Extend the NEC definition ?

980 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 9,544 posts
Extend the NEC definition ?
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, September 9, 2015 8:33 PM

Here is an article that has many possible outcomes and this poster has no idea what it all means.

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/blogs/frank-n-wilner/no-fingerprints-on-nec-track-grab.html?channel=00

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:11 AM

Minus all the speculation and purple prose, it is just reporting on an easily overlooked piece in a Congressional bill that would extend Amtrak ownership of the track south of Union Station.  This would prevent the VRE from appealing to the STB in the event of a dispute.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,632 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:52 AM

Maybe Amtrak should concentrate on becoming competitive for commuter contracts rather than trying to win them through extortion.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 17,783 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, September 10, 2015 6:23 PM

oltmannd

Maybe Amtrak should concentrate on becoming competitive for commuter contracts rather than trying to win them through extortion.

Amtrak was not able to win the MARC operational contract, despite playing the Nazi Collaborator card against Keolis for their French railroad heritage.  Bombardier got the contract.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy