Erik_Mag Mark, The Olympian Hiawatha most certainly did serve Miles City, my family rode the train between Seattle and Miles City in 1957. Not sure if the Hi' stopped in Terry and the line was on the wrong side of the river for Forsythe.
Erik:
You're absolutely correct. I didn't mean to include Miles City, and errored when I did. As information, the Olympian Hiawatha didn't stop at Terry or Forsyth. Their Milwaukee passenger train service ended when the Columbian was discontinued. Interestingly, in Milwaukee passenger train schedules (and the Official Guide), there is a footnote by Terry and Forsyth in the Olympian Hiawatha's column, which says, "Rail tickets destined to Terry or Forsyth will be honored to Miles City; thence via bus to destination." Similar footnotes indicated such bus connection to places like Drummond, Alberton, St. Regis and Haugan (Greyhound, three trips daily on US 10) as well as Lavina, Ryegate, Barber, Shawmut, Two Dot, and Martinsdale (Canyon Transportation, one bus daily between Billings and Helena via Harlowton and Townsend). Stopping the train at these locations would simply had added time to a schedule (which by 1961 was already over 2 hours slower than the Empire Builder westbound), and probably wouldn't be huge generators of ridership.
Though I errored in including Miles City in the list of NP exclusivity, I wouldn't have included Terry and Forsyth regardless. The original premise was cities with a population of 3,000 or more, and neither community achieved this threshold. But the whole exercise was meant as a generalization of how little exclusivity (and population) could be attributed to Milwaukee Road service. And even beyond that, I excluded (and probably shouldn't've) Laurel and Toppenish because they weren't stops for the North Coast Limited - the most direct NP competition for the Olympian Hiawatha - but both communities had well over 3,000 people the year the Olympian Hiawatha went away. Then there's Cheney, WA that met the population criteria and where the NP stopped its Mainstreeter and the UP its Hinkle-Spokane train, but the Olympian Hiawatha (operating on UP) didn't stop. But, any way you look at it, it's hardly a mystery as to why the Milwaukee bowed out before the others and wasn't missed when they did.
Mark Meyer
VerMontanan The Olympian Hiawatha died in May of 1961 (60 years ago), and when it did, the only community served exclusively by that train west of Mobridge, South Dakota with more than 3,000 people was Renton, Washington - a Seattle suburb (that wasn't even on Milwaukee Road track). Not counting suburbs, the next-biggest community exclusively-served by the Olympian Hiawatha was Roundup, Montana, population 2,842. This is contrast to places like Dickinson, Glendive, Miles City, Billings (which admittedly had CB&Q - half owned by the NP - service), Livingston, Bozeman, Helena, Pasco-Richland-Kennewick, and Yakima where the "parallel" NP had exclusivity in Midwest-Seattle service. And further north, GN-served communities in general were not huge, but were exclusively served (Williston, Wolf Point, Glasgow, Havre, Great Falls, Shelby, Cut Bank, Kalispell, Wenatchee, Everett).
May be of interest to note that the Olympian began in 1911, making it older than the Empire Builder by almost 20 years. After the war, and the success of the Twin Cities - Chicago Hiawatha, the Milwaukee began adding "Hiawatha" to the names of it's trains that had been streamlined. So it wasn't a new train the Milwaukee added in the forties expecting a big post-war surge, it was a revamping of an established train.
Thanks everyone for your responses, they made fascinating reading. Thanks in particular to VerMontanan for the detail and insight.
Thanks for your responses, everyone, has made for fascinating reading for me. 'VerMontanan' in particular, I really appreciate your detailed response, certainly makes clear the hopelessness of the Olympian Hiawatha's situation compared to the traffic bases of the GN & NP trains. Also, I hadn't considered the point about the inferiority of some of the Hi's equipment, think I was distracted by the Stevens' 'Skytop' observation cars.
BaltACD I don't have the answer to your question. That being said, if you search through the forum for posts from a former poster 'Michael Sol', a expert on things Milwaukee Road - you can probably find the answer(s) you are looking for.
I don't have the answer to your question. That being said, if you search through the forum for posts from a former poster 'Michael Sol', a expert on things Milwaukee Road - you can probably find the answer(s) you are looking for.
Mr. Sol's "expertise" is debatable. On the website indicated and elsewhere, one will find his treatises on the Milwaukee Road. Specific to the Olympian Hiawatha, one of his claims is especially entertaining from the "American Rails" website: "From these numbers it is clear to see that despite what you may have previously read or understood about Milwaukee's Northwest flagship, the railroad was far more efficient than its competitors with transcontinental rail service."
Of course, this begs the questions about why the train was discontinued a decade before most of its competitors, and why the competitors who were so inefficient (and kept operating their passenger trains) were able to upgrade their railroad for the future with CTC, power switches, lineside failed equipment detectors, and longer sidings - all things that the Milwaukee never had the money to do. (The Milwaukee never even had the money to place block signal protection on its main line between Plummer, Idaho and Marengo, Washington.)
So, before you take anything - even what I say - at face value, ask yourself why if the Milwaukee was so much more "efficient", it's not around today, and no one (with the wherewithal to do so) stepped in to save it in the 1970s.
http://trainweb.org/milwaukeemyths/
Blue Star Line So, after that long preamble, my questions are: did the Milwaukee Road give up on the 'Olympian Hi' without really trying to save it? Or was the competiton from the 'Builder' and 'NCL' just too much?
So, after that long preamble, my questions are: did the Milwaukee Road give up on the 'Olympian Hi' without really trying to save it? Or was the competiton from the 'Builder' and 'NCL' just too much?
IIRC, between Aberdeen and Butte, the largest city on the route of the OH was Miles City with a population of a bit over 10,000. The Empire Builder served a lot of sparsely populated territory, but did have Glacier National Park adjacent to the line. The North Coast Limited did serve Billings as well as a couple of the larger cities in North Dakota.
Some of my earliest memories were of riding the Olympia Hiawatha between Seattle and Miles City at the ripe old age of 33 months.
BaltACD I don't have the answer to your question. That being said, if you search through the forum for posts from a former poster 'Michael Sol', a expert on things Milwaukee Road - you can probably find the answer(s) you are looking for. Welcome Aboard.
Welcome Aboard.
Milwaukee Road Archives A lot of information about all things Milwaukee Road.
Jeff
The MILW Pacific Extension was built at a later date than the NP where the larger towns had established themselves. Population was sparse along the MILW.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Hello, just joined this board, apologies if this seems to be a very obvious question.
I have long been puzzled by the relatively early demise of the Milwaukee Road's 'Olympian Hiawatha' [1961]. I understand that of the three northern trans-continental roads, the CMStP & P was the weakest financially and that the 'Olympian Hiawatha' had to compete against two magnificant rivals in Great Northern's 'Empire Builder' and Northern Pacific's 'North Coast Limited'. But it is this that partly puzzles me. My understanding is that, along with the Florida streamliners, the Western transcontinental streamliners were amongst the last profitable / viable passenger trains in the States. (Think not only of the two Hill roads' trains, but also Santa Fe's 'Chiefs' and Union Pacific's 'City' trains).
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter