Trains.com

Metra West Improvements

4705 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Metra West Improvements
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:06 AM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, April 18, 2010 2:01 PM

 I noted an error in the story.  All Metra UP lines go to Ogilvie Transporation Center (horrible name), not Union Station.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,480 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, April 19, 2010 6:35 AM

schlimm

 I noted an error in the story.  All Metra UP lines go to Ogilvie Transporation Center (horrible name), not Union Station.

It's still North Western Station to me.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, April 19, 2010 9:28 PM

schlimm

 I noted an error in the story.  All Metra UP lines go to Ogilvie Transporation Center (horrible name), not Union Station.

Maybe the writer was thinking of the Overland trains (City of Los Angeles, San Francisco Overland, etc.) which in their last days did run to Union Station? Even so, the writer was a bit careless.

I have trouble remembering that horrible name, and think of it as the Northwestern Station.

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 19, 2010 9:46 PM

Deggesty
I have trouble remembering that horrible name, and think of it as the Northwestern Station.

 

North Western, please!  (Two words, with a space)

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, July 17, 2010 2:10 PM

 I noticed today that some of the new signals are working on the Metra UP West line today.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,015 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, July 18, 2010 2:52 AM

But when the "overland" trains ran to Union instead of NW, they came to Chicago on the Milwaukee and not the C&NW.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:18 PM

Sadly, from that dark day in 1955 to the beginning of Amtrak, Overland Route (City) trains ran on the Milwaukee to Union Station.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 12:35 PM

I'm old and lucky enough to remember seeing the UP domes on the C&NW at Maywood waiting for a bus and from the Churchill forest preserve in Glen Ellyn while fishing.

Be that as it may, if new signals can be seen, the UP and Metra are going to some considerable, I think unnecessary, expense for wayside signals; but maybe there's a new rule.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Friday, September 17, 2010 2:13 PM

Last week I rode out to Elburn.  Intermediate signals between West Chicago and Wheaton are operational.  These are spaced a mile apart at 25.6, 26.6, 27.6 & 28.6.  Signals from east of College Av through Finley Rd, Lombard are installed but not cut in and don't have the ID plate.  Little if any track or signal work could be seen around where the crossovers would be located or east through Villa Park.

Sorry I can't embed my photos like KP.  Microsoft licensing doesn't extend to the replacement hard-drive;and I'll be darned to buy it all over again.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Friday, September 17, 2010 6:01 PM

In response to HarveyK400, the west line project is about more than new signals.  The project includes additional crossovers, including triple tracking the segmetnts through Geneva and Maywood that are currently double track.  It also includes station changes to allow trains to pass each other without stopping for unloading passenger trains, which is currently a major issue on this line.  All of these changes, taken together, are supposed to creat new capacity on the line, and reduce the need for freight curfews.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,480 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:20 AM

It would appear to me that UP has less of a freight curfew in the PM rush than BNSF.  I ride the UP West Line occasionally (the grandkids live in Elmhurst) and I've seen some inbound freights while riding on a 5:13 departure from North Western Station to Elmhurst.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:55 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

It would appear to me that UP has less of a freight curfew in the PM rush than BNSF.  I ride the UP West Line occasionally (the grandkids live in Elmhurst) and I've seen some inbound freights while riding on a 5:13 departure from North Western Station to Elmhurst.

In answer to CSSHEGEWISCH (I'm including this notation because it no longer appears possible to reliably quote prior notes in a reply due to the recent website upgrades), my info is that the BNSF doesn't have as tight a curfew as UP.  Nonetheless, it's not surprising you might see some freight activity, if the UP dispatchers think they can fit some traffic in.  I note, for example, that you saw inbound freights during the evening rush.  Because UP doesn't normally use the center track for Metra passenger trains on the West Line and runs left handed, inbound freights during the evening rush can currently move all the way into Proviso without interefering with any trackage used by the outbound rush hour parade.

One of the things the upgrade is supposed to do is to to expand the triple track on the West Line and allow all three tracks to be used for all types of traffic (more like the BNSF Aurora line now operates).  That can't be done now because of lack of an adequate number of power crossovers to support such an operation. 

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Libertyville, IL
  • 372 posts
Posted by Mr. Railman on Monday, October 25, 2010 9:01 AM

I was born after it was renamed bu I still comsider it Northwestern Station :D

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy