Trains.com

The Real High Speed Train

1948 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
The Real High Speed Train
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 8:55 AM

When talking of HST passenger service, we think of trains going 125 mph or 150 mph.

Watch this little video to understand what HST is about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE4A0nPjyqQ&feature=player_embedded

356 mph is some figure! (who needs airplanes?)

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 4:34 PM

Sir Madog

When talking of HST passenger service, we think of trains going 125 mph or 150 mph.

Watch this little video to understand what HST is about:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE4A0nPjyqQ&feature=player_embedded

356 mph is some figure! (who needs airplanes?)

activated

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 8:32 PM

That TGV is pretty "activated" all by itself!  

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Wednesday, August 8, 2012 6:08 PM

Sir Madog

356 mph is some figure! (who needs airplanes?)

I realize that Madog is being lighthearted. But of course the genius of airplanes is that they don't require expensive, dedicated infrastructure for every mile they fly, including across oceans. That the crew in the instruments car acts like it was Houston landing a man on the Moon is a tipoff to the narrow niche such a service will occupy under the best of circumstances.

Again I would say, in this country let's see what we can achieve with less ambitious but more affordable projects ... such as, in dedicated corridors like LA-San Francisco and Chicago-Twin Cities, end-to-end speeds such as the Milwaukee Road and Chicago North Western achieved 80 years ago. With today's population densities, I'll bet that would pull enough people off planes and out of cars to make it worthwhile.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 459 posts
Posted by jclass on Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:13 AM

dakotafred

...a tipoff to the narrow niche such a service will occupy under the best of circumstances.

Again I would say, in this country let's see what we can achieve with less ambitious but more affordable projects ... such as, in dedicated corridors like LA-San Francisco and Chicago-Twin Cities, end-to-end speeds such as the Milwaukee Road and Chicago North Western achieved 80 years ago. With today's population densities, I'll bet that would pull enough people off planes and out of cars to make it worthwhile.

What spurs me is that the Milwaukee and C&NW along with the Q were privately-owned companies pridefully providing that level of service to attract customers so they could earn a profit.  Where is the incentive and leadership to offer such service today?  (Decisions by their nature are politically laced the way things are currently "organized"  Example - $7 billion to revamp Washington Union rather than upgrade ROW?).

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
The Real High Speed Train
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, August 9, 2012 7:55 AM

jclass

  Example - $7 billion to revamp Washington Union rather than upgrade ROW?).

suggest you read the whole proposal. Amtrak is only going to upgrade the ROW (ie trackage and switches including another set of puzzle switches so a single filure will not tie up the station). Also the station will be upgraded to carry more passengers thru the station. everything above station will be responsibility of developers.

Also NYP is becoming a real choke point and will be completely choked whenever the Gateway tunnels open ( ?? date unknown  )).

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 9, 2012 8:09 AM

blue streak 1

 

 jclass:

 

 

  Example - $7 billion to revamp Washington Union rather than upgrade ROW?).

 

 

 

suggest you read the whole proposal. Amtrak is only going to upgrade the ROW (ie trackage and switches including another set of puzzle switches so a single filure will not tie up the station). Also the station will be upgraded to carry more passengers thru the station. everything above station will be responsibility of developers.

Also NYP is becoming a real choke point and will be completely choked whenever the Gateway tunnels open ( ?? date unknown  )). 

Union Station, Washington, D.C. is owned by the United States under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).  Amtrak is just one tenant. Although it says that it plans to upgrade the station, Amtrak will need board approval for the project. See my separate thread regarding Union Station for more detail.    

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy