CSSHEGEWISCHIt was tried in Chicago about 35 years ago with routes serving Chicago Union Station and it did improve bus timekeeping. It was discontinued after a few years over pedestrian safety issues.
People kept looking for cars going in the usual direction and could not comprehend that a bus would be coming the other way on a "one way" street. All the signs and markings could not prevent them from walking in front of an oncoming bus. People get set in their ways and have a hard time changing. Ever get in the habit of catching a commuter train that always departs from track 2 and one day that track is OOS and the crowd control can't handle the 1500 people who need to find it on track 6. What a circus. Not to mention the people who used to board a different train on track 6.
Hey, you know what they should bo with those NYC buses?
Put a full-face photo of Mayor DeBlasio on the front with the caption "Big Brother Is Watching You!" lettered backwards so errant drivers can read it in their rear-view mirrors!
That'll warn 'em! Assuming they're not too busy texting while driving.
Or something.
Chicago has a similar problem with autos infringing on bus-only lanes. The one method that will succeed is to establish a counter-flow lane for buses on paired one-way streets. It was tried in Chicago about 35 years ago with routes serving Chicago Union Station and it did improve bus timekeeping. It was discontinued after a few years over pedestrian safety issues.
San Juan has a fair amount of counterflow lane arrangements and they seem to work quite nicely.
deleted
The "Forward Plan" has a signal system improvement plan that has an error, involving the "1" and the "R" south of Canal Street. This shows the correction:
Forward plan <https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5afef986c3c16a2dc6705929/t/5b072571f950b7a5e621a4ff/1527194994914/Fast+Forward+Plan_05-24-2018_3.15PM.pdf>to improve bus service, increase bus speeds and attract new ridership.Results so far have yielded faster bus speeds by as much as 19% on aportion of Fifth Avenue and as much as 30% near the Hugh L. CareyTunnel’s Manhattan approach. Other strategies include redesigningevery borough’s bus network to better meet customer needs, installingtraffic signal priority technology, implementing more transit prioritystreet designs, and deploying new modern buses with better reliabilityand customer amenities.A sample warning is available here.<https://apps.cio.ny.gov/apps/mediaContact/public/download.cfm?attachment_uuid=7D135EE5-5056-907F-6FF78A8AC297505C>
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.