Trains.com

Will the addition of the Nippon Shayiro cars and Siemens Charger locomotives allow for expanded services

2350 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,834 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, March 1, 2015 12:01 PM

When additional cars and locos become available Amtrak's plans will probably be determined on how Congress has positioned the RR.

1.  Spare cars will first go thru any refurbishment needed to improve the car's appearances and reliability.

2.  If no additional funds to Amtrak it may attempt to increase the lengths of their present trains to attact more passengers to current trains.  The ACS-64s will be able to pull longer trains with only one motor.  However the problem of unreliable diesels will require probably another diesel on those routes where only one diesel might stall on a hill. Hopefully they would come from the displaced diesels.

3.  Additional trains on any current route would require 3 -4 train sets in eastern US and 4 -6 western.  Exceptions would be a daily Cardinal needing only one more set or if Sunset made thru Chicago - LAX no superliners but 2 single level sets for SAS - NOL.

4.  Any new route would require mega bucks to get the route ready for service .  + the requisite train sets.

All the above will eat up extra cars rapidly and not enough may be spare to accomplish any more than one of these options.  

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, February 28, 2015 10:55 PM

There won't be any new service, Amtrak, state funded or otherwise, unless two ingredients are present:

  1. A large, loud groundswell of popular demand, from people who will actually buy tickets and ride the trains.
  2. Some venture capitalists who will put up the initial billions to get the routes operable and equipped.

Absent those essential ingredients, the plans for the various proposed routes are exercises in hot air.  Las Vegas - Southern California is a typical example.  Press releases, plans, pretty pictures - but, so far, nobody has moved a spadeful of dirt, and it has been talked to death for eight years now.  If it was likely to make money the casino owners would be lined up, checkbooks in hand.  If they are, it's the best kept secret in Las Vegas.

Chuck (Las Vegas resident)

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Friday, February 27, 2015 11:40 AM
What about a regional service between Houston and New Orleans?
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Sunday, February 22, 2015 7:22 PM

I think a bunch of amfleets will either be sold off to commuter rails, sent to California to surplus the California/Surfliner routes, or maybe its time to come up with a new regional route for Amtrak such as Chicago to Nashville, TN as an example.

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Nashville TN
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Wdlgln005 on Sunday, February 22, 2015 6:31 PM

081552
I haven't done the math but won't the delivery of this new equipment place 100+ Amfleet coaches out of service? There's a blog post about a "wish list" for new single level equipment. It looks like Amfleet will be not seen west of Chicago in a few years.

Not sure how much Amfleet vs Horizon single level cars can go elsewhere. There should be enough to cover the 2 a day trains to Galesburg, St Louis, Carbondale. 1 a day to Quad Cities or Rockford delayed for some time. not sure how much may appear on Michigan trains. a lot depends what happens with the Hoosier to Indy.

Amfleet may easily be sent Northeast. Horizon cars could be sent somewhere South where they don't have to deal with so much snow.

 

 

Glenn Woodle
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Altadena, CA
  • 340 posts
Posted by 081552 on Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:36 PM

I haven't done the math but won't the delivery of this new equipment place 100+ Amfleet coaches out of service? There's a blog post about a "wish list" for new single level equipment. It looks like Amfleet will be not seen west of Chicago in a few years.

 

 

 
zkr123

I don't think I worded the sentence right.  I meant would there be enough of the new equipment to move the older sets to a new route.

 

 

 

There are a few issues here.  

One, is who owns the equipment.  The California corridors are all populated by equipment owned by the state, so it can't go anywhere else.  

Two, Amtrak itself hasn't proposed of pushed any new service anywhere in decades and isn't likely to start now.  They let all new and expanded service initiatives come from the states.

Three, any new route would require an agreement with the host road.  Except in very specific spots, the frt RRs are going to require a boat load of capital for capacity improvments, at the very least, for there to be new service anywhere.

 

[/quote]

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Saturday, February 21, 2015 8:01 AM

zkr123

I don't think I worded the sentence right.  I meant would there be enough of the new equipment to move the older sets to a new route.

 

There are a few issues here.  

One, is who owns the equipment.  The California corridors are all populated by equipment owned by the state, so it can't go anywhere else.  

Two, Amtrak itself hasn't proposed of pushed any new service anywhere in decades and isn't likely to start now.  They let all new and expanded service initiatives come from the states.

Three, any new route would require an agreement with the host road.  Except in very specific spots, the frt RRs are going to require a boat load of capital for capacity improvments, at the very least, for there to be new service anywhere.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,834 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Friday, February 20, 2015 1:13 PM

zkr123

For example Amtrak California/Surfliner extend to Las Vegas with new equipment coming? Or an Amtrak high speed Texas triangle service. 

I don't think Amtrak is even in the picture for the Texas service.    And so far only localities have discussed the possibility of kicking in money to extend the current private HOUSTON to DALLAS HSR line to Ft. Worth.     Not much state involvement in that yet.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Friday, February 20, 2015 11:29 AM

I don't think I worded the sentence right.  I meant would there be enough of the new equipment to move the older sets to a new route.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,480 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, February 20, 2015 7:27 AM

The additional California equipment will go to cover additional service on existing routes.  The last time I looked, Las Vegas was on the other side of the state line.

Since this new equipment was ordered by various state agencies, no new service will be established in Texas.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Will the addition of the Nippon Shayiro cars and Siemens Charger locomotives allow for expanded services
Posted by zkr123 on Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:35 PM

For example Amtrak California/Surfliner extend to Las Vegas with new equipment coming? Or an Amtrak high speed Texas triangle service. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy