Trains.com

China Holds Test Run on World’s Longest High-Speed Railway Link

3038 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,275 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 27, 2012 6:16 PM

schlimm

Might be a worthy goal, but do as China did by building some of the segments first and eventually connecting them.  As the article states, the line will be extended on to Hong Kong next.  But these things require the vision to see then as an investment for economic development, not just another expense, and then the will to make it happen.

And has been demonstrated time after time Congress and State Legislatures could be declared legally blind when it comes to have VISION!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Thursday, December 27, 2012 4:49 PM

New Jersey Transit has a lot of 3 and 2 coaches.  The three seat side is so crowded than many people will stand rather than take the center seat.  I find it pretty uncomfortable.  However, that is commuter service with much lower fares than premium service.  I'm surprised that an extra fare would get a person such a crowded seat.  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012 5:58 PM

AFAIK, the Chinese gauge is standard 4' 8"   TGV's, at least some, are also 3-2 seating.  ICE's in Germany are 2-2.  Perhaps it depends on passenger size?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:16 PM

Thanks for the pictures, Schlimm.  I noticed the 3 and 2 seating.  Perhaps the tracks are broad gauge.  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012 10:07 AM

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/752363.shtml

The new train made its inaugural run today (Wednesday).   Link shows some pictures.  It is hard to imagine that this sort of service, even with a somewhat lower top speed (this HSR is 186 mph and the average sustained speed is about 175) would not be very successful in appropriate, shorter corridors here.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 24, 2012 9:14 PM

schlimm

Might be a worthy goal, but do as China did by building some of the segments first and eventually connecting them.  

of course !!!!!!!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, December 24, 2012 8:39 PM

Might be a worthy goal, but do as China did by building some of the segments first and eventually connecting them.  As the article states, the line will be extended on to Hong Kong next.  But these things require the vision to see then as an investment for economic development, not just another expense, and then the will to make it happen.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Monday, December 24, 2012 7:31 PM

If Chicago to Miami requires changing planes an 8 hour train ride would be competitive with flying.  

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 24, 2012 6:49 PM

schlimm

1428 miles is like Chicago to Miami.

chicago - miami in 8 hrs ? or more realistic chicago - orlando.  would that ever change the surface transportation thinking in this country ?
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 24, 2012 6:34 PM

John WR

It is hard for me to imagine realistically getting high speed rail between Chicago and any east coast city.  

John ---   Not in the next 30 years unless there is some thing that occurrs that would change the public perception.  As someone who is much wiser has said " look 10 years out and you can just barely tell what the future will be; 20 years no way "  30 years wow ?
  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Monday, December 24, 2012 6:09 PM

It is hard for me to imagine realistically getting high speed rail between Chicago and any east coast city.  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, December 24, 2012 3:36 PM

1428 miles is like Chicago to Miami.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 24, 2012 11:19 AM

schlimm

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-12-22/china-holds-test-run-on-world-s-longest-high-speed-rail-line

The various segments en route make more sense for ridership than the full length.

although it may  make more sense to some of us in the USA it may be entirely different in china.  we will have to wait and see what the ridership figures are reported disclose  ( if china ever releases the various segment figures ).  this seems to be about the distance from WASH; PHL; NYP - Chicago ?
 
edit ---  actually  wash is only 54%
 
                               phl                  58%
                               nyp                 67%
my bad
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
China Holds Test Run on World’s Longest High-Speed Railway Link
Posted by schlimm on Monday, December 24, 2012 9:12 AM

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-12-22/china-holds-test-run-on-world-s-longest-high-speed-rail-line

The various segments en route make more sense for ridership than the full length.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy