapped modeler asked his friends to give him any scrap wood they found.  Some of it was heavy hardwood, so hard that he had to drill starter holes for nails.  (Just the use of nails dates the article - and me!)  Once the layout was built and scenic cover had been applied, who could tell what had gone into the benchwork?

If someone wants super strength, they should look into Glue-Lam engineered joists...

Aside to Mark Pierce - a sun-proof garage is infinitely better than working on the Edwards flight line...

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Virginia Beach
  • 2,150 posts
Posted by tangerine-jack on Saturday, November 14, 2009 6:56 PM

I use 2x4 and 5/8 ply.  Overkill?  Maybe.   Heavy?  Don't know, the concrete floor shows no signs of stress.  Portability?  Where will I take my home layout and why?  Wood quality?  I pick 'em out myself and I don't buy the crap.

I've had lots of layouts built with 1x4 L girder, it's fine, they work and I've never had one collapse.  2x4s work just as well, and as mentioned, when it's all said and done nobody's going to see it anyway.

The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!