Trains.com

What type of control do you use?

5443 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Redding, California
  • 1,428 posts
What type of control do you use?
Posted by Train 284 on Sunday, July 24, 2005 12:57 PM
Hey everyone, let everyone else know what your using!
Matt Cool Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Sunday, July 24, 2005 3:37 PM
I have tried radio control and have abandoned it as -removing 'the fun element' seems to be all it does. I now simply have a an on/off switch with a fwd/back switch and fire and forget the loco around the track.

I find it a lot more fun that way.

regards

ralph

The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Sarasota, Fl.
  • 106 posts
Posted by BudSteinhoff on Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:22 PM
I checked track power but I also run Aristo on-board and switch remotes.
Bud[8D]
Bud
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:23 PM
Removed the fun element, huh?
We run for 7 hours in wayfreight ops, more fun than you can legally have anywhere.
Turn the switch on and let them run in circles?
That's fun?

Okay, whatever floats your boat.
I ripped out track power 11-1/2 years ago, everyone around here has just about done the same.

UK....well, maybe so.
After all, everything fun is illegal there now, right?

TOC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:34 PM
TRACK POWER ,with a T E ben
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 24, 2005 10:59 PM
So, I am the lone DCC guy. I love it, and it's simpler than people think. So much fun to mu/doublehead any locos together.

Greg
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 1,192 posts
Posted by kstrong on Monday, July 25, 2005 12:00 AM
Well, technically Live Steam and Battery-R/C, but since we had to choose only one, I opted for the more prevalent form of propulsion. Haven't used electrons throgh the rails since 1984, and haven't missed it one bit. I'd much rather rewire a locomotive than clean track. (but that's just my opinion.)

Later,

K
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Monday, July 25, 2005 12:04 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by gregeusa

So, I am the lone DCC guy. I love it, and it's simpler than people think. So much fun to mu/doublehead any locos together.

Greg


No you're not, I just keep a low profile.[}:)][:D][:D][:D][}:)][;)]
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 25, 2005 8:48 AM
Digitrax DCC. Works good. The only problem I've had has been the controller getting hot and shuting down. Put a fan blowing on the controller to keep it cooler and it works great now. I run a track cleaning car around the track a few times before I run anything else and have had no problems with dirty track. I figure that's prototypical anyway. The real railroads always have the Mow and inspection cars run the track before the regular trains run to make sure everything is ok, so why not with the model trains, too?
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Redding, California
  • 1,428 posts
Posted by Train 284 on Monday, July 25, 2005 10:01 AM
Well Stated!
Matt Cool Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 25, 2005 10:21 AM
LGB pack run thru a Basic Train Engineer controller, works for me[;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Monday, July 25, 2005 11:14 AM
On-board Train Engineer and batteries. Pretty much the same as DCC except you don't have to clean the track and worry about rail joints.

Walt
"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, July 25, 2005 11:17 AM
or, like one guy, put 22 volts on the track and clean 1200 feet in 10 minutes at warp factor 3.

We just start out and operate.

Hard to comprehend all the hoops the track power folks jump through to justify what they do....

Clamps, bonds, feeders, track cleaners, 15A power supplies, power districts, even cooling fans.
Hilarious.

TOC
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Monday, July 25, 2005 11:54 AM
David,

I just drop a new SLA into the loco put it on the track, flick the switch and watch it run. My (now) 5 year old son can do the same. Top speed for freight locos 8 kph, passenger locos 25kph (scale)

I can watch the trains go around my track while I weed or relax with a mug of tea.

regards

ralph

The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Sarasota, Fl.
  • 106 posts
Posted by BudSteinhoff on Monday, July 25, 2005 12:00 PM
I thought this was a poll on what everyone used , not mine is the 'bestest 'and the 'only' way to go.
Your batteries can't handle the extra draw from fans , sound , lights and smoke ?
I don't have to justify my set up, it works without any hassle for me.
Seems that there is one consistant other that always jumps in to justify and try to sell his set up though.
Bud[8D]
Bud
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 25, 2005 12:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Curmudgeon

or, like one guy, put 22 volts on the track and clean 1200 feet in 10 minutes at warp factor 3.

We just start out and operate.

Hard to comprehend all the hoops the track power folks jump through to justify what they do....

Clamps, bonds, feeders, track cleaners, 15A power supplies, power districts, even cooling fans.
Hilarious.

TOC


Dave, it easy for me to justify doing the track powered mombo. I'm indoors, elevated on benchwork, and the layout is large enough to be interesting for me, yet small enough not to take up the entire building. Everythings wired up using good old Atlas controllers, manual switches, real Low Tech!! For me RC just doens't make sense, but if I ever do get outside and make a larger more complicated layout, aint no way in Hades I'm gonne wire that mess up!!! [;)]

BTW your 2-4-2 has already been introduced to Mr. Razorsaw! Stay tuned for pics![:p]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, July 25, 2005 2:04 PM
Nobody is saying "mine is best", except for:

"I have tried radio control and have abandoned it as -removing 'the fun element' seems to be all it does."

Sure looked like a "mine is best" statement.
What, you expected me to just sit here?

I challenge you to quote in this thread where I said "mine is best".

Seems "I thought this was a poll on what everyone used , not mine is the 'bestest 'and the 'only' way to go.
Your batteries can't handle the extra draw from fans , sound , lights and smoke ?
I don't have to justify my set up, it works without any hassle for me.
Seems that there is one consistant other that always jumps in to justify and try to sell his set up though. " is pretty blatant at picking a fight.

Show me IN THIS THREAD where anyone tried to sell anyone anything, OR even mentioned a product EXCEPT for somebody who said:

"I checked track power but I also run Aristo on-board and switch remotes."
"LGB pack run thru a Basic Train Engineer controller"
"On-board Train Engineer and batteries."

then:

"Digitrax DCC."
and "I just drop a new SLA into the loco".


So, let me get this straight.
3 folks (you included) are pushing an Aristo product, by name.
Two others mentioned other products, by name.

Nobody mentioned any other brand of radio control, nor did they try to sell anything, but you seem to have a (problem) with anyone who thinks differently than you.

I do appreciate your being so candid and letting everyone on THIS board see that, as you have done on other boards.

Gotta watch that bias, Bud.
It shows.

TOC

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 25, 2005 2:42 PM
I'm not even going to put my head over the parapet.
I'm carefully waving a flag with DCC track power on it.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Monday, July 25, 2005 2:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Curmudgeon

Nobody is saying "mine is best", except for:

"I have tried radio control and have abandoned it as -removing 'the fun element' seems to be all it does."

Sure looked like a "mine is best" statement.
What, you expected me to just sit here?

I challenge you to quote in this thread where I said "mine is best".

Seems "I thought this was a poll on what everyone used , not mine is the 'bestest 'and the 'only' way to go.
Your batteries can't handle the extra draw from fans , sound , lights and smoke ?
I don't have to justify my set up, it works without any hassle for me.
Seems that there is one consistant other that always jumps in to justify and try to sell his set up though. " is pretty blatant at picking a fight.

Show me IN THIS THREAD where anyone tried to sell anyone anything, OR even mentioned a product EXCEPT for somebody who said:

"I checked track power but I also run Aristo on-board and switch remotes."
"LGB pack run thru a Basic Train Engineer controller"
"On-board Train Engineer and batteries."

then:

"Digitrax DCC."
and "I just drop a new SLA into the loco".


So, let me get this straight.
3 folks (you included) are pushing an Aristo product, by name.
Two others mentioned other products, by name.

Nobody mentioned any other brand of radio control, nor did they try to sell anything, but you seem to have a (problem) with anyone who thinks differently than you.

I do appreciate your being so candid and letting everyone on THIS board see that, as you have done on other boards.

Gotta watch that bias, Bud.
It shows.

TOC


Sheeeeesh Dave,

It's only Monday! Long way to go to running trains on Friday.[:o)][:o)][:D][:D]

BTW about being candid; isn't that a trait you admire??[;)][}:)][:D][:D]

Sooooo whatever turns your crank (without getting cranky)! I like ZIMO DCC, live in the climate that's easy on the oxydation problem!

[}:)][}:)] I can't get my track to tarnish properly, have been considering sending the stuff for six months of holidays in the Seattle - Vancouver - Victoria Triangle [;)][;)], known for plenty of rain and dreary weather.**** OTOH probably just paint the rail and be done.

Oh yeah.......................operation is point to point and a trailing car with batteries being on the wrong end of the engine isn't my idea of prototypical.

**** It probably rained - again - on the weekend and TOC's cigar got wet![:o)][;)][:D][:D]
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 25, 2005 3:30 PM
[:0]Maybe I should have said...

"(name withheld) pack run thru a (name withheld) controller"

...guess thats Generic enough to avoid any "Minest ist Bestest " controversy, a little boring though, dont ya think? Besides, its not like I was trying to SELL anything here, just a statement about what I use...If people like what they use they're gonna be vocal about it and praise it, thats normal. I didnt realize we had to be "enthusiaticly nuetral" when we replied to these topics.

Ya know. sorry I cant do that, So I'll repeat my initial reply, I use an:

LGB pack run thru a Basic Train Engineer controller.

[:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, July 25, 2005 3:49 PM
Well......it sure is fun tho, isn't it?
Who puts a trailing car on the wrong end of the loco?

I have absolutely no problem with any of it, use what you want.
You should have seen the two words I had in the original I replaced with (problem).

I have been a long time dealing with folks who have realized the errors of their ways with track power in many parts of the country, so I make it a point to offer the opposing viewpoint.
Unfortunately, doing so is construed by some as "cultish" activity, so I do it all the more.

Like Judgement Day.
At least you won't be able to say nobody told you.

Oh, and who uses trail cars?

Like Sunday's meet, no trail cars, I was double-heading the old LGB Moguls from one transmitter (as I have done for over 10 years), and Shays, Climaxes, 2-6-0's, small diesels, didn't see any trail cars (if you don't count the short, short flatcar used to hold the beer can while working).
But it was on the "correct" end of the loco....at least until the fourth beer, anyway.....

TOC


edit- for HJ.....yes, candid I appreciate, in fact, I think I said that.....
Makes understanding a bit easier.
At least I spell it out clearly (sometimes anyway).
I suppose, after all the money I have spent actually advertising in GR, I could push a product line, but, I don't.
Just the concept, so folks can see what is out there....
I can't magine trying to clean all this track under the spreading Maple, Filbert, Fir and Cedar trees.....
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 25, 2005 4:03 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Curmudgeon


... didn't see any rail cars (if you don't count the short, short flatcar used to hold the beer can while working).


TOC


And you didnt take any pictures??? We coulda got Phil to do a class on this![:D]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, July 25, 2005 4:27 PM
Someone was taking photos....I'll see what I can get.
My back hurt, I only ran for 3 hours.......
TOC
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Monday, July 25, 2005 4:32 PM
David,

I am puzzled by your vitriol? In my part of the world SLA is a common abreviation for Sealed Lead Acid. and as far as I am aware has nothing to do with Messrs Polk Models... Mine are produced for the UPS system that provides shutdown power for my home office system -thus there are always plenty of fully charged spares to hand. (I have a dual 2.2KVA for my local server and workstation).

As to stating 'my way is best' -to my knowledge I did not..

I found that R/C systems did not suit my method of working. Please remember that I am one of the few people I know of that have designed their own locomotive control system from scratch. Here in the EU it is quite legal to use 433Mhz for synchronous bi directional data transmission and (for me) it made sense to adapt standard computer radio modem parts for this purpose. I did not use DCC but FIG79 -a dialect of the FORTH language.

I got bored checking that the radio tx/rx was fully working and bench testing everything; servos; PWAM curves; RF spurious emissions etc -before it ran. (By the way I have a G3 and a G8 RSGB licence)

Nowadays, I flick a switch.

