Frank,
While I really like my docksider, you should know that it moves rather poorly through 022 switches. Sometimes stalls and always bumps and grinds. If my memory serves me correctly your layout features 022, correct?
Mike S.
I like the whistle. Then again, I like plain vanilla ice cream too.....
Rickster, Lake Woebegone
I now own two of these. Like them a lot. Hate the whistle. I guess the Docksider is meant as a low cost entry level loco, and that's why the whistle is so silly (want a better whistle, spend more money). Since the sound board of the DS looks to be somewhat sofisticated, to me at least, it seems the silly whistle was done quite on purpose. Am I stating the obvious? I can understand this to a degree, but I think that Lionel should have also offered a more realistic sounding upgrade whistle board for maybe $39.00. I'd bet they'd have sold a bunch, and the profit margin on that would be much higher than with the loco.
Just my thoughts on it.
Bobby
dead photo link
brwebster wrote: OK, the whistle is....um...questionable.
OK, the whistle is....um...questionable.
I beg to differ.
There is nothing "questionable" about Docksider's whistle. It is a total embarrassment!!
Lionel could (and should) have done better.
Other than that...
Remember the Veterans. Past, present and future.
www.sd3r.org
Proud New Member Of The NRA
This is the only photo I could find of a PRR tank 0-6-0T.
I went to a local lionel dealer who has a couple of techs that work on locos. One of them told me that they installed the TMCC system from ER for cab1. he said that the loco is too small to cram in electonics for steam sounds and chuffs. Have you heard of anyone installing electro couplers front and rear? Since I model PRR I looked online to see if PRR had 060 tank locos. I have not found a definitive answer yet but I did find a photo of the bethlehem tank loco.
prriscool wrote:I'm glad to hear that! Lionel catalogued a J&L steel slag train with an "Aliquippa Works" dockside engine. I've been watching for it on ebay. Really would like to have. It was only in the 2004 vol.2 catalog. Kinda hard to find.
brwebster wrote: Ironhoarse,As the old commercial usta say....Try it! You'll like it!You might even be as pleasantly surprised as I was.Bruce Webster
Ironhoarse,
As the old commercial usta say....Try it! You'll like it!
You might even be as pleasantly surprised as I was.
Bruce Webster
I'm going to try it. Only problem is that my layout is in Michigan and me and the docksider are in Nevada until May. Next winter I hope to have a small layout in Nevada too.
csxt30 wrote: I just have to suggest the one that says "Lionel Lines " on it & plus, I heard it runs the best on tubular track !! Thanks, John
I just have to suggest the one that says "Lionel Lines " on it & plus, I heard it runs the best on tubular track !!
Thanks, John
I'm IN!
Frank53 wrote: I may break down and get one, as I think they are pretty cool and the size is right.I don't need to have several - one will do.
I may break down and get one, as I think they are pretty cool and the size is right.
I don't need to have several - one will do.
Frank53,
From all I have read about the docksider there just doesn't seem to be any bad press about it. OK, it's got a whistle only a mother could love, but short of that how can you lose? Seems it can easily be had for well under MRSP. If the way it pulls on my level layout is any indication ( have had up to 14 cars in tow) it should handle the grades on your layout. Right now it's effortlessly chugging around the track pulling 5 K-Line Fleet of Modernism aluminum 15" cars.
palallin wrote: brwebster wrote: I'm not aware of any nicknames for the Docksider. There's only a short description of it in the Cyclopedia which claims the loco was built by Alco in 1910. Bruce, "Docksider" IS the nickname. Technicallly, it's a 6-wheel saddletank switcher (according to the Whyte system), an 0-6-0T.
brwebster wrote: I'm not aware of any nicknames for the Docksider. There's only a short description of it in the Cyclopedia which claims the loco was built by Alco in 1910.
Bruce,
"Docksider" IS the nickname. Technicallly, it's a 6-wheel saddletank switcher (according to the Whyte system), an 0-6-0T.
Palallin,
Yes, technically saddletank is the correct terminology. Docksider seems to fall between nickname and the general term for saddletank shifters of various wheel configurations. Whereas nicknames like "widow maker" or "ghost train" have a pet name feel to them, alluding more to the trains personality. IMHO
Just got the copper range one for $65. It was on auction at The Train-Station. Now I need to aquire some ore cars and caboose for this puppy. I also have the NYC one and really like it.
Dennis
TCA#09-63805
I have four of the Lionel Docksides now, and will buy more if they'll dress one up in U.S. Army livery.
A great little engine with the worst -sounding whistle in all of contemporary model railroading (which doesn't really bother me all that much because I never use it).
brwebster wrote: Laz, The fella was selling a variety of train related stuff. I'm sure I'd missed quite a few of his bargons as I didn't come across him until mid day. He didn't have any business cards and I didn't ask. I do recall he was only there one day cuz when I went back the next day to see if he had brought any more stuff he was gone. At the time I wasn't sure how much of a deal I got on it until I checked up here on prices. Sure beats $140 Canadian plus tax. Bruce webster
Laz,
The fella was selling a variety of train related stuff. I'm sure I'd missed quite a few of his bargons as I didn't come across him until mid day. He didn't have any business cards and I didn't ask. I do recall he was only there one day cuz when I went back the next day to see if he had brought any more stuff he was gone. At the time I wasn't sure how much of a deal I got on it until I checked up here on prices. Sure beats $140 Canadian plus tax.
Bruce webster
BRUCE you got an excellent deal.
laz57
csxt30 wrote: johnandjulie13 wrote: Hello John:I believe the widowmaker was the camelback. The cab (and anyone inside) were susceptible to all sorts of injuries due to its configuration.Regards,John OThat's right, John !! Now I remember, the Camelback !! Thanks !!
johnandjulie13 wrote: Hello John:I believe the widowmaker was the camelback. The cab (and anyone inside) were susceptible to all sorts of injuries due to its configuration.Regards,John O
Hello John:
I believe the widowmaker was the camelback. The cab (and anyone inside) were susceptible to all sorts of injuries due to its configuration.
Regards,
John O
That's right, John !! Now I remember, the Camelback !! Thanks !!
The Camelbacks were widow makes cause if a main drive arm would break it would come right up through the engineers compartment and then its light out meatball.
John,
I'm not aware of any nicknames for the Docksider. There's only a short description of it in the Cyclopedia which claims the loco was built by Alco in 1910.
I hope my LHS gets a few of those Atlas USRA 0-6-0's in stock when they're released. As with other Atlas products I'm sure the detail on those things will be superb. Still, I gotta look before I buy but it's my kinda engine!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month