Trains.com

Let me throw a layout design by you guys...

6425 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 12, 2007 9:50 AM
Jer,
Road edges and shrubs would work for a rural scene as well.  Also, terrain can be used to hide panels as well, you could have a hill in front of the line, or rocks that cover the edge...

Brent
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 12, 2007 9:27 AM

 lionroar88 wrote:
Jer,
I'm hoping to 'block' the seams with scenery, place city buildings infront of the access panel so you can't see the seam.

Brent

Oh, yeah a city theme would help a lot, because you could blend the theme with a sidewalk or a road edge.  As for me, I'm planning on a rual landscape, maybe I can use some shrubs or trees or something; otherwise I'll just have to accept the fault lines.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 12, 2007 8:53 AM
Jer,
I'm hoping to 'block' the seams with scenery, place city buildings infront of the access panel so you can't see the seam.

Brent
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 12, 2007 7:37 AM

 lionroar88 wrote:
The access panels are going to be tricky because you don't want them to be obvious, so careful placement of the scenery is key.

Brent

Yeah, that's not going to be easy.  How will you conceal the seams?  This is the problem that I'm trying to think through as well; since I'm planning to build a portable permanent display I will be trying to integrate removeable terrain features (tunnels, hills, etc).  Someone mentioned cutting down into the table top to have a place where the piece sets into, but that will leave a seam as well.  It may just be something that I have to deal with, but I'd like to find the best solution possible.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 12, 2007 7:30 AM

 USNRol wrote:

really enjoy reading this thread the layout in question looks great; may steal some ideas from it for myself if that's OK! 


Roland,
No problems here!  I love designing layouts... I have 10 versions of this layout alone, so to think it is final is plan crazy... heck I'll probably change it 5 to 10 times before I screw one section of track down!

 ATSJer wrote:

Hey Lionroar;

I love your layout, that thing looks beautiful.  One question, how do you plan to integrate the access panels?  Are you going to have scenery on them or what?



ATSJer,
Yes they will have scenery on them.  They will be simple 1x4 frames that 'lock' into the benchwork.  My goal is to make them as light as possible so I can lift them into position and hold them in place with one hand while turning the locks into position (just going to be 1by stock screwed into the benchwork, two locks per side.  The access panels are going to be tricky because you don't want them to be obvious, so careful placement of the scenery is key.

Brent
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 9, 2007 10:34 PM

Hey Lionroar;

I love your layout, that thing looks beautiful.  One question, how do you plan to integrate the access panels?  Are you going to have scenery on them or what?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 9, 2007 10:31 PM
 USNRol wrote:

Google Earth pics of Conway yards...

 Enjoy the pics,

Roland

Wow!!  Thanks for those pics, that thing is huge!

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Southern MD
  • 315 posts
Posted by USNRol on Friday, March 9, 2007 10:13 PM

Google Earth pics of Conway yards...

 

really enjoy reading this thread the layout in question looks great; may steal some ideas from it for myself if that's OK! 

Enjoy the pics,

Roland

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 9, 2007 2:07 PM

OK,
So I've been staring at this layout for over a week now and couldn't figure out what was missing...

Fife's recommendations about scrapping the turntable and roundhouse just weren't sitting well with me, but I really liked the idea of having a larger railyard for storage... so I got to playing around with the design... and this is the result:



Color Key:
Black: Track at base 0
Grey: Ascending Track from base 0 to 7 inches
Blue: Track at level 2 (7 inches)
Red: Descending Track from Level 2 to base 0

I added a few access doors so if there is a problem they can be attended to...

Thoughts?

Brent

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 10:45 AM

 lionroar88 wrote:
Jeremy,
Those long sidings are going to be under a custom built roundhouse.

Let me explain a bit of what the railyard is modeled after.

I had lived in the Pittsburgh, PA area for most of my life and I lived very near the Conway Yard.  The Conway Yard was the largest railyard in the world for most of its life.  It was the first place I had ever seen a working turntable with roundhouse, and it is still in operation today.  If you are travelling along the Ohio River you can see the railyard and the town of Baden, PA behind it (the Railyard stretches from Conway, PA at its Eastern end, and Freedom, PA at its Western end), if memory serves me correctly it is nearly 5 - 10 miles long, and is some 20 tracks deep!  This yard has seen everything from old steam engines to modern diesels, and its construction still reflects its history.  Gone are the huge water towers and coaling stations for the steamers, but they have been replaced with one of the largest sanding tower complexes in the US.

I'll post pics when I get back and have a chance to post them!

Brent

Woah!!  That's huge!  I can't wait to see pics, and I understand now why shortening that end of the layout is not a possibility.  Still love your plan though, very nice indeed.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 7:51 AM
Jeremy,
Those long sidings are going to be under a custom built roundhouse.

Let me explain a bit of what the railyard is modeled after.

I had lived in the Pittsburgh, PA area for most of my life and I lived very near the Conway Yard.  The Conway Yard was the largest railyard in the world for most of its life.  It was the first place I had ever seen a working turntable with roundhouse, and it is still in operation today.  If you are travelling along the Ohio River you can see the railyard and the town of Baden, PA behind it (the Railyard stretches from Conway, PA at its Eastern end, and Freedom, PA at its Western end), if memory serves me correctly it is nearly 5 - 10 miles long, and is some 20 tracks deep!  This yard has seen everything from old steam engines to modern diesels, and its construction still reflects its history.  Gone are the huge water towers and coaling stations for the steamers, but they have been replaced with one of the largest sanding tower complexes in the US.

I'll post pics when I get back and have a chance to post them!

Brent
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 7:48 AM

I'l look around for that video.

Those buildings represent the station that go on the 2x5 foot upper section.  i just moved them so you could see below.

W

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 7:24 AM

Wes,
You could decide on a 'preferred route' and wire those switches to be automatic (throw approprite to train direction), see the video that ATSJer posted, at least it appears that the switches automatically throw to avoid derailments, you can then concentrate on throwing the other switches when you want to...

Brent

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 6:50 AM

I'll try to group the switches together so i can hit them both at one time and throw the whole path, or Even wire up multiple turnouts to one switch.  i haven't thought that far ahead yet.

W

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 11:19 PM

BTW, I'm lovin' this!  I love the turntable too.  If you're hunting for more room, maybe shorted the run-off lines that are on the other side of the turn-table, it won't solve all of you problems, but it might help.  I like this layout a lot, because there is a lot of motion throughout the whole thing, but the focal point will be the turn table; as it should be.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 11:16 PM

I like it, there's a lot of action in a small space, just keep those switch controls handy. Wink [;)]

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 9:45 PM

Well, I have made some progress. I found an MTH graduated trussle kit at the LHS, and started messing around with that for a while.  It cleared some things up for me, and I worked on this for a couple of days.  I have come to the conclusion that I like doubling back dogbone layouts when space is limited.   I found a couple of places to but sidings and other pathways around the loop, so I can park two trains and drive the third.  The only tricky piece is the double curve switch (031 and 042) which I haven't seen in the stores, but it's in the MTH set catalog.  I plan on making the top section all flat on top of "rock", and the trains will go into tunnels underneth.  I will have to make plenty of access to the tunnels, since I have a couple of switches under there.  The total price of track was $770.  I don't like to think about that, but it's actually cheaper than other plans I have come up with, and this design leaves a lot of area for scenery and buildings.

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/weswhitmore/photo/294928804265787514/0

Hope you like it!

Wes

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 10:49 PM
Wes,
Still wish I we had gotten the first house... 35 x 12 with a 7 x 19 extension would have been loads of fun!  I can't complain though, the 12' 10" x 17' 10" room is a heck of a lot larger than I have ever had to work with before.  The only problem with the turntable is it takes up a lot of realestate and only having a 3' wide area may make it very difficult to get more than 2 people in the room at a time.  I would really like to have space for at least 6 people, and I have no where to do work on anything...

Jerry,
Just shy of 13 x 18.  I've been trying to get something that I could pack a lot of action with train movement, and have a bit of space for accessories and scenery.  This is going to be the largest layout I have ever worked on (Dad and I designed a 30 x 40 HO layout back in the early '80s that we only got 20% finished) in O Gauge.

If I can find a transfer table, as recommended by Fifedog, I may scrap the turntable idea.  The other constraint is I have only 5 years to design, build, and play with this layout as the wife is already planning the next move!  At least in the next house I get to dictate how much space I get!  LOL!!!!

Brent
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 5:05 PM

Hi Brent,

 Is that layout only 13x18?  That's a lot of action.  Looks great.

 Jerry

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 2:27 PM

Wow, I wish I had that much room available. You can get lost in all of that square footage.  I think you should keep the turntable.  That might take a while to build.  it makes my track plan look pretty basic.

Wes

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 1:41 PM

Wes,
Here is the latest version of my big layout...  the dimensions are now correct (after measuring the room myself and finding that who ever measured before added 2 inches to both length and width).

There is also going to be a raised trolley line, and a subway line below the deck.  These are not on the layout yet, have to figure out how to incorporate them after I get the basics down.

I also have determined that a ceiling layout is a definite go... as long as the walls to the right are not poured concrete (which I do not think they are after the home inspection on Wednesday).

Brent

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 12:54 PM
I didn't see this since you edited it...
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 12:38 PM

The doors are still where they are (one at just over 5 foot from the left of the main bench), and one at the edge or the right of the bench).  I think they show up in the pictures above.  They are staying there, as I just finished building them!

I shortened the two sidings just for illistration purposes.  It was making the layout too small to see.  So to add it up, there will be a 5' siding just to the left of the main (like in the pictures), and then it will go through that wall (just to the and continue another 8 feet and then turn around and come back.

It should be very fun to control the trains on such a long layout. 

The more I think about it, it is a little like Buckeye's layout now.  He has an upper section of track that loops back to itself, and then goes down a long hill, makes a turn around, and heads back towards the bottom section of his layout.  Of course his layout is so big that you get lost with what the track is actually doing.  It's a great layout, that's for sure.

Wes

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 12:23 PM
Wes,
Looks good... one question though... does the misses know you are moving a door now?

I thought you had a door on the left side of the main layout about 8 inches out from the back wall?

Brent
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 12:17 PM

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/weswhitmore/photo/294928804257924152/0

 Here is a little change to the plan.  I changed the yard/station area, and extened the lower section pointing towards the left out before it joins back in with the loop.  I also shortened the most left sidings so the picture would be bigger, but still plan on running it 10 feet into the next room.

Wes

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 10:15 AM
Wes,
No problem.  I'm glad to help.

Fife has me all confuselled with my layout plan... I really want a turntable and roundhouse, but I can see how not having that would make for a more interesting yard and potential for more industry...

Brent
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 9:42 AM

Thanks for doing those Brent.  That addition allows for some really long trains, that's for sure.

 I don't know which one I like better.  Each has it's own stong points.  I guess the first one allows to you set two trains for unsupervised action without much change of collision, but the second one allows for a long single track path.  I guess it's a good place to be.

I initially had my station siding on the 2x5 area as well, but found it hard to get much of a station in there.  I'm sure it could be done.  Of course, with a train much longer than the siding allows for, the train will have to leave the station before the next train comes along.

Great ideas, and thanks for the help.  I'll try to get back into the program and make some improvements like you suggested.

Wes

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 2, 2007 9:08 AM

Wes,
Here they are... first one is two sets of track (reversing loops on each level with the ability to send the train down the long reversing loop sidings). The second is a long reversing loop where the two levels are connected thus resulting in a continuous loop and not a reversing loop... I like the second one a bit a more (you can run three or four trains on this one).

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Powell, OH
  • 1,257 posts
Posted by Wes Whitmore on Friday, March 2, 2007 7:43 AM

Brent, It's hard to see, but there are two reversing loops, and two sets of tracks going to the left.  It's just a very small picture, and I don't know how to make it bigger. Still, please post your ideas and plans.  I love to see new ideas!

Wes

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month