That is what the poll asked: 'What type of Control do you use?' to which I believe I have answered: 'NONE OF THE ABOVE'.

regards

ralph



The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Monday, July 25, 2005 4:33 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Curmudgeon

Well......it sure is fun tho, isn't it?
Who puts a trailing car on the wrong end of the loco?

I have absolutely no problem with any of it, use what you want.
You should have seen the two words I had in the original I replaced with (problem).

I have been a long time dealing with folks who have realized the errors of their ways with track power in many parts of the country, so I make it a point to offer the opposing viewpoint.
Unfortunately, doing so is construed by some as "cultish" activity, so I do it all the more.

Like Judgement Day.
At least you won't be able to say nobody told you.

Oh, and who uses trail cars?

Like Sunday's meet, no trail cars, I was double-heading the old LGB Moguls from one transmitter (as I have done for over 10 years), and Shays, Climaxes, 2-6-0's, small diesels, didn't see any rail cars (if you don't count the short, short flatcar used to hold the beer can while working).
But it was on the "correct" end of the loco....at least until the fourth beer, anyway.....

TOC

Hey Dave,

My railway is somewhat like that "Rusky" sub you used to work on, mostly metric, most certainly a foreign prototype and believe it or not the prototype is electrically powered.[;)][:)][:)] You would probably bang you're head running it, just like you used to on the "Rusky".

Sooooo, I'm on the "right track" - except where it's double tracked, it's left hand running.

So far we have one live-steamer on the poll! no live-diesels?? Tsk tsk and what's with all the electrically powered steam engines? [;)][}:)][}:)][:D][:D]

Yep, couldn't resist, the devil made me do it![;)][}:)][:p][:D]
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Monday, July 25, 2005 4:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cabbage

I did not use DCC but FIG79 -a dialect of the FORTH language.

I got bored checking that the radio tx/rx was fully working and bench testing everything; servos; PWAM curves; RF spurious emissions etc -before it ran. (By the way I have a G3 and a G8 RSGB licence)

Nowadays, I flick a switch.

That is what the poll asked: 'What type of Control do you use?' to which I believe I have answered: 'NONE OF THE ABOVE'.

regards

ralph


Hi Ralph,[;)][:D][:D][:D]

Just for a moment I thought that "FIG79" was perhaps the 79th power of "I don't give a FIG"; which would have been the pat answer to TOC's missive. [;)][:)][:D][:D]
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, July 25, 2005 6:00 PM
Never heard it called that....GelCell is what we use around here.
The post was directed at the one who created the conflict, not you.
Howver, you were used as an example!

HJ- All I can imagine is your railroad is also labelled in some ferrin language, too...like Swiss or German or Russian or some other such stuff.

One hard and fast rule was on valves...."O" was abbreviation for "Open", "3" was abbreviation for "Closed"....important to know on a boat that is mostly below the water line.....
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:32 AM
HJ,

Ask and you shall receive, the SWISS Electric Powered Steam Locomotive.

http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/swisselec/swisselc.htm

There were also Diesel powered steam engines as well.

http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/kitson/kitsonst.htm

This site is (to me) a major source of inspiration.

regards

ralph

The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:50 AM
David,

For your edification and elightenment please type in the three letters SLA into the SEARCH box.

http://www.maplin.co.uk/

You have been informed repeatedly that I do have an alternate persona on the computer forumns -you have just been the recipient of a slightest glimpse of what it is like.

In America you have the expression 'Hard Ball Player' -I carry a BODKIN...

regards

ralph

The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:32 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cabbage

HJ,

Ask and you shall receive, the SWISS Electric Powered Steam Locomotive.

http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/swisselec/swisselc.htm

There were also Diesel powered steam engines as well.

http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/kitson/kitsonst.htm

This site is (to me) a major source of inspiration.

regards

ralph


Hi Ralph,

I'm quite familiar with the E3/3 "we don't have enough coal" version.

Didn't know about the diesel, thanks for the link!
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy