Trains.com

raised garden layouts

30622 views
43 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
raised garden layouts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, October 22, 2007 1:10 PM

I'm pondering a raised garden layout. Not a simple platform like those used by live steam enthusiasts and not redwood benchwork, but an actual raised platform at least waist high, framed by bricks, blocks or rocks mortared together with fill inside and soil at the top. I don't recall ever seeing anyone do this, except in GRR last year, a fellow in England or Wales modeling 16mm (he's 86 years old).

The only thing holding me back at the moment is that I don't know if we are going to live in the house for many many years, so I'd need to design it tastefully enough so the house sells (think raised flower bed).

 

As to dimensions, I'm thinking 30' X 6', could be curvy. Modeling 7/8n18 so curves could be kinky 

 

Any discussion on this topic appreciated. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Monday, October 22, 2007 2:47 PM

Club member, Peter Drymalski, has a beautiful raised garden railway built on dry stack stone raised planters. It runs around the perimeter of his backyard. Lots of pics at - http://www.wvmgrs.org/ go to the menu at the left for Archives then scroll down to the 2007 meetings and click on the May meeting. Here is one -

 

It took him a few years to complete using something like 7 pallets (over 10 tons) of wall stone and that doesn't even count all the soil to fill it.

-Brian 

President of
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, October 22, 2007 3:01 PM

Hi Brian,

 

Nice natural stone; mine would need to be higher, of course and rocks perhaps need to slope inward to avoid a blowout. I've seen New England (and upstate NY) stone fences, and might try that out. Some of those stone fences have been in place for centures.

 

I'm thinking maybe make a few raised beds with walkways in between and liftout sections of bridge connecting.

 

Thanks 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Ivins Utah
  • 190 posts
Posted by Camaro1967 on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:52 PM

Here is a look at Bob Johnson's raised layout. He is a frequent contributer to this forum, and probably will comment with more details when this picture appears.

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Monday, October 22, 2007 11:29 PM
David:

Here are a couple more raised bed GRRs, from this years GTS San Diego show.   

Smoke?  Do you smell the smoke too?  Yikes San Diego is alight again.  One of the fires (Fallbrook/Rainbow) is about 10 miles up the river from where I live.  For those of you not native to California, a "river" is defined as a linear depression in the ground that used to contain flowing water, but now is so clogged with small trees and large weeds that they burn at a rate of 3~12 mile per hour (depending on wind conditions.)  I'll check back in when I can, assuming we don't get evacuated.  And I just got the backyard ready for the Daughters wedding reception in two weeks.





Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Peak District UK
  • 809 posts
Posted by cabbage on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 2:24 AM
David,

Could I suggest something radical? You would like a raised railway -could I suggest that you produce a system on planks on posts and then back fill with rocks, soil and plants. This would give you your track to run on and watch -while you shovel!!!

This is the technique I am going to use to produce my dual width dual gauge track (16mm and Gauge 3) for around my garden.

regards

ralph

The Home of Articulated Ugliness

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:31 AM

- Bob's raied layout is an engineering marvel. Would esp. look nice with some ground cover and structures. Must have cost a pretty penny for all those stones. He's lucky to have a lot of space. One can only dream.

- Tom. How true about S. Calif rivers. Used to live in both SD and LA. The climate there is #1 in the world (except for this week). The layout looks exactly like the one I described in GRR and is oone I'd like to emulate. The one in the magazine had some low sedums near the track that made it esp attractive

- Ralph, your ideas are the best. Give me something to chew over. And yes, I'm considering dual gauge as I've got 7/8 trains in both 32 and 45 mm.

 

Thanks, all and here's a toast to those coooool raised layouts. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Oklahoma
  • 20 posts
Posted by alamosa on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:19 AM

Dave,

I only raised mine about a foot off the ground so my pictures wouldn't help (also I just nailed landscape timbers together to form the outside framework). But after doing this I have one question for you, how close can you get a dumptruck to where you are planning to build. It takes an amazing amount of fill dirt and unless you have many strong backs to help a wheel barrow quickly becomes a royal pain. Since you are talking waist high also remember to plan for ramp(s) to get the top soil up to it's final destination.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:44 AM
Hi, no way to get dump truck in; about 30% grade and narrow space with fencing; I lift weights and was gonna incorporate it into workout. I happen to love exercise so thta'ts no problem; I just don't feel like hauling it all UP the hill if we have to move so I'm still thinking about it. If not here then difinitely at my final place of retirement
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Slower Lower Delaware
  • 1,266 posts
Posted by Capt Bob Johnson on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:45 AM

Dave,  been busy with other projects and haven't been keeping up with forums.  Paul gave me a heads up!

My layout is 30" high at the outer or first level!   2008 block in it that my wife and I layed in 3.5 days.  I ran electrical and water lines in conduit under where sidewalk was going to go so as to service the area of the layout.   I had a rough track plan in mind, and had a contractor come in and pour a 3' wide sidewalk in conformance with that plan so that I could use the inside edge of the concrete as the back edge of the wall!   That method also took care of levelling things as there was an 18" drop from left front to right rear!   The blocks are 4"hi X 12' W X 9"D and weigh 35 lbs each.   They are dry laid and the top course is glued down using an exterior grade construction adheasive.  After I got the wall built, I removed (and numbered for replacement) the block from one end. 

I had a guy with a bobcat who needed work on a flexible schedule (at a very attractive price per hour), so I had packing sand delivered in the yard and he moved it inside the walls.   There were 30 - 12 Wheeler loads to fill it to the 30" level, and we didn't put fill where I knew the pond was going!   After it was full, I replaced the end wall blocks and pulled fill back down from a pile I had placed on top for that purpose!

I then had another 9 loads placed on top for the mountains using a gradall to dig it out of the trucks and place it on top! (Again, by getting the work done during the slack season when they were getting ready to lay crews off for the winter saved a ton of $$$$).

Entire space is about 55' by 80' and has about 16,000 gallon pond in it!

If I were doing it over, I'd go with a series of raised islands or fingers that would permit working on the interior without the crawling around.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:02 AM

Hi Bob,

 

Sounds like a bundle of work for sure! The raised islands idea is something I mentioned that would allow access in and around the raised area without having to walk all the way around. The islands could be connected by removable or raised bridges or even duckunders (de ja vu indoors)

 

As I mentioned, I'm not fully committed to the raised idea until I ponder how long I'll be living in the house as the raised element is more or less permanent. If I don't do raised, I'm gonna try building a field railway sans ballast, of the type used in constucting roads, dams and so on; narrow gauge with critters and V-dumps. Not many people are aware of these temporary railways, as they often existed for just weeks or even days. They allow you to follow the terrain without having to do too many fills and cuts and heavy bridgework, if you like the rough hewn look 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Chatham, Ont
  • 116 posts
Posted by DennisB on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:42 AM

Raised layouts have several drawbacks. They too often resemble a virtual HO tabletop look. At 30" high, you have to have a means of servicing and moving about the landscaping. That is why it is best to keep trains running only at the outside edge. I too am a gardener and enjoy playing in the dirt. But not everyone is like us. If you choose to sell your home in the future, one of the first things you will have to remove is the raised layout. Solution...Make it half as high, have the trains run the outside edge, but in the center use taller buildings and even a small mountain range. Good luck on the project,Dennis

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Oklahoma
  • 20 posts
Posted by alamosa on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:36 PM

Dave

One other factor to add into your thinking, when I figured the amount of dirt I would need they told me I would need to add 6 or 7 percent to allow for setting. By the time I was done (we had some VERY hard rains during the process) I think the setting was closer to 10%. My little wheel barrow was very tired by the time I was done as I too have a very small gate that leads to the back yard.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: West Texas
  • 108 posts
Posted by imrnjr on Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:45 AM

My railway is  a raised bed... which makes it easy to deal with the outside loop, but it's still a railway on the ground on the insiude loop.Laugh [(-D]

It is very easy to deal with the rest of the yard.  I used pave stone and castle rock from lowes and Home Depot.  Buried the first stone at least 1/2 way  and continued to level and bury the stones until I had to step back and set a full course below ground to provide a base. The second course (and all the rest) was set with glue and backfilled with dirt.  It runs from 3 courses or blocks high in the front to 6+ in the back.  Roughly 16" to 40" as a base height for the perimeter cap. It is 30' deep at one end and almost 40' at the other and 45' wide

It's very easy to do, but labor intensive, and each pave/castlestone weighs in at 22 pounds.  I used over 500 (5 and 1/2 pallets at 128 per pallet), and they run in the neighborhood of $3 each now.  If you can dry stack real stone you might have a significant cost savings, but when I started I really did not think I could do the job with real stone work.  I am very satisfied with the look and the opportunity to structure  my rail way the raised bed gives me.  I also contains me to some extent, keeping me from running wild across the yard with various ideas....(provides a clear demarcation for the weed eater.... and no problems in the yard for the mower)Big Smile [:D]

either way the fill and additional stone to landscape is another consideration...I believe at last count I had 90 yards of dirt and still need 4 to 5 more, and an additional 6-7 tons of stone in the bed to provide conture and elevation. you will need to allow the dirt to settle or utilize a plate/ditch compactor.  I have seen about 10% settling, but my roadway is on hardiplank on PVC posts so it doesn't effect level or grade.

I had most of the materials available, but have purchased at least 3 1/2 tons of moss rock and holy wall rock.

A narrow raised bed with access on both sides would be much easier to access and deal with all the train traffic than the bed I created.  However, that said, I like the separation and vertical distance between the track loops on mine...Smile [:)]

so what if I have to get in the garden and pick up a derailed or recalcitrant train....

I've got knee padsSmile,Wink, & Grin [swg].... from all those years in corporate life....

MarkCowboy [C):-)]

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Saturday, October 27, 2007 10:21 AM

There's a family here in Sierra Vista with an elevated G-scale layout.  Pictures of it are at http://members.cox.net/cacole2  Look at the Rose family layout.

My G-scale layout is also raised on both an elevated, filled-in section and on trestles and bridges.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Shire Counties UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by two tone on Sunday, October 28, 2007 9:25 AM
Why go waist high you seem to be fit if you deside to sell house raised planter 2 feet high is enough any higher would put me off from buying it would be over powering and in years to come it will need maintenance, if you go hogher make dam sure you put drainage it if it will cost you dear later on

                Age is only a state of mind, keep the mind active and enjoy life

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Takasaki, Gunma, JAPAN
  • 79 posts
Posted by Takasaki Matt on Sunday, October 28, 2007 6:53 PM

This year I took the plunge and raised my railway by about a 40cm.  I laid four courses of bricks around the perimiter and ordered two small truck loads of normal earth.

The brickwork ties in with my house bricks and entrance wall/gateposts, which give it some continuity.  The earth had to be barrowed in by myself with the aid of some willing (to make some yen) nephews.  That took less than a day using two wheelbarrows.

The brick work I did in about five stints with cement blocks for the rear part that isn't seen unless you go around the back.  This saved money and time.

The planting is continuing.  There are bare bits that will have structures, after I make them, and more miniature trees and shrubs will be added in time.

One bonus of not raising too high is that the surrounding shrubs are at a height thay they are visible and add to the background in photos.

 Whatever you decide, it will be worth the effort.  If you need to knock down the raised areas when you move it will be easier to recycle the bricks/blocks for your next railway and also easier to spread the earth around leaving a plain flat yard space for the future owner.

Best regards, Matthew Foster.

PS  This is one of the reasons I haven't been posting much this year, sorry guys.

Matthew Foster Takasaki Light Railway http://www.freewebs.com/mjhfoster/
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, October 29, 2007 6:00 AM

Matt,

 

Looks great. I bet if you took photos of all the steps that would definitely be a GRR magazine how-to. I think they'd for sure consider the idea. Are you doing any turnouts or simple loop?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Takasaki, Gunma, JAPAN
  • 79 posts
Posted by Takasaki Matt on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:52 AM

Perhaps Christmas will provide me with the opportunity to invest in some points / turnouts.  As yet, I still have just the circuit and unconnected length of siding.  When I do put in turnouts I plan a short link to the brewery (also yet to be built) and a passing loop and siding / engine shed / steam-up area.

As to the article idea...I seem to remember a similar raised-walll article a few GR issues ago, though with the right spin it might be worth a try.  I've enough photos to make an article so I will put something together and send it to Marc.  I still owe him a piece on the whole railway.  However, that has been delayed until next year due to the rebuild.  Nevertheless, I will give it a go!

Regards

Matthew Foster Takasaki Light Railway http://www.freewebs.com/mjhfoster/
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:35 AM
I have a similar situation. The land is very flat and I'm 73, so a raised bed is necessary. One think to remember, is to put in drainage.
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 6 posts
Posted by bigboy on Tuesday, November 6, 2007 12:42 PM

The is someone who has a very large article posted on Large Scale On Line about making a raised bed using 2x4 frames on 4x4 legs. I think it is called the Coos Bay railroad. His system is to make eight foot long by three foot wide frames with 2x4 with cross braces every foot. Then he nails one half inch hardware cloth on top of the frame and covers it with weed block fabric. He uses the ladder system for laying out the road way support on top of this platform. He then installs a 2x4 apron around the outside edges and fills in the area around the track with gravel. What you end up with is a very economical raised bed platform that looks much better than the typical wooden platforms most live steam people use. Rain drains through the gravel and weed fabric. This system would be great for someone in a wheel chair as you could have access to the track since there is not a wall around the perimeter. Sort of like a table top so you could roll right up to the edge and reach in. Check it out.

 

Big John

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Tuesday, November 6, 2007 12:51 PM
That would be Richard Smith. He's got the best garden RR I've ever seen (probably the best). I mentioned that I'm refraining from benchwork. His is redwood and he livees in the northwest and had access to a lot of affordable benchwork
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Tuesday, November 6, 2007 1:33 PM

Richard's is the Port Orford Coast RR. It is beautiful but is basically an indoor layout out in the backyard. More of a railroad out in the garden than a garden railway.  I'm not sure who's the Coos Bay belongs to and I can't locate the mentioned article.

added - Coos Bay is a town on Richard's RR. As far as I searched he never authored anything on LSOL. Now I have to find if there is something similar there.

-Brian 

President of
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: West Texas
  • 108 posts
Posted by imrnjr on Thursday, November 8, 2007 7:06 AM

There is a small 'bobcat like' stand on loader (1/4yd bucket?) that you might be able to find at an equipment rental shop to help move the soil and rock if you make the decision to go forward.  One of the landscaping companies in town uses one and it'll lift 300-500 pound trees which might make the build easier.

Here's a couple of more recent overhead pictures of my raised bed.

 

It seems you've gotten several good references.  I really like the way the raised beds showcase the gardens and the railways.

Good luck

Mark Cowboy [C):-)]

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Sykesville MD
  • 155 posts
Posted by gbbari on Friday, November 9, 2007 8:46 PM

Richard Smith's amazing Port Orford Coast RR is chronicled with many great pix (by Richard himself) in MyLargeScale.com.  Use the Search tool (it's link is at the upper left of the main frame along with several other links) and set the following criteria (without the quotes):

Search For:  "POC"
     - click the button next to "Match exact phrase "
Search Forum:  "Track, Trestles, Bridges and Roadbed"
Search by Member:  "Richard Smith" (you will have to select his name from a l-o-n-g drop-down list of member names but they are in alphabetical order by first letter of first name.

From the resulting list (it will take a minute to come up) choose any of the topics started by Richard  - they start in July of 2004. You will be spending several hours reading the posts and looking at his pictures. I know I sure did.

AL

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Big Island
  • 97 posts
Posted by Neiler on Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:05 PM

I've been reading the responses to your query with great interest. My layout started against the back of a stone retaining wail about 2' high within a planter around the perimeter of the yard.  To keep it looking too much like a layout in the yard rather than a railroad IN the garden, I stopped the planter areas periodically and spanned the gaps with trestle. Now there are lots of trestle left to build, but you get the idea.

The height is still too low. I wish that I'd thought it through as you are doing. In hindsight, I would go another foot or two higher.  In one area where the yard naturally sloped away from the house, it is about 3' off the ground and looks great!  Had that been 5' - wow! 

Consider getting a Bobcat in the yard and depressing the center (former lawn) to create a feature for resale and simultaniously making the raised beds with the cut material (also known as embankment).  Space the planter areas and bridge them with the railroad to create some drama and, for heaven's sake, don't make a complete loop (I can hear the wails now).  Make the train GO somewhere and come back.  When you get nearing completion, you will have something to do on the line other than watch it go in circles.  Still want continuous operation? - use electronics for the times you just want to "watch 'em run".

Neil

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, November 12, 2007 7:04 AM

A couple of comments.

<>A raised layout would be ideal for someone with a very steep hill in their property that goes for some distance. One would only need to dig into the hill  for the walking area and then dig a second time however high you want it (perhaps chest high) and as far back as you want the trains to run. Presumably that would be within reach for where the track would be but a little bit beyond for the backdrop consisting of plants, buildings, etc. One could even create a mountain but installing a large sewer culvert and then backfilling earth on top.

<>The ends of the layout could have reversing loops either built into the hill or via a  very tall trestle or viaduct.

The earthen areas would likely need to be reinforced with blocks and drainage and that is where the cost would come into play in addition to renting a Cat.

<>This would be an ideal permanent layout for someone wishing to run trains into old age or for someone disabled. Especially good for hill treatment, which I always see so many questions about on this forum.

Since my job is going to get BRAC'd in about 3 years (base closing). We are considering moving up toward the Ft Meade, MD area in the future and finding a permanent place. If there's a hill, this would definitely be the route I'd take. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: silver spring, md
  • 1,232 posts
Posted by altterrain on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:58 PM

Not many hills out in the Ft. Meade area. The land gets flatter as you get closer to the Bay. You'll be close enough to visit though! Sign - Welcome [#welcome]

 -Brian

President of
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Thursday, December 27, 2007 7:10 PM

I've just finished an analysis of fill vs. platforms and have concluded that the platforms are a better choice. The cost and effort are about the same (the platforms being just a bit less expensive) but the platforms are a lot easier to remove than moving 100 tons of dirt and rock. You can safely bet that the new homeowner will not want that elevated flowerbed in the backyard.
 

I think a viable option is to make a couple "islands" linked to the platforms by liftout bridges where you would concentrate your serious gardening efforts.
 

Unless you intend to always "operate" your RR, I think a height of 30" is about right to allow you to easily observe the trains while you are sitting and relaxing, anything higher puts the roadbed too close to eye level.

Walt 

 

"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Slower Lower Delaware
  • 1,266 posts
Posted by Capt Bob Johnson on Friday, December 28, 2007 1:26 PM

That smaller bobcat like walk behind is called a "Dingo", and marketed by Toro.  Many rental places have them!

I know several landscapers who swear by them as they have several attachments that make them very versitile!

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy