Trains.com

High Speed Train Wreck - China

4203 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:36 PM

China now recalling both type of trains involved in crash with a major reduction in scheduled trains.

http://www.railjournal.com/newsflash/beijing-shanghai-hs-services-cut-as-train-recall-starts-

 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,274 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, August 6, 2011 1:22 PM

I find it hard to believe that in the event of 'signal malfunction' such as the lightning strike that they had not designed in setting adjacent signals to stop....this has been a feature of automatic signal system since the 2nd day after the first one was installed.  A GLAREING design flaw.

blue streak 1

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, August 6, 2011 11:50 AM

Reading that article and a link to People's Daily shows considerable honesty in reporting and that the comments from TT and greyhounds to be wishful thinking.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
High Speed Train Wreck - China
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 5:31 AM
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:55 AM

greyhounds

I hope casualties were minimal and minor, but I would think China will restrict reporting if it's anything really bad.

Anybody waiting for the equivalent of a FRA report from the Chinese government would be as likely to find fur and feathers on fish.  And the official propaganda ministry will prosecute any media type who speculates on causes.  Even an official casualty count is likely to be classified `Drop dead before discussng.'

Chuck

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
High Speed Train Wreck - China
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, July 25, 2011 5:46 PM

Passenger count on board no 1 train a 16 car emu [ cra1b series ]. A report states train no 1 had started moving according to reports.  No 2 train a 16 car emu [crh2e series] with 558 passengers. No crew count on either train listed yet. Some indication that preliminary examination is looking at a possible cause:  " why their version of PTC did not stop second train ".  Pure speculation  ---  maybe system turned off???

Canadian take on crash.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/bombardier-could-see-fallout-from-deadly-crash/article2108607/

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, July 24, 2011 11:30 AM

Latest count 43 dead 200+ injured. 

Axe is already falling as 3 officials are fired. No wait for determination of cause.

http://news.yahoo.com/toddler-found-alive-rubble-china-train-crash-121137102.html

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:40 PM

Perhaps the lightning fried the signal system? 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
High Speed Train Wreck - China
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:00 PM

BaltACD

All of which brings up the question....why was the 2nd train traveling faster than a restricted speed with a stopped train ahead?

makes one wonder??

1.  Did lightning strike cause a false clear?

2.  design flaw in signaling system?

3. Second train driver not believing signals?

4. regenerative braking and/or regular braking on second train fried by emp of lightning strike?

5. will there be a cover up?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,274 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:37 PM

All of which brings up the question....why was the 2nd train traveling faster than a restricted speed with a stopped train ahead?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
High Speed Train Wreck - China
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:35 PM

This is a "D" train usually not more than 95 mph. Count now up to 16 dead and 89 injured.

http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-state-media-16-dead-train-accident-174630858.html

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, July 23, 2011 12:46 PM

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-as-china-train-crash,0,6683950.story

These were not the true HSR trains, but older 1st generation equipment that has a maximum speed of 122 mph, but generally only goes 95-100 mph on that trackage.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, July 23, 2011 11:35 AM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
High Speed Train Wreck - China
Posted by greyhounds on Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:55 AM

I hope casualties were minimal and minor, but I would think China will restrict reporting if it's anything really bad.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-chinatrain-accidenl3e7in06t-20110723,0,1499268.story

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy