Trains.com

Vermont state rail plan

1614 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,831 posts
Vermont state rail plan
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, July 10, 2015 3:07 PM

Both passenger and freight rail plans to get all lines to 286,000#, domestic double stack clearances, passenger speeds to 79 MPH.  No mention of PTC and possibility to increase speeds further. 

http://vtrans.vermont.gov/sites/aot/files/VT%20State%20Rail%20Plan%20Draft%20June%202015.pdf

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,401 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Saturday, July 11, 2015 11:08 PM

I could only find the NECR and Whitehall-Rutland-Bellows Falls line to be the 2 lines to get full doublestack clearance upgrades.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 157 posts
Posted by conductorchris on Monday, July 13, 2015 9:35 PM

The WACR Conn River line is pretty close if not already cleared.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,831 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:57 PM

On the much lighter side chuckles.  Mass DOT got some Amtrak signs wrong.  Quite costly.

http://wwlp.com/2015/08/25/error-found-on-the-greenfield-amtrak-train-station-signs/

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,468 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 8:41 PM

Vermont is the only state east of the Mississippi I haven't been to, and every thing I know about the state makes me like it more.  This state rail plan is a perfect example in that it appears to this Ohioan as well thought out and forward-looking.  We in Ohio know nothing of this sort of state study and proposal.  In Ohio the "our way" IS the highway, and nothing else.

I envy you New Englanders.  We often get what we are willing to pay for, and in Ohio, at least, we aren't willing to pay for almost anything.  Best luck to the passengers of the Green Mountain State.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:34 PM

Boy nkp you are right about ohio

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:35 PM

Boy nkp you are right about ohio. The plan is no rail.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:43 PM

NKP guy

Vermont is the only state east of the Mississippi I haven't been to, and every thing I know about the state makes me like it more.  This state rail plan is a perfect example in that it appears to this Ohioan as well thought out and forward-looking.  We in Ohio know nothing of this sort of state study and proposal.  In Ohio the "our way" IS the highway, and nothing else.

I envy you New Englanders.  We often get what we are willing to pay for, and in Ohio, at least, we aren't willing to pay for almost anything.  Best luck to the passengers of the Green Mountain State.

 

+1.  Hopefully in Illinois our anti-rail new governor won't emulate the ones in Ohio and Wisconsin.  We have well-established state supported services....for now.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy