Trains.com

News Wire: Amtrak announces new CEO

6592 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:42 PM

It's from Wiki, so take this info with a grain of salt, however....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_subsidies#Russia

"In total, Russian Railways receives 112 billion rubles (around US$1.5 billion) annually from the government."

 

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NS Main Line at MP12 Blairsville,Pa
  • 830 posts
Posted by conrailman on Friday, June 30, 2017 6:43 PM

n012944

It's from Wiki, so take this info with a grain of salt, however....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_subsidies#Russia

"In total, Russian Railways receives 112 billion rubles (around US$1.5 billion) annually from the government."

 

 

 

 

Russia Railway put in Large order about 6 or 7 years for 5,000 New LD Cars, in Sleeping Car, Dining Cars, Lounge Cars, and Coaches. They think Big overseas, when Amtrak can only put in little 130 Viewliner car order.My 2 Cents

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,833 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Saturday, July 1, 2017 6:40 PM

n012944

It's from Wiki, so take this info with a grain of salt, however....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_subsidies#Russia

"In total, Russian Railways receives 112 billion rubles (around US$1.5 billion) annually from the government."

In regards to both China and Russia, their stats are always suspect because they do not operate as normal Western governments do.    In the case of Russia and China both, neither has made the full transition from state run economy and state run firms are heavily subsidized usually with a political appointee at the head who is a friend of a party boss somewhere.

If you follow the footnote from wiki-pedia it attributes the stat to a Russian publication and if you dig deeper within that Russian publication you'll see that Russian railway equipment firms are also subsidized and you will also see in some cases the government of Russia places the order direct with the equipment manufacturer as a intermediary and then turns to the railway company and says......here find a use for this equipment.    Interesting reading.

So based on what I read further I would assume the $1.5 Billion figure is on the low side but because of the Economic backwardness of Russia even today, I do not think their Railways require the huge amount of subsidies that Conrailman suggests either since Russia does not really have an Interstate Highway system and their roads East of the Urals are basiscally crap in most places.    Which makes Russia a lot more dependent on their railway system......and it probably does not require a whole lot of skill or management to reach profitability in that environment of lack of competition from neighboring highways.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NS Main Line at MP12 Blairsville,Pa
  • 830 posts
Posted by conrailman on Saturday, July 1, 2017 11:10 PM

All these Overseas Countrys like Russia and China, and other Countrys have 100% better Train Cars then the USA have. We should have First Class Amtrak, not other Countrys do. They put Amtrak to Shame for 30 plus years.Sad

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,833 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, July 2, 2017 1:20 AM

conrailman
All these Overseas Countrys like Russia and China, and other Countrys have 100% better Train Cars then the USA have. We should have First Class Amtrak, not other Countrys do. They put Amtrak to Shame for 30 plus years.

.

Ehhh, with that your sadly mistaken.   You need to watch some youtube videos on Russian long distance train travel via Trans Siberia Railway......I think I posted some links not too long ago.  Russian rail passenger cars would not pass the U.S. Federal Safety Requirements in this country.   Among the violations I believe are coal fired boilers in sleeping cars, pretty sure the windows are not safety glass since a lot of travelers complain of ill fitting duo pane window seals that let drafts of freezing cold air into the car.   Linoleum floors vs carpeting as well.     I would not rate them better than Amtrak first generation cars.   I would venture to guess that materials used in their construction also not as fireproof as in the U.S.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, July 4, 2017 11:24 PM

CMStPnP

 

 
conrailman
All these Overseas Countrys like Russia and China, and other Countrys have 100% better Train Cars then the USA have. We should have First Class Amtrak, not other Countrys do. They put Amtrak to Shame for 30 plus years.

 

.

 

Ehhh, with that your sadly mistaken.   You need to watch some youtube videos on Russian long distance train travel via Trans Siberia Railway......I think I posted some links not too long ago.  Russian rail passenger cars would not pass the U.S. Federal Safety Requirements in this country.   Among the violations I believe are coal fired boilers in sleeping cars, pretty sure the windows are not safety glass since a lot of travelers complain of ill fitting duo pane window seals that let drafts of freezing cold air into the car.   Linoleum floors vs carpeting as well.     I would not rate them better than Amtrak first generation cars.   I would venture to guess that materials used in their construction also not as fireproof as in the U.S.

 

I believe conrailman was referring to emerging HSR services, such as St. Petersburg to Moscow.  As to China, you omit this from your response.  Had you ridden some of their current HSRs or even the previous generation of passenger services, you'd see it is far superior to anything here.  And they keep building new lines!

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 7:02 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

 

 
conrailman

Maybe the New Guy could order Brand New Superliner car order and more Viewliners too, and New LD Engines order too.My 2 Cents

 

 

 
You said the same thing when Wick Moorman took office.  Amtrak is a lot more than locomotives and cars and those other issues need to be addressed, too.
 

Remember that one of the things Moorman had going was the development of generic equipment specs that could be used immediately for an equipment order.  

