Trains.com

Union Pacific M 10000

10669 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2018
  • From: Flyover Country
  • 5,557 posts
Posted by York1 on Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:19 AM

Deggesty
York1
Deggesty
When I lived in Wesson, Mississippi (55 miles south of Jackson)

I had a family friend who lived in Wesson.  He worked for the federal government  dealing with railroads.

 

Hmm, I do not recall knowing anyone with such an occupation; I lived there from 1962 to 1965. The only people there I knew who had a connection with railroading were a retired agent and the then agent.

 

 

Sorry, my post was a misleading.  The man was from Wesson, worked for the government while living in New Orleans, and then retired back to Wesson.  The last time I was in Wesson and saw him was right after Katrina; he and his wife took in a family friend after the New Orleans house was flooded.

York1 John       

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:00 AM

David, you remember pretty good!

The Suzie-Q originally had two of what they called "Motorailers," numbered 1001 and 1002, and they were definately double-ended to save turning.  They ran from Paterson to Susquehanna Transfer which was the Lincoln Tunnel bus connection to New York City.  The service began in 1940.

A Motorailer was tried on the Suzi-Q's Hanford Branch out in the wilds of northwestern New Jersey, but it couldn't handle the grades. 

Otherwise, they were so successful that the Susquehanna bought two more Motorailers second-hand from the Illinois Central in 1943.

They leased a gas-electric Brill from the Erie in 1940 that ran from Butler to Jersey City, but in 1944 returned it to the Erie.

Brill gas-electrics were also purchased from the Boston and Maine (1940) and the Cumberland and Pennsylvania (1942).

All in all the "Motorailers" and gas-electrics were quite successful, although 1001 was destroyed by a fire in 1947, and ran until they were replaced by RDC's beginning in 1950. 

Here's a picture of one of the Motorailers, plus more than anyone wants to know about the Susquehanna.

http://www.classicstreamliners.com/rr-nys-w.html   

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:55 AM

I have vague childhood memories of the Suzy-Q's Motorailers.  I recall them as being only one car, not two, double-ended (a sort of RDC-1 predecessor), running from a Lincoln Tunnel rail-bus transfer station, which was also a stop for most of the steam trains, all of which continued to Erie's Jersey City (Pavonia) Terminal, to downtown Patterson, on a stub-end branch.  In my memory they did not go into Erie Terminal.   I think the service may have been the victim of the DOT's general curtailment of oil-and-rubber tire transportation, since the alternatives were all-rail, Erie Terminal and then the Hudson and Manhattan, and Erie Terminal and the Erie ferry boats.  Logical that at the buildup to USA's entrance to WWII, increased business could have suggested a two-car train.  But was the IC's double-ended?   And can anyone confirm my memories of the Susquhanna's operation?  Did it run through WWII and afterward, or was it revived ater WWII?

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:11 PM

Here is a linked photo of the ICRR's Land'oCorn "AC&F built " MotoRailer"  

@ http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=3227192

 It started service in about 1940 and ran  Chicago to Waterloo,Ia. as trains #13 and #14.  In Feb. 1942 the train hit a semitruck at Plato Cntr. Il. It was returned to ACF to be repaired. Later was re-sold to 'The SusieQ' [NYS&W] which already had a couple of 'Moto-Railer' sets.  

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Saturday, June 6, 2020 8:34 PM

Sorry, I meant IC not ICC. (Duh!) Anyway, the crew at X2200S would have been all over a pioneering diesel from the streamliner era if it was still in existance or had a life after the RR. I can remember reading in the 60's numerous times about what steaners were parked at someone's scrapyard (IIRC, a N&W Y6b lasted until 75 or so until rescuers gave up), http://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12665), we had a CNJ ex-Blue Comet observation car (Biela) that was part of a restaurant fairly close to where I grew up http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4055629, so why not some data on a streamliner....Yes, it's a long shot, but who knows.....

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, June 6, 2020 8:23 PM

York1

 

 
Deggesty
When I lived in Wesson, Mississippi (55 miles south of Jackson)

 

 

I had a family friend who lived in Wesson.  He worked for the federal government  dealing with railroads.

 

Hmm, I do not recall knowing anyone with such an occupation; I lived there from 1962 to 1965. The only people there I knew who had a connection with railroading were a retired agent and the then agent.

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, June 6, 2020 2:53 PM

BEAUSABRE
The July-August edition has an ICC roster and given their passion for completeness, they'd probably mention it if it hung around for years after being sold

ICC valuation department wouldn't give a crap about what was done with a locomotive after a railroad retired it for scrap, unless it was subsequently bought for operation by another railroad subject to ICC valuation oversight.  It was only actual railroad ownership of capital equipment, not the equipment itself, that would be of any concern.

I haven't seen anything saying that the engine and perhaps cars the OP remembered at Cleveland were intended to operate -- my impression was that they were intended as an attraction to spur patronage, the way a trucking firm might have a tractor-trailer high on its facade or a car dealership something like a MG or Beetle welded to a pole in the days long before perceived collector value went up.  The only 'records' concerning such a sale would be receipts from the scrapyard or whoever provided transportation -- and the likelihood of finding those nearly three-quarters of a century later appear pretty slim to me.

  • Member since
    February 2018
  • From: Flyover Country
  • 5,557 posts
Posted by York1 on Saturday, June 6, 2020 1:54 PM

Deggesty
When I lived in Wesson, Mississippi (55 miles south of Jackson)

 

I had a family friend who lived in Wesson.  He worked for the federal government  dealing with railroads.

York1 John       

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Saturday, June 6, 2020 11:53 AM

Does anybody have access to old copies of Extra 2200 South.....The July-August edition has an ICC roster and given their passion for completeness, they'd probably mention it if it hung around for years after being sold

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:43 AM

Tom F posted this picture over at the Railway Preservation News forum, showing M-10000 at the scrapyard.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 1:29 PM

According to Wikipedia, the original Green Diamond went south, and ran between Jackson, Mississippi, and New Orleans as the Miss-Lou. 

It replaced the original Miss-Lou, which was a one-car train. which, of course, had a limited capacity. When I lived in Wesson, Mississippi (55 miles south of Jackson) one of the older residents told me that when the train arrived in Wesson in the morning, it was almost full, so it was not easy for anyone there to take it to New Orleans.

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 1:12 PM

Downey (Chicago and the Illinois Central Railroad) says the train set was briefly tried on the IC's Daylight (the counterpart to the Green Diamond service) and then on the Miss-Lou (formerly of Motorailer fame) before being sent for scrap (Downey says 'scrapped' but does not have a date or pictures of actual scrapping) at the Burnside shops in Chicago in 1950.  It's anybody's guess if someone bought it there and moved it to Cleveland, though.  It would have had some (or all) the cars with it; the whole train was articulated.

A principal reason it survived the war was that it was built in (then-new) copper-bearing Cor-Ten steel and not aluminum.  Arguably this might help the carbody survive in 'industrial' air for a good length of time with only poor repainting...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,530 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 12:18 PM

ORNHOO
Maybe something like the IC-121? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Central_121

   ORNHOO:  By golly, I think the locomotive you suggest is almost certainly the beast in question.  The on-top headlight is just as I remember it and the bulbous grill looks familiar, too.

   The Wikipedia article says it was sold for scrap in 1950, so it's possible it made its way to Cleveland and was there when I first saw it about 1959.

   This seems a much more plausible explanation of what I saw than it being the M 10000.

   A tip of the hat to you, ORNHOO!

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:57 AM

ORNHOO
Maybe something like the IC-121?

That's the tomato worm I mentioned previously... I must have remembered the wrong kind of worm.

 That was one of my favorite trains when I was in my teens.  I was never able to get a straight answer to when and where it was actually cut up (although I suspect the information is well-known to IC fans) and it would be interesting to know it survived as late as reported.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:54 AM

ORNHOO
Maybe something like the IC-121?

That's the tomato worm I mentioned previously.  That was one of my favorite trains when I was in my teens.

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 250 posts
Posted by ORNHOO on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 9:56 AM

Overmod

 

 
NKP guy
No, it was a gen-u-ine diesel locomotive of the art deco period and from Out West.

 

This is beginning to get more interesting.  None of the UP 'bulbous-nose' cars were locomotives; they were parts of articulated trains.  Same for the tomato worm.  By the time you get to anything that would be 'separable' as a locomotive it would be the City of Denver style -- and that would be memorable in a completely different way.

I don't suppose on reflection you remember the size, or the number of trucks, or other detail about it?  I'm still thinking 'advertising replica' rather than actual, functioning locomotive equipment...

 

 

Maybe something like the IC-121?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Central_121

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, May 25, 2020 7:00 AM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, May 22, 2020 4:34 PM

Overmod
 He had all sorts of classic-car parts he would sell... if you paid his asking price first, sight unseen, take it or leave it.

You can see some cool things "stranded" in places like these. Every once in a great while the guy I worked for would sell one of his museum pieces, and then he would strut around all barrel chested,  acting vindicated for all the clutter he forced us to endure in the mean time.

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, May 22, 2020 3:29 PM

Convicted One
Trying to make sense of it, I used to wonder if they were hoping for some really long shot that one day some other party trying to restore a "whatever" might come along and pay them 10 times scrap value for parts  needed in their restoration.

Guy in South Jersey was like this.  He had seven complete blimps used for early-warning radar off the Atlantic coast, with engines and electronics.  He had all sorts of classic-car parts he would sell... if you paid his asking price first, sight unseen, take it or leave it.  

Dick Jensen and Glenn Campbell come to mind.  One an unhappy ending, the other really nearly one.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, May 22, 2020 1:57 PM

"Hoarding" is a sickness, I finally concluded. 

I had a boss who was a compulsive collector, he'd be out on his truck making a business related trip, and just happen upon some wretched piece of antiquity that he just couldn't pass up, so he'd fetch it in his truck, bring it to the shop, and set it right where it was in everybody's way

Time and time after time he would do this, each aquisition  reducing the available floor area for work related things we were doing that were actually paying the bills.

We all grew quite frustrated with his "packratting" of oddities. He used to be quite proud of some of the "treasure" he would drag in. And he  would often boast "You know what I told the guys selling this stuff?"

To which I usually replied  "Hey, I'll haul all this junk away free if you let me keep it?"

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Friday, May 22, 2020 11:20 AM

Convicted One
I've known people who although officially were "scrappers" ,...yet over the years managed to from time to time get ahold of really unique items that they just couldn't find the heart to cut up. So there they would sit, for years. Tucked over in the corner  of the lot, and just left to the elements.

A lot of Civil War vintage cannon surfaced from scrapyards around the time of the Centennial just for that reason.  

Some Civil War re-enactors were still finding them there as late as the 1970's, but I don't know what they were paying for them.  Needless to say don't bother looking for them in scrapyards now!  

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, May 22, 2020 10:11 AM

NKP guy
Or maybe someone had bought it for scrap and then changed his mind?  I know it's a long shot.

I've known people who although officially were "scrappers" ,...yet over the years managed to from time to time get ahold of really unique items that they just couldn't find the heart to cut up. So there they would sit, for years. Tucked over in the corner  of the lot, and just left to the elements.

Trying to make sense of it, I used to wonder if they were hoping for some really long shot that one day some other party trying to restore a "whatever" might come along and pay them 10 times scrap value for parts  needed in their restoration. Even though it appeared far more likely that the one sitting in front of me was the last one on the face of the earth.

And even if the latter was the case,  is there anything wrong with someone holding onto a museum piece, if doing so gives them a sense of enjoyment?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,530 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Friday, May 22, 2020 9:12 AM

   My thanks to all who've replied.

   I'm in the process of waiting to hear back from a few trusted sources in railfandom and Cleveland history.  I'll be sure to post here what I learn from them.

   Mr. Ames, I'm pretty sure it wasn't a mock-up made by someone.  It looked exactly like what I imagined such an engine to look like from the photos I saw. 

   Yes, Winton was a noted Cleveland manufacturer of engines and such.  There might be a Winton connection here, after all.  Maybe a prototype made for Winton's use in development?  Or maybe someone had bought it for scrap and then changed his mind?  I know it's a long shot.

    I saw this phantom about half a dozen times between about 1959 and 1966, when I was 11 to 18 years old.  Being acutely aware of trains from my youngest days, I had reasonable railfan chops early.  That's why this locomotive grabbed my attention: Even with five railroads in town I never saw anything like this in Cleveland; but I did recognize it from photos I'd seen as being from Out West.

   This ain't easy to research, but it's worth my looking further into it.

 

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:31 PM

There's a model train store up the road from me that has a steam switch engine out front. Took me quite a few drives by to realize it's fake, built by skilled welders and fabricators. Looks full-size to me. On close inspection it's clearly not real, but it's quite impressive.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, May 21, 2020 6:21 PM

Along those lines, I believe I've read about Union Pacific having miniature display trains back in the day. I bet it's in an article at Don Strack's site, Utah Rails.

Edit: Didn't take long to find it. Towards the end of the article is what's possibly pertinent to this topic.

https://utahrails.net/up/up-mini-train.php

It's a long shot, but any chance it may not have been full size, NKP guy? These sound like reasonably large miniatures according to the article. If you perhaps didn't get up close to it, maybe you saw the realistic looking M-10000 replica mentioned in that article?

I ask just in case you were young child when you saw this, since we all know our memories of when we were very young aren't always fully accurate.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 21, 2020 5:30 PM

Just another random thought. We used to have a somewhat eccentric club here that was part of a trade union. And they maintained  about a 3/5 scale replica of a steam locomotive, that in actuality was a parade float.  Sat in a parking lot across the street from my doctor's office for years. Presumably they would take this thing out for display at various events, but to tell you the truth I cannot remember ever seeing it budge....for years and years, until one day it was gone.

Any possibility this unit in Cleveland might have been a parade float, or other "for fun" mock up? 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:16 AM

NKP guy
No, it was a gen-u-ine diesel locomotive of the art deco period and from Out West.

This is beginning to get more interesting.  None of the UP 'bulbous-nose' cars were locomotives; they were parts of articulated trains.  Same for the tomato worm.  By the time you get to anything that would be 'separable' as a locomotive it would be the City of Denver style -- and that would be memorable in a completely different way.

I don't suppose on reflection you remember the size, or the number of trucks, or other detail about it?  I'm still thinking 'advertising replica' rather than actual, functioning locomotive equipment...

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:29 AM

NKP guy
   No, it was a gen-u-ine diesel locomotive of the art deco period and from Out West.  It was not a Burlington Zephyr; it looked like the UP 10000 or something similar.  But how it came to repose for a few years in Cleveland is a story that will be harder to discover.  

Well, the first 3 units in the series were scrapped in time for the war as mentioned earlier.  The second series M10003 thru M10006 operated until 1953 and reportedly were sold for scrap, while a very similar unit was built for Illinois Central, operated as the "Green Diamond"  before falling into lesser service before ultimately being scrapped in 1950.

(speculation) while it seems a safe bet that the units scrapped prior to 1945 did find their way into the war effort,   there may be a distinction worth mentioning for the later units between the concepts of "sold as scrap" versus "cut up for scrap".

It's entirely possible that one of the later units was sold for scrap, and then just sat as a curio in someone's lot until meeting it's ultimate fate.  Perhaps there is some connection through the Winton powerplant?  Winton was a Cleveland company, was it not?

Link to useful info

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,530 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:07 AM

Convicted One
Do you think there is any chance that it may have instead been one of the Van Sweringen's rapid transit cars?

    Having been raised in the Heights area of Cleveland I am as familiar as possible with the equipment used on the SHRT Lines.  My very first fantrip in 1964 was riding their 1200-series Kuhlman center entrance car #12 (Cleve. Rys. #1212).  The PCC's were still operating when I saw that parked locomotive, so I can say with certainty that the vehicle in question was not a streetcar of any sort.

   I remember that it had that bulbous grill on the front, below the windows.  It had been repainted from its original colors into an innocuous white, I think.

   No, it was a gen-u-ine diesel locomotive of the art deco period and from Out West.  It was not a Burlington Zephyr; it looked like the UP 10000 or something similar.  But how it came to repose for a few years in Cleveland is a story that will be harder to discover.  

   Thanks for your answer, CO.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy