With regard to late annulment or 'bustitution' I notice Amtrak is notably, and perhaps intentionally, silent in the FAQs. One would think that an "upgrade" to amenities now unavailable or insufficient would warrant a refund of the upgrade bid charge when Amtrak cannot provide the expected amenities. But the large and highly-paid legal department carefully avoids any discussion; perhaps it wasn't frequently-asked enough there...
I thought the FAQ entry regarding travel insurance coverage worth discussing, though. Note how carefully the Federal presumption of 'consult your lawyer' carries over to the question of whether you get your bid money back... even from a nominal Amtrak 'partner institution'...
Yeesh, that was awful!
And you wouldn't believe how many times it tried to restore posts when I edited them out, too! I finally had to back all the way out each time, or the software would 'helpfully' restore the duplicate posts.
I don't know if this is a Kalmbach change or something in the recent criOS update. But I sure hope whatever-it-is gets fixed!
I assume OM's quadruple post was an anomaly, not intentional.
OM, from your end, do you see that there are four duplicate posts? Being an anomaly, maybe you see only one. ??
In any event: You can say that again!
Just FYI, I wasn't using an Amtrak app. I was sitting at my desktop computer using Safari.
I was looking at the upgrade option on the Amtrak app this morning.
Go to https://www.Amtrak.com/bidup and scroll down to the FAQs bar. I think there are answers to all the questions in there.
Note the typical Amtrak language about non-refundable, non-changeable, non-transferable once your bid is accepted and your card has been charged. What happens when you get on the train and people are squatting in "your" new seat, I don't know.
Apparently my posts are not welcome on Newswire as I tried to reply to this message by John Rice on the above subject: "John Rice
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.