So some of the figures like a $400,000 passenger car seem suspect to me but an interesting video nevertheless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwjwePe-HmA
Bogus cost comparisons.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Looks like a sophmore level general course presentation. That's when it isn't hawking videoblox or whatever it is.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII
PJS1Amtrak bought 492 Amfleet I cars in the 1970s for $192 million or an average of $390,244 per car.
Using CPI calculation, that's $1.8M a copy now.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
oltmannd PJS1 Amtrak bought 492 Amfleet I cars in the 1970s for $192 million or an average of $390,244 per car. Using CPI calculation, that's $1.8M a copy now.
PJS1 Amtrak bought 492 Amfleet I cars in the 1970s for $192 million or an average of $390,244 per car.
I wonder what some new coaches from China would cost?
I thought the 1 Amtrak employee per four passengers ratio was humorous. All the effort those people must put into keeping a low profile and not being seen at train stations or on board trains........you have to wonder where exactly Amtrak warehouses all those employees?
That ratio has to be much higher than what the Queen Mary II staffs at when it sails..........and look at the service difference.
I'm sure that the figure includes employees in maintenance of way, shop personnel, front office, etc.
CSSHEGEWISCH I'm sure that the figure includes employees in maintenance of way, shop personnel, front office, etc.
Politics aside, how many Amtrak employees HAVE to be Amtrak employees. Could some things be contracted out? Many, myself included, have suggested Amtrak might be better off contracting out the hopsitality work to hospitality workers.
The passenger ship business pivoted from transport to the cruise lines by realizing the transport business was dead and they were actually in the hospitality business.
CMStPnP I thought the 1 Amtrak employee per four passengers ratio was humorous. All the effort those people must put into keeping a low profile and not being seen at train stations or on board trains........you have to wonder where exactly Amtrak warehouses all those employees? That ratio has to be much higher than what the Queen Mary II staffs at when it sails..........and look at the service difference.
So, Amtrak has 30M passengers a year and 20,000 employees. So, what's the ratio? I think we need to put both on time basis. If avg trip is 8 hours and avg employee works 240, 8 hour days (or equivalent), then ratio is about 6:1.
On a cruise ship, a panamax ship will carry 2-3000 passengers with a staff of 800-1000. Ratio: 3:1
A typical LD train will have 8-12 employees on board and 100-300 passengers. Ratio: 20:1
A typical NEC train will have 350 passengers and a crew of 6. Ratio: 60:1
The Carolinian, with 348 seats (both classes) will generally turn nearly 600+ passengers on many trips between CLT and NYP. Crew of 6, Engineer, Conductor, Assist. Conductor, LSA, Business Class Attendent, and Coach Attendent covering 4 coaches. I'll let you figure the ratio.
NC specifies the BC Attendent as part of the contract. NC agreement still specifies pillows in BC, the only day train still with pillows.
Everyone compares Amtrak fares against the airlines 'loss leader' fares. They dont' compare them against the normal coach or normal first class air fares.
Back in the day, when I was frequently flying for business - at my boss's scheduling - on Monday he'd say go to Chicago Wednesday and come back Friday afternoon. No way to get the $99 super saver - the round trip cost was generally in the $600-800 range, of course it all went on the expense account.
Some interesting comparisons of median employee comp including benefits to other railroads and airlines. Southwest Airlines $81,000, Delta $93,000, American $62,000, United $83,000, Union Pacific RR $83,000, Norfolk Southern $92,000, CSX $99,000. So yes I'd say Amtrak employees at $116,000 are very well compensated relative to their peers. And yes that American number seems low but that's what they reported in their 2018 SEC proxy filing. BNSF numbers not available as they are privately held by Berkshire Hathaway, so they did not report employee comp at the BNSF level. For all Berkshire Hathaway employees it's $54,000.
A lot of Amtrak employees are based in major cities. You aren't going to get decent people if the wages are crap.
JL Chicago Some interesting comparisons of median employee comp including benefits to other railroads and airlines. Southwest Airlines $81,000, Delta $93,000, American $62,000, United $83,000, Union Pacific RR $83,000, Norfolk Southern $92,000, CSX $99,000. So yes I'd say Amtrak employees at $116,000 are very well compensated relative to their peers. And yes that American number seems low but that's what they reported in their 2018 SEC proxy filing. BNSF numbers not available as they are privately held by Berkshire Hathaway, so they did not report employee comp at the BNSF level. For all Berkshire Hathaway employees it's $54,000.
On the Berkshire Hathaway employees..........would love to be one of them and in their stock plan with the stock appreciating what 30-40% per year?
Interesting that non-Union Southwest Airlines has a much higher compensation rate than Union American. Of course a huge part of that is US Air merged with non-Union America West without later equalizing pay as well as US Air and American's strategy to use non-Union Regional Jet carrier subsidiaries. Delta does that too but apparently not as much. United was under bankruptcy for a while and before that had labor issues for not paying competitive salaries.
The problem with the Airline to Amtrak comparison is Amtrak employees beyond the office employee comparison is the different operating environments. I only have one reaction to the $116k average salary figure though........Jeeeessssuussss, thats where most of the subsidy is going no doubt.
zugmann A lot of Amtrak employees are based in major cities. You aren't going to get decent people if the wages are crap.
True, but alot of airline employees are also based near large cities, too: UAL Chicago; AA Dallas; Delta Atlanta.
charlie hebdo zugmann A lot of Amtrak employees are based in major cities. You aren't going to get decent people if the wages are crap. True, but alot of airline employees are also based near large cities, too: UAL Chicago; AA Dallas; Delta Atlanta.
Personal observation - a number of airline employees have decided to live in rural areas - with the available airline system - they can use other carriers to 'deadhead' to and from their on duty point for their round trip. Then when getting home have much more than a single day off before the next trip.
Because they have to pay for there own tracks and roads and be taxed on top of that.
CMStPnP Interesting that non-Union Southwest Airlines has a much higher compensation rate than Union American.
Interesting that non-Union Southwest Airlines has a much higher compensation rate than Union American.
Non union??
Southwest's pilot union
https://www.swapa.org
Southwest's Flight Attendant's union
https://twu556.org
Southwest's mechanic's union
http://www.amfanational.org/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_page.cfm&page=Southwest20Airlines
Southwest's customer service agents union.
http://www.iamdl142.org/southwest/
An "expensive model collector"
CandOforprogress2 Because they have to pay for there own tracks and roads and be taxed on top of that.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.