henry6 I see and hear a lot of people knowing how to cut and remove and save and whatever Amtrak. Does anyone have a single plan from top to bottom, side to side, front to back how to organize, equip, man, finance, market, and operate Amtrak?. Has to be total plan not just sentences of what should or shouldn't be done.
I see and hear a lot of people knowing how to cut and remove and save and whatever Amtrak. Does anyone have a single plan from top to bottom, side to side, front to back how to organize, equip, man, finance, market, and operate Amtrak?. Has to be total plan not just sentences of what should or shouldn't be done.
Got $10 or 20 million? That's about what it would cost to do what you are asking. You want a strategy? Read my blog: Feb 2012...
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
I would tend to believe Acy in regard to the peak numbers, which are not the average found in reports.
"An answer to the ridiculously high commissary charge for the A-T ($13,969,000 vs only $1,450,000 for the Silver Star) should be found soon. It becomes very hard to take Amtrak seriously with such an obvious boondoggle going on."
The answer may simply be that this is an artifact of an accounting system that allocates 80% of costs. In other words a host of overhead unrelated to production might be roled into these numbers atop the Aramark contract. There is Corporate Support in the Commissary numbers as far as I can tell per the link to a presentation by Tom Hall at Amtrak. Even still the cost recovery ratio has made an impressive improvement. Sometimes costs are allocated by revenue, instead of cost drivers.
I would still like to see a Industrial Engineering type analysis of future stocking efficiency (commissary cost) with a refrigerated cart system that I thought was coming with Viewliner-2.
Of no relevance? Please!! December 2013 is only two months earlier. Soon we should have the January 2014 numbers for comparison. And for planning and evaluation, the overall average for an entire year is relevant in any endeavor that serves customers. The best stat is current month vs one year prior.
You said the Superliners were not used before so the passenger counts would have been lower in 2012 than currently. Not so, according to Amtrak.
Average daily ridership for A-T:
Dec 2013 = 360 [I overstated in the earlier post] Dec. 2012 = 360
Jan. 2013 = 351 Jan. 2012 = 293
Feb. 2013 = 317 Feb 2012 = 359
Your numbers are surprisingly higher in the summer. Aug. 2013 = 417.
These are all Amtrak's numbers and they include the number of passengers they budget for. If you are serving 550 at times,then you will far exceed the budgeted numbers, which have been very close to actual numbers. Is there some explanation?
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
ACYThat was 2 years ago. Also, the average may be interesting, but we have to be prepared every day for the maximum.
This is interesting. Does that mean that the commissary has to be prepared to stock the train ... in Lorton ... with up to 550 meals until they get the 'final' ticketing numbers? Or just be sure to have the capability on hand to source that many meals?
What is done with any meals that are prepared and not required? Or with the food, or meals, that have been loaded but remain uneaten? And how is that formally accounted for in the documentation we're considering?
Beginning to suspect there is some formal convention that is making the A-T commissary numbers read so high than those for comparable (Florida sleeper) LD trains...
(How much more difficult can it be to put a buffet section... even with electrical heating to the steam tables... in the upper section of a Superliner? I don't see anything particularly showstopping about it, or about provisioning it... but then, I'm not experienced in Amtrak train service, so tell me what I should be 'designing in' to such a facility...)
Your statements do not correspond to offical Amtrak reports. Average daily ridership on each A-T train in Dec. 2013 was 386. According to the PRIIA Section 210 Performance Improvement Plan (published September 2012), the A-T was equipped with Superliner (bi-level) equipment all of FY 2012.
As to the buffet service, it began in '83 or'84--and it was used on the Crescent, for a while, at least. I ate dinner that way when I rode from Wilmington, Delaware, to Pomona (Greensboro) in September of '84. My wife and I ate that way when we rode the Silver Star from New York to Sebring and the Silver Meteor north to Washington in the spring of 1989. The food seemed to be as good as that served in a regular diner.
Johnny
oltmanndAnyone remember the buffet-diners they used to have on the Silver Service trains? The staff filled your plates and carried your tray and seated you at a table. I wonder if this arrangement wouldn't have higher throughput than current. Skips the order-taking, food prep elapsed times.
That modification sounds like it could work, even with many patrons. As far as breakfasts go, if not the buffet, then airline-style food passed out from carts. If a 747-8I with 467 passengers can serve breakfast in one hour, one would think Amtrak could also on the A-T. BTW, the A-T averaged 343 passengers per train in 2012, not 550 as suggested above. The 550 must refer to the Silver Star, which averaged 553, some of whom rode less than the full ride.
An answer to the ridiculously high commissary charge for the A-T ($13,969,000 vs only $1,450,000 for the Silver Star) should be found soon. It becomes very hard to take Amtrak seriously with such an obvious boondoggle going on.
daveklepper Buffet service, or cafeteria style, was tried out on the Flordia trains around 1988-1990, if i remember correctly, or maybe a few years later. it seemed dto create more problems than it solved. I did not mind it, but the food seemed not quite as wonderful as before.
Buffet service, or cafeteria style, was tried out on the Flordia trains around 1988-1990, if i remember correctly, or maybe a few years later. it seemed dto create more problems than it solved. I did not mind it, but the food seemed not quite as wonderful as before.
The Veggie Lasanga was the best bet on those trains. It was pretty good!
Anyone remember the buffet-diners they used to have on the Silver Service trains? The staff filled your plates and carried your tray and seated you at a table. I wonder if this arrangement wouldn't have higher throughput than current. Skips the order-taking, food prep elapsed times.
El Al has a reputation for good food from fairly picky people. I believe for flights from the USA it uses the same caterers that USA domestic airlines use for Kosher food, I think this is usually Wilton Caterers. So you might try ordering a Kosher meal and see how it compares with your regular meal on your next flight.
Lots of mid-priced hotels here and expensive ones overseas have basically self-serve buffet breakfasts. Perhaps that approach could be adapted?
ACYFinished a trip yesterday and had hoped I'd have more info of a reliable nature. I still have no more detailed or more reliable info than anyone else on this forum. Many posters, including Mr. Frailey, seem to be certain these changes will be the salvation of Auto Train, but I haven't heard anything that tells me how service will be delivered. Part of the plan is to introduce staggered seatings, but those of us who are expected to deliver the service still have not heard just how this will be orchestrated. Staggered seatings were tried unsuccessfully many years ago. Maybe there will be some new element that will make it a success. I am anxiously awaiting that new information. The train has been running with the extra coach, and the second lounge has not been removed. Passenger counts have been in the neighborhood of 550. At breakfast time, we are committed to serving breakfast to every one of these passengers. This generally has to be completed between 6:00 am and 8:30 am because the train often arrives early (often before 8:00 am). One problem is that the 550 passengers do not all show up for breakfast in the diner at nicely spaced intervals. Most show up between 6:30 and 7:45. With no second lounge car for people to sit in while they wait, some of us have been wondering how these people can be served expeditiously. We have wondered how we will be able to safely serve meals, whether in the morning or the evening, with large numbers of people walking through the diners to get to the one lounge car. With the current passenger numbers, it has already been necessary to exceed the anticipated 90 minute time frame per seating, so that the last seating starts late almost all the time. So far, it has often proved impossible for onboard service staff to have time for their own meal. We are trying to be confident that the architects of this new plan are working on solutions to these problems, but I don't know any veterans of Auto Train onboard service who know how this will be accomplished. That's why we don't make the big bucks, I guess.
I guess the Brainiac's will just invoke the line from Seinfield - 'No soup for you!'
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
CMStPnP They should close it and produce the meals out of an airport commissary. If Amtrak cannot handle those meals in it's cooking apparatus it should approach Congress, explain the problem and obtain funds so that Amtrak meals are interchangeable with the meals offered to the airlines. BTW, folks that hate airline food. Airport commissaries serve and produce better food than you eat in First Class domestically on most U.S. Airlines. The issue is the U.S. Airlines are not willing to pay the prices for the more upscale meals offered because their profits on most domestic and close in domestic flights are razor thin. Some of the Middle Eastern Airlines are willing to pay the price and decent meals DO exist via airport commissaries of high quality.
They should close it and produce the meals out of an airport commissary. If Amtrak cannot handle those meals in it's cooking apparatus it should approach Congress, explain the problem and obtain funds so that Amtrak meals are interchangeable with the meals offered to the airlines.
BTW, folks that hate airline food. Airport commissaries serve and produce better food than you eat in First Class domestically on most U.S. Airlines. The issue is the U.S. Airlines are not willing to pay the prices for the more upscale meals offered because their profits on most domestic and close in domestic flights are razor thin. Some of the Middle Eastern Airlines are willing to pay the price and decent meals DO exist via airport commissaries of high quality.
Precisely. I'll be checking out meals on AirBerlin in May, which is offering low transatlantic fares. My sense, however, is that most people do not really select one airline over another based on food service. Fares, convenience and comfort of up-to-date planes rank higher as factors. Since the commissaries used by the airlines are all over the country, perhaps that is the service Amtrak should be moving towards? Or use the break-even NEC model?
V.PayneI suppose I did read the report (how would I get the numbers after all) and I did mean what I said in regards to excessive net revenue reductions from food service reductions.
Your suggestions should be considered. Why Amtrak seems clueless about this is a puzzle. but the figures make it clear that the problem is NOT on-board labor costs, but commissary costs. The A-T commissary costs are totally out of line with those of the other Amtrak lines.
schlimm The A-T commissary cost needs to be addressed and resolved for Amtrak to have any credibility as a purveyor of LD train services. Otherwise it becomes as laughable as Mica's "$15.00 hamburger." Since at least one of the commissaries is in Florida, one wonders if there is some connection with Mica?
The A-T commissary cost needs to be addressed and resolved for Amtrak to have any credibility as a purveyor of LD train services. Otherwise it becomes as laughable as Mica's "$15.00 hamburger." Since at least one of the commissaries is in Florida, one wonders if there is some connection with Mica?
I also want to be clear on this as well as I suggested outsourcing the commissary in another thread. The answer is YES to ACY.......the current outsourcing agreement is not producing the efficiencies of a consolidated facility. They should close it and produce the meals out of an airport commissary. If Amtrak cannot handle those meals in it's cooking apparatus it should approach Congress, explain the problem and obtain funds so that Amtrak meals are interchangeable with the meals offered to the airlines.
schlimm If Atlanta area contractors could cater for around $15 or so, it is hard to imagine why Sanford and Lorton would need to be much higher.
And that includes the employees that man the buffet line...
oltmannd I don't think they want far and wide enough in the supply chain. The starting point was "I have this commissary...." They took the existing 1950s commissary process for supplying trains and outsourced that. "How much do I have to pay to run my exiting commissary just like I'm running it now?"
That applies to Amtrak LD food service in general, but not to the specifics of the A-T. As I said earlier, the total food service cost per passenger for AT is $84.40, which is far more than double the per passenger charge for the Silver trains: ($12.81 and 14.83) It is double that of the CZ , which runs 3X the distance. If Atlanta area contractors could cater for around $15 or so, it is hard to imagine why Sanford and Lorton would need to be much higher.
ACYThe commissary is already outsourced. Once you've outsourced it, do you outsource it again because outsourcing is costing too much? Sorry I can't continue. I'll be at work for a few days.
V.Payne It is almost like the commissary numbers don't make sense... On another question, from the Amtrak OIG report OIG-A-2014-001, Page 14. "The market research indicated... Amtrak would lose... $91 million in ticket revenue if food service on all short distance routes was eliminated... and $93 million in ticket revenue if dining car service was eliminated on all long distance routes." So Amtrak can save $71 million in costs and loose $184 million in ticket revenue. That doesn't sound like a plan to stay in business.
It is almost like the commissary numbers don't make sense...
On another question, from the Amtrak OIG report OIG-A-2014-001, Page 14.
"The market research indicated... Amtrak would lose... $91 million in ticket revenue if food service on all short distance routes was eliminated... and $93 million in ticket revenue if dining car service was eliminated on all long distance routes."
So Amtrak can save $71 million in costs and loose $184 million in ticket revenue. That doesn't sound like a plan to stay in business.
ACYThe commissary is already outsourced. Once you've outsourced it, do you outsource it again because outsourcing is costing too much?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.