Trains.com

GMO 1900

3711 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
GMO 1900
Posted by NP Eddie on Saturday, March 14, 2015 11:38 AM

ALL:

Can anyone tell me more about GMO 1900, the only locomotive that Ingals Shipbuilding of Mississippi built? Why did they build it and was the GMO an on line customer?

What was the disposition of the unit?  It looked like a BL unit from EMD.

 

Ed Burns

Happily retired NP-BN-BNSF from Minneapolis

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: La Grange Illinois USA
  • 131 posts
Posted by 16-567D3A on Saturday, March 14, 2015 12:10 PM

               

 

 

 

 

 

  .       .  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       .              

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, March 14, 2015 3:40 PM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Saturday, March 14, 2015 9:00 PM

She was powered by an inline 8 cylinder Superior diesel with Westinghouse switch gear, and was still switching the yards in Meridian Mississippi well into the 1960s. Traded into EMD in 1966 on an order of SD40's. EMD seemed to view it with respect and fascination at the time, but sadly, diesel preservation was virtually unknown at the time so she didn't stand a chance.

In another time and place, maybe she'd of been saved. But EMD didn't view there being much call to save anything, even scrapping their own heritage almost without fail (Such as SAL E6 #3014, exhibited at the New York's World Fair in 1939, traded to EMD in 1964, exhibited by EMD at that year's World Fair, then promptly scrapped afterwards).

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, March 16, 2015 7:11 AM

EMD took trade-ins (which were all cut up after being picked for parts) in part to improve the market for replacement locomotives.  A locomotive that was turned into razor blades couldn't turn up as an alternative to a new locomotive.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Monday, March 16, 2015 1:22 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

EMD took trade-ins (which were all cut up after being picked for parts) in part to improve the market for replacement locomotives.  A locomotive that was turned into razor blades couldn't turn up as an alternative to a new locomotive.

 

Destroying a source of spare components was even more the reason behind their policy during their decades of dominance.

Nobody much thought that there was a market for 15-20 year old locomotives until about 1970 when Geep rebuild programs started to popularize the concept, but there was always a market for spare parts. So trade-ins had to be mechanically complete. 

EMD always could make an exception, and famously did just that at least twice since they obviously knew there was no threat posed to their business by cooperating in saving asuperannuated E units in an era of train-offs. But sadly there wasn't the internal interest at La Grange nor outside of EMD in diesel preservation until the late 1970's.

While I don't know what context it was used in, Trains reported when this unit was traded in that EMD referred to it as the only one of its kind. Nice that this obscure one-off locomotive caught someone's eye at EMD enough to comment on it in some context. 

I'm sure that it pained at least a few folks there that their heritage in particular was almost universally going to scrap. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy