Trains.com

Best Postwar Transformer!!

26469 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Hobart, In
  • 568 posts
Posted by jwse30 on Friday, February 27, 2009 7:40 PM

 My current layout is powered by a ZW. It has two independent loops, and I'm using one of the inner throttles to power my insulated rail activated accessories.  I'll use the fourth throttle to power my switches. I'll be using a DC power supply to light my buildings and streetlights. My 1033 will power my 3656 stockyard eventually.

I did use my 1033 to power my Christmas layout for a while this year.

J White


 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Florida
  • 2,238 posts
Posted by traindaddy1 on Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:15 AM

I use a ZW 275 and am very satisfied with its power and appearance.

Side Note: I am a little Confused and  maybe I haven't been reading previous threads on the transformer subject but one opinion expressed indicated that the "modern" ZW was not up to par.  I wonder if this suggests that the current ZW (List @ $430.) should be avoided and the concentration should focus on getting an original from a reputable source.   Interesting!

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Silver City, NM USA
  • 1,370 posts
Posted by Deputy on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 5:39 PM

What a COOL thread!!! I found it by sheer luck. I find that I have become a transformer accumulator....or maybe a transformer addict. Shock
I started out with an MTH Z-4000. BTW...to Lee who said "Getting back to more of the original post here, I can run four trains at one time on four different tracks with a post war ZW, can't do that with a Z-4000!"
I can run way more than 4 trains on ONE track using my Z-4000 and DCS. Who said we had to be restricted to conventional control? Clown

I also have a Lionel KW for under-tree duty and a postwar ZW and prewar Type Z for additional power for the main layout. BTW....horn and direction control is no problemo with the Type Z, since I also have a Lionel 167 Whistle/Direction Control Box.

The biggest plus for the ZW is that it is MUCH lighter than the Z-4000. So updating the DCS and TIU has become a lot more pleasant. Smile
My ZW was also rebuilt by Davis Lyons, so it is nearly totally quite and doesn't have any overheat problems. But a fast circuit breaker or quick burn fuse is mandatory for the modern train hardware.
What's next? I thought about a 250 watt ZW, but haven't found a good deal on one yet. Also thinking about a 150 watt type V. Geez this addiction is BAD!!!!

Dep


 

Virginian Railroad

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Florida
  • 2,238 posts
Posted by traindaddy1 on Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:28 PM

I have a ZW275-R.   Received used.  Had 'Trainland' replace the old cord and overhaul it for a very nominal cost.  I don't know if it is the "best" but it sure works fine for me.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: SE MI
  • 915 posts
Posted by MichRR714 on Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:42 PM

I run a ZW for my tracks and TW for my accessories.  I love the look of the old transformers.  With proper fusing and transient voltage protection they are just as safe as the new ones IMHO.

Charlie a.k.a. MichiganRailRoad714 (Charter Member TTC)      

 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:07 PM

 Using the pw ZW for powering switches, accys, and lights.  (New ZW for track power).  Should do something with a KW, and LW holding down the workbench. 

Question:  Why didn't any of the Lionel Xformers have a power "On/Off" switch?  Do you think the intent was to force the unit to being unplugged?  Curious about that!

Don

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Friday, September 11, 2009 8:52 AM

dbaker48
Why didn't any of the Lionel Xformers have a power "On/Off" switch?  Do you think the intent was to force the unit to being unplugged? 

 

It was probably a combination of reasons. 

Mom or dad could see from across the room if the transformer was unplugged or not.

A switch on a transformer adds expense & takes up real estate while reducing simplicity & reliability all without affecting operation.

Another question... some Lionel transformers did in fact have power "On/Off" switches built in to them... what year did the first one come out?

Rob

Rob

  • Member since
    February 2014
  • 83 posts
Posted by Serows1 on Friday, September 11, 2009 4:04 PM

I use KW's, I like there looks and they are way cheaper per watt than ZW's. Smile

 

Paul

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Silver City, NM USA
  • 1,370 posts
Posted by Deputy on Friday, September 11, 2009 4:20 PM

Cool! I like that KW setup. I just scored a 150 watt Type V for only $45 and it looks to be in minty condition.

Virginian Railroad

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Silver City, NM USA
  • 1,370 posts
Posted by Deputy on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:51 PM

Just got my E-Bay-purchased Type Z yesterday. Put the voltmeter on each pair of terminals,.WOW!!! 25 volts out of each one of them!!! This has to be the "sleeper" transformer in Lionel's whole lineup. They say if you put a train on it and crank it all the way up, it's a guarantee launch off the track. I don't doubt it. Only downside I can see is the lack of whistle and direction controls. But a visit to Trainz.com scored me a type 167 whistle/direction controller, so no sweat there. Best part is the transformer only cost me $99. Big Smile

 

Virginian Railroad

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by lionel2 on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:33 PM

Thats awesome.  I have (4) Z's and a ZW and KW running my setup.  Believe me, the Z is the best of them all.  I run my trains and accessories with my Z's.  I have just about all the postwar big accessories you can think of.  Z packs a punch. And to answer that question.  Yes, when I run my 1615 or 2037, they nearly fly off.  But, I know better than to go full bore.  You crank it up when you want that smoke unit juiced up.  Yes, I have some 167's.  But, I dont use them.  I have a 118 Whisle shack now that I use for sounds.  Will be getting a 114 for the horn sounds soon.  As for directions, I just power down and then back up.  I believe I picked up all 4 Z's for around....humm...$220...around there.  I know I got one for $40 and another for $50. two in one day at the show.  Then another for $80 and one for $90.  Thats $260 grand total.  I was little off. But, why spend $200 on a ZW that only has 18 volts.  when you can get 25 volts for half the price and just get some $10 167's for controls and whatever.  thanks.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: My Old Kentucky Home
  • 599 posts
Posted by mackb4 on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:34 AM

 The 30b A.F. 300 watter is powerful,great looking,but hard to find (at least around here).

 The 275 watt ZW is a great performer.But mine wore out the carbon rollers and I have never got around to replacing them .Got three more packed away,but they haven't been used since we picked them up in the 70's.Heck  they may not have used since the 50's or 60's.

 So right now I'm using an A.F. 12b dual handle 250 watt.It works great on my little temp. layout.Just won't blow the Lionel whistle without a button. 

  I guess their all good if they work for what you need Tongue  

Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Silver City, NM USA
  • 1,370 posts
Posted by Deputy on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:27 AM

Lionel2: I agree 100%. I've been watching the ZWs on E-bay, and even with this crummy economy, the prices being paid for them are OUTRAGEOUS. Some are in TERRIBLE condition, yet they are selling for $100+. But the Type Z is selling for peanuts. No, the Z doesn't have the "feel" of a ZW with the vertical throttle handles, and it doesn't have the "Lionel mystique" associated with the ZW, but for raw power it can't be beat.

mack: You answered a question I was about to ask. I wondered if anyone was using an AF transformer to run their Lionel layouts. Some of those AF transformers look VERY cool and they can be had for a lot less than Lionel transformers of comparable voltage.

Virginian Railroad

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:47 PM

I have a 30B that I tried to get used to a few years ago.  But having the two controls turn in opposite directions kept me continually confused.  I'm also used to turning down the voltage to cycle the e-unit and was frustrated by having to lift the handle.  I replaced it with a second Lionel Z and am much happier with that.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: West coast, USA
  • 356 posts
Posted by rlplionel on Monday, September 21, 2009 9:45 PM

I'm partial to the postwar electronic transformer. Cool

Robert

http://www.robertstrains.com/

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 140 posts
Posted by thankey on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:52 PM

There's something about post war transformers that is really fascinating.  To attest to that fact, see the following list of what's available for my layout. 

The style and decent power of the LW puts it near the top of my favorite list.  It's not really old-school in appearance but a tasteful transition piece.

The KW's are really a good bang (watt) for the buck and, in my opinion, attractive in appearance.  The throttles are a little cumbersome though.

If your desire is for no fuss, no muss power, consider the TW.  They get the job done and can be quite a bargain.  The SW ranks about the same but the attempt to modernize its look falls short, and to me detracts from the overall package.

The Q, R, & Z are all great examples of transformers with no fluff.  They just have the power to run the trains.  Lack of whistle and direction is more than acceptable when you consider the era.

The RW, 1033, 1034, and 1042 are all nice compact units appropriate for the smallest of layouts or sidings / spurs or trolley routes.

Without regard to power, if someone said I could keep only one, it would be the LW.

 

1033

#1

90

1033

#2

90

1034

75

1042

75

KW

#1

190

KW

#2

190

KW

#3

190

LW

#1

125

LW

#2

125

Q

75

R

100

RW

#1

110

RW

#2

110

SW

130

TW

#1

175

TW

#2

175

TW

#3

175

Z

250

18

2,450

 

Did I mention that my layout consists of O-27 tubular comprised of 8 curve sections and 4 straights?  It's a door layout in that it hangs on the back of the extra bedroom door when not in use. 

Do you think I have enough power?  Yeah, you're right, I need more.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:29 PM

thankey
If your desire is for no fuss, no muss power, consider the TW.  They get the job done and can be quite a bargain. 

 

The TW is ideal for your small layout.  It IS a radical departure from all other Lionel transformers, though.

The TW is essentially two 90 watt (1033 type)transformers in one housing, the most it can output for train control is ~ 60-65 watts, but the accessory load can also be this high too w/o affecting train performance.

The similar SW(almost identical case) would be better for you if you have larger engines like a two-motor F-3 as it can be loaded to it's full output(~ 105-110 watts) on either A-U or B-U.  A-U has the whistle/horn control.   Train speed & load will affect accessory performance, though.

Rob

Rob

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Silver City, NM USA
  • 1,370 posts
Posted by Deputy on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:54 PM

Here are 3 postwar transformers I recently scored off E-Bay:

250 watt ZW

 

150 watt VW

150 Watt Type V

Virginian Railroad

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 621 posts
Posted by dsmith on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 8:50 PM

 My favorite for style and functionality is the Lionel LW.

  David from Dearborn  

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 101 posts
Posted by tcripe on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 11:24 PM

After my old Lionel Scout transformer burned out, I needed something. About all I could afford was an LW. My Dad went to a convention in Chicago and promised to bring one home. I could hardly get to sleep the night before he returned. Opening the box was just like Christmas! I spent many hours at the throttle of that LW.

Terry

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: St. Louis
  • 15 posts
Posted by delwoodjef on Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:30 AM

I have a KW and an LW; I like them both. The LW has the green light, and I'm a sucker for those old lights.

My question is, can these two transformers be hooked up in phase with each other? I've used them independently from one another in the past.  

 

Jef http://theoldie.blogspot.com/ Baseball cards, Lionel Trains, Rock & Roll, and Chevrolet
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:58 PM

 

delwoodjef

I have a KW and an LW; I like them both ...My question is, can these two transformers be hooked up in phase with each other?...

Yes.

Common on the KW are the "U" posts.  Common on the LW are the "A" posts.

Rob

Rob

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month