Trains.com

Amtrak cuts

24255 views
187 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:23 PM

schlimm
If Amtrak wants to provide more leverage to show the Prez's rail initiative isn't just money thrown down the drain, they'd better hurry up with some highly visible cost-cutting and vision focusing.

I think so.  It doesn't even matter if the cuts cause equal revenue drop at this point.  

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:39 PM

On  auto train it was noted at one time coach passengers also received meals as part of fare.  Is that true today ?  If so much less increase of fares needed to break even ? 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:50 PM

ACY
Why are AT's Commissary costs so high in comparison? I doubt that my answer tells the whole story because I don't know enough about Commissary's operations. All Auto train supplies are provided by the Washington DC Commissary. Every day, a truck is dispatched from Ivy City to Lorton (about 20 miles or so each way) with 2 Commissary workers to supply the train for a round trip. That is an expense the other trains don't have to contend with. There is also a small Commissary in Sanford to supply supplemental supplies at that end. Every passenger eats dinner (there are no short-hauls), so it takes a lot of food and other supplies to supply the train's 2 full lounge cars, 2 working diner kitchens, and 6 sleepers.

Those factors cannot possibly account for the difference with other trains on the same route.
Auto Train      $13,969,000
Silver Meteor     1,826,000
Silver Star          1,450,000

And the latter two trains cover much longer distances, so serve more meals.  The on-board labor costs are more than double the Meteor and Star.   The discrepancies are of such a large magnitude that they must be seriously addressed.  

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:31 PM
On Auto Train, Coach passengers do receive meals (dinner and breakfast). Onboard labor cost is double because the crew size is approximately double. Currently 24 o.b.s. plus one chief. Soon to be reduced to 22 plus chief. This does not include T&E crew. I don't know the comparable figures for Silver service. Longer distance does not mean more meals because Silver Service carries fewer passengers. Many passengers on those trains are not travelling the whole distance. Many bring their own food. As I have said many times before on this thread and others, the AT often carries 500+ passengers. and they all go the entire distance and are guaranteed dinner and breakfast. I said above that I am not privy to information about why AT's commissary costa are higher, but I mentioned a few factors that I do know about and have given a few ideas. Another factor is that the Sanford Commissary is not shared with any other train. Having another train to share expenses with is a very good thing for any individual train's bottom line. I would suggest this is an advantage the Silver Service trains enjoy in New York.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:19 PM

The total cost per passenger for AT is $84.40, which is far more than double the per passenger charge for the Silver trains: ($12.81 and 14.83)  It is double that of the CZ , which runs 3X the distance.  It isn't from onboard labor, but rather the commissary.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2011
  • 509 posts
Posted by V.Payne on Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:08 PM

It is almost like the commissary numbers don't make sense...

On another question, from the Amtrak OIG report OIG-A-2014-001, Page 14.

"The market research indicated... Amtrak would lose... $91 million in ticket revenue if food service on all short distance routes was eliminated... and $93 million in ticket revenue if dining car service was eliminated on all long distance routes."

So Amtrak can save $71 million in costs and loose $184 million in ticket revenue. That doesn't sound like a plan to stay in business. I can see trying to cut spoilage, discounting items about to expire by announcements, and improve stocking efficiency at the commissary level but the service that people want has to be kept if the marketing survey is to believed.

Perhaps this is a crazy question, but are foodstuffs, either refrigerated or not, offloaded if unused at the end of the run and returned to the commissary only to be restocked shortly thereafter? It would be nice to see a comparison of the improvements in food carts that the new Viewliner diners are supposed to have (I think they are refrigerated carts) and how that improves efficiency of the commissary operation. If the operation was so structured that would seem to have a large effect on the comissary costs.

Second question, are costs like fumigation or food service equipment assigned to the commisary?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:56 PM

I suggest you read page 3 of that report, which shows the breakdown on LD, short corridor and NEC food services.  Very different numbers which show almost the entire loss from food service comes from LD.

LD food revenue = $63.5 mil.; total direct costs = $135 mil. yields a loss of $71.5 mil. of the total food service loss of $72 mil. in 2012.

So if the marketing study is correct, Amtrak would lose [one 's' only] $93 mil. in LD ticket revenue (losing 345,000 riders) by eliminating LD food services, but would also not have the actual $71.5 loss, so that the net impact would be a loss of $22.5 mil. not at all what you stated above. 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:01 PM

The study makes it obvious that the biggest cost (outrageous on the A-T) is the commissaries, not labor.   Finding more efficient practices (out-sourcing the commissary function?) could reduce the losses considerably, while still maintaining the LD food service.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Friday, February 28, 2014 7:54 AM
The commissary is already outsourced. Once you've outsourced it, do you outsource it again because outsourcing is costing too much? Sorry I can't continue. I'll be at work for a few days.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, February 28, 2014 9:14 AM

ACY
The commissary is already outsourced. Once you've outsourced it, do you outsource it again because outsourcing is costing too much? 

Perhaps the contract need to be rebid when it expires?   Pretty clearly, the costs for the AT commissary services are incredibly out of line with those of all other LD trains, including those that run longer distances and have more patrons.  Methinks some folks in Amtrak management have some 'splaining' to do.  Could there be some 'pay-to-play' (aka kickbacks) going on? 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, February 28, 2014 9:25 AM

V.Payne

It is almost like the commissary numbers don't make sense...

On another question, from the Amtrak OIG report OIG-A-2014-001, Page 14.

"The market research indicated... Amtrak would lose... $91 million in ticket revenue if food service on all short distance routes was eliminated... and $93 million in ticket revenue if dining car service was eliminated on all long distance routes."

So Amtrak can save $71 million in costs and loose $184 million in ticket revenue. That doesn't sound like a plan to stay in business.

But, food service isn't being cut - just changed.
How about just sourcing the food differently?  Lorton and Sanford are not in the boonies.  
Including meals on the AT is probably a good idea.  Can you imagine the mess from cleaning up after 500 people who brought their own food and ate it at their seat?  I imagine the mess is pretty substantial now from people snacking...
I'm still of the opinion you could find a national food chain that could supply pre-plate meals that would just need to be re-warmed before serving.  They'd cook them in of local restaurants who get their foodstuffs from the current supply chain (you see their trucks everywhere each morning).  Build them in early afternoon between the lunch and dinner crowd.  Load them onto racks.  Wheel them to the train.
Or, provide the food catering-style.  Local restaurants around here can cater dinner meals in the $10-20 range (usually served buffet style).  Meals can be plated in the diner kitchen.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, February 28, 2014 9:36 AM

ACY
The commissary is already outsourced. Once you've outsourced it, do you outsource it again because outsourcing is costing too much? Sorry I can't continue. I'll be at work for a few days.

I don't think they want far and wide enough in the supply chain.  
The starting point was "I have this commissary...." They took the existing 1950s commissary process for supplying trains and outsourced that.   "How much do I have to pay to run my exiting commissary just like I'm running it now?"  
That Is not a good way to save money.  The real question to get bids on is "I need to supply meals and snacks on my trains.  What can you do and what would it cost me?"   Cast a wide net.  Get lots of ideas and proposals.  Involve marketing and operations, not just purchasing.
Someone at Amtrak would have to benefit from innovation.  RIght now, there are no rewards for doing anything like this.  It's hard.  It's risky.  It tears down fiefdoms. 

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, February 28, 2014 10:59 AM

oltmannd
I don't think they want far and wide enough in the supply chain.  
The starting point was "I have this commissary...." They took the existing 1950s commissary process for supplying trains and outsourced that.   "How much do I have to pay to run my exiting commissary just like I'm running it now?"  

That applies to Amtrak LD food service in general, but not to the specifics of the A-T.  As I said earlier, the total food service cost per passenger for AT is $84.40, which is far more than double the per passenger charge for the Silver trains: ($12.81 and 14.83)  It is double that of the CZ , which runs 3X the distance.   If Atlanta area contractors could cater for around $15 or so, it is hard to imagine why Sanford and Lorton would need to be much higher.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, February 28, 2014 12:22 PM

schlimm
If Atlanta area contractors could cater for around $15 or so, it is hard to imagine why Sanford and Lorton would need to be much higher.

And that includes the employees that man the buffet line...

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, February 28, 2014 12:40 PM

The A-T commissary cost needs to be addressed and resolved for Amtrak to have any credibility as a purveyor of LD train services.  Otherwise it becomes as laughable as Mica's "$15.00 hamburger."   Since at least one of the commissaries is in Florida, one wonders if there is some connection with Mica?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2011
  • 509 posts
Posted by V.Payne on Friday, February 28, 2014 6:24 PM
I suppose I did read the report (how would I get the numbers after all) and I did mean what I said in regards to excessive net revenue reductions from food service reductions. Here is the basis, if the reduction in food service on the long-distance routes causes additional fixed commissary costs to be forced on the remaining operations then those cost increase, so they are next in line for the same treatment. Will the full effect be seen, probably not. However, there is also the dangerous “just kill the whole thing” reaction that would lump everything in together.

On the Crescent, besides the Atlanta crew changes affecting prime meal revenue time, the low revenue is also the result of only about 1.5 sleepers being open to passengers due to the crew using a part of one as a dorm. Besides figuring out a way to make the crew change more agreeable, this is a large effect that could be corrected only by adding capacity between Birmingham, AL to NYC.  (with the wye and siding at Anniston Army Depot used as a late running backup, put in a potable water/ generator/ air pump container shed off the siding and use the road power to do the switching, or just build/rehab the siding where the future Atlanta station will go).

I still see figuring out a way to get the food service staff off the train at night, and heading back home upon re-boarding, as a good cost reduction strategy and revenue generating move, that could be a win-win for quality of life and costs. I also see some type of ordering automation (beyond the point of sale rollout), say once you have Wi-Fi on the long-distance trains (why has this taken so long), then customers just use their Amtrak app to reserve a time, select a table type, and pre-order from the menu, from 6 months out to 20 minutes out). The pass-off between Wi-Fi servers in the individual cars would know exactly when you are walking that way from your device. It takes a plan to invest, not cut. There are some of those plans out there like the point of sale, but there need to be more.

On complementary items, I am afraid they are shooting themselves in the foot. Per Page 15, $428,000 is the cost of complimentary items to sleeper services for 306,349 sleeper passengers on affected routes (FY 2013 reporting). So $1.40/ passenger will be “saved/gained” by now charging for these high brow amenities? How much labor will the cash collection take? Why not just pretend to add a ticket surcharge that reports to the revenue column and call it a day?
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,843 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, March 2, 2014 4:36 AM

schlimm

The A-T commissary cost needs to be addressed and resolved for Amtrak to have any credibility as a purveyor of LD train services.  Otherwise it becomes as laughable as Mica's "$15.00 hamburger."   Since at least one of the commissaries is in Florida, one wonders if there is some connection with Mica?

I also want to be clear on this as well as I suggested outsourcing the commissary in another thread.    The answer is YES to ACY.......the current outsourcing agreement is not producing the efficiencies of  a consolidated facility.    They should close it and produce the meals out of an airport commissary.     If Amtrak cannot handle those meals in it's cooking apparatus it should approach Congress, explain the problem and obtain funds so that Amtrak meals are interchangeable with the meals offered to the airlines.

BTW, folks that hate airline food.   Airport commissaries serve and produce better food than you eat in First Class domestically on most U.S. Airlines.    The issue is the U.S. Airlines are not willing to pay the prices for the more upscale meals offered because their profits on most domestic and close in domestic flights are razor thin.      Some of the Middle Eastern Airlines are willing to pay the price and decent meals DO exist via airport commissaries of high quality.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, March 2, 2014 10:21 AM

V.Payne
I suppose I did read the report (how would I get the numbers after all) and I did mean what I said in regards to excessive net revenue reductions from food service reductions.

Your suggestions should be considered.  Why Amtrak seems clueless about this is a puzzle.  but the figures make it clear that the problem is NOT on-board labor costs, but commissary costs.  The A-T commissary costs are totally out of line with those of the other Amtrak lines.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, March 2, 2014 10:27 AM

CMStPnP

 They should close it and produce the meals out of an airport commissary.     If Amtrak cannot handle those meals in it's cooking apparatus it should approach Congress, explain the problem and obtain funds so that Amtrak meals are interchangeable with the meals offered to the airlines.

BTW, folks that hate airline food.   Airport commissaries serve and produce better food than you eat in First Class domestically on most U.S. Airlines.    The issue is the U.S. Airlines are not willing to pay the prices for the more upscale meals offered because their profits on most domestic and close in domestic flights are razor thin.      Some of the Middle Eastern Airlines are willing to pay the price and decent meals DO exist via airport commissaries of high quality.

Precisely.  I'll be checking out meals on AirBerlin in May, which is offering low transatlantic fares.  My sense, however, is that most people do not really select one airline over another based on food service.  Fares, convenience and comfort of up-to-date planes rank higher as factors.   Since the commissaries used by the airlines are all over the country, perhaps that is the service Amtrak should be moving towards?   Or use the break-even NEC model?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Monday, March 3, 2014 3:53 PM
Finished a trip yesterday and had hoped I'd have more info of a reliable nature. I still have no more detailed or more reliable info than anyone else on this forum. Many posters, including Mr. Frailey, seem to be certain these changes will be the salvation of Auto Train, but I haven't heard anything that tells me how service will be delivered. Part of the plan is to introduce staggered seatings, but those of us who are expected to deliver the service still have not heard just how this will be orchestrated. Staggered seatings were tried unsuccessfully many years ago. Maybe there will be some new element that will make it a success. I am anxiously awaiting that new information. The train has been running with the extra coach, and the second lounge has not been removed. Passenger counts have been in the neighborhood of 550. At breakfast time, we are committed to serving breakfast to every one of these passengers. This generally has to be completed between 6:00 am and 8:30 am because the train often arrives early (often before 8:00 am). One problem is that the 550 passengers do not all show up for breakfast in the diner at nicely spaced intervals. Most show up between 6:30 and 7:45. With no second lounge car for people to sit in while they wait, some of us have been wondering how these people can be served expeditiously. We have wondered how we will be able to safely serve meals, whether in the morning or the evening, with large numbers of people walking through the diners to get to the one lounge car. With the current passenger numbers, it has already been necessary to exceed the anticipated 90 minute time frame per seating, so that the last seating starts late almost all the time. So far, it has often proved impossible for onboard service staff to have time for their own meal. We are trying to be confident that the architects of this new plan are working on solutions to these problems, but I don't know any veterans of Auto Train onboard service who know how this will be accomplished. That's why we don't make the big bucks, I guess.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, March 3, 2014 4:20 PM

ACY
Finished a trip yesterday and had hoped I'd have more info of a reliable nature. I still have no more detailed or more reliable info than anyone else on this forum. Many posters, including Mr. Frailey, seem to be certain these changes will be the salvation of Auto Train, but I haven't heard anything that tells me how service will be delivered. Part of the plan is to introduce staggered seatings, but those of us who are expected to deliver the service still have not heard just how this will be orchestrated. Staggered seatings were tried unsuccessfully many years ago. Maybe there will be some new element that will make it a success. I am anxiously awaiting that new information. The train has been running with the extra coach, and the second lounge has not been removed. Passenger counts have been in the neighborhood of 550. At breakfast time, we are committed to serving breakfast to every one of these passengers. This generally has to be completed between 6:00 am and 8:30 am because the train often arrives early (often before 8:00 am). One problem is that the 550 passengers do not all show up for breakfast in the diner at nicely spaced intervals. Most show up between 6:30 and 7:45. With no second lounge car for people to sit in while they wait, some of us have been wondering how these people can be served expeditiously. We have wondered how we will be able to safely serve meals, whether in the morning or the evening, with large numbers of people walking through the diners to get to the one lounge car. With the current passenger numbers, it has already been necessary to exceed the anticipated 90 minute time frame per seating, so that the last seating starts late almost all the time. So far, it has often proved impossible for onboard service staff to have time for their own meal. We are trying to be confident that the architects of this new plan are working on solutions to these problems, but I don't know any veterans of Auto Train onboard service who know how this will be accomplished. That's why we don't make the big bucks, I guess.

I guess the Brainiac's will just invoke the line from Seinfield - 'No soup for you!'

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, March 3, 2014 7:05 PM

Lots of mid-priced hotels here and expensive ones overseas have basically self-serve buffet breakfasts.   Perhaps that approach could be adapted?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Monday, March 3, 2014 10:37 PM
Show me one that serves 550 people in a 10' x 240' space in 2-1/2 hours, and sometimes less. I really don't want to be negative about this, but I'm having a hard time visualizing a great success, knowing what I do know about the milieu and the problems to be overcome.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,025 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:47 AM

Buffet service, or cafeteria style, was tried out on the Flordia trains around 1988-1990, if i remember correctly, or maybe  a few years later.   it seemed dto create more problems than it solved.  I did not mind it, but the food seemed not quite as wonderful as before.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,025 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:57 AM

El Al has a reputation for good food from fairly picky people.  I believe for flights from the USA it uses the same caterers that USA domestic airlines use for Kosher food, I think this is usually Wilton Caterers.  So you might try ordering a Kosher meal and see how it compares with your regular meal on your next flight.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:26 AM

Anyone remember the buffet-diners they used to have on the Silver Service trains?  The staff filled your plates and carried your tray and seated you at a table.  I wonder if this arrangement wouldn't have higher throughput than current.  Skips the order-taking, food prep elapsed times.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:27 AM

daveklepper

Buffet service, or cafeteria style, was tried out on the Flordia trains around 1988-1990, if i remember correctly, or maybe  a few years later.   it seemed dto create more problems than it solved.  I did not mind it, but the food seemed not quite as wonderful as before.

The Veggie Lasanga was the best bet on those trains.  It was pretty good!

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:49 AM

oltmannd
Anyone remember the buffet-diners they used to have on the Silver Service trains?  The staff filled your plates and carried your tray and seated you at a table.  I wonder if this arrangement wouldn't have higher throughput than current.  Skips the order-taking, food prep elapsed times.

That modification sounds like it could work, even with many patrons.   As far as breakfasts go, if not the buffet, then airline-style food passed out from carts.  If a 747-8I  with 467 passengers can serve breakfast in one hour, one would think Amtrak could also on the A-T.  BTW, the A-T averaged 343 passengers per train in 2012, not 550 as suggested above.  The 550 must refer to the Silver Star, which averaged 553, some of whom rode less than the full ride. 

An answer to the ridiculously high commissary charge for the A-T ($13,969,000 vs only $1,450,000 for the Silver Star) should be found soon.  It becomes very hard to take Amtrak seriously with such an obvious boondoggle going on.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 11:06 AM

As to the buffet service, it began in '83 or'84--and it was used on the Crescent, for a while, at least. I ate dinner that way when I rode from Wilmington, Delaware, to Pomona (Greensboro) in September of '84. My wife and I ate that way when we rode the Silver Star from New York to Sebring and the Silver Meteor north to Washington in the spring of 1989. The food seemed to be as good as that served in a regular diner.

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Tuesday, March 4, 2014 11:51 AM
Schlimm & others: 343 passengers per train (average Auto Train) in 2012 is not relevant to the discussion. That was 2 years ago. Also, the average may be interesting, but we have to be prepared every day for the maximum. 550 passengers per train (typical Auto Train) last week is relevant to the discussion. Before A-T was equipped with Superliners, it featured a buffet service using old Heritage cars that had been specially modified for the purpose. One reason the train went to traditional diner service with the introduction of Superliners is that the Superliners could not be modified for buffet service at a reasonable cost. Many comments suggesting buffet service and such tend to ignore the cost and practical difficulty of installing the plumbing, steam tables, etc. in the upstairs area of a car that was not originally designed for it.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy