Trains.com

Locomotive "Whistle"?

10877 views
70 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:52 AM

That would be 1947. M&O + GM&N started in 1938 with the ICC and the two predecessor names were gone by 1947 at the same time ALTON was swallowed by GM&O.(5-31-47)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:07 AM

tataia
I don't know about you but electric or diesel-electric locmotives equipped with whistles, not horns existed in the past....some of them exist even today. FOr example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzM5InljDxo

Other side of the Pond!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2017
  • 1 posts
Posted by tataia on Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:24 AM

I don't know about you but electric or diesel-electric locmotives equipped with whistles, not horns existed in the past....some of them exist even today. FOr example:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzM5InljDxo

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, March 20, 2017 10:20 PM

B&O 50 was used on one of the 'lightweight' equipment sets on the Royal Blue between Washington and New York.  B&O President Daniel Willard didn't like the ride quality of this set of equipment and after a short time in operation it was sent to the B&O's Chicago & Alton subsidary along with B&O 50 to operate between St. Louis and Chicago.  On the Alton it was given a face lift and ran with the equipment as the Abraham Lincoln.  During WW II the B&O sold the Alton to the Mobile & Ohio which at some point thereafter renamed itself to the Gulf, Mobile & Ohio.

Save

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Monday, March 20, 2017 10:07 PM

Thank You.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, March 20, 2017 5:32 PM

I may be mistaken, but I do believe what is shown as GM&O 1200 started life as B&O 50 and it was originially equipped with a horn.

 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Monday, March 20, 2017 3:58 PM

Thank You.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,251 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Monday, March 20, 2017 2:23 PM

RME

 

 
oldline1
I own a Nathan P5 "whistle". I have the maintenance sheets and some other data from Nathan that refer to this huge and loud creature as a "whistle".

 

Interesting, because the official Nathan site now doesn't refer to the AirChimes as anything but 'horns'.

You might provide the date of the material you have, and perhaps document numbers or even scans, as it would be interesting to identify when their policies changed.

 

Well, I lack the intelligence to master posting photos and stuff to Kalmbach's site. 

I checked my parts pages and maintenance pages for my P5 and they have no dates but everywhere they call it a whistle. I went to the Nathan site and they do call it a horn. 

Apparently they refer to the entire assembly as "whistle" and the individual cone shaped things I always heard of as "bells' as the "horn". Go figure?

I don't know when they changed the terminology or why.

Roger Huber

Deer Creek Locomotive Works

 

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Monday, February 13, 2017 10:23 PM

Meanwhile, the plot thickens.  While I was looking over Eastern 4-8-4s (and then a wider selection of 4-8-4s) for what has turned out to be the Locomotive Draft Control Device, I noticed some interesting details concerning air horns.

In the 1975 PRM book on "Northerns", p.110, there is a lovely shot of the Timken Four Aces on the DL&W at Hoboken Terminal, with a rather amazing chime horn visible at the top of the boiler (it has at least four bells).  I thought perhaps the horn was actually mounted (for a reason I couldn't really explain) on the cat-bridge structure behind the locomotive, but there's a picture of Lackawanna 1501 with a very similar horn, in a very similar place, on p.21. 

Meanwhile, judging from what I've seen, all the Lackawanna Q-4-a's had small single air horns, right on center top of the boiler just ahead of the sand dome.  How they kept cinders, soot and such out of this bell, small as it was, I'm not sure...

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Sunday, February 12, 2017 7:18 PM

Firelock76
Doesn't explain why the NYC put air horns on the Niagaras though. Just to be modern and "cool?"

The Railway Mechanical Engineer articles on the Niagara specifically mention the various savings to be derived from the use of a 'pneuphonic' horn blown by compressed air vs. the use of superheated steam.  (Whistle on the C1a was likewise to use superheated steam so I'd expect those would have gotten horns by '47; on the other hand, the A2a Berkshires, last NYC big steam, never got horns -- which was an advantage, because they had some of the finest whistles ever applied to steam power...)

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, February 12, 2017 7:10 PM
The GCOR uses the term Whistle to indicate use of both the actual whistle on a steam locomotive and the horn that replaced it on diesel electric/electric locomotives…the term is still used as a matter of continuity and convenience.
Here is a link to the current GCOR

 

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, February 12, 2017 10:29 AM

That makes sense too.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, February 12, 2017 10:27 AM

Firelock76
It does sound plausible.  Mariners will tell you fog does distort conventional whistles making it difficult to tell just where the sound is coming from, it's one of the reasons fog was the most hated navigational hazard in the pre-radar days.

Doesn't explain why the NYC put air horns on the Niagaras though.  Just to be modern  and "cool?"

In the early fall, rivers that have accumulated Summer's heat all summer, when the early cold snaps come along generate some severe fog events throughout the valleys that the rivers occupy.  NYC prided itself in being 'the Water Level Route' - being water level it occupied many river valleys that would become fog filled.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, February 12, 2017 9:10 AM

Norm48327
 
blue streak 1

Doesn't Portland's  GS-4 4449 have a single note air horn as well as a steam boat whistle ?

 

Yes it does, and it's been said that Doyle McCormick hates it.

 

I forget where I read this, but supposedly the air horns were installed on the GS's since they ran along the California coast and the sound from air horns was distorted less by the frequent fogs along the route than steam whistles were.

It does sound plausible.  Mariners will tell you fog does distort conventional whistles making it difficult to tell just where the sound is coming from, it's one of the reasons fog was the most hated navigational hazard in the pre-radar days.

Doesn't explain why the NYC put air horns on the Niagaras though.  Just to be modern  and "cool?"  Although RME's suggestion of saving steam, heat, and water does make sense.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, February 12, 2017 9:04 AM

wanswheel

 

I wonder if those guys were salaried or paid by the hour?

Or the honk?

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Sunday, February 12, 2017 12:29 AM

selector
I have always used the term 'horn' for the flared tubes with vibrating diaphragms that make what I like to call a 'blaaattt!" That would be on all diesels and on at least one 4-8-4 back in the day...the S1-b Niagara.

Just as a note: the Niagaras weren't built with them (and the C1a Duplex wasn't specified with one, either).  The 'pneuphonic' horns were applied at quarterly inspections in 1947 (5550, the S2a, got its horn in March).

There's an appreciable saving of heat and water if there's a need to blow for many grade crossings at high speed...

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 711 posts
Posted by SD70M-2Dude on Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:43 PM

jeffhergert
zugmann
Deggesty
Ed, Larry, Carl, Balt, Zug, Jeff, anyone?

Whistle or horn - completely interchangable.  I think the rulebook calls them horn signals, but don't quote me on that.  I'd check, but it's in my locker.   On newer engines, the lever/button has a picture of a little trumpet next to it.

GCOR calls them whistle signals.

So does the CROR (Canadian rules), but horn is acceptable too apparently.  Excerpt from Rule 14:

14. Engine Whistle Signals

Note:

  • (i) Wherever the words “engine whistle” appear in these rules they also refer to “engine horn”. Signals prescribed by this rule are illustrated by “o” for short sounds; “___” for longer sounds.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Saturday, February 11, 2017 3:07 PM

blue streak 1

Doesn't Portland's  GS-4 4449 have a single note air horn as well as a steam boat whistle ?

Yes it does, and it's been said that Doyle McCormick hates it.

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, February 11, 2017 2:27 PM

Doesn't Portland's  GS-4 4449 have a single note air horn as well as a steam boat whistle ?

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Saturday, February 11, 2017 11:29 AM

Deggesty
... among other interesting things, my fingers at first failed to put the "t" in rabbits."

Not as much of a mistake as you think!  Those rabbis were probably avoiding paying rail fare by utilizing קְפִיצַת הַדֶּרֶךְin a more direct line...

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, February 11, 2017 11:06 AM

Deggesty
Whew! It is well that I proofread what I just wrote--among other interesting things, my fingers at first failed to put the "t" in rabbits.

Darned clergymen...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Saturday, February 11, 2017 10:25 AM

Semper Vaporo

I have two friends that are "Engineers" (another misnomer) and they both have referred to "Whistling a crossing" or "Whistle signals for the man on the ground..."

And on the scanner I have heard references to "whistling off" (departing).  

And further on a point made above, the Milwaukee Road 4-8-4 #261 has two different steam whistles and an air horn.  I am told that in regular service it almost always used the air horn at crossings, etc.  Now and then they use it (the air horn that is) in excursion service.

Dave Nelson  

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, February 11, 2017 10:20 AM

wanswheel

 

This reminds me of how Pullman Conductor Moedinger spent part of Christmas Day, 1945--riding in the engineer's seat of a Milwaukee Road electric locomotive while the engineer and fireman got the steam generator going so that the homeward-bound servicemen would not freeze. He blew for some crossings that the engineer had forgotten about, as well as for places where rabbits jumped across the track.

Whew! It is well that I proofread what I just wrote--among other interesting things, my fingers at first failed to put the "t" in rabbits."

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, February 11, 2017 10:05 AM

"Hey, we've got a crossing coming up.  Get the horns out of the lounge car..."

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, February 11, 2017 9:54 AM

I would formally like to nominate Wanswheel's posting above as "The Photo of the Year"....cannot see this being topped...likely ever!

Also well aware that the Milwaukee built a lot of their equipment, from rolling stock to passenger cars, and they all had their own distinctive look but this arrangement/creation is amazing. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, February 11, 2017 9:45 AM

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Saturday, February 11, 2017 9:20 AM

RME
I have to wonder, a bit tongue in cheek, what the official word for horn use that corresponds to 'whistling' might be...

Fortunately "tweet" is taken...

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:32 AM

jeffhergert

Whistle or horn - completely interchangeable.  I think the rulebook calls them horn signals, but don't quote me on that.  I'd check, but it's in my locker.

GCOR calls them whistle signals.

NORAC is interesting.  It calls them "whistle or horn signals" in most places (e.g., Rule 19) but then refers to the actual procedure only as 'whistling'.  One piece of wording is interesting:

For trains and engines exceeding 60 MPH, the whistle signal must not be started more than ¼ mile in advance of the public grade crossing, even if the advance warning provided by the locomotive horn will be less than 15 seconds in duration.

In the definitions section, for "quiet zone", only the word 'horn' is used, which I assumed to be related to a formal or perhaps legal definition (remember that 49 CFR Part 222 is called by the FRA the "Train Horn Rule", and by CSX the "Locomotive Horn Rule")

I have to wonder, a bit tongue in cheek, what the official word for horn use that corresponds to 'whistling' might be...

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Saturday, February 11, 2017 12:30 AM

zugmann

 

 
Deggesty
Ed, Larry, Carl, Balt, Zug, Jeff, anyone?

 

Whistle or horn - completely interchangable.  I think the rulebook calls them horn signals, but don't quote me on that.  I'd check, but it's in my locker.   On newer engines, the lever/button has a picture of a little trumpet next to it.

 

GCOR calls them whistle signals.

Jeff

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy