Trains.com

Penn Station NY to Jamaica Ave Queens With Catenary

7492 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: US
  • 971 posts
Penn Station NY to Jamaica Ave Queens With Catenary
Posted by alloboard on Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:28 PM

Has there ever been proposals to electrify Penn Station NY to Jamaica Ave Queens with Catenary?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:46 PM

None that I have seen, and I'd think that 'bang for the buck' would be particularly poor considering the infrastructure cost for the very relative 'benefit' of one-seat from New Jersey out to Queens on the LIRR with no rail extension to either LGA or JFK.

Much easier to put third-rail shoes and some DC-to-DC converters on existing power, almost for sure. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:47 PM

PRR took control of the LIRR with the idea of being able to get the Main Line inhabitants of Philadelphia out to Montauk and the Hamptons with their private cars with no changes....so Penn Sta was originally 600v DC from Manhattan Transfer to Sunnyside and was the same as the LIRR and passenger trains would be hauled to Jamaica by electric locomotives similar and often the same as the PRR was using to MT.  But when PRR went to overhead in 1930 the idea seemed to pass.  I believe PRR DD1's did haul LIRR's Cannon Ball and other far east end trains to Jamaica where power was changed to steam maybe until 1950 when PRR released the LIRR from its fold...from then on it was "change at Jamaica" and it meant you not the motive power.   Diesels short circuited a lot of electric operations with the idea rails had the economy of electric without the smoke, soot, and cinders of steam and therefore a lot of wire and third rail dreams were abandoned.  The Depression of the 30's also caused railroads to cut back on big ideas...

Today, however, there are the dual locomotives...LIRR has several but no one has yet to play with one west of the west end of NYP as far as I know.  NJT has some duals but with small pantagraphs for catenary  and not shoes for 3rd rail and have as yet not been accepted by Amtrak for use on the Corridor into NYP.  So, possibilities are here...the time has yet to come.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: US
  • 971 posts
Posted by alloboard on Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:22 PM

     I don't understand why Amtrak will not make additional good use of thier dual powered 3rd rail P42 locomotives to operate from Washington DC to Jamaica Ave Queens. It would be cool if there were tri powered hybrid diesel 3rd rail and catenary locomotives similar to ALP-45DP locomotives .

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:30 PM

There is no reason to.  There is no intercity marketing on this route nor reason for it.  Nothing would be gained by anybody by doing it.  Amtrak,  LIRR, NJT, MNRR, SEPTA are not in the business of running trains because they have equipment and track but because they have specific service committments.  Running D.C. to Jamaica, Queens is not one of those services.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:07 PM

You don't need tri-power diesels, and as Overmod said you don't need new cat wire.  Equipment similar to New Haven's would work across the NEC-LIRR divide.  I think a NJT-LIRR cross commute would make more sense than an Amtrak divergence.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:42 PM

As I posted in another thread all you would need is a M-8 train set with 25 Hz transformer and over running 3 rd rail shoes.  SO it appears that NJT and  LIRR see no need for this kind of service 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, February 1, 2013 5:07 AM

If you check through all the old Official Guides available, I suspect that at one time there were through Pullmans or parlor cars from various places to Montauk.   I know there were some special moves like that directly to the NY Worlds Fair 1939-1940.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, February 1, 2013 9:39 PM

blue streak 1

As I posted in another thread all you would need is a M-8 train set with 25 Hz transformer and over running 3 rd rail shoes.  SO it appears that NJT and  LIRR see no need for this kind of service 

I know there is at least some demand for this cross-commute type service, but apparently it has not reached critical mass, or at least not enough to cause the two agencies to explore a cooperative service.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, February 2, 2013 10:15 AM

MidlandMike

[I know there is at least some demand for this cross-commute type service, but apparently it has not reached critical mass, or at least not enough to cause the two agencies to explore a cooperative service.

The only way to really find out is to offer a thru ticketing scheme.  If you could buy a thru ticket even if it required 2 coupons then the real demand could be measured.  That would also give LIRR & NJT indications of what times such a service is needed ?
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, February 2, 2013 3:00 PM

Amtrak has run through trains into LIRR territory in the past with P32AC-DM diesels.  I seem to remember specials from Albany to the Shea Stadium area.

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • 1,112 posts
Posted by aegrotatio on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:39 PM
Aside from the Empire Connection third-rail, isn't there just one North River tunnel that has third-rail that only gets passing maintenance attention? I remember discussing this on one of the online fora a few years ago. Do all of the East River tunnels have third-rail?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:31 PM

aegrotatio
Aside from the Empire Connection third-rail, isn't there just one North River tunnel that has third-rail that only gets passing maintenance attention? I remember discussing this on one of the online fora a few years ago. Do all of the East River tunnels have third-rail?

I had tacitly assumed that with catenary in both tunnels, you would want third rail for the wire trains to access them.  That may be wrong, but it seems implausible to keep third rail in only one.

Any of the East River tunnels that can see LIRR third-rail traffic will of course have third rail.  That should be all of them; I haven't heard different.

Will be interesting to hear if either of these is no longer correct.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, February 6, 2013 2:41 AM

As far as I know,. third rail still exists in the two Amtrak Hudson River tunnels to just a few feet beyond the portal.   If anyone has  a recent pix of the portal, it should show.   And of course all four East River tunnels have third rail .  Two are "owned" by LIRR and two by Amtrak, but they are dispatched as one railroad.

With revised third rail shoes, the M8 designed car could operate NJT - LIRR through electric service.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Wednesday, February 6, 2013 5:53 PM

daveklepper
I suspect that at one time there were through Pullmans or parlor cars from various places to Montauk.

Anybody found such a thing in a timetable?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:10 AM

LIRR was well-known for its primarily weekend parlor car service between New York City and either Montauk or Greenport.  There were occasional special moves of through cars from PRR but I don't think that they were scheduled operations.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:52 AM

blue streak 1
SO it appears that NJT and  LIRR see no need for this kind of service 

NJT can hardly do tactical things like keeping equipment out of floods right.  I can't see them being interested in tackling strategic things with large tactical challenges.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:48 AM

The M-8 can only use third rail in shared territory, once a third rail shoe hits third rail pantographs come down with no override. The M-8 can NOT use the 25 hz catenary between Gate and NYP or NEC south.

 The Transformer on M-8 can only handle 60 hz power.

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:07 PM

According to this site the Long Island Railroad operated regular parlor car service:

http://www.dominionrailvoyages.com/jhd/lirr/

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:23 PM

John WR
According to this site the Long Island Railroad operated regular parlor car service:

Yes, but we're talking about THROUGH parlor cars (or other passenger cars) coming from the PRR catenary trackage. 

Think George Pins trying to get to Easthampton...

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:29 AM

Pennsy's Trail Blazer operated from Chicago through to the New York World's Fairgrounds in 1939-40.  The GG1 that brought the train from Harrisburg to Penn Station was simply replaced with an LIRR DD1 during the Penn Station stop.  This could be done today with an LIRR or Amtrak dual-mode. 

  • Member since
    February 2013
  • 1 posts
Posted by Tnli on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 7:26 AM

The PRR/LIRR ran "The Sunrise Special" from Pittsburgh to Montauk from 1922-42. It ran eastbound on Fridays and westbound on Mondays. For a time it ran every day. Not sure about the equipment.

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 7:33 PM

Overmod
Yes, but we're talking about THROUGH parlor cars (or other passenger cars) coming from the PRR catenary trackage. 

Overmod,  

Do you consider parlor car service "From New York City to either Montauk or Greenport" through service?

Best regards, John

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:59 AM

John WR
Do you consider parlor car service "From New York City to either Montauk or Greenport" through service?

Not even remotely.

That's entirely on LIRR, in a LIRR train -- like the Cannon Ball with the gurgling, rocking RS3s.

"Through service" by definition involves other carriers -- most probably PRR, but NH would have been possible (for example, with a 'reverse' move of the car in the west yard at Penn Station).  See the previous post about the Sunrise Special (which I had no idea was a through train from Pittsburgh until my face was rubbed in it...)

I'm sure there's a history of private car moves, and that might 'count' but not to the same degree as service that was truly interline common carrier.  PRR to LIRR is an interline move, even if PRR exercised a controlling interest in LIRR at the time.

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:32 PM

Overmod
hat's entirely on LIRR, in a LIRR train -- like the Cannon Ball with the gurgling, rocking RS3s

I agree. 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:46 AM

Pretty certain the Sunrise Special has parlor cars

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:35 PM

daveklepper
retty certain the Sunrise Special has parlor cars

Perhaps a daily Sunrise Special could be re-established to replace the Pennsylvanian.  Of course it would be an all parlor car train.  

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:08 AM

John WR

daveklepper
retty certain the Sunrise Special has parlor cars

Perhaps a daily Sunrise Special could be re-established to replace the Pennsylvanian.  Of course it would be an all parlor car train.  

I presume that this is not a serious suggestion since I doubt the existence of a large enough market to support an all-first-class Pittsburgh-New York-Montauk train.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Huntsville, AL
  • 24 posts
Posted by Fox2! on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:22 AM
Pictures I have seen of a World's Fair train show a DD-1 leading a GG-1. The GG-1 was left on to provide steam heat.
  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 4:59 PM

You ask if my suggestion for a Sunrise Special, an all parlor car train, from Pittsburgh to the tip of Long Island is "serious."  Actually it is not.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy