lionroar88 wrote:Also I think they should offer all their engines in a Conventional configuration, but with the option to have TMCC/Legacy installed (at the buyer's discression).
Also I think they should offer all their engines in a Conventional configuration, but with the option to have TMCC/Legacy installed (at the buyer's discression).
lionroar88 wrote: Fewer engines in Pennsy, NYC, Santa Fe, UP... I mean really it gets very tiresome to see the catalog laden with these roadnames and only 1 or 2 offerings in B&O, C&O, and WM..
Fewer engines in Pennsy, NYC, Santa Fe, UP... I mean really it gets very tiresome to see the catalog laden with these roadnames and only 1 or 2 offerings in B&O, C&O, and WM..
Jason
B&O = Best & Only
BL-2 s
more sharknoses (other than NYC)
5 axle c-liners
lionelfanatic wrote: lionroar88 wrote: Also I think they should offer all their engines in a Conventional configuration, but with the option to have TMCC/Legacy installed (at the buyer's discression).That sounds like a good idea.I like the TMCC, but I would rather have convintional(?) locomotives for the price.
lionroar88 wrote: Also I think they should offer all their engines in a Conventional configuration, but with the option to have TMCC/Legacy installed (at the buyer's discression).
I agree with this idea. It permits a much broader market for essentially the same production item, attracting those with a lower purchase price threshhold, those who simply want conventional and don't want the additional features, accomodating those who want TMCC/Legacy, and satisfying those who would some day want to upgrade for whatever reason. And with limited additional manufacturing cost to Lionel. This approach has worked for the automobile manufacturers.
Lionel must have thought about it and declined to do so for some reason unknown to us.
Jack
IF IT WON'T COME LOOSE BY TAPPING ON IT, DON'T TRY TO FORCE IT. USE A BIGGER HAMMER.
lionroar88 wrote: Also, I would like to see then sell the engines in mulitple numbers, and the rolling stock in multiple numbers.
How about O27 track in a radius between 27 and 42".
Also steam engines that smoke like an MTH. Why couldn't they make tmcc engines with a conventional/tmcc switch for conventional operators who buy tmcc engines and want it to smoke out of the box. Pretty disapointing when you buy a new steamer and it smokes tiny wisps about invisible.
Also more mid-priced sets. Most sets are either 150-300 dollars or 900-1000 dollars.
And they should put quality first. example: Don't make diesel starter engines with 1 motor/power truck that cant pull anything. They just turn people away with things like that.
trainsfan wrote: How about O27 track in a radius between 27 and 42".Also steam engines that smoke like an MTH. Why couldn't they make tmcc engines with a conventional/tmcc switch for conventional operators who buy tmcc engines and want it to smoke out of the box. Pretty disapointing when you buy a new steamer and it smokes tiny wisps about invisible.Also more mid-priced sets. Most sets are either 150-300 dollars or 900-1000 dollars.And they should put quality first. example: Don't make diesel starter engines with 1 motor/power truck that cant pull anything. They just turn people away with things like that.
lionroar88 wrote: trainsfan wrote: How about O27 track in a radius between 27 and 42".Also steam engines that smoke like an MTH. Why couldn't they make tmcc engines with a conventional/tmcc switch for conventional operators who buy tmcc engines and want it to smoke out of the box. Pretty disapointing when you buy a new steamer and it smokes tiny wisps about invisible.Also more mid-priced sets. Most sets are either 150-300 dollars or 900-1000 dollars.And they should put quality first. example: Don't make diesel starter engines with 1 motor/power truck that cant pull anything. They just turn people away with things like that.The reason they don't have a switch is because TMCC engines are conventional - no need for a switch, TMCC engines run in conventional mode when the Command Base is not present.Also, most people who want only conventional engines don't want to pay for the TMCC electronics (this adds $$$ to the engine's cost).What I would do, if I were Jerry, is take the price of the TMCC engine, subtract the cost of the TMCC boards, and sell the engines in conventional only for that price (Say the TMCC board is $150, and the TMCC engine costs $450, sell the conventional only for $300 and the upgrade board for $150) They get greater coverage, more affordable engines, AND potential future revenue from the upgrade kits.As for the smoke units... MTH sued Lionel over this very thing... there's your answer.
Lionroar88: I know the engines will run without a switch, But it would be nice if they had a switch for conventional and the engine would actually smoke out of the box. That or they should put on the box: Puffing smoke unit which makes next to zero smoke with your conventional transformers. Why not try for 100 percent customer satisfaction? :)
Well, the CNJ question has been answered, they're making a John Bull, just looking for 1 more thing.....
Tropicana reefers Orange &/or White....mulitple numbers 6 car set...I like them way they come from Florida to Jersey City...and, no, if MTH made them, I just ain't interested.... and I liket the TMCC option...
I haven't seen any FEC containers (I have pictures), though I have seen on occasion, FEC well cars. Most that I've seen are TTX or CSX (and some CSX containers). I get to run past the FEC mainline going to & from work (If you mapquest it, Greenland Road near US1 Zip 32257).
Just an observation....
I am the monster in your head...And I thought you'd learn by now, It seems you haven't yet.I am the venom in your skin --- Breaking Benjamin
lionroar88 wrote:Just thought of something else...A way to upload custom sound sets to the engines.
Sniff...sniff....Smell like an MTH idea....
anjdevil2 wrote: lionroar88 wrote:Just thought of something else...A way to upload custom sound sets to the engines. Sniff...sniff....Smell like an MTH idea....
Rob
"Texas & Pacific... MKT... FW&D... Cotton Belt ... Frisco"
Hi, just read the post and replies so far. sounds like Lionel should read these forums. I have two angles on this. first most guys here are older guys who had lionel in their childhood. they need to keep catering to us. I like the reissues of postwar stuff and the tin stuff. next angle, lionel made its reputation in making trains for fathers to play with their sons. they need to concentrate on starter sets! and with todays electronics they all need to have railsounds for starter prices. it is ridiculous that MTH can do this but not lionel. electronics are cheap. I can go to the grocery store and get a birthday card with more sophisticated sounds than the lionel starters. if you want to get this generation of nintendo kids you have to make them worth looking at.
as a side note my 5 year old nephew will 10 to 1 go for steam over diesel. it's the action, side rods, smoke, generally more to see.
Scott
In the 2000 volume 1 catalog, Lionel offered several engines in "command" and "traditional" versions. The traditional version was generally $100.00 less than the command version. This only lasted a few catalogs. I remember (correct me if you know differently) the explanation given when this was discontinued, was that the traditional engines were not selling in large enough quantities to justify their production.
I would be very surprised if Lionel decided to offer command & traditional engines together a second time. I do agree with the idea of a command/traditional operation mode switch on engines.
I've been waiting over a year for a scale SF F3 B unit, so I guess I'll wish for that. Or I'll just sell the A unit and move on.
Jim
Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale
The LionMaster Union Pacific Turbine "Veranda" Locomotive would fit with the series.
Should it have a plastic body or a Die-Cast Metal Body?
Plastic or Die-Cast Metal is a choice somebody will have to make.
Andrew
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
Speaking from my grandson's point of view:
Toby,
Cranky the Crane,
Edward,
Gordon,
Forgot the name of the railbus, must be senility.
Remember the Veterans. Past, present and future.
www.sd3r.org
Proud New Member Of The NRA
here here!! is MTH the only one with a sense of humour? I like the idea of accurate prototypical
stuff as much as the next guy but you have to admit this is really funny. lets have more fairy tale stuff!
Kooljock1 wrote:"first most guys here are older guys who had lionel in their childhood. they need to keep catering to us. I like the reissues of postwar stuff and the tin stuff. "Not necessarily. Some of us were too young (or in my case not born yet!) to get the good stuff the first time around. And we want a chance to have it all minty-new now!OF course, we'd also like CAN motors, cruise, and RailSounds... but not in the Pre-War thank you!Jon
Yes, the train companies are compelled to serve a market with extremely diverse interests. Nurture the roots and sow the seeds, so to speak. That can get get pretty dicey, and expensive. Just look at the laundry list that has been compiled here. Then think of the financial condition of the combatants.
A couple of months back on this forum somewhere, someone started a thread looking for ages and came up with an average age. Unscientific but interesting. Not enough repondents. The average age (not mean age) was younger than I expected.
lionroar88 wrote:trainsfan,This is why I feel selling engines that are conventionally equiped, but upgradable to TMCC/Legacy with add-in boards is the better route. Also, the boards should be available through service centers only, if selling to individuals they should be made fully aware that Lionel does not gaurantee the boards unless they are installed by a service center.
They did this for a few years starting maybe around 2000, that is how I got started with TMCC. I have two sets of the B&O FT's that I bought the plug-n-play boards and a pair of D&H C-420's one that came w/TMMC and the other, issued the same year, that I upgraded the same as the FT's.
Not being privy to the cost breakdowns I don't know what the cost difference would be to market them as upgradeable. However it seems as though if they were upgradeable, on a P&P basis, it would be a good way to get your foot in the door in anticipation of additional sales of upgrade parts. But that brings up another question as to wheather "upgrading " is even feasible with Legacy systems.
lionelfanatic wrote:One more idea, more euro trains, they seem to be selling well.I would recommend the Mallard.
dougdagrump wrote: lionroar88 wrote:trainsfan,This is why I feel selling engines that are conventionally equiped, but upgradable to TMCC/Legacy with add-in boards is the better route. Also, the boards should be available through service centers only, if selling to individuals they should be made fully aware that Lionel does not gaurantee the boards unless they are installed by a service center.They did this for a few years starting maybe around 2000, that is how I got started with TMCC. I have two sets of the B&O FT's that I bought the plug-n-play boards and a pair of D&H C-420's one that came w/TMMC and the other, issued the same year, that I upgraded the same as the FT's.Not being privy to the cost breakdowns I don't know what the cost difference would be to market them as upgradeable. However it seems as though if they were upgradeable, on a P&P basis, it would be a good way to get your foot in the door in anticipation of additional sales of upgrade parts. But that brings up another question as to wheather "upgrading " is even feasible with Legacy systems.
I would also think that their production costs would go down. When Brent mentioned that Lionel should offer easy upgrades, I thought it was a great idea. I did not realize Lionel had already tried this. Jerry Calabrese talks about the funnel theory. Doug hits the nail on the head, by giving owners and easy upgrade path to TMCC (and even to Legacy) Lionel has a chance to make the funnel larger.
I would be curious to know if providing a "P&P" option is really more expensive than making a conventional locomotive.
Regards,
John
" What do I think needs to be produced by Lionel ? "
Something Made in the USA !!!
I like Mike's sense of Humor with the Burp-Oh Beer Car & I do not even drink at all. Maybe a Charlie Horse Dog Food Reefer would be an excellent seller also. Take Care all.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month