Also remember that rail passenger equipment has a really long life.  There really isn't anything keeping Amfleet and Superliner equipment from running indefinitely.  Just needs overhauling every couple of decades or so.  

Moorman also talked about the diesel locomotive fleet.  He said it wasn't clear whether the best path forward was rebuilding the P42s or buying new.  (I would think rebuilding with AC conversion would be more economical.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NS Main Line at MP12 Blairsville,Pa
  • 830 posts
Posted by conrailman on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:16 AM

GE stop making P42 Engines parts few weeks ago, Its in Railpace Maz July issue. So Amtrak can't get parts then for their P42 engines, they just out of Luck.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,831 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:46 PM

conrailman

GE stop making P42 Engines parts few weeks ago, Its in Railpace Maz July issue. So Amtrak can't get parts then for their P42 engines, they just out of Luck. 

Wonder if this is a power play by GE ?  Maybe Amtrak not paying what GE considers enough ?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,480 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:51 PM

What kind of parts are we talking about?  How credible is the source?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NS Main Line at MP12 Blairsville,Pa
  • 830 posts
Posted by conrailman on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 3:12 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

What kind of parts are we talking about?  How credible is the source?

 

 

It was in Railpace Maz issue, that was in that GE stop making all parts for P42 engines. Amtrak is not only railroad runs them engines. Metro- North Railroad and VIA Railroad runs these engines too.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 5:17 PM

conrailman

GE stop making P42 Engines parts few weeks ago, Its in Railpace Maz July issue. So Amtrak can't get parts then for their P42 engines, they just out of Luck.

 

Shouldn't be a problem.  Lots of ways to get non-OEM parts for locomotives.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: US
  • 88 posts
Posted by dmikee on Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:21 PM
1.5 billion is chump change in a national budget exceeding one trillion. Add a billion and Amtrak trains and systems could regain a prime position in America's transportation system. The states can't help much unless they are as large as Texas and California. Intermediate destinations are also understated in importance Not everyone rides from LA all the way to Seattle. One train per day? Arriving and departing in the middle of the night? This kind of scheduling is designed for failure.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:36 PM

dmikee
Not everyone rides from LA all the way to Seattle. One train per day? Arriving and departing in the middle of the night? This kind of scheduling is designed for failure.

Right.  LD trains are a waste.  The money could be better spent on shorter corridors, where higher speed service multiple times each day is efficient, popular and competitive.  Air travel over longer distances such as Chicago to LA will always be more efficient and popular than a 44 hour train.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:43 PM

Excerpt from Reuters, July 12

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-amtrak-idUSKBN19X2UJ

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Outgoing Amtrak Co-chief Executive Wick Moorman said on Wednesday the money-losing U.S. passenger rail system is considering a less comfortable economy class of seats that could allow it to pack in more passengers.

"We are looking at doing some creative things in terms of creating an economy class," Moorman said at the National Press Club talk in Washington.

He said that seat pitch - the distance between the seatback and the seat in front of it - would be tighter like in airline seats. "There will be some other things that just don't make it quite as comfortable," Moorman said.

Moorman told reporters the railroad is studying the idea and has not made any final decisions.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,939 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:01 PM

I am betting they will use the Auto-Max cars as a starting point - enclosed, multiple decks what better staring point could they have for a REAL economy class - might even install a shackle or two for unruly passengers.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,831 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:40 PM

schlimm

Right.  LD trains are a waste.  The money could be better spent on shorter corridors, where higher speed service multiple times each day is efficient, popular and competitive.  Air travel over longer distances such as Chicago to LA will always be more efficient and popular than a 44 hour train.

 

 
Have to dispute.  This trying to lump LD trains into end point passenger trips just does not compute. At least 50% of passengers on LD trains do appear to only touch one end point.  However it makes sense to lump all NEC stations as one end point.
 
2 trains on some or all parts of a present LD train route may more than double passengers traveling that route.  NYP - Florida is one and WASH - ATL is another.  LSL definitely.  Cardinal ? ? The night time sections of present LD routes if served by a day train can attract many new passengers. It will never happen due equipment availability. 
 
Doubling or at least adding one train a day on any route will not double operating costs.
Fixed terminal and station costs will be almost the same.  There will be some equipment savings when equipment can turn on different trains.  A big savings will be operating crew costs.  T&E crews can be better scheduled.  But the need for extra board crews will only increase slightly.  That can be a big savings.
 
Some routes might even be able to justify an intermediate F&B location saving costs.  Can see that might be possible on a route of NEC <> Florida.
  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 1,340 posts
Posted by ATSFGuy on Friday, August 25, 2017 6:00 PM

If Amtrak can afford to overhaul the Surfliner F59PHI Fleet, then they can overhaul the P42's and extend thier lifespan another 10-15 years.

GE has to make spare engine parts for the P42's, otherwise where will Antrak go when the fleet becomes unserviceable?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy