Trains.com

First time on the NEC

3391 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 469 posts
Posted by Enzoamps on Friday, January 15, 2016 1:10 AM

We have used the NEC from Washington to Trenton a lot.  As a senior, at least we get preferential boarding, instead of the festival- cattle-call rush.  The waiting area gets full, and for the Capitol Limited it gets crowded.  But my hat is off to the red caps, those guys know their stuff.  One drove us to the NEC train in his golf cart, and stopped by a particular car, and said, "This car stops right next to the elevator in Trenton."  And sure enough, in Trenton we walked off the car looking right at the elevator.   And when transferring from NEC to Calitol and vice versa, they left us in that extra waiting room between the main waiting room and the gate.  Quiet and not crowded, and busy as they were, they knew exactly when our train boarded and came back to retrieve us promptly.  Worth a five dollar bill to me.  

The wife asked how fast we were going, and I told her to look at the 70 mph interstate parallel the track, and we were leaving those cars in the dust.  Track was smooth enough for me, even at 110+.

I don't pay for first class on NEC, but I do appreciate the "quiet car".  NO cell phone conversations.

And when I use the sleepers on the Capitol, I appreciate the use of the Amtrak lounge in Washington,  Free snacks and drinks, and quiet comfort while i wait.

And if you have a little free time in the Union Station, you can walk out the front door, and there right in front of you is the US Capitol.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, December 28, 2015 7:47 PM

Since I am usually traveling first class when I am in Washington, I have seldom had any problem there. Two years, ago, I did see a problem. When detraining on a southbound NEC train, I found the escalator running down--and the last Amtrak employee who came down just as the train came in did not set the escalator to go up. I had a good idea as to what to do, but felt that I should not do it. I started towards the  stair--and went back to the escalator because I had no desire to go up with my suitcase. By the time I returned, someone had tumbled to the fact that passengers preferred using the escalator to go up and had changed its direction.

Johnny

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: US
  • 62 posts
Posted by cudjoebob on Monday, December 28, 2015 7:33 PM

MARTY CALON

 

 
Toronto Fan

Well, 59 years old, been riding trains most of my life, and finally took an Amtrak NEC journey. Quick thoughts. Gate areas at Washington Union Station are totally inadequate. Boarding process can be confusing for those who are not regular customers. Much of the route between DC and Philadelphia is quite scenic while large portions show the US at its third-world best. We should be ashamed. Ride quality was worse than I anticipated. Crews were competent and professional. Attention to detail is required - the coach windows northbound were filthy. Loved the speed. However, if this is the best we've got, we're a poor country cousin to much of the world. 

 

 

 
I agree, accurate observations.  Union Station in Washington was reconfigured at a time when rail travel was declining.
 
Union Station is now so crowded that some trains (at least MARC trains) have to double-up on the platforms, meaning very long walks just to get to the train.  MARC resorted to squeezing a few more tracks in Ivy City yard for train parking, and also parks trains in Baltimore and at Martin Airport.
 
Even the Red Line Metro station at Union Station is constricted and overcrowded for travellers at its in-station access point.
 

 here's a trick I use to avoid the semi-organised chaos at Union Station: for those in Maryland suburbs heading south (Florida trains, Virginia, Carolinas), I take MARC to Baltimore to board the train.  you've got your seat secured before you get to the D.C. cattle rush.  and for Virginia/D.C. residents heading north of D.C., take the Metro to Alexandria and board an Amtrak train there.  more civilised!   of course this is all true if you have the couple hours of extra time, but it does avoid the Union Station chaos.  

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Wednesday, December 23, 2015 8:27 AM

DS4-4-1000

Nixon was tired of all of the litigation, protests and bad publicity the administration was getting (rightly or wrongly) from the one at a time train offs.

 
Rather, it was all of Washington, not just the Nixon administration, scared to death it would end up owning most of the U.S. rail system if it didn't give the railroads relief on the passenger front. (Of course, it ended up owning Penn Central & co. for a while anyway.)
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,560 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:56 PM

My best NEC memory was standing on the platform waiting for an NYP bound train in New Brunswick, N.J. when a southbound PC train went past on the inner tracks at a very high rate of speed pulled by two black GG-1s. Man, that was a sight I will never forget! In the late afternoon, it was and there were around 18 cars in that train so it may have been the Silver Meteor. That thing flew by and the ozone given off made my Navy haircut stand on end! Regardless of the situation with Amtrak and the Penn-Central at the time, I remain impressed and that's a fact! I later took the SM to Florida many times, but no GG-1, sadly. 

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 225 posts
Posted by DS4-4-1000 on Tuesday, December 22, 2015 2:20 PM

Nixon was tired of all of the litigation, protests and bad publicity the administration was getting (rightly or wrongly) from the one at a time train offs.  Amtrak was Nixon's attempt to bring all of the remaining long distance passenger trains under one umbrella.  He stated that after three years he could eliminate all of the trains at once by showing that rail travel could not make a profit.   Of course when the three years were up Nixon was knee deep in other problems and Amtrak got ignored.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 11 posts
Posted by MARTY CALON on Tuesday, December 22, 2015 2:04 PM

Toronto Fan

Well, 59 years old, been riding trains most of my life, and finally took an Amtrak NEC journey. Quick thoughts. Gate areas at Washington Union Station are totally inadequate. Boarding process can be confusing for those who are not regular customers. Much of the route between DC and Philadelphia is quite scenic while large portions show the US at its third-world best. We should be ashamed. Ride quality was worse than I anticipated. Crews were competent and professional. Attention to detail is required - the coach windows northbound were filthy. Loved the speed. However, if this is the best we've got, we're a poor country cousin to much of the world. 

 

 
I agree, accurate observations.  Union Station in Washington was reconfigured at a time when rail travel was declining.
 
Union Station is now so crowded that some trains (at least MARC trains) have to double-up on the platforms, meaning very long walks just to get to the train.  MARC resorted to squeezing a few more tracks in Ivy City yard for train parking, and also parks trains in Baltimore and at Martin Airport.
 
Even the Red Line Metro station at Union Station is constricted and overcrowded for travellers at its in-station access point.
  • Member since
    March 2011
  • From: Clermont Florida
  • 6 posts
Posted by wiseguy on Monday, December 21, 2015 8:44 PM

I grew up  around the NEC I shot many a Mp-54 GG1 E-44 E-33 and Silverliners and Frankford Junction was my old stomping grounds back in the day I only shot one new Haven EP-5 AKa E-40 in Morrisville I wish some of those had ended up in museums but were scrapped in 1978 after my son was born I miss a lot of the old stuff BTW Get your shots of AEM-7s while you can 

Fred M Pohl My wife Carolyn and my Son Fred M Pohl JrPhoto by Robert M Allen

 

o.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, December 17, 2015 4:24 PM

Buslist

 

 
schlimm

Fred:  Maybe.  But that love and reverence for the passenger business was hardly universal in 1970.  The Southern management, ICG and Sante Fe and BN, probably did, but not very many others.  

 

 

 

 

 

Certainly wouldn't put the IC in that group (the G came several years later). They kept the trains clean and well maintained, with some PR efforts (Chicago - Carbondale mini corridor). But the trains were always late and the crews reached new levels of rudeness and laziness.

 

True.  I rode the IC a fair amount 1964 onward.  It was uneven service even in the mid-60s.  But after Amtrak, it got much worse.   I recall riding Chicago to Champaign around 1977 on the evening train.   There weren't many passengers, but since we left after work and hadn't eaten, we thought we could get something in the snack car.   We ordered some food from the surly attendant.  Since there was no one else there, we figured we could sit in the small seating area.  Wrong!  When our order came, we were asked to return to our coach because that area was reserved only for people waiting for their orders, which was sensible.  I said, sure, but could we sit there until other passengers came.  No!   Violation of the rules.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:38 AM

schlimm

Fred:  Maybe.  But that love and reverence for the passenger business was hardly universal in 1970.  The Southern management, ICG and Sante Fe and BN, probably did, but not very many others.  

 

 

Certainly wouldn't put the IC in that group (the G came several years later). They kept the trains clean and well maintained, with some PR efforts (Chicago - Carbondale mini corridor). But the trains were always late and the crews reached new levels of rudeness and laziness.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, December 17, 2015 8:55 AM

+1  Very true. And those who opted out of Amtrak initially did so for financial reasons, not nostalgia.  It is hard to imagine passenger rail continuing more than a few years without Amtrak's formation. 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, December 17, 2015 6:45 AM

schlimm

Fred:  Maybe.  But that love and reverence for the passenger business was hardly universal in 1970.  The Southern management, ICG and Sante Fe and BN, probably did, but not very many others.  

That may have well been true for those carriers, but notice that all of them, except for Southern, joined Amtrak prior to May 1, 1971.  Also remember that W. Graham Claytor, while he was VP-Law at Southern, conducted a pretty thorough search-and-destroy operation on much of Southern's passenger service.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, December 17, 2015 4:52 AM

schlimm

Fred:  Maybe.  But that love and reverence for the passenger business was hardly universal in 1970.  The Southern management, ICG and Sante Fe and BN, probably did, but not very many others.  

 

PC most definitely did not!  About half of Amtrak was formed from PC routes and equipment.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:10 PM

Fred:  Maybe.  But that love and reverence for the passenger business was hardly universal in 1970.  The Southern management, ICG and Sante Fe and BN, probably did, but not very many others.  

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 8:24 PM

Agreed. I give Amtrak credit for doing the best it can, given the constraints. But I can't help but think that, 45 years ago, if we had realized this was all we were going to get, we'd have found a way to keep the freight railroads in the passenger business. Many of those railroads deeply loved that business, considered it one with their corporate identity, and surrendered it only with profound regret.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 3:19 PM

+1  Exactly!

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 10:50 AM

Spot on

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 19 posts
First time on the NEC
Posted by Toronto Fan on Monday, December 14, 2015 10:04 PM

Well, 59 years old, been riding trains most of my life, and finally took an Amtrak NEC journey. Quick thoughts. Gate areas at Washington Union Station are totally inadequate. Boarding process can be confusing for those who are not regular customers. Much of the route between DC and Philadelphia is quite scenic while large portions show the US at its third-world best. We should be ashamed. Ride quality was worse than I anticipated. Crews were competent and professional. Attention to detail is required - the coach windows northbound were filthy. Loved the speed. However, if this is the best we've got, we're a poor country cousin to much of the world. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy