CandOforprogress2 So having rode the Porter Line by bike it seems to serve a denser population belt then does the South Shore. It also seems that many of the SS park and riders drive up from here anyway. So building a southern belt on the Porter railbanked right of way might make some sence.
So having rode the Porter Line by bike it seems to serve a denser population belt then does the South Shore. It also seems that many of the SS park and riders drive up from here anyway. So building a southern belt on the Porter railbanked right of way might make some sence.
For a Green Field approach it might make but to replace/compete with an already existing/successful commuter route makes no sence at all.
CandOforprogress2So building a southern belt on the Porter railbanked right of way might make some sense.
But it runs the wrong way. From Porter to Hobart. At Hobart, where do you go? If the destination is Chicago you would have to rebuild the former PRR row to Tolleston where one could access the NS (former WAB) or some other route to Chicago. Or you could access the NS (former NKP). These all presume that the NS is willing to accept your trains and that there was sufficient dollars to make them want to participate in the project.
Did EJ&E also connect with PM/C&O at Porter?
Yes. MC line went through East Gary. EJ&E Porter branch is the one.
n012944 EJ&E Porter branch.
EJ&E Porter branch.
That nails it.
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
An "expensive model collector"
My first guess without consulting the Steam Powered Atlas is former Michigan Central that ran to Kennsington where their passenger trains used the IC to reach Central Station.
http://www.traillink.com/trail/prairie-duneland-trail.aspx
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.