Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Layout Plan

5226 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Thursday, December 15, 2016 4:48 PM

Hey Lynn-

Keep in mind that the yard in the upper right corner is not quite so crowded. The innermost line is not a siding but rather represents a screen. I think. Might be solid and completely hide the staging yard, or maybe just a line of trees, fences, small structures, etc to give the impression of a screen. A psychological screen.

Robert 

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Thursday, December 15, 2016 4:54 PM

ROBERT PETRICK

Hey Lynn-

Keep in mind that the yard in the upper right corner is not quite so crowded. The innermost line is not a siding but rather represents a screen. I think. Might be solid and completely hide the staging yard, or maybe just a line of trees, fences, small structures, etc to give the impression of a screen. A psychological screen.

Robert 

 

Yep I realized that after looking a couple times.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:15 PM

carl425
I've gone back through this thread and I don't see anywhere where you have expressed your operational goals for this layout.  What type of operations are you trying to support?  Do you want to operate the layout as a simulation of a real railroad or do you just want to run trains?  Do you just want an outlet for your artistic energy? You reject the yard so I guess you don't want to originate/terminate trains.  You reject staging so there is no source/destination for run through trains.  What is it you want to do with this layout? There are no wrong answers.  It's your railroad, your choices, but an understanding of what you want out of the layout would be most useful to those trying to help you. wickman How would you access a train in the Staging yard? Are you perhaps confusing the staging yard with the fiddle yard?  You park assembled trains in a staging yard.  Think of it as the actors waiting in the wings for their turn on stage.  A fiddle yard is where you move cars on and off the layout by hand to make up/put away trains. btw, I like Steve's plan a lot (but then I'm not building it)

Hi Carl

 Yes many questions you have and I will try to address each.

 

My Operational goals are very simple, there not  on the top of my List but  yes if I feel a need to switch some cars I would like to have  it make scence. I would preer to simply run trains and at the most two 5  or 6 car trains. 

I have DCC along with Tortoise switch machines connected to the DCC via DS64's. I have often  thought I would like a simple control panel. 

I have not rejected the thought of a staging yard but I'm  struggling with loosing  space for scenery. To tell you the truth I don't understand what you mean by " originate/terminate trains " , this is probably because I have always been simply a train runner. 

 

I  do understand the Staging yard is  behind the false screen in the upper right corner and know  what it is for, I  had a gigantic staging yard on a  layout in the same room with the same sort of benchwork and the staging yard was on a lower level that went down around the  walls on a 2 % grade. I didn't find much use for it because  once again back then operations didn't interest me  but building the layout did.

 

To tell  you the honest truth I think Steve did a very good  job  on his plan and  give him 2 BIG THUMBS UP and have not written it off,I'm simply  making comparisons to my benchwork also I  like his  idea of a hidden staging  but have never done this idea before with a hidden  screen and have no  experience with it and my thoughts are to hold its construction would steal a bit more  valuable space,  but have read about modelers doing this with lanoleum flooring because  of its smooth surface and being very bendable. 

I also really like the idea of the lower left loop going into a tunnel to break up the Loop ( Brilliant idea ) .

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,682 posts
Posted by Lone Wolf and Santa Fe on Thursday, December 15, 2016 7:24 PM

Correct. I removed the reverse loop. It will save you a lot of wiring headaches to leave it out. I moved the passing siding to be near the industrial area so it has a reason to be.

You don't need to hide the staging. I prefer to have mine in the open. It just looks like a yard, which you need anyway. I added a couple of tracks to the top of the page to create a staging yard. Now you have a place to park a couple of trains when not in use. You can add more if you wish.

I liked the track plan that Steve created but it may be too busy for you because it concentrates more on switching that running trains. Maybe you can use ideas from both. You should check out the track plan for the Cajon Pass layout in this months magazine. It is similar to what your idea is. Basically it’s just a big loop designed for running trains through the scenery with limited switching. It has a nice big staging yard that holds several trains.

http://www.trainweb.org/lonewolfsantafe/postpla2.gif

Modeling a fictional version of California set in the 1990s Lone Wolf and Santa Fe Railroad
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 223 posts
Posted by Choops on Friday, December 16, 2016 6:46 AM

With the staging yard along the back wall you can put a backdrop in front of it or build a liftout foam mountain to access.

You will only need to access the staging yard if there is a derailment in there.

Stageing will allow you to store trains on the layout.  If you dont have one you will need to store the trains somewhere off the layout.  In my experience the less you handle the trains the less they get broken. And it is a process to pack away 15 cars and set up another 15 vs. flipping a switch.

You dont need to build all the town areas I have shown.  I draw it in to see what is possible but most usually lay these areas out by hand at the build stage.  What looks neat from the top on paper does not always look right in 3d and may need to be adjusted or left out.  If you dont want the main yard replace it with a smaller switching area.  That works too.  With staging you won't need a main yard.

if you have the bench work built already. you would only need to narrow the top left section and lengthen the peninsula.  Now is the time to do it.  I had built all my benchwork (layout is 22' x 24') and started to layout roadbed then decided to make a change.  I tore out everything accept along one wall.  I don't regret it.  Wood is the cheap part.

Steve

P.s. I really like the cajun pass layout this month also.

 

 

Modeling Union Pacific between Cheyenne and Laramie in 1957 (roughly)
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 223 posts
Posted by Choops on Friday, December 16, 2016 7:29 AM

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15621668_10209933187040619_1481220691384588872_n.jpg?oh=4a5deb115a0d06b20cd73dddb152716a&oe=58EADD53

 

Simplified the plan. 

Moved the staging for easier access.  More visable track along back wall for mountain or river scene.  You can look along the wall behind the backdrop to see what is there.  added an access to the top corner also.  Staging tracks are 10' long.

Slow time at work.

Steve

Modeling Union Pacific between Cheyenne and Laramie in 1957 (roughly)
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Friday, December 16, 2016 10:28 AM

Lone Wolf and Santa Fe

Correct. I removed the reverse loop. It will save you a lot of wiring headaches to leave it out. I moved the passing siding to be near the industrial area so it has a reason to be.

You don't need to hide the staging. I prefer to have mine in the open. It just looks like a yard, which you need anyway. I added a couple of tracks to the top of the page to create a staging yard. Now you have a place to park a couple of trains when not in use. You can add more if you wish.

I liked the track plan that Steve created but it may be too busy for you because it concentrates more on switching that running trains. Maybe you can use ideas from both. You should check out the track plan for the Cajon Pass layout in this months magazine. It is similar to what your idea is. Basically it’s just a big loop designed for running trains through the scenery with limited switching. It has a nice big staging yard that holds several trains.

http://www.trainweb.org/lonewolfsantafe/postpla2.gif

 

I'm DCC so wiring  is simpilfied with autoreversers. Never too many ideas.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Friday, December 16, 2016 10:33 AM

Choops

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15621668_10209933187040619_1481220691384588872_n.jpg?oh=4a5deb115a0d06b20cd73dddb152716a&oe=58EADD53

 

Simplified the plan. 

Moved the staging for easier access.  More visable track along back wall for mountain or river scene.  You can look along the wall behind the backdrop to see what is there.  added an access to the top corner also.  Staging tracks are 10' long.

Slow time at work.

Steve

 

I spent a bit of time in xtrakcad to get a better feel  for your first idea, of course the second idea has potential as well. I'm not done but this is what I've done so  far . I'm a bit concerned with the left loop/tunnel , its easy enough to elevate the rail coming from the left wall and into the loop above grid level but lowering it to go below the upper track  in  the tunnel  and then reappearing is a bit of a mind spin for me . Hiding the tunnel is easy  enough with a building or two in front.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Friday, December 16, 2016 10:20 PM

I couldn't contain myself, I had to test the theory with the left loop to the tunnel , a bit crude but I can see it better now. I'm still not sold on the staging yard going all the way up to the top and around the corner but I can see it happening shorter and further down on the same side.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Friday, December 16, 2016 11:38 PM

Lookin' good Lynn!

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Saturday, December 17, 2016 9:34 AM

Thanks Dave, I'm not completely sold on the 4" high loop yep , means the are in the loop has to be raised up the same and that will all be sawmill and related. We will see.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Friday, December 23, 2016 12:30 AM

I'm back seeking  somemore help and ideas after getting  such great results from you's. 

I decided that no reverse loops will be needed but what I would like to do and seeking better ways of doing it is to keep the continuous loop but also be able to utilize the turntable and two tracks that are leading to it, we'll call  the exits east and west , idea is , no matter which way the train  is traveling  I want to be  able to stop the train  , disconnect from  train and use run around to enter to the rail to the turntable  on both the right side tracks and the left side  track. 

 

My problem is I'm having a hard time accepting the fact that I would have to reach across over buildings to connect/disconnect to the cars.  

What other way can  I do this so I can have the continuous run option but also have proper Turntable use? Is  the location  I've specified the  best or are there other options you's see?

 

Apparently this  is the way to run continuous but also do  operations with the use of a Turntable.

 

If more information is needed please don't hesitate to ask and I will provide. The Turntable is a 90 foot which takes 13 inch mount hole.

Thanks

Lynn

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Friday, December 23, 2016 2:05 PM

Hi Lynn:

Have you considered magnetic uncouplers at the two locations where the cars need to be uncoupled? Personally I would go with the electromagnetic ones so the uncoupling function can be turned off when not needed. I have heard that out of the box the Kadee electromagnetic uncouplers dont work all that well but I recall seeing articles on how to improve their reliability. Maybe someone can link to one.

Coupling the cars shouldn't require you to reach in as long as you do it on the short straight sections above the turnouts (he says, firmly believing that all couplers will work perfectlySmile, Wink & Grin).

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Friday, December 23, 2016 2:41 PM

Dave I have tried magnetic uncouplers a few  layouts back and they were very unpredictable at  best  , my buddy tried the drop away ones  and because he enjoys  his operations  opted  away  from the uncouplers all  together  and uses the skewer.  I figure if I'm going to try the Operations  side I would  prefer the manual uncouplers. I'm still playing around in xtrackcad to  see if I can make it work.  I hate to say it but I may have to resort to print out of the  TT  area and work it through  with pencil, xtrackcad just  isn't cooperating and my imagination is growing thinner by the  day.

I was more curious from guys with experience if  this was the  right idea for Operations and Continuous  Run.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 24, 2016 8:47 AM

wickman

I'm back seeking  somemore help and ideas after getting  such great results from you's. 

I decided that no reverse loops will be needed but what I would like to do and seeking better ways of doing it is to keep the continuous loop but also be able to utilize the turntable and two tracks that are leading to it, we'll call  the exits east and west , idea is , no matter which way the train  is traveling  I want to be  able to stop the train  , disconnect from  train and use run around to enter to the rail to the turntable  on both the right side tracks and the left side  track. 

 

My problem is I'm having a hard time accepting the fact that I would have to reach across over buildings to connect/disconnect to the cars.  

What other way can  I do this so I can have the continuous run option but also have proper Turntable use? Is  the location  I've specified the  best or are there other options you's see?

 

Apparently this  is the way to run continuous but also do  operations with the use of a Turntable.

 

If more information is needed please don't hesitate to ask and I will provide. The Turntable is a 90 foot which takes 13 inch mount hole.

Thanks

Lynn

 

 

Move the turntable to where the switch leading to the turntable currently is located.  This should provide room (providing that the TT fits there) to have locomotive storage tracks or a roundhouse if desired.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, December 24, 2016 9:09 AM

i think you need to space (passing) sidings roughly halfway around the loop if you want to be able to run two trains in opposite directions with less interference (top left instead of top right.   For this purpose, there is no need to uncouple cars, just hold a complete train until the other train passes.

Additional sidings are of course useful to hold trains/cars or as run-around tracks (left side) for locating cars on facing (not trailing) turnouts.

not sure why you need two connections to the turntable.   May also be better to connect the turntable to a siding track instead of the main before the sidings, unless you're thinking of it as a yard lead (but then that inside spur (right side) would be better suited on the outside of the siding tracks.

a single spur can be used for multiple industries.

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Saturday, December 24, 2016 12:21 PM

BMMECNYC

 

 
wickman

I'm back seeking  somemore help and ideas after getting  such great results from you's. 

I decided that no reverse loops will be needed but what I would like to do and seeking better ways of doing it is to keep the continuous loop but also be able to utilize the turntable and two tracks that are leading to it, we'll call  the exits east and west , idea is , no matter which way the train  is traveling  I want to be  able to stop the train  , disconnect from  train and use run around to enter to the rail to the turntable  on both the right side tracks and the left side  track. 

 

My problem is I'm having a hard time accepting the fact that I would have to reach across over buildings to connect/disconnect to the cars.  

What other way can  I do this so I can have the continuous run option but also have proper Turntable use? Is  the location  I've specified the  best or are there other options you's see?

 

Apparently this  is the way to run continuous but also do  operations with the use of a Turntable.

 

If more information is needed please don't hesitate to ask and I will provide. The Turntable is a 90 foot which takes 13 inch mount hole.

Thanks

Lynn

 

 

 

 

Move the turntable to where the switch leading to the turntable currently is located.  This should provide room (providing that the TT fits there) to have locomotive storage tracks or a roundhouse if desired.

 

Yes I agree with moving the TT North , problem is the Reach factor to the east sidings. I'm  working on moving the West and East sidings closer to the isle but I do like  the idea of moving the TT upward.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Saturday, December 24, 2016 12:28 PM

Yes Greg I did  finally figure that much out that there is no need for  West and East Turnouts below the sidings. The reason I'm  doing this is so I can work in proper operations using the sidings and turntable West and East , I'm not doing this  for a two  train continuous run although when its done I should have that option.I'm attemping to move both sidings so there reachable, its taken a while but I think I've got the hang of manipulating the turnouts to connect on curves etc, I realize now the hours I spent years ago in xtrackcad was on a destop not a laptop, what  a  difference.Crying

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Saturday, December 24, 2016 2:34 PM

Ok guys I  think  I have it where it needs to be as far as West and East sidings and access to TT goes. Any thoughts or ideas on this plan ? Any  ideas for tweaking the operations side of it for switching cars in and out of industries  , thoughts?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Monday, December 26, 2016 5:26 PM

Hi Lynn:

I like it! The 32" reach in might require a bit of a stretch but you don't seem to have planned a lot of structures between that turnout and the aisle. You will have to be careful with telephone lines and lighting poles obviously.

Your plan has improved a lot from where you started!

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Canada
  • 1,284 posts
Posted by wickman on Tuesday, December 27, 2016 12:21 AM

hon30critter

Hi Lynn:

I like it! The 32" reach in might require a bit of a stretch but you don't seem to have planned a lot of structures between that turnout and the aisle. You will have to be careful with telephone lines and lighting poles obviously.

Your plan has improved a lot from where you started!

Dave

 

Thanks Dave ,I'm going to work this week to get the turntable area and yards tweaked this week. Credit goes to suggestions and Steve's plan rework. 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!