Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

track compatibility

1066 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
dlg
  • Member since
    October 2009
  • 3 posts
track compatibility
Posted by dlg on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:48 PM

I am fairly new at model railroading and am in the process of building an HO layout (6 x 10).  I have a number of Atlas code 100 sectional track and turnouts from a previous layout which I had to dismantle.  I plan to incorporate flex track in the new layout in order to obtain greater radii on the curves.  Recently I discovered a shop in my area that sells Model Power 36 inch superflex track for $13.99 for a box of 5 pieces while the cheapest Atlas flex track is $24.99 for a box of 5 pieces.  My question is how well does the Model Power track line up with the Atlas track I have?

Grandpa L

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:55 PM

If both brands are Code 100, they'll work together. I've used track from several manufacturers and never had trouble with things lining up properly. I also mix brass and NS track with no problem.

Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
dlg
  • Member since
    October 2009
  • 3 posts
Posted by dlg on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:59 PM

Thanks, Tom!  They are both code 100 so that answers my question.  I really appreciate it.......Larry

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Jenison, MI
  • 133 posts
Posted by analog kid on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 4:37 PM

Just be a little careful. Model Power flextrak can be a little stiff, and it is a little hard to get the rail joiners on at times.

Other than that, i have no problem using model power track.

As surely as the day is long, I am the Analog Kid. (Don't believe me? Ask me how many vinyls I listen to in a day...)
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 133 posts
Posted by ford86 on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:58 AM
Stick with atlas....model power might cost less but its cheap track, it doesnt give that smooth flowing curve that atlas track does plus every rail end will require filing the sharp metal left overs that they didnt take off when they used a stamp cutter.  Pretty much all it is good for is hidden staging that will never see the light of day.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:19 AM

TomDiehl
If both brands are Code 100, they'll work together. I've used track from several manufacturers and never had trouble with things lining up properly.

I have issues using Peco turnouts and Atlas Code 100 track.  The rail shapes are different enough that the Peco joiners won't fit over the Atlas rails, and the Atlas joiners are loose on the Peco rails.  The height also seems off, and I have to do a lot of shimming.  The general sloppiness of these rail joints makes it hard to bring flex track up the the diverging route of a Peco turnout and get a smooth, kink-free transition.  It can be done, but it's a lot more work.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

dlg
  • Member since
    October 2009
  • 3 posts
Posted by dlg on Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:09 AM

Others have told me the same thing.  Thanks for responding.  I have since found a place that sells Atlas Superflex track much cheaper than the $24.99 I previously listed.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!