CPM500These FB trucks featured a minimum of metal-on-metal wear surfaces.
But unless I'm badly mistaken, they accomplished this through the use of a great many elastomer pieces ... which did not age any more gracefully than things like rubber-block motor mounts, giubos (fascinating that BMW misspells these wholesale!), or driveline isolators in automobiles. I believe we have had discussions about the problems this causes.
The 'Alco B road truck' was characterized by many wear surfaces, i.e. pins/bushings, wear plates, etc. In other words, maintenance intensive. The frame was subject to twisting under high hp/axle ratings, which negatively influenced adhesion.
Accordingly, Alco came out with their 'Hi-Ad B truck around 1967 or 8, which addressed these issues. There was also a 'Hi-Ad' C truck, which was a replacement for the old 'Tri-Mount' truck, which the railroads saw as problematical.
Many GE B-B's used the Alco B truck salvaged from trade-ins, as you stated. The GE FB-2 truck was a derivation of the GE FB-3 truck, which dated from the days of the U28C. For a number of reasons, this truck became the standard for high hp GE B-B locos. These FB trucks featured a minimum of metal-on-metal wear surfaces.
The most popular truck: the EMD Blomberg B.
CPM500
I'm not sure if this has been done before, but why do some GE u boats and -7's have EMD trucks while others have the truck seen on engines like the b39-8 (FB-2?), and occasionally a truck that looks like those used in early alco road switchers.
is there much of a difference by performance, or is it just from trade ins?
also, which was the most popular
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.