SDR_North wrote: I understand, during the Nineteen-Fifties, that CP had Two 539 MLW Switchers Modified so they could be 'Run' from Either Side where a Man was Required on the Left Side of Cab part of the time to Watch for Hand Signals From Switchmen.This was during the 'Getting Rid of the Fireman' Phase while Steam was on the way out. Can anyone Supply more info on this, Please?
I understand, during the Nineteen-Fifties, that CP had Two 539 MLW Switchers Modified so they could be 'Run' from Either Side where a Man was Required on the Left Side of Cab part of the time to Watch for Hand Signals From Switchmen.
This was during the 'Getting Rid of the Fireman' Phase while Steam was on the way out.
Can anyone Supply more info on this, Please?
There was an article in TRAINS from the early 1960's when Battle Creek yard was expanded and rebuilt, but as a flat-switching facility. GTW assigned S2's which were oriented on the switch leads to have the control on the outside of the lead so the engineer could see the switchmen. There were also a trio of SW900's which were floaters (could be assigned to any lead) and were equipped with dual controls to put the engineer on the outside of the lead without having to turn the locomotive.
I think that all of the C&O BL2s, at least in the 1840-1847 series, had dual controls (I guess I should look it up).
The Chicago Great Western had a number of TR2s that had dual controls. CNW kept the stands there at least until it rebuilt some of them in the early 1970s, though they never used them, that I'm aware of.
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
Our SD-9s have dual control ( BNSF) not sure the heritage of these old dogs but they are still out there running ( some are even lead qualified!!!!)
Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train
To go back even further the C&O had dual control BL-2's, their 1846 being one of them. The left hand controls where tucked in to the rear of the fireman's side cab door. It was a a tight fit. I was never in the cab of any other C&O BL-2's so don't know if this was one of many, or the only one.
Other dual control units I can think of where Soo 2556 (psgr GP9) and many of the CB&Q SD9's.
The Rock Island's had 15 "Suburban" dual control RS-3's 485-499. Also dual were the RI's two H-15-44's 400 and 401. The RI BL-2's were not dual control.
The MP had some dual control hi-hood GP7's.
Dave H.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
oltmannd wrote: A couple of clarifications and additions:"PRSL" GP38s 2010-2014, were actually PC. PRSL ordered them, but couldn't afford them when they were built. PC took them instead. These and the 2000-2009 actually had a single control stand, but had mechanical linkage to operate the throttle from the LH side. To accomodate the linkage, the front cab wall had to by bumped out a few inches.The PC U23Bs weren't really dual control, they were bi-directional. They had a single control stand that was placed parallel to the side wall of the cab so that you could turn the seat either way and still have easy access to the controls. PC also bought some GP38-2s with this arrangment. The Southern had started the practice and the PC president at the time of these purchase was a Moore, an ex-SOU guy.Conrail also has the ex-EL SD45-2s that had dual control stands.
A couple of clarifications and additions:
"PRSL" GP38s 2010-2014, were actually PC. PRSL ordered them, but couldn't afford them when they were built. PC took them instead. These and the 2000-2009 actually had a single control stand, but had mechanical linkage to operate the throttle from the LH side. To accomodate the linkage, the front cab wall had to by bumped out a few inches.
The PC U23Bs weren't really dual control, they were bi-directional. They had a single control stand that was placed parallel to the side wall of the cab so that you could turn the seat either way and still have easy access to the controls. PC also bought some GP38-2s with this arrangment. The Southern had started the practice and the PC president at the time of these purchase was a Moore, an ex-SOU guy.
Conrail also has the ex-EL SD45-2s that had dual control stands.
I guess the PC GP38/38-2s and the RDG SD45s were the only ones needing the "bumped-out" cabs.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.