Trains.com

More "B" units

3979 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:18 AM
 nbrodar wrote:

B units died because they lack the flexiblity of A units.  A B unit will always need an A unit to lead.  If your basic consist is two units, like ours is, what's the point of B units.  I have a hard enough time putting together working consists, without worrying about A vs B units.

Also note that under most union contracts, a B unit is not a locomotive - there are no seats, toliet, cooler, or sink.  Being forced to run from a B unit is a time claim, 8 hours in our case.

Nick

They may come back but be known as robots without humans driving the train.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:14 AM

Definitions of the "same thing" according to Webster's, The Rule Book, and The Union Contract can be very different.

Most union contracts specify minimum equipment requirements for a locomotive to qualify as a lead capable locomotive.  Usually, they state there must be seats, a toilet, sink, cooler, and space to put your grip.  Under these rules, a B unit does not qualify as a usable locomotive. You can use it for power, but you can't run from it for any length of time.

If you are forced to run from a non-equipped locomotives, there is a penalty claim you have against the company.  We're suppose to get an extra 8 hours pay for using a non-equipped locomotive.

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:12 AM
 spikejones52002 wrote:

nbrobar

 Would you please explain what you meant with these statements.

Also note that under most union contracts, a B unit is not a locomotive

A locomotive has a power plant and driving force. I never had the understanding that it need a human present to be called a locomotive.

- there are no seats, toliet, cooler, or sink.  Being forced to run from a B unit is a time claim, 8 hours in our case.

Thank You

Dictionary definitions, union contract definitions, railroad definitions and common sense do not necessarily always coincide.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Michigan City, In.
  • 781 posts
Posted by spikejones52002 on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 6:19 AM

nbrobar

 Would you please explain what you meant with these statements.

Also note that under most union contracts, a B unit is not a locomotive

A locomotive has a power plant and driving force. I never had the understanding that it need a human present to be called a locomotive.

- there are no seats, toliet, cooler, or sink.  Being forced to run from a B unit is a time claim, 8 hours in our case.

Thank You

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Over There
  • 454 posts
Posted by CPRail modeler on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 7:16 PM

The CPR had some SD40-2B units that were converted from A-units. These units had the toilet, A/C, seats and other things essential for the crew removed and had the windows blanked over with wood or steel. Many of these units were converted back to A-units but there may be some that still have the blanked windows. There were some high-hood SD40-2's purchased from a leaser (GATX?) that were used as B-units. A number of these units eventually went to NRE.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 13 posts
Posted by ENIGEERBOB on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 6:33 PM
Question: are they used as switch engines in the yards? Thanks & God bless. Smile [:)]
Keep them on track
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Friday, July 6, 2007 12:34 PM
Actually on the UP all they are doing to make them B units per say is not maintaining the toliets and some other minor things.  If needed they could be brought up to full lead unit status quickly.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Friday, July 6, 2007 11:46 AM

 I have also read that ATSF wanted a quote for a cabless Dash 8-40B from GE and were told that they would cost more than a wide cab unit!(and yes, this was after the B30-7ab's were bulit for BN) I believe the RR also inquired about 6 axle B units (SD70/C40-8) from both EMD and GE and got the same response. So while they could save money on maintaining the cab the higher purchase costs were uneconomic....

 In real world use B unit roadswitchers, while adding interest for railfans, can cause some major operational headaches for crews, although there have been a fair number of cases of RR's removing the control stands from older units to make them into boosters (UP with SD40's for instance)..

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 356 posts
Posted by youngengineer on Friday, July 6, 2007 3:35 AM
GP60B's have a hostler stand in them, a reverser, thorttle with one notch and an independent brake valve. B units can move by themselves but cannot move a train. I believe the top speed of a b unit leading is 4 or 5 mph. Since the B unit cannot control train brakes, the b unit could not be used to move the train.
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Wednesday, July 4, 2007 9:25 PM

B units died because they lack the flexiblity of A units.  A B unit will always need an A unit to lead.  If your basic consist is two units, like ours is, what's the point of B units.  I have a hard enough time putting together working consists, without worrying about A vs B units.

Also note that under most union contracts, a B unit is not a locomotive - there are no seats, toliet, cooler, or sink.  Being forced to run from a B unit is a time claim, 8 hours in our case.

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Michigan City, In.
  • 781 posts
Posted by spikejones52002 on Wednesday, July 4, 2007 1:03 PM

Ed

I do not know the complete Santa Fe story.

They could have cut off the traction motor in the defective unit and used it as a control cab unit.

If for some reason they could not move the defective unit. Then the train was stalled even if it had multi "A" units.

If they could have cut off the "A" unit and clear the track. Then they could have used the second "A" unit and long end forward until they could come upon a replace ment up the line.

What happenes when they have multi units hooked up long end to long end and they loose they lead unit? The second unit is long end forward.

I seen on RFD TV's trains. New Haven pulled two long freights with a single "F" unit backward and track speed.

"B" units have control boxes at both ends of unit movements.

If needed a person could stand at the front of the units with a signal hose. This is done with passenger trains with out a control unit at the other end for yard movements, also radio commucation from front end to control cab.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Wednesday, July 4, 2007 9:16 AM
Simple answer here called lack of flexiblity.  The Santa Fe ran into this problem in the early 90's with its Super Fleet of GP60M's they also had some GP60B's they would run them GP60M-B-B-M lashups will things were great til the time they had one that had a traction motor fire on the lead unit on train 199 the hottest of the hot.  The only other lead capable unit was facing the other way.  I guess they grabbed the lead unit off a loacl which was a GP-7m to get them into Argentine Yard so they could get another GP60M on the point.  After that they broke up the sets of basically abba and made sure there were 2 units facing forward on each end of the consist so they would have a spare unit to lead.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Michigan City, In.
  • 781 posts
More "B" units
Posted by spikejones52002 on Wednesday, July 4, 2007 8:26 AM

Watching Videos. I got to thinking. Why Main line railroads do not have more "B" units?

With out all that was needed for a person in  a control cab. A "B" unit would be cheeper to purchase and maintain.

Adding much more weight inplace of a person had to add greater tractive effert.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy