When appropriate and useful, Metro North will delight preservationists. And don't forget what they have done for GCT!
Amtrak also wanted to demolish all the old Bronx stations. Good thing all their plans did not come to pass.
MN NH--Line service to Penn is in detailed planning, with new MN stations on Amtrak property as part of the planning.
BroadwayLionClearly if MN does develop service here they will likely develop their owen stations. It will cost less than repairing these things.
I would guess that it would cost less for MN to maintain a modern station than an older one, but the museum will have to maintain the old station, and the cost will ultimatly fall on taxpayers and philanthropies. So the public will ultamatly be supporting the old station either way. In the scheme of recycling, reuse is better than repurposing.
MidlandMike Why hasn't Amtrak or MetroNorth considered these old stations for rehab for the new stations for the new Bronx commuter service? I would thin that they would want full control of any structures built over their tracks.
Why hasn't Amtrak or MetroNorth considered these old stations for rehab for the new stations for the new Bronx commuter service? I would thin that they would want full control of any structures built over their tracks.
Metro North does not own the right of way here.
Amtrak is not going to stop at these stations. Amtrak does not do intracity service, at least not without payment and a contract so to do.
Tere is talk of MN using this line to access Penn Station (I will believe it when I see it!--- And since I am not coming back to the city any time soon, I doubt taht I will see it.)
Clearly if MN does develop service here they will likely develop their owen stations. It will cost less than repairing these things.
(ROAR)
The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.
Here there be cats. LIONS with CAMERAS
I'm sure you are correct in most cases, but each location is different.
I have a narrower view of repurposing an old rail station, only to build a second newer station. I see more benefit in the station being rehabed for it original purpose, and the museum using their saved rehab money to build a better building.
You obviously have a narrower viewpoint of usefulness and public benefit than I have. And you are entitled to display that opinion.
I'm guessing Amtrak/MN didn't want the old stations because it may cost more to rehab them just to get a less than modern station. However, the non-profits are looking to government funds to rehab the sites and will probably need continuous funds to maintain a structure for a use that has no practical reason to be located on a bridge over an electrified mailline railroad.
Because both Amtrak and Metro North have ideas on how their stations should be planned that don't fit these historic structures. And Metro North will be happy to have the off-peak, non-rush-hour additional business these attractions will bring.
Interesting David. Thanks!
From Mike:
Attempts to save a New York New Haven & Hartford Bronx station:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22In+the+Bronx%2C+a+Push%22+%22the+majestically+moldering%22&rlz=1C1CHNY_enUS933US933&biw=1600&bih=757&tbm=nws&ei=pq_1YbWXMN-vptQP-aWz-AU&ved=0ahUKEwi1guv78df1AhXfl4kEHfnSDF8Q4dUDCA0&oq=%22In+the+Bronx%2C+a+Push%22+%22the+majestically+moldering%22&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LW5ld3MQDDoICCEQFhAdEB46BQghEKsCOgUIIRCgAToHCCEQChCgAVD7K1i_nQJg27UCaAJwAHgAgAGGAYgBiBmSAQUyMS4xM5gBAKABAcABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz-news
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.