Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII
My understanding of the China Rail situation is that the routes into less-developed areas of China (much of the huge expense in construction and thus debt) is for the future, as major urban metro areas have become overcrowded and too expensive for additional growth. I suppose that "forward thinking" was a motivation for our building a transcontinental railroad through what mid-19th century Americans considered an uninhabited wasteland.
You think NYC or SF are expensive for housing? Try Shanghai!!
BackshopYet, some on here have touted how great the Chinese railroad system is because it's electrified and we should be just like it because it has HSR.
Just not even remotely economically justified. For a very considerable percentage of the route-miles in the developed Chinese system, with no clear indication to me whether the 'take rate' for many of the nominally-non-cost-effective routes is increasing to the point it would break even or better on above-the-rail operating costs.
If the issue of how much true HSR costs is included in an appraisal of 'great', it presumes either massive construction and operating subsidy from 'somewhere', or the deep-pockets access to suitable capital, the synergistic economic factors, and the sheer determination of Wes Edens and Fortress.
Yet, some on here have touted how great the Chinese railroad system is because it's electrified and we should be just like it because it has HSR.
CMStPnPMy interpretation there is it is written sensitively and not to offend. There is a point where a skeptical reader would say to themself.......this reads as too good to be true.
Overmod For those who want to read the original World Bank study (101-page PDF): https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/933411559841476316/pdf/Chinas-High-Speed-Rail-Development.pdf
For those who want to read the original World Bank study (101-page PDF):
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/933411559841476316/pdf/Chinas-High-Speed-Rail-Development.pdf
I read most of it while the overlap is not surprising since the video shows it took pertinent parts from the World Bank study. I definitely noticed the World Bank study is written in very careful language where the video is more frank. Also, the text heaping nothing but praise on how the railways were setup, managed and engineered..........I have an issue with. My interpretation there is it is written sensitively and not to offend. There is a point where a skeptical reader would say to themself.......this reads as too good to be true.
BaltACDWho holds the debt?
They do. Roughly analogous to intergovernment loans in the United States.
CMStPnPOh my....... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAFVHJ-6FEY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAFVHJ-6FEY
Who holds the debt?
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Oh my.......
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.