Trains.com

Will Amtrak create an amfleet III? Will there ever be Viewliner coach class cars built?

13593 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Will Amtrak create an amfleet III? Will there ever be Viewliner coach class cars built?
Posted by zkr123 on Saturday, April 12, 2014 5:57 AM
Is there any talk of an amfleet III being built? The current class of amfleets I and II are between 20-50 years old.


Why has amtrak not built Viewliner coach class cars. It would make sense maintenance wise.
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Monday, April 14, 2014 9:00 AM

Amtrak doesn't have the budget to be building new cars right now, and the cars set to be replaced by the latest Viewliners are much older than the Amfleets.

 

Although, Amtrak could rebuild some of the stored Metroliner shells into something similar to an Amfleet car, like the cab cars.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, April 14, 2014 12:30 PM
The oldest Amfleet car is still less than 40. They have good bones - solid stainless steel - and are not technologically obsolete. You need some incentive like capacity or lighter weight to buy new. Otherwise it's always better to rebuild what you have. Being old in and of itself is pretty meaningless for railway equipment. Amtrak might want toth

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, April 14, 2014 12:33 PM
... Think about double deck equipment ala NJT for standard corridor service. That would buy time on NYP platform length constraints. Might provide savings to justify cost.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, April 14, 2014 1:41 PM

Amtrak is receiving new cars as we speak.  NJT (nor LIRR) Bilevels are not good long distance, inter city cars...little leg room, not comfortable compared to Amtrak.  If I am going to pay Amtrak to carry me I want a roomy, comfortable, reclining seat and not a commuter salt box sardine can.  Yeah, LIRR does Bi's to Montauk (over 100 miles) and Greenport (almost 100 miles) but that a can be exhausting and stretches the limit of most people (me for one). 

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 14, 2014 2:13 PM

Double-deckers can be commuter cars with straight fixed pitch seats or more spacious, partially reclined seats for longer distance service.  Witness the newer TGVs or even the very comfortable non-adjustable seats on many Regional Expresses on the DB.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, April 14, 2014 3:23 PM

But the double deckers...and they are called Bi Levels and not double decker because seating is not full length on either level and they'll correct you sternly down there if you don't call them BiLevels....these cars are not designed and not useful for long distance operations even on the Corridor...or maybe especially on the Corridor.  I don't think I would want to be hurtling down the main at 125 or 130 or 160 aboard one of them...even 90 is not really cool.   They may be designed and designated to 100, but I'm not sure I like that having ridden them quite a few times.   In fact the timetable allows only 90 for most of the  Bi's but 100 on the trailers with toilets.  If that makes sense..

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 14, 2014 4:10 PM

http://www.alstom.com/transport/products-and-services/trains/very-high-speed-train-duplex/

200 mph in safety and comfort.

And the cars used in Germany (and Israel) on many trains, originated in 1935 (now built by Bombardier) and have always been called double-deckers (Doppelstockwagen or Dostos).

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, April 14, 2014 4:16 PM

schlimm

Yes...but these are not the BiLevels neither NJT nor LIRR are using.  They cannot be used between Boston and D.C. with safety, comfort, nor speed.   

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Monday, April 14, 2014 10:20 PM
Yet, the comfort depends on the interior arrangements and these can just as easily be installed in a NJT/LI bilevel as any other car body. As far as speed/safety, would that not depend on the trucks, not the car body? Or are there structural standards that have to be met for HSR that these bilevels do not meet?
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:53 AM

If their vertical clearances conform, Amtrak should buy some of the TGV bi-levels for the NEC as a way to add capacity and efficiency as well as manage the platform length problem.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Tuesday, April 15, 2014 7:28 PM

I think the FRA crash standards would be more of a barrier...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Tuesday, April 15, 2014 7:39 PM

NorthWest

I think the FRA crash standards would be more of a barrier...

Always has been, always will be.  Although there are efforts to get waivers from FRA on some items.  In a conversation about 10 years ago with an Alstom major executive about concepts and ideas, he said a lot of them have been put into practice and use but the US standards would not accept them nor did anyone want to talk and adapt.  I have a nephew who works for one of the Big 3 automakers whose sole job at the moment is to modify several new European imports to fit USA auto standards and he says it ain't easy.  

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:49 PM

Clearances may also be a problem for double/bi-levels beyond NYP.  Amtrak hopes to upgrade the south-of-NY half of the NEC to 25 kV.  Cat would need double the isolation distance above and below the wire.  While NYP might always remain 12 kV, they might not want to limit themselves in Phily, Baltimore, and perhaps other places.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:28 AM

Unless the tunnel cearances are raised, Baltimore must remain 12.5KV.   I am not certan LIRR/NJT double-decks would fit now.   Baltimore has older tunnels than NYC and may be even more restrictive. 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:42 AM
Netherlands and Belgium use bilevels in exactly NEC type intercity routes. They are good for at least 125. They ride very smoothly and quietly. The have fixed seatbacks and folks find lots of ways to stash their luggage. Thalys train sets have very little leg room and no recline. Trains run packed! If bilevels are not acceptable, then no reason not to rebuild Amfleet in kind for another 40 years or more.

Ed Ellis's stuff is really old and nobody is claiming that's an issue.... Age is a red herring

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:46 AM
Amtrak has a really big lever they can use on Congress for crash standards. Cost. Just details the difference between recent European deliveries and US estimates including fuel consumption and CO2 difference

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:50 AM

Up to now US loading gauge standards have been adhered to...cost by Congress is not a leverage point. 

And to clarify.  I am not opposed to BiLevels on the Corridor, just not the commuter designs as used by NJT and LIRR.  They would have to be reconfigured at least, of course, for passenger use and comfort and possibly for technical reasons...there is a reason they are restricted to 90 mph.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:41 PM

oltmannd
Ed Ellis's stuff is really old and nobody is claiming that's an issue.... Age is a red herring

Who is Ellis?

It seems clear that the easiest and cheapest way to increase capacity, whether intercity or commuter, has been and continues to be two level coaches.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:08 PM
Has zero to do with loading gauge. Has everything to do with crash energy management.
Ed Ellis is running ancient streamlined equipment on the back of the City of New Orleans. Older than Amtrak's eastern LD diners.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:10 PM
http://www.travelpullman.com

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, April 18, 2014 6:50 AM

Bi-levels in intercity service are hardly new.  C&NW initiated the practice in 1958 when it re-equipped the "Peninsula 400" and "Flambeau 400" with bi-level gallery coaches.  The coaches had 96 seats compared to the usual 156 seats in suburban gallery coaches.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, April 18, 2014 9:06 AM

Amtrak leased them from C&NW for a while, and they were used in Milwaukee - St. Louis service, then returned to C&NW and reconfigured for commuter use.   They may still be around somewhere.

Rode the train around 1962, flew to Chicago Midway, taxi to Roosevelt Rd., Electroliner to Milwaukee, trolleybus to C&NW Lakefront Station, Penninsular 400 to De Pere.

The single-level diner  (good food) had a false high roof to match the gallery cars.   One car was half parlor with single seats above and below.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:56 AM

I don't think he meant literally the same ones as NJT and LIRR. I think he was talking about an inter city version that would meet amtrak standards. We could probably get Nippon Shayiro or CAF to make some.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:58 AM

They should make Bi Level Acela's

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, October 3, 2014 6:49 AM

zkr123

They should make Bi Level Acela's

Highly unlikely.  The Acela is mostly a business class arrangement, with larger seats and more amenities.  Amtrak also charges a premium for the service.  Bi-level equipment would run counter to this service.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,199 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Sunday, October 5, 2014 8:51 PM

The next single level intercity corridor car will be whatever Siemens delivers for All Aboard Florida. We shall see where it goes from there.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy