Trains.com

DMUs for Amtrak

5693 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Saturday, March 1, 2008 8:37 AM
 Paul Milenkovic wrote:

As to 1200 HP on the CRC DMU including HEP (Whew!), they have a separate Diesel gen set for HEP in addition to the two 600 HP traction Diesels -- the CRC is like the transit agency locos with a separate HEP genset.  Whether that HEP genset can supply the heat and AC and light needs of two trailers I don't know.

But Amtrak seems to think it needs about 1 locomotive for every 4 cars -- maybe every 6 cars if they stretch it.  Do they really need that much power or is this a reliability/factor of safety thing -- that they can bring their trains in on one locomotive?

Is a one-locomotive train too risky for an LD train given current levels of maintenance? 

The operative term is "given the current levels of maintenance."  Remember what you are dealing with -- Toasters by GE.  An E8 could/can keep a schedule with 8 cars through mountains.  Those CRC units use automotive type diesels and are pulling 2 cars in addition.  No need to be hanging on during a accelleration.  The transmissions make a differance, too.

Eric
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 2,741 posts
Posted by Paul Milenkovic on Monday, February 25, 2008 10:09 AM

As to 1200 HP on the CRC DMU including HEP (Whew!), they have a separate Diesel gen set for HEP in addition to the two 600 HP traction Diesels -- the CRC is like the transit agency locos with a separate HEP genset.  Whether that HEP genset can supply the heat and AC and light needs of two trailers I don't know.

But Amtrak seems to think it needs about 1 locomotive for every 4 cars -- maybe every 6 cars if they stretch it.  Do they really need that much power or is this a reliability/factor of safety thing -- that they can bring their trains in on one locomotive?

Is a one-locomotive train too risky for an LD train given current levels of maintenance? 

If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, February 25, 2008 6:28 AM

 JT22CW wrote:
 PNWRMNM wrote:
Colorado Rail Car says the DMUs have two 600 HP engines, which is 1200 hp/car
1200 horsepower per train, actually (including HEP requirements).  They use one car to haul two other ones.

Once upon a time, the LIRR ran 17 car trains from Long Island City to Port Jefferson with 17 cars and 2400 HP.  Metra used to run some fairly long trains (10-12 cars?) behind a single E8/9.  So 1200 HP for 3 cars is within the normal range for std practice.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 302 posts
Posted by JT22CW on Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:28 AM
 PNWRMNM wrote:
Colorado Rail Car says the DMUs have two 600 HP engines, which is 1200 hp/car
1200 horsepower per train, actually (including HEP requirements).  They use one car to haul two other ones.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: NL
  • 614 posts
Posted by MStLfan on Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:54 AM
 PNWRMNM wrote:

Blue Streak

 

Colorado Rail Car says the DMUs have two 600 HP engines, which is 1200 hp/car, which is more than most loco hauled trains.  My question is why the discrepancy in accelleration rates you report?  Hotel power?  Transmission?  Also what is the basis of your statement??

 

Mac

Maybe weight is a factor? I noticed a slower acceleration by less than 10 year old double deck intercity emu's here in the Netherlands compared to late 60's early 70's single deck suburban emu's.

greetings,

Marc Immeker

For whom the Bell Tolls John Donne From Devotions upon Emergent Occasions (1623), XVII: Nunc Lento Sonitu Dicunt, Morieris - PERCHANCE he for whom this bell tolls may be so ill, as that he knows not it tolls for him; and perchance I may think myself so much better than I am, as that they who are about me, and see my state, may have caused it to toll for me, and I know not that.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:56 AM

Blue Streak

 

Colorado Rail Car says the DMUs have two 600 HP engines, which is 1200 hp/car, which is more than most loco hauled trains.  My question is why the discrepancy in accelleration rates you report?  Hotel power?  Transmission?  Also what is the basis of your statement??

 

Mac

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, February 15, 2008 2:16 PM
I have ridden tri-rail's DMU and they would work if the line does not have a lot of slow orders. The DMUs have acceleration that is less than 50% acceleration of a locomotive and car set. This is a consideration for timekeeping and schedule.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:43 PM

There are a few points to consider if runnig the Colorado-Railcar-DMUs in intercity-service. Of course, on lightly-travelled routes, they would be a cheaper alternative to locomotive-hauled trains. Most probably, two Colorado-railcars, one at each end, would be able to pull two to three trailers, which would make a nice four or five-car-train. (Bad acceleration is not a top-issue in intercity-service, because there are fewer stops than in communter-operations.)

How is riding-quality at 80 or 90 mph? The DMUs are built for commuter-operations with lower top speeds. Would they need new trucks? Would the engines overheat if runnig continously at higher speeds? Same questions appear if the DMUs power the proposed Chicago-Quad-Cities trains.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:02 AM
The Vermont DMU deal fell apart because the State was insisting on guaranteed buyback at 90% of the purchase price for the cars should the service not work, and Colorado Railcar would not/could not furnish such a guarantee.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 2:16 PM
Don't know about amtrak but if I ever won the lottery I would have one of them outfitted for my personal train and it would be first class.
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 302 posts
Posted by JT22CW on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 1:18 AM
This thread isn't about Tri-Rail's double-deck DMUs, IINM.  Amtrak wouldn't be getting double-deckers if they were ever to go for DMUs again, besides.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:35 PM
Tri-rail dmu's terrible acceleration
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 302 posts
Posted by JT22CW on Friday, May 25, 2007 11:21 PM

I think it would be great if the states would jump in and help Amtrak out a little
That is what the current administration in DC wants.  However, that would be the weasely way out of DC's obligations to Amtrak per both the National Passenger Rail Act of 1970 and the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.

Amtrak used to have a sizable fleet of DMUs.  They were called by the name "Budd RDC".  Amtrak was even in possession of the unique "Roger Williams" version of this DMU.  If the politicians in DC are relenting on the decision thereof to purge DMUs from Amtrak, let them come up with the cash.  (Gas is approaching $4/gallon at the time of writing, after all; and it's coming up very close to summer.)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:08 PM
Sign - With Stupid [#wstupid]
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: The Beautiful North Georgia Mountians
  • 2,362 posts
Posted by Railfan1 on Sunday, May 20, 2007 6:07 PM
Interesting.
"It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 19, 2007 5:05 AM
To me I think it would be great if the states would jump in and help Amtrak out a little.  I know that the Colorado Railcar DMU folks also make a self propelled double deck train.  Maybe Amtrak could get a few of these for the long distant trains, They could still put the locomotive up front, but also put a self propelled car, just in case the 1 locomotive goes down.  The train could still continue enroute and drop it off at the next Yard, for the next train to take with them to the shops.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 19, 2007 5:02 AM
As long as the trains have atleast 3 cars then yes it would activate the signal circuits.  All they would really have to do is put some of the old baggage cars on the trains and put to motor cars, or DMU's.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, May 18, 2007 10:26 AM
Amtrak has the state of Vermont interested in purchasing some for operation between Springfield Mass and Burlington VT. 

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Thursday, May 17, 2007 4:02 PM
 n012944 wrote:

I don't see Amtrak buying new equipment any time soon.  Unless they can get a state to pony up for it.

 

Bert

True dat, true dat.

Another problem to be addressed is will the DMUs activate signal circuits. Otherwise, what good would 25MPH trains be?

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Monday, May 14, 2007 7:46 PM

I don't see Amtrak buying new equipment any time soon.  Unless they can get a state to pony up for it.

 

Bert

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • 1 posts
DMUs for Amtrak
Posted by j.peplow on Monday, May 14, 2007 6:42 PM
Is Amtrak considering use of Colorado Railcars DMU for any of its shorter runs? 2 miles per gallon of fuel seems to be pretty economical. Talk of a possible Chicago to Dubuque train would be a good fit for a DMU.